This shit will crumble miserably, but mess up a lot of people, financially and mentally. Have a friend that is going into full blown psychosis talking to machine gpt. He's losing it, its scary to see in real life normal people you knew for years turn into brainless ai worshippers.
>>534413104Judging by the way most ads are worded nowadays, it's at least putting marketing department parasites out of a job.I consider that to be a plus.
So if AI is the future we need a reduced population as AI will do the work that immigrants do.
>>534413104>get top-notch web design output in 5 minutes that would normally require days by professionals>speed up anything related to coding>have essentially a search engine on steroids for anything you do not know>generate academic-level research papers on any subject>"but look! sometimes it makes mistakes or hallucinates?!? AI btfo, we meatbags are still useful!"lollmao even
Take him somewhere to the countryside for 2 weeks with no internet access, at least that's available in this shithole.
>>534413683Reduce the browning of europe, white people please reproduce.>>534413819Meatballs.. the whole economy is made to make life easier for humans. Are you counting how expensive is to raise a human against training ai and resources that a human condumes in like 20 years until becomes smart? Kek>>534413889Would love to, but he is married with two children... i can tell in roughly 6 months he changed, also he is paying it. He asks ai everything and it started messing him up, he started treating ai as a friend, he refers to it with a name or sometimes bro.. its crazy.
>>534413819the hallucinations and mistakes are a pretty big deal because it means every single output has to be meticulously double checked by a human, the more complex the output the worse of a problem this is. That's not to say that the AIs dont have any benefit, they do, they can speed up researching a topic because its faster to fact check an output than it is to research something from scratch, the point is simply that>A: their outputs have been massively overstated by those who stand to profit most from the AI hype (big surprise)>B: many brainless boomer corpos fell for the above without a shred of critical thinking>C: AI functionality and reliability is improving at least an entire order of magnitude more slowly than they were telling us 2 years ago when all the hype started picking up
>>534414552the other problem with AI that I forgot to mention was the accountability vacuum they produce. Humans can be reliably corrected, disciplined and fired if needed. If you have replaced two thirds of your workforce with AI and integrated it into your entire business model, and then it turns out the AI can't reliably complete a core function without fucking it up, you cant fire it, you cant reliably train it (no you cant), and you cant hold it accountable because its a tool.
>>534414552Are you so unintelligent you can't double check things? Do you just believe everything everyone says to you? >>534413104What a low IQ take, cavemen like you were against the printing press too.>>534413683Is this what you call thinking? You should be embarrassed.
>>534414728I kekd hard when heard elon say in 2 years robots will be better than best surgeons.And the fable of UHI with robots in greater number than people... i just think he imagined a world with a few thousand people and shitload of robots.
>>534413104The “how many of this letter in this word” trips them up because they don’t see the letters, it’s all converted to tokens and that’s all they can see. It’s like saying I’m stupid if you ask me how many fingers you’re holding up on one hand behind your back and I have to guess between 0 and 5 and get it wrong. I’d be stupid if I said 7, but I couldn’t do better than guess between 0 and 5.
>>534413104it's sad because all AI does is what your brain does naturally if you just read a couple articlesyour brain is already designed to selectively scan the articles for the information you need, and you'll accidentally learn more that'll help another timeyour brain is better at doing this than AI is
>>534414826Fuck printing press i hate it. But i have nothing against ai, as a caveman, i think its deceptive and will do great damage to humanity. And is gonna be used exclusively as a surveillance and killing tool, and to shift accountability, all to our demise.
>>534414959They talk about it like it'll be luxury space communism for everyone and not mass death. Personally I just wonder whether Elon actually believes that in his head or if he also knows he's just saying that because he expects to survive the genocide. It seems unlikely that he's so dumb and naive that he thinks he'll live in a world where he and the shareholders own 100% of the resources AND the labor supply, but still find it in their hearts to provide good lives to the now useless unwashed masses. They can't even bring themselves to pay everyone fair wages right now when they actually need us, what're the odds they'd give us anything if they didn't?Personally I'll be very glad if we never find out like OP says, those faggots are stuck with us a bit longer. I think they may know it too, since they say automation from one side of the mouth and mass immigration of cheap Jeet labor from the other.
>>534413819>sometimes it makes mistakes or hallucinates?!? AI btfo, we meatbags are still useful!"Yeah AI is great. But the trillion dollar investment was made with the promise that it would replace 30% of the workforce, not make coding easier for people that already know how to code.
