same niggers that were terrorist in the 70s working for the soviets now they work for china. THIEL IS RIGHT thunberg is the anticrist
>>534551961yeah i know
>>534551961Your graph is trash>As of recent 2024-2025 data, China's CO2 emissions per person (approx. 8.7–10.8 tonnes) have surpassed Germany's (approx. 7.06 tonnes)
>>534551961Germany outsources their pollution.They import electricity from Poland and French coal power plants.They also claim their use of gas is 100% clean (????) and therefore should not be accounted for.You can't expect less from a country known for Dieselgate, where they spent almost 30 years faking health reports to make diesel cars look very good for the environment.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_emissions_scandal
>>534551961you must vote communist because of the flowers and trees, the children and women.you must feed muh keedz.
>>534552277Ohhh, let's not forget that most countries in Europe don't count the emissions of fossil fuels used for heating.
>>534552277I want to contradict you just in one point. Diesel IS the cleaner, more effective and better fuel.
>>534551961>70s working for the soviets now they work for china.They work for the usa tho.
>>534552656t. Volkswagen shareholder.
>>534552747It just is. Check any real sources about it. Jews hate Diesel.
I thought they cared about the environment but that black women in the UK just wanted reparations and it turned out her family profited from slavery while the British ended it..
>>534551961CO2 emissions = industrial production
>>534552976>Check any real sources about itThose sponsored by Volkswagen that surprisingly have not been updated after the scandal?Also, it's 2026. Electric cars are not a billionaire thing anymore. Claiming any fossil fuel is cleaner than EV is just shitposting at this point.
>>534553179I was comparing it to petrol. Also where does the electricy come from?
>>534553252>Also where does the electricy come from?IN my country?90% comes from reneable hydropower plants.>b-but we don't do this in germanySkill issue! Your country got so behind in clean energy and now needs to suck Putin's cock for a little bit of gas.
>>534553409>and now needs to suck Putin's cock for a little bit of gas.Excuse me tis the opposite. If only......>>534553409>90% comes from reneable hydropower plants.It doesnt tho.Also yes i guess you agreed Diesel is better then Petrol.
>>534553409>>534553463>It doesnt tho.Sorry, even if it does. You have 30 times the area of Germany and the largest tropical rainforest of course you have water power.
>>534553463how does it feel to be ruled by kikes so hard that you need to rely on expensive fossil fuels that come from every other corner of the world because your country is not allowed to harness the multiple sources of renewable energy?
>>534553540There are no hydropower plants in the Amazon.Contrary to popular belief, the Amazon River is at such low altitude that it has no potential for energy generation. Plus, [almost] no one lives there...
>ex-commiesNo, they are current commies. They are behilden to Jes. No one is a more faithful follower of the tikkun olam plan than Greens.
>>534553179EV is as clean as the electricity supply is. So it's pretty dirty because coal is a major component in most energy mixes and by far the greatest pollutant.
>>534552146The graph is true - you are quoting per capita cumbers, the graph has total numbers
>>534553839It feels like shit actually.
>>534554106>EV is as clean as the electricity supply is.No.You see, one of the main issues with ICE is the fact that it releases a lot of pollution close to humans. Meanwhile, power plants are in the middle of butt fuck nowhere, where the damages to humans are mitigated.You know that 1 in 4 Americans had their IQ lowered due to lead poisoning because they were one of the last countries to stop adding lead to their fuel? This is one of those things we only learn after we stop. Imagine how much more garbage we are inhaling because fat people need their cages to go buy slop?
>>534551961>*post bullshit graph*>*lie about it*Wow so brave!Anyway, the point is to make economies of scale such that green energy is more cost efficient than burning dinosaurs. That's never going to happen automatically because companies built on burning dinosaurs will manipulate the market and buy politicians and influencers until they can buy homes in low earth orbit, leaving the rest of us to deal with the aftermath.
>>534554157Since you are here.Do you mind explaining to me what the deal is with the Green Party?They oppose every project of green energy and pretty much demand more coal.How is a wind farm worse than a coal power plant???
>>534554287Nigger - the EU is basically making everything to make coal die out and make greennigger shit, that never was profitable, profitableAlso the charts are true - took me 2 mintues to google them, kys faggot:https://ourworldindata.org/profile/co2/germanyhttps://ourworldindata.org/profile/co2/china>>534554380>How is a wind farm worse than a coal power plant???It is more expensive to produce - you have to create co2 quoatas just for the wind to be profitable, pay shitloads of subsidies for themThen, since it produces energy randomly, you need to add additional batteries to the grid and you need to use synchronous compensators to add artificial inertia to the grid, to keep the frequency, which also costs money.All for some fake and gay bullshit that isn't even happening and China produces all the co2 anyway, so it doesn't even matter lmaoAlso in the green nigger shit, there never is any nuclear power, which would actually be an economically efficient way to produce electricity, but that means kike funds like Blackrock can't scam as many subsidies and US niggers can't sell their NGL (which is "green" because it produces slightly less co2 than coal and you need it for controllable power, which solar and wind is not)
>>534554144the graph is bullshit>China has approximately 17 times more people and its total area is roughly 27 times larger than Germany's.
