>They're not gypsies, they're just RomaniansWhat's the difference?
Ugly children need to be euthanized
>>534507327Gypsies are darker skinned, they came from india. Gypsies are pajeets by DNA.
OP is romanians.Pic related are gypsies, they are pajeets.
>>534507327>What's the difference?the type of music they listen to and the way they speaksame way you tell apart american mongrels with nigger background
>>534507327Genetics, languages, religion, culture, history, origins.Lots of things are different.
>>534507684Hilarious that a burger knows this year most Europeans don't.
>>534507327the only real difference is their shoplifting techniques
>>534507536Don't blame the children, blame their parents.
>>534509414Not a single Romanian is from “romania”
>>534509557yeah, mine is the "don't shoplift" technique. I just pay. suckers fall for it every time, I always get my stuff
>>534507327Put a Romanian, Italian and Greek in the same room and they will look alike and recognize each other, non-verbally, because of their physical resemblance. Are you saying that Italians and Greeks are Gypsies? Is pic related a Gypsy? Put a Hungarian in the same room with their closest linguistic relatives like the Khanti, Mansi and Bashkirs and they look nothing alike, because the Hungarian identity is artificial and doesn't exist, it's a low IQ larp, that is easily exposed as I just have.The Romanian identity is much stronger and more established than the Hungarian identity. Romanians have: Roman blood, Roman language, Roman religion.By comparison, Hungarians are Slavic mutts, with a Slavic creole language that they transcribe with a Latin alphabet because they discarded their original aphabet in addition to discarding their religion and converting to catholicism.
>>534509643meds?
Had a Romanian friend who said gypsies would break into his farmstead up in the mountains and he'd end up shooting at them. Sometimes the would get hit and lope off into the bushes like a wounded animal.
>>534509643Romania = everywhere Romans live.Romanians physically resemble the other Romans, in addition to having Roman language and Roman religion. It is a very strong and established identity, one for the strongest in Europe, easily>>534509882
>>534507684Op is a hungarian having an identity crisis. Everybody knows it's the hungarians that are gypsies.
>>534509882You forgot portuguese. They're the iberian gypsies
>>534510105>we wuz Romans>and not some Slav mutt Genetics tell a different story
>>534511100Romanians are genetically similar to Serbs, another Slav group of non locals. Like I said, not a single Romanian is originally from “Romania”.
>>534507327they're gypsy mutts>>534507875no gypsy looks like this
>>534511151Serbs lean more into Thraco-Roman genetics just like us and just like the Bulgarians. It's their langauge and culture that is Slavic. There is no such thing as a Slavic genes. But Europeans almost all are mixed, especially those of us in this region, which is why infighting is retarded.
>>534511525>thraco-roman geneticsThere you go with a baseless sourceless talking point.
>>534507327>they're just Romaniansyeah... no. I know some romanians they get pissed if you even hint that romani are romanians.
>>534511100Beautiful, way to expose yourself with this anti-intelelcutal discourse. You started this low IQ bait thread implying that Romanians are gypsies and now suddenly you're pivoting to Romanians are Slavic mutts. So which one is it retard? Or are Slavs also gypsies? Next you'll say we are in fact Chinese. Identity is language + religion. Genetics play a secondary role as it is a recent development that was ne we considered during national awakening and even then Romanians clustering with Serbs all it means is that we are Thraco-Romans.
Kek
>>534511151>Like I said, not a single Romanian is originally from “Romania”.What does Romania represent to you and since you imply it's a location, where is it, then?
>>534511781You’re low iq and can’t see ID’s for some reason. I started this thread saying Romanians are originally not from “Romania”. I provided two pieces of damning evidence while you make sourceless claims not wanting to lose izzat.
>>534511975The current territory of Romania. Romanians are 2-3 times more genetically related to Serbs and Bulgarians than they are to Albanians and north Italians that are more related to early Iron Age Roman genetic samples than anyone else. It’s not hard to grasp these things. Maybe you should read some history, “Wallachia” is steppe and has been raped by dozens of different tribes and ethnicities. As I said, not a single Romanian is originally from “Romania”. Cope, seethe and dilate.
>>534511994>I started this thread saying Romanians are originally not from “Romania”mf you originally from Africa. so what does that make you?
>>534507327the scamming, grifting and outright theft?
>>534512233Beating around the bush won’t win you izzat
>>534512294where did the Romanian touch your wife though? we seem to be living rent free in your head
>>534512333I accept your surrender, now you just need to admit that you’re a slavoid and not a Roman or Thracian.
>>534511994>You’re low iq and can’t see ID’s for some reason. I started this thread saying Romanians are originally not from “Romania”Yeah because we're Roman colonists whom mixed with Thracians and later mixed with Slavs, just like the Serbs and Bulgarians.>I provided two pieces of damning evidence while you make sourceless claims not wanting to lose izzat.You didn't provide shit. In your narrow and compromised world view you think Serb= exclusively Slavic migrant and non-native which is clearly not the case. And your entire argument is predicated on this which is why you failed.
