Isn't it great that the next Einstein turned out to be a woman?
>>534432918it would be but you can tell that bitch is going "Atwood" in the next five years just from looking at her
>>534432918Pheno tells all. It's a good memory, not brilliant comprehension.
Where's the female Lorentz?Just kidding she's in NM
>>534432918She looks like my ex-gf but slimmer.I should have made my bitch pregnant
>>534433258>It's a good memory, not brilliant comprehension.concur. i see it too.
>>534435132>>534433258What do you see in this one
>>534434515Always try to get women pregnant, as long as they are racially suitable
>>534435288She was a total psycho but I still liked her all the same. Not suitable as a mother at all thoughbeit
>>534432918So she's another fraud who will impede science for a century?
>>534435738chuds lose again
>>534435837Interesting necklace. Druidic Egyptian
>>534432918She hasnt discovered anything tho.
test
>>534435837Would impregnate
>>534432918didn't she get herself killed trying to break into her ex's house through the chimney?
>>534432918read this as the next Epstein
>>534432918>"I'm not the new Einstein" Pasterski responds to the label.>According to the BBC, the physicist born in Chicago in 1993 explained that this name came about when Stephen Hawking cited a paper in which she collaborated with Andrew Strominger.>"First of all, that was said when Hawking had referenced the work I did with Andrew Strominger. I was only in my second year of my PhD," she clarified.>Beyond the flattery, Pasterski questions the narrative that elevates a single figure as the star.>"To what extent can we control the narrative a little better? It doesn't always have to be about standout stars," he reflected, advocating for a more collective vision of scientific progress.Seems like someone with an agenda is trying to push her into being a media icon when she just wants to be an academic researcher.
>>534432918>next einstienWhat Germans did she steak academic credit from to get that title?
>>534432918Her mother is a spic