>>534553912>There are no hydropower plants in the Amazon.Who gives a shit?The chart you posted clearly shows that your country has the capacity for hydropower, which it utilizes.You can only use hydropower if you have the rivers for that and pretty much all the countries that can produce it already do as much as possible, since hydropower is generally very cheap to produce and very controllable.So you can't just say that everyone has to cover their power needs with hydropower when a lot of the countries don't even have the rivers for that
Capitalism is six feet under I say give the commies a chance it literally cannot get worse than it is now.If they fuck it up we will just blame it one them.
>>534555498>>China has approximately 17 times more people and its total area is roughly 27 times larger than Germany's.Yes, retard, it's not a per capita chart, just as I said.And if you weren't a retard and knew how to use google, you'd see, that in China, they are still increasing the co2 per capita as well, when goymoney has decreased the per capita number, lmaohttps://ourworldindata.org/profile/co2/germanyhttps://ourworldindata.org/profile/co2/china
>>534555570>If they fuck it up we will just blame it one them.thats not how commies work, if you give them the power they will never leave
>>534553912>hydropower plantsNot enough water here
>>534551961THE SCIENCE IS CLEARWE MUST NUKE CHYNA TO SAVE THE ENVIRONMENTTRUST THE SCIENCE NUKE BEIJING
>>534555135>the EU is basically making everything to make coal die out and make greennigger shit, that never was profitable, profitableThat's literally what I'm saying. You bring down prices of green energy such that burning oil becomes comparatively more expensive. You do this by subsidizing green energy and taxing oil.
>>534551961What else is new? Bankrolled by Nixon and Reagan.
since the year 2000, despite increasing in population, americas emissions are down 25%since the year 2000, despite barely increasing in population, chinas emissions are up 800 percentwhat are we doing here guys
>>534555498>per capitachinks see this graph and say 'look, we don't pollute as much as america' and think that's a free pass to pollute more.and then unsurprisingly the west is cucked in productivity because a significant chunk of chinks live in caves..
>>534559982same graph not per-capita capitathe west see this graph and say 'china is the one responsible, it's not our fault'
>>534559982>>534560459>china has 4 times as many people as the USAretard
>>534560855exactly.the message i'm trying to convey is, this problem is easily solved by making the populations equivalent.a mass extinction of chinks would be a good start.
>>534560855these chinese cave dwellers do little more than skew per capita metrics and give chinese industry extra 'allowance' to pollute, and outcompete western business who have to abide by restrictive carbon quotas.it's unthinkable for the poor of pretty much any other moderately developed country to have such a small carbon footprint.
>>534551961The greens are based I wish we had based greens
>>534552146found the nigger
>>534555798Don’t you have the Danube?
>>534551961Imagine being a western nigger right now crying about global warming and climate change, wanting to limit the CO2 usage and all politicians forcing us to eat bugs, meanwhile China won't stop increasing their CO2 usage and completely makes the west look like a park by comparison.Eat ze bugs for ze Jews, whitey!
>>534552146Note that because were working with data sourced from the Communist Party of China, the data might not be perfectly accurate. Through out the history of the party, many facts have been erased or spun in a positive direction. For the sake of the argument, lets say they are ahead of the world in CO2 emissions.>>534551961Let's identify why CO2 emissions are as high as they are:>The EPA and other regulating environmental organizations have little to no say in communist regions as the power is isolated entirely within a small portion of the ruling government. Which brings up a unique point,Why would Chinese officials not care about pollution?> China became a global manufacturing hub for labor-intensive simple goods like plastics and textiles.The reason why they don't care is because regulation and environmental protection cost money. The only reason why China has dominated the market for so long is cost. If they cannot be the lowest cost in comparison to other nations they loose the trade war and collapse entirely. Fee's that prevent pollution are deemed as a "roadblock to the progress of the party">>534554284"Toxic" materials are only disclosed after they can be properly replaced. Microscopic Polymer pollution itself is 100 times worse in terms of long term human health.>>534554287>companies built on burning dinosaurs will manipulate the market and buy politicians and influencers until they can buy homes in low earth orbit, leaving the rest of us to deal with the aftermath."The humble atom splitter>>534554380How is a wind farm worse than a coal power plant???Coal has been around since the 1800's, the industry has had hundreds of years to adapt and become profitable. Electric wind turbines are extremely new in comparison, the margin of profit is very small because the technology has not been refined or established as well. building a solar or wind farm will always produce less and cost more than an oil or coal rig due to energy density.
>>534562809doubt you'd find a single western environmentalist willing to live like vidrel to save the planet. this is the kind of lifestyle westerners are competing against whenever someone mentions per capita co2 emissions.it's practically living like mud hut niggers lmao
