Daily reminder that it’s not too late to admit you were wrong about capitalism
>Marx thought calculus was fake because he thought he had disproven derivatives.https://x.com/kane/status/2048216859355611635
>>534450904No, I was right. It's a made up word by worthless thieving commie sacks of shit that want to steal from productive people practicing free trade.
>>534450904>Please take economic advice from an unemployed kike
>>534450904I've never been a big fan of Capitalism, I just don't think Marx offered any competent replacementDon't bitch to me about it
>>534451149A lot of things that we take for granted are things Marx argued for and said were inevitable
You chuds gotta admit, Rabbi Marx Levi Mordechai ben Samuel HaLevi's grandson was onto some things
>>534450904I was wrong about niggers, not capitalism.
>>534450904What do you mean by being wrong about capitalism? whether you like it or not, a country without a capitalistic economic system cannot function nowdays because the world economy is interconnected and global, making it not competitive. Marx's "ideas" are 19th century were the economy worked completely differently. That is not to say that social policy cannot have some of marx's ideas but marx's economic policy not only is bad, but it's trash by today's standards.
>>534450985Marx was deeply interested in understanding calculus, particularly while working on Capital. Marx developed his interest in mathematics in connection with his work on Capital. Rather than attempting to disprove calculus, Marx was trying to understand and clarify its foundations from a dialectical materialist perspective. The "proof" presented in the claim (that dy/dx = a leads to 0/0 = a, which creates a contradiction) does not appear in Marx's actual writings. Marx was critical of the way differentials were treated in 19th century mathematics, but he was working to clarify the concept, not to disprove it. Marx everywhere calls 'symbolic' (as distinct from 'algebraic') those expressions which contain the symbols specific to differential calculus, dx, dy etc. He calls 'real' those expressions of functions which do not contain such symbols. Marx's mathematical work was focused on understanding the foundations of calculus, analyzing the methods of Newton and Leibniz, developing a more rigorous understanding of differentials within a materialist framework, and distinguishing between "real" and "symbolic" expressions in calculus. Marx employs the term 'limit' in a special sense: the expression, given by predefinition, for those values of the independent variable at which it becomes undefined. In addition, the mathematical manuscripts of Marx once again confirm the truth of the words Engels spoke at the graveside of his great friend. Speaking of Marx as the scientist who had discovered the law of the development of human history and the law of motion of capitalist production, Engels said: 'Two such discoveries would be enough for one lifetime. Happy the man to whom it is granted to make even one such discovery. But in every single field which Marx investigated - and he investigated very many fields, none of them superficially - in every field, even in that of mathematics, he made significant discoveries.'https://www.jstor.org/stable/3516241
>>534450985Marx was right. Lysenko was also correct about Genes being fake
>>534450904The debate is pointless, since we don't even have capitalism.
>>534453487
>>534453615>since we don't even have capitalism.??????are the goods prices fixed by the government or are the prices driven by the market?
>>534453668Show me a gene.
TOTAL COMMUNIGGER DEATH
>>534450904Capitalism is wrong but so is Marx. I'm forbidden by law from mentioning the name of the only person to get it right, which capitalism and marxism had to ally to take down.
>>534453800We have neither communism or capitalism. The dominant factor in our economies are the Jewish financial instruments.
>>534450904Karl, I don't want to be part of society. I don't want to give alms to the poor. And if the gov't takes something from me I demand the right to at least pee in government bathrooms.So fuck your communism, your community, because being with all you retards have zero, ZERO BENEFITS.
>>534450904
>>534450904>The government that allows these capitalists to hold all of the wealth and means of production in their hands are evil.>So we should have an even stronger central government who will hold all of the means of production in their hands, and promise to give it to the people and dissolve itself when true communism has been achieved.>Also, fuck those lumpenproletariat, they're useless and deserve to die, because they are not part of the system of capital.>And no, this isn't the same mentality those evil capitalists have about people who also do not benefit them and their system!Communism is just inverse capitalism, with more outward spite.
>>534453455Communist countries could trade with the world economy though, if they weren't blockaded by America. I don't see how this criticism makes any sense. It only points out that America attacks any country that tries any form of socialism.
>>534455443Retarded Argentine whose president twerks for Netanyahu in Tel-aviv talking
>>534453615/Board
>>534450904Marx was a liar and wasn't honest about capitalism either
>>534453615>it wasn't REAL capitalism
>>534457008Correct. English imperialism isn't capitalism like Marx said it was
>>534450904>Daily reminder that it’s not too late to admit you were wrong about capitalism
>>534457008Explain what capitalism is and explain how this is actual capitalism
>>534451149>I just don't think Marx offered any competent replacementHe didn't, that's why he had Mikhail Bakunin (someone all commies love bringing up, despite Bakunin eventually hating communism) removed from the First International's council after Bakunin said his system did nothing to address the problems of inequality created by industrialization, and just replaced it with a system that still created inequality and functioned the same, but turned the tables on the holders of capital; it wasn't a solution, it was just a spiteful reactionary system.
>>534457008We don't, though. A sound monetary policy is required, and we don't have that. We have useless paper, backed by absolutely nothing but faith, that can be manipulated and endlessly printed, and further backed by nothing with an actual market use and value. A dollar gaining its value solely from something like being the international exchange currency for a market like oil, but I cannot trade in my dollars for oil and use that oil in any way with purchasing power in the same system, isn't a sound monetary policy.
>>534450904Dialectics are boring and are predictably unsolvable. Marxism tries to be capitalism and capitalism tries to be Marxism. Maybe it’s because they’re moralist positions that refuse to believe they’re immoral by nature and that’s why you believe capitalism and communism contradict each other rather than seeing them stem from the same evil tree.
>>534450904You'd be more of a whore, to the State, under another system.
