I am curious about the true purpose of demoralisation.For example - this innocuous thread >>534445272on the nature of reality.The first comment calling the concept stupid is crude and doesn't offer a contrary idea - fine.The next post engages with an attempt at sexual humiliationDo you think the posters are-"AI"or-Anons (humans)What is the purpose of the attack on a thread which lauds no side of any conflict underway on the catalog.What is the true purpose of this type of demoralisation? If the replies were indeed made by humans, do you view these humans as practicing a superior or inferior form of warfare? Do you think this form of warfare is in fact causing deformation in the form of the operator's own subconscious which is permanent? Could this be seen as a form of subterfuge in and of itself - whereby a corrupted node above the executing nodes on the post, is issuing a form of warfare "from within"?We should keep in mind even if the posts were produced by AI - the origin of this form of attack is human in origin and selection of training data.What do you think?
>>534477424show flag and then we can talk
>>534477424you are on 4chan you are going to be called a nigger
>>534477424>What do you think?Lots of paid NGO and Government actors trying to push narratives.Lots of retards who believe certain narratives.Very few people who actually have intelligent well thought opinions.I mean why would you waste your time wading through shit when almost any other use of your time would be better.
>>534477557Thank you for answering, I am looking for the specific reason why A thread on the nature of reality would provoke - attempted sexual humiliation as a response.Perhaps the reason I am here is similar to your own presence? Why would you say you are present here despite the "shit wading"?
>>534477473here it is with its flag
>>534477690>Why would you say you are present here despite the "shit wading"?I remember when this place wasn't so shitty and there were high quality posts.Even though the discussion is almost non-existent at this point, there are some threads that highlight what is going on.So even though you probably aren't going to get a discussion here, you can then go search elsewhere for better analysis.
>>534477860I understand that, you are looking for a signal among the detritus. I am examining why specifically the post regarding the stratification of reality - was met with what I would describe as a more insidious type of warfare involving sexual degradation as opposed to the usual "you are an idiot and this is stupid" type of response.Why was the sexual degradation triggered specifically (this is where the AI/Human operator distinction is important to understand the infrastructure behind the mo) As you mention the quality of posts used to be much higher but the quips and insults were always present, however they have taken on a much more insidious nature, as discussed above.
>>534477424>memeflag>redditspacingYou have to go back and ACK.
>>534477821very possible
>>534478499Are you an honourable being?
>>534478807show flag and then we can talk
>>534477424Well it's not working. I'm angrier and more motivated to win than ever. Each passing year makes me more determined to find and crush my enemies to death without mercy or remorse. I can never be demoralized. I am the remoralizer. I am made of morale. I'm pure morale. I'm a berserker who knows no fear and has no quit. I will fight until my body is hamburger and laugh covered in the blood and entrails of my enemies and then I'll go to Valhalla and party with my ancestors. You can't fucking stop me, I am a force of nature!
>>534477424>Do you think the posters arePrimarily a botnet trying to mimic contrarian nature of the old 4chan. Primarily set to be disruptive. Not even pushing an agenda, but you could expect such a system to fuck things up for everyone who would like to do so (possibly using very similar means). Any coherent message would get drowned out in shit, metaphorically speaking. Btw for this level of "enagement" such a system would not need to be very intelligent.
>>534480132Thank you for your response. Wouldn't the agenda be what you have illustrated in your response - drowning out coherent signalling which is associated with a different form of brainwaves within the human. The static you describe or noise, hoping to maintain a certain brainwave in the user base, more closely associated with fight or flight amygdala driven interactions?
