The creator of Bayonetta on LGBT
Let's Go Bomb Tel Aviv
>>534524786Based Nintendo. Snoys would’ve caved because they’re a bunch of fags.
The creator of Harry Potter after I tell her Harry is trans.I still don't care.
Doesn't he tell everyone who tags him while writing in English to get lost?
tourists didn't play the first game
>>534524961Bayinetta is owned by sega thougbeit.
>>534524879Now do MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+.
>>534525016She's only saying this because her vagina is the only thing that qualifies her to inclusion in "womanhood"When you see an animal, a dog for example you don't say "this is a woman-dog" you say "this is a female dog"If you are born with a vagina you are a female. Inclusion in womanhood means actually behaving like a woman. Feminists exclude themselves from this category by denying ALL aspects of womanhood. They reduce themselves to their reproductive anatomy, they reduce themselves to the category "female" just like the dogs they are.
>>534528348In fact this is how I rank the hierarchy of womanhood.1. The least feminine. These are female creatures but they are the furthest thing from "Women"They have voluntarily abdicated their womanhood and treat femininity with contempt. Their entire lives revolve around rebelling against womanhood. They hate Women. They hate Men. They hate themselves. 2. The "Feminist" who has attempted to create a philosophical and rational justification for the desexing of womanhood such that all "women" are merely materialistic beings, reducible to their reproductive organs and held in absolute parity with the male species3. The homosexual transsexual. This may surprise many and I'm sure it will cause a great deal of screeching. Yet they are still MORE "women" than the feminist or the anti-feminine abominations of the 2nd and 1st category. They are ersatz "women"; they enact "womanhood" and while it is a hyperreal simulation, a simulation of reality is still more aligned with reality than a total rejection of reality.4. The one dimensional, libidinal, erotically possessed, self-objectified woman. While she is incomplete, she is the first actual example of womanhood. She has created a one dimensional form of womanhood, sexually submissive, sexually appealing, but still routed through the material aspect of her feminine character.Finally 5. The complete woman. It should be obvious exactly what this means. A spiritually, physically, and emotionally complete Woman who does not perform but simply exists exactly in her natural state. Who does not mark her existence as one of competition or contrast with the masculine but recognizes herself as the feminine aspect of an incomplete unit, the relational/reproductive unit. Feminists are less "women" than the transsexuals they fight with. Neither are "women" but at least the transsexual attempts womanhood as an aspiration while the feminist holds femininity in abject contempt.
>>534524961Retard.
Does Suda51 have any hot takes on MGSVQWIPPIEEEEEE+=-/?
>>534529053>Feminists are less "women" than the transsexuals they fight with.Nah. If you have XX chromosomes you're woman, if you have XY chromosomes you're man. Simple as.
>>534531293No. If you have XX chromosomes you're female. If you have XY chromosomes you are male. You clearly didn't read, or failed to understand my point. Reducing humans to anatomical, material units is what the jews do. A "woman" is not her chromosomes, or her reproductive organs. A "woman" is an adult-human-female who has actualized her nature within a hierarchy of value. "Womanhood" is the quintessential structure under which all things "female" are measured against.Those who desecrate "womanhood" by rejecting every basic metaphysical or spiritual aspect of it are not "women" they are females, no different than any other anti-human animal.If you say otherwise then you have to hold category 1 and category 5 as equal to one another in womanhood, and that is self-evidently not true
>>534529053>Yet they are still MORE "women"Flag checks out
>>534531550Stop all the mental gymnastics just to justify that you're not gay for fucking trannies, Mr. Jones. You are a fag for fucking Blair White, end of discussion.
>>534524786Now we wait to see if he gets shamed into clarifying and apologizing. No doubt this will be the only thing gaming journalists will ask him about moving forward
>>534531550You're doing a massive overcomplication, and you are being silly. There's no "womanness" independent from being "female".> who has actualized her nature within a hierarchy of value.This is just meaningless blather. A woman is a human female, XX chromosomes. A hideous medieval hag is still a woman, no matter how she lives or what she does.It's not complicated. It's only when you start bringing meaningless "gender" ideas into it things become fruit loops.>If you say otherwise then you have to hold category 1 and category 5 as equal to one another in womanhoodDo they have XX chromosomes? If so they're both 100% women.
>>534528348
>>534524879soon
Mentally ill faggots are not women. They never have been and never will be. It's all quite simple.
>>534531683There are no mental gymnastics. I am simply holding females to the same level of hierarchical accountability males (and females) hold other males to. Is picrel a "Man" to you? If you equate the most anti-feminine, contemptuous of femininity, females as equal Women to the feminine and highest attainment of womanhood then you have to hold male funkopop collectors, nintendo switch enjoyers, latte sipping urbanite males as equal in Manhood to soldiers, fathers, leaders etc. Is the basedsmiling neckbeard equal in Manhood to Caesar?If you realize how absurd that is to say then you must be able to understand my argument.Yes, the transsexual is more of a "Woman" than anti-feminine females because a simulation of womanhood is still more aligned with actuality than the complete rejection of reality. If you feel otherwise then you must similarly hold the least Masculine males as equal in Manhood to the most vital men in all of human history
>>534531550>A "woman" is an adult-human-female who has actualized her nature within a hierarchy of value. "Womanhood" is the quintessential structure under which all things "female" are measured against.>Those who desecrate "womanhood" by rejecting every basic metaphysical or spiritual aspect of it are not "women" they are females, no different than any other anti-human animal.none of this actually means anything at all, you retarded fucking faggot
>>534531873>Is picrel a "Man" to you?Yeah, that's obviously a man. What did you think it was, a porcupine?
