Yes, his music is beautiful and has pure soul, but many other composers have these qualities too, yet almost all female pianists went full on frenzy on Chopin’s pieces, on the contrary the holes are rarely into Bach, Rachmaninoff, etc.
Always finish on ze Bach, never finish on Debussy.
>>534468183Chopin had very long fingers, really tricky to play if you got small hands.
>>534468183Because it is easily appreciable as frilly and romantic and elegant and emotive and sophisticated without requiring much technical savvy or interpretation or bearing through actively, like like someone like Liszt or Schumann would. Same for Beethoven to a lesser extent because he is a little bit more technical in general. Chopin is wonderful music in no way derided by the fact it is easier but this is why.
>>534468183They have a faggit on the piano, Steve; do not be fooled by that type of faggitry.
>>534468445This. You get a lot of bang for your buck both in terms of listenability for the audience as well as satisfaction relative to skill. It's why Mendelssohn is similarly popular for string ensemble work as well as his concertos. They don't require much, relatively speaking, of either the performer or listener but provide a great deal of satisfaction for both. In contrast to, for example, Wieniawski.
I would not recommend, doing that on a piano, it is not good for your organs, I hope you do not have intestinal parasites.
>>534468183THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ME! Not him...
>>534468183Also>that strobe setup>insisting on showing off his balls and taintThat's that fucker Terry isn't it.
I feel like this was all British entertainment before 1900
I think you should separate "female" into two groups: the conservatory/musically trained ones, and the "just listen to a bit of classical music" ones.I've been through conservatory and I've seen women definitely into a lot more interesting things than Chopin. French impressionism I think must have been the top one. But now that you say it, I don't remember any of them except one that ever showed actual interest in Bach for example. But all guys know he's God tier of course. As for Rachmaninoff I was the most interested in it.Now for non musically trained women, they probably like Chopin because it's way more famous in normies circles than Bach's fugues or Rach's Etudes-Tableaux. If you show them the very cheesy "romantic" parts of Rachmaninoff, they love it just the same as Chopin. But they'd recoil at anything a bit more esoteric or serious. But isn't that just a normie thing ?
>>534468183damn nice hole he has
>>534468183Still better than all the male pianists who mostly play their gay anime theme-songs or whatever. The only classical pieces they want to learn are pieces like Moonlight Sonata 3rd mov. or La Campanella, some Fantaisie Impromptu. The only students I've so far had who've brought up composers like Grieg, Sjostakovitj, Skrjabin etc. are women.
>>534468219Heh.
>>534468183what little Chopin I've heard doesn't sound technically difficult
>>534468445Chopin is easy, get off the grass, he's one of the hardest to learn. I think OP's is wrong too.
>>534469698This. Especially if we're talking about his etudes.
>>534468183Chinks love Chopin as well. What's up with OP image
>>534468183Cute
>>534468183A thread about the final boss of Eternal Sonata?I played that on the Xbox 360
From the listeners perspective it's Chopin is what the masses like. You have to grow into Bach, Bach enjoyers are usually older people while Chopin is something that kids/teenagers would appreciate more.From the pianists perspective many treat Bach as boring exercises and never grow out of their Chopin/hopeless romantic teenager/whatever you want to call it phase. Because of the popularity, Chopin concerts are also guaranteed money makers, that's why you see more of it on youtube etc.
Objectively speaking Chopin is peak classical piano.>t. Classically trained pianist
>>534468183Chopin is a brainlet-tier composer.
>>534470476>ch*pin is greater than Liszt, Schumann or even Brahms even when it solely comes to Piano>"""trained pianist"""
>>534468183just leaving a post before it gets 404edop is gay>>534468423he also had 12 fingers
>>534468183Chopin is classical yet contemporaryBach is too rigid and classicalRachmaninoff is too russian
>>534470598>>ch*pin is greater than Liszt, Schumann or even Brahms even when it solely comes to PianoYes. Opinions of plebs who don't even know how to play henle 6+ pieces discarded. (I highly doubt you play piano at all)
>>534468423>Chopin had very long fingersThis is a common myth, we actually have a gips of his hands and they're average sized
>>534470746Professional pianists only play ch*pin for marketing reasons, it's because brainlets who know absolutely nothing about classical music want to listen to ch*pin, not because that he's a great composer.Just Brahms 2 piano concertos mog everything that polish nigger ever wrote. And note that Brahms true genius was in chamber music, not in piano works.
>>534470729Bach is baroque
>>534470944Holy seetheWhy am I even arguing with a turdworlder like you
>>534470944Unfathomable how anyone can actually be this stupid. Or maybe not, since you are, after all, a brown turd.
>>534471317ch*pin is literally the v*valdi of the Romantic era. He's just marketable and accessible for brainlets like (You).
>>534471304Here is an Irish composer you never even heard of composed ch*pin nocturnes before ch*pin himself.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uktj2MYSsaUHere is your """genius""", brainlet. Even his best work was stolen.
bcuz chopin is part of cookin
>>534470476Big hands Rach mogs
You have made this thread just to post that image, haven't you?