>>534414728I'm hoping, really hoping, that all the companies diving deep on this eat shit on it. I hope they get faced with the prospect of having to hire back all that staff they fired at a new premium or go out of business completely. J U I C Y
>>534415318It is a form of subtle pressure to accept so called universal high income. I think china in a year produces 10k humanoid robots. a web of lies to make believe billionaires want good for us all. We're fucked.
>>534413104Guys, there's this new tech called "car", which lets you move quickly.> Car huh? Well, what if it runs out of gas?Then you go to a gas station and refuel.> Refuel huh? Well, what if you're not near a gas station?That can be an issue sometimes, but at least there is a warning indicator for low fuel.> Warning indicator huh? Well, what if you miss the warning?Then you run out of gas.> *triumphant rejoicing*Literally the "AI bad" argument.
>>534415956 looks like something a vaccinated person would write.
>>534413819Anon, over the weekend I googled what states Wolf Spiders could be found in. It gave me a list of 11 states including Virginia, Utah, American Truck Simulator: New Mexico, and Kentucky. Why should I trust any part of the rest of what it said? Even if its 90% accurate, I can't know what the 10% it is fucking up is without ignoring the AI and doing my own research, which means the AI provided no benefit at all, just a risk of tricking me with false information.
>>534415824Anon, most of the time that companies replace staff with "AI", the immediately turn around and hire a bunch of work visa indians within 3 weeks, which was always the plan. None of these companies actually believe that AI can do the work, they just want to downgrade their operating costs using cheaper labor, but saying that they are switching over to AI gives them better PR and entices investors more.
>>534413104AI is bad or inaccurate is such a low IQ opinion. AI doesnt consciously exist it just translates input > output. If youre a retard who doesnt give the AI enough source code or source material then ofcourse its gonna hallucinate. Because its filling up what you didnt give it. Example: lets take something super specific like a Unity3D Asset. AI wasnt trained on that specific asset but give it source code and it will code within its API just fine, if you give it nothing it will just give you broken code because ofcourse it will
>>534414826I dont see any issue with his thinking, without the produce of labour what use is the typical person to the elite? Especially if the AI could not only replace regular labour producing jobs, but also militarily. Its a rational concern i.m.o
>>534413104too big to fail btw
>they said AI would wipe out the shitty jobs like McDonalds worker>go to McDonalds>it's still shitty humans instead of robotsPlease do something about the wagies, I hate seeing them. I hate wagies, please replace them NOW.
>>534413819>>generate academic-level research papers on any subjectAny paper full of errors is wet shit. But i agree, it's good to create memes.
>>534416717Work visa Indians are going to cause the same problems in time.
>>534414826>Are you so unintelligent you can't double check things? Do you just believe everything everyone says to you? you throw around terms like 'low IQ' and yet you're completely unable to comprehend the very simple and obvious point I made, which was a critique of the bluster around how much efficiency AI is generating by taking on the work of humans, when in reality it is so unreliable that all of its outputs have to be meticulously double checked, that backchecking process gets exponentially more time consuming with the more complexity involved in the task you have given the AI. That checking process is a form of labour and is time consumptive, which cancels out a large portion of the efficiency the AI is marketed as generating. I said nothing about my personal capacity to double check things my smoothbrained friend.
>>534415824The truth is, most major corpos have bought multi-million/billion pound AI licenses through pure FOMO, but the actual utilisation of AI has been extremely slow to progress in the corporate world, and I say that as a completely soul-drained white collar manager who oversees a project team that covers a wide range of disciplines (accounting, legal, consultancy, engineering etc.). The average desk worker has had, at best, a marginal utilisation of AI, immediately noticed hullicinations and factually incorrect information, and then resigned it to the backpocket where all of the other 'bad tools' go. A calculator that gives you a wrong answer 1 in 10 times doesn't get used at all by a good accountant. AI is exactly that.
>>534413819The coding thing is deboonked. At least if you care about quality and having things working. It is ok at initial prototypes though
>>534420145It's actually been rebunked. Yeah, you have to proofread it and still have a deep understanding of your coding language, but for the most part, it eliminates much of the mundane parts of coding. It's allowed me to be a code director and manager rather than a code monkey.>design patternsI will say that AI knows fuckall about implementing good design, so this is where a senior software engineer will shine.