>>534531883It means everything, see:>>534531873
>>534531911kill yourself
>>534524786Unless something has changed, he just fucking hates people tagging him when writing in english. It has nothing to do with what they say.
>woman with big tits is somehow representative of faggots >WHATYOU'RE NOT A WOMAN>WHATYOU WILL NEVER BE A WOMAN>WHATYOU HAVE NO WOMB>WHATYOU HAVE NO OVARIES>WHATYOU NEED TO TAKE A MILLION OF THEM LITTLE PILLS>WHAT TO CONVINCE YOURSELF>WHATTHAT YOU'RE A WOMAN>WHATAND YOU'RE NOT>WHATLEMME TELL YOU SOMETHIN>WHAT HOW BOUT YOU TAKE>WHATA LITTLE PILL>WHATBOUT THE SIZE>WHATOF A .357 MAGNUM>WHATPUT IT UP AGAINST YOUR BALD-ASS HEAD>WHATSWIPE YOUR HAND ACROSS YOUR FACE>WHATCUZ YOU DON'T WANNA GET YOUR BEARD STUCK IN THE HAMMER>WHATAND BLOW YOUR GODDAMN BRAINS OUTWHAT
>>534531900Then you are reducing Manhood from a spiritual, archetypal, and metaphysical ideal to materialistic/crude reality.If that is a Man to you then in terms of Manhood he must have equal standing with Caesar, with Vercingetorix, with Leonidas, with Martel, etc etc etc.And then you must say that you don't believe in any standards or objective value of an individual. You are basically a liberal so I don't know why you're on this board.
>>534532020No one is talking about metaphysics except you when they talk about men and women. No idea why you do, it's completely uninteresting.>If that is a Man to you then in terms of Manhood he must have equal standing with Caesar, with Vercingetorix, with Leonidas, with Martel, etc etc etc.Yeah, when it comes to being a man, i.e. having XY chromosomes and being a male of the human species, that soi is on equal footing with Caesar, that is true.How is this basic shit that even 3 year olds understand so hard for you?
>>534524786Giga based. but still game is literally demonic, guess that's point for Japanese they use Christianity like fashion
>>534532020>And then you must say that you don't believe in any standards or objective value of an individual.I think I see your confusion. Somehow you've gotten the idea that being a man or being a woman is some sort of ranking system?It's not like that, the bar for being a man or a woman is extremely low. All humans are simply born as either (except a few mutants that don't count.) It's like having a nose. Everyone is born with one (except a few mutants.)There's no ranking or merit or spiritual mysticism to having a nose. You simply were born with one. Just like all people are born either as a man or a woman (XY or XX).Hope this cleared it up for you.
>>534532081>no one is talking about metaphysicsBecause we live in a culture that has suffered 6 decades of post structuralist philosophy that has bled out of the ivy league schools through graduates of the humanities departments which have found employment in high schools, HR departments, and government think tanks. Why do you think it's an argument that "no one in this liberal hellscape is talking about illiberal ideals"Are you completely retarded?> Yeah, when it comes to being a man, i.e. having XY chromosomes and being a male of the human species, that soi is on equal footing with Caesar, that is true.Again. We do not refer to animals as "women" or "men" because they do not have the capacity to attain a higher mode of Being, they are basic creatures. Humans are not basic creatures.Having XY chromosomes makes you a male. Courage, duty, integrity, power, wisdom, authority, dominion, etc make you a Man in every world except your liberal world where objective qualities can't exist because everyone has to be equal on a flat line.
>>534525016it's really that easy, would you call a man a woman for being born with such a small cock he can't even successfully penetrate?
>>534532264>Having XY chromosomes makes you a male. Courage, duty, integrity, power, wisdom, authority, dominion, etc make you a ManThe very fact that you capitalize man shows that you need to create some weirdo metaphysical sort-of difference between men and these Men of yours.It's just silly. XY or XX, that's it. I'm done with you.
>>534532248I don't entertain metaphysically inert, liberal egalitarians. Hierarchy exists. Hierarchy is an intrinsic property of the universe and reality. A male who abandons his family is not simply a "bad man" he has failed to attain the very qualities of Manhood in the first place. No duty, no obligation, no responsibility, no integrity, no dominion.You're arguing within a very liberal worldview. "Everyone is equal, it's just our choices that define what we are because everything is constructed, nothing has inherent value or meaning, and choices are arbitrary moral exchanges between parties and everything is evaluated post-hoc as to whether it is good or not"that is the foundation of the liberal view, and you embody that.So you can reply, but I am done with this conversation. I can't squeeze blood from a stone, and I can't squeeze recognition of reality out of a liberal.
>>534524786>lose shit over sexy female character, cry about misogyny and the male gaze>time passes>uhm ackshually she's always been an LGTV icon chudMany such cases, Lara Croft is another prime example.I actually hate that I know this, I hate that I know how these fucking losers think.
>>534531995And that's the bottom line cause ston cold said so*beats debra*
>>534532458OH HELLL YEAHHHHH
if you ever want a good laugh just ask a weeb to explain how tranime isn’t the tranniest of all art.
>>534524786Goddam I love the Nips.
only white tourists believe japan is anti-lgbt