>>534512096The fact that Romanians are related to North Italians AT ALL is proof of our origins. The strength of that relation is irrelevant. Of course the Slavic admixture is going to be stronger as it happened over a longer period and is more recent, you know this but your are deliberatley arguing in bad faith as all hungarians.>As I said, not a single Romanian is originally from “Romania”.Romania is called Romania because, us the Romans are inhabiting it currently not the other way around you larping retard. >Cope, seethe and dilateYou lost tranny
>>534512401seethe harder you irrelevant no history having leaf.
>>534507327
>>534512466This is not what genetics say, you are clearly slavoid mutts and hardly related to early Iron Age Rome. We know about early Iron Age Rome genetics (1000 bc to 500 bc) from Antonio et al. 2019. Genetic calculators can measure the relatedness, Serbian, Romanian, Bulgarian hardly related to them.
>>534511100Aren't the fagyar cigány retarded larpers the ones that claim Romanians are Albanians in denial?
>>534512684Your argument is equivalent to a typical American saying that americans have roots from the mayflower when 90% of Americans today don’t and thus most Americans today are not foundation Americans. Romanians are not Romans and genetics prove this. Not Thracian either because thracians, illyrians and Romans were related people.
>>534512900It’s clear that Albanians have high blood relations with ancient Romans because illyrians and Romans were related. Albanians and Romanians are practically different people, Romanians are brothers with Serbs and this is shown by genetics.
>>534512961ye bro aliums beamed us here we replaced the existing population, learned their language and everything, we somehow are here, speak latin language but we're from some other dimensiontake your meds and ease up on the mental gymnastics. your wife also must really love romanian bvll cock
>>534512806Bulgarians claim to be the rightful descendants of the Thracians, this is their official state narrative. Be sure you go and challenge the Bulgarians and tell them they're not Thracians. You won't, of course because hungarian subanimals like you have so many enemies already that you can't afford to alienate them also. Unfortunately for you however, saying that Romanians are not at least in part Thracians is an automatic attack on the identity of both the Bulgarians and the Serbs, since we are so related, so which one is it, dumb larper? Do the Serbs and Bulgarians also have no Thracians relation? This is why the whole world laughs at fagyar cigany imbeciles like you.
>>534513194Romanians, Serbs and Bulgarians are all slavoid mutts with hardly any latinic, Thracian or Illyrian roots. I’m not saying it just for the lulz, this is what ancient genetics says and modern genetic relations between ethnic group.
>>534513468rent free
>>534513468That's nonsens, of course since Romanains, Italians and Greeks resemble with one another and historically in the historiography of neighbouring Slavic, Hungarian nations Romanains were designated as "something other" and "Romans" and thus never recognized or identified as Slavs, and this is a continuous re-affirmation of the non-Slavic origins and the non-Slavic character of Romanains. I will take that over some fake meme genetic study, honestly. Identity has got nothing to do with genes, either way, and Romanian identity is very strong as I have explained in this thread, and confirmed by the historiography of our neighbours.
>>534513959>fake meme genetic study>antonio et al 2019>genetic calculatorsYou can larp all you want but the facts remain.
>>534514230Kin are supposed to be able to recognize one another, even non-verbally. Do Romanians physically resemble other Slavs, or are Romanains closer in appearance to Italians and Greeks? At no point in history in any of the historiography of the Slavic nations are Romanians ever reffered to as being Slavic, having a Slavic origin, or Slavic a character. You'd think the Slavs ought to be able to recognize one of their own right? Do the Poles call Romanains Slavs? No. Do the Rus people call Romanians Slavs? No. Do the Austrians call the Romanians in Transylvania Slavs? No. And the Austrians knew how t tell different Slavs apart as different Slavic nations were part of the Habsburg empire. Moreover there are the non-Slavic sources like the Hungarians, Germans, French, Anglos, etc who are also in agreement throughout their entire historiography that Romanains are not Slavic.Genetic studies are irrelevant.
>>534514230>>antonio et al 2019>95% italian authors>akshually rome is still here we wuz romans and shit only us are romanssure buddy
>>534507327None. Zero whatsoever. Same cockroach.
>>534512961>Your argument is equivalent to a typical American saying that americans have roots from the mayflower when 90% of Americans today don’t and thus most Americans today are not foundation AmericansExactly and the fact that the majority of modern day Americans are not foundational Americans doesn't change anything, they still identify as Americans and they still retain their American character.>Romanians are not Romans and genetics prove this. Not Thracian either because thracians, illyrians and Romans were related people.Romanians have a genetic Thraco-Roman foundation.
