How do we as National Socialists deal with the money grubbing, often mongrel, capitalist problem?
>>534484737definitely not socialism ,you retard
>>534484737>weI assume youre referring to the nigger fucking you in the ass?
>>534484822Are you a shitskin?
>>534484737Remove parasites from power, be they financial or ethnic. No man is alive the welfare of the Nation or its blood. The authority to do so should be available and gifts or lobbying should be illegal to ALL government representatives and their families.
>>534484966*No man alive is above thefucking hell, I'm going to stop drinking
>>534484737>Please take the same now-predictable failed path insteadThey really are desperate to lead us along predictable lines.
>>534484888i'd rather be the darkest blackest chimp nigger than a subhuman collectivist groupthinking socialist
>>534484737Capitalism has nothing to do with "giving up your land, culture, or people"The USA's greatest capitalist economic expansion was when we either only let White people in, or shut down the borders completely.Unless you're going to claim American feom 1865 to 1965 wasn't capitalist.
>>534484737Everything you bitch about capitalism was caused by communist policies. You are right about one thing however, muh nazis were dirty socialists which is just a nicer word for communism
>>534485109National Socialism isnt really Socialosm. Hitler used a private enterprise system but you're a disingenuous bad faith actor and you either know that or don't care and you're a liar.
>>534484737> ????$????muh money is le evil?!?> "give up your culture"no.> "heritage makes no profit"wrong.heritage makes tons of profit, our highest investments skyrocket during Midsummer, Yule, Samhain, Påsk, Valborg and etc.without christianity, we might even get more of the old world rituals back.> give up your landno, fuck your christian shit
>>534485272Socialism*>>534485141See>>534485272
>>534485272 sophist
>>534484737>>534484888>embrace the third position>losefascists always lose. It's been proven time and time again. Do it again, and you'll lose, again. Lol
>>534485320>That wasn't real communism because the bad mustache man did it!>Sure, his government gave away money but that doesn't count because I said it doesn't>It's only real communism when I am doing the fucking!
>>534485382Mongrel.
>>534485411We will torture you in Hell.
>>534485128You’re oversimplifying both history and capitalism. The U.S. from 1865–1965 wasn’t some pure free-market success story—it was full of state intervention, from railroad subsidies to the New Deal and wartime command economies, so calling that “capitalism alone” is misleading. And the idea that prosperity came from restricting who could enter ignores that industrial growth was driven by exploiting labor—immigrants, Black workers after slavery, and the working class in general—while wealth piled up for a tiny elite during the Gilded Age. Exclusion laws like the Chinese Exclusion Act weren’t a strength; they were tools to divide workers and keep wages down. From a communist perspective, that “growth” wasn’t some neutral success—it was built on inequality, state-backed capitalism, and deliberate social division, not proof that capitalism thrives because of closed borders.
>>534485472TLDRCapitalism = Private Property Ownership (USA)Communism = Anarcho Labor-Unionism (Non-existent retard ideology)Socialism = An authoritarian retard state with super unions LARPing like they'll become Communist one day (China, USSR)
>>534485728That breakdown is just caricatures, not what those ideologies actually mean. Capitalism isn’t just “people owning property”—it’s a whole system where the means of production are privately owned and profit-driven, often backed by the state (which is why U.S. history includes things like the New Deal and corporate subsidies). Communism isn’t “anarcho labor-unionism”—in theory it’s a classless, stateless society where production is collectively owned, as outlined by Karl Marx, and it’s distinct from anarchism even if they overlap in rejecting hierarchy. Socialism also isn’t just “authoritarian states”—it broadly means social or collective ownership of key industries, and it exists in many forms, from democratic systems in countries like Sweden to more centralized models like the Soviet Union. Lumping all of that into insults and pretending they’re fake or identical just avoids engaging with what the ideas actually are.
>>534484737National socialism and fascism in general collaborates with capital, they preserve the private industrialists while mobilizing the labor pool through socialist mass mobilization and agitation yet retain class divisions in service of the nation. It then hyperinjects nationalism into the mode of production, which for capitalists (as they are simply reoriented from private profit to state profit) is the most easiest and lucrative way to make money and to maintain labor mobilization at the state level; inevitably leading to imperialist war.The only way is to eliminate capital and private ownership of the means of production and defense. >>534484822The people, working class, should make the decisions, not capitalists.>>534485128In those days people were desperate to form unions and would be murdered by armed private guns, which is just capitalism working as intended.>>534485141Incorrect, capital leeches off of the productive capacity of working class people and leaves them destitute, public ownership and investment of the labor pool is what made western nations rise in the first place, now as there is no counter weight it is being cannibalized for money, and money alone.
>>534485786>proving my point
>>534485784Thanks Chat-GPT
>>534485973Got it—that kind of response is basically him doubling down with labels instead of engaging. If you want a clean way to hit back:He’s not defining anything seriously—he’s just throwing insults and pretending that’s an argument. Capitalism isn’t just “owning stuff,” it’s a system where production is controlled for profit, usually with heavy state backing (like during the New Deal). Communism isn’t “anarcho-unionism,” it’s a theoretical classless system described by Karl Marx, and whether you agree with it or not, it’s a coherent body of theory. And socialism isn’t just authoritarian states—it ranges from democratic models to centralized ones like the Soviet Union. If his whole argument is redefining terms and adding insults, he’s not actually proving anything—he’s just avoiding the real discussion.
>>534485786>The people, working class, should make the decisions, not capitalists.thats what they tell you useful idiot revolutionary knuckle draggers
>capitalism>hands down the best system>socialism>hands down one of the worst systems>capitalism + jews = absolute terrible>socialism + jews = communism, literally the worst system ever known to menIts allways the same: system + jews = human miseryNo jews no problem, every one of those systems woukd work if it wasnt for the jews
