Is AI art soulless?
>>534443221Yeah, AI is souless. So is the libtard art that was used to train it.
I listened to a ‘Free Jazz’ song created by AI. It sounded better than you would think, but it has a ‘stiff’ feel to the music. AI is good, but not there yet.
post the original you thief
>>534443221I used AI to make some edits of people and fictional characters based on their names, for example I took Horus from Warhammer and turned his head into a horses, I thought it was pretty funny at the time
>>534443221Yup
flag mistake
>>534443221>outputs may varySome are pretty good.
>>534443445>>534443221OP, comparing both your image and Gemini's image, I can say confidently, you suck OP
>>534443221I don't know if it's soulless or not. I know it doesn't do it for me, and I also know that when I learn a piece of art is AI, when I thought it wasn't, that ruins the piece. The art somehow becomes less interesting when it wasn't a human being making it.
>>534443221I just use AI to make porn.Good enough, especially when there's no lewds of a character I want to fap to, like, for example, most heroines in Unicorn Overlord (especially the blonde elf and the MC's mother).Now I can just not waste time looking for niche art in pixiv and, if said lewds does not come out of a shallow name search, I can just make some for my own.
>>534443458dumb but funny
>>534443221not as soulless as tranimeGo back tranny >>>/a/
>>534443221It's not ideal, but it offers the avantage of not having to partner with a blue-haired tranny to get the artwork done for a project.There should be a creative hub where white rightoids with various skills can collaborate.
>>534443772>i can't find ready-made porn of cartoon characters i want to jack off to>i will make my ownthis is definitely not tragic mental illness
>>534443221yes. but the hylics on both sides of the political spectrum don't care. through AI, they can do anything. we have no idea how grim it's gonna get
>>534443564Definitely true. I think it has uses though when the artwork itself isn't the point, it's just a supporting element. Like if you're making an animation of comic that expresses an idea, and that's the focus, the imagery is just a tool to convey the idea.A talented human is always better, but that can be super-expensive, you're at the mercy of whoever has the cash. If you have an idea that isn't mainstream you might never be able to make it without AI.
Not any more soulless than the digital "artists" pumping out dozens of vectors with hardly any change between them. Not any more soulless than the digital "artists" who press a button to take a photo and then use a slider in Photoshop to fix the colors. Not any more soulless than the digital "musicians" using prerecorded loops and editing software to play their "music" for them.
>>534444550Oops wrong pizzacunt pic
>>534443221No. Art was never just about rote skills. The truest artists of history were composers; people who, sure, definitely had technical skill with instruments or painting or whatever field they were in, but, ultimately they changed the world through their vision. Ancient patrons would pay the greatest artists to sculpt and paint what they envisioned. Composers like Beethoven would have 100 people play his symphonies. AI is blasphemous to modern individualism because everything these days revolves around one person "doing" something. But, AI's potential could be harnessed by actual visionaries, commanding it to create for them massive projects that would be cost or logistically prohibitive. What if you had Beethoven-tier creative potential but no money or status to hire or attract a full orchestra? You can just get AI to do it (or some of it). Artfags mad about their rote skills possibly becoming obsolete were just the means to an end the whole time. They only had status or influence because there was no other choice but to appeal to them. Now, we have other choices. If you want AI to just mindlessly do stuff for you, sure, it will be "slop". But if you use AI to bring true artistic vision and genius to life, then you'll see the real potential within it.
>>534444052Its definitely not.If you can't find ready-made food of something you're craving, you make them.If you can't find parts for a machine or a furniture, you make them.Hence, if you can't find porn...
