[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: imrs.jpg (97 KB, 1440x810)
97 KB JPG
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/05/06/supreme-courts-callais-redistricting-ruling-could-backfire-gop/

TL;DR Now, Dems are free to gerrymander too.
>>
>>534569649
This combined with the popular b
Vote thing. We might have a constitutional crisis on our hands.
>>
>>534569649
Everybody can gerrymander. You just can't explicitly draw nigger only or nigger majority districts because niggers vote for you.
>>
>>534570281
However the ruling allows for political gerrymandering
All they need to do is group a bunch of blue niggers with a larger rural white district and it's perfectly fine as long as the district isn't majority minority
>>
can't be much worse than 1930s - 1990s
>>
of course, because they are based on OLD models of the last election, not based on how new voters will turn out. I think the GOP want to lose at this point. Lower the number of % in each district so they lose higher margin.
>>
>>534570399
>political gerrymandering
that is literally what you just descried above retard. white and black districts are by definition political. get rid of gerrymandering, the supreme court sucks huge donkey cock.
>>
I believe the "majority minority" wording is dangerous
It's only a matter of time until whites are not the majority in some states and at that point a all white district is illegal under that interpretation
>>
>>534569649
Democrats never stopped gerrymandering. They have always done it under phony claims of racial equality. Now they will get tit for tat.
>>
File: IMG_0846.jpg (1.68 MB, 828x5230)
1.68 MB JPG
totem pole status?
>>
>>534570803
It's going to backfire
By trying to get rid of a couple token black representatives they will instead be distributed to balance out white districts
Even the deep south states are playing with fire and still going off last elections numbers
>>
File: 1769371767841508.gif (3.28 MB, 635x640)
3.28 MB GIF
nope. democrats had no regulations imposed upon their gerrymandering because they were able to tell the court
>the resulting districts are minority White therefore they are not only legal, but protected by the VRA.
they do this in NY by grouping Staten Island with the nigger slums of Brooklyn.

but now they can not do that. White voters now have the same voting power and districting rights as nigger and spic voters.

expect 10-20+ D seats in D states to get struck down before 2030, and expect a House with a guaranteed republican majority for at least a decade (barring any black swan event)
>>
>>534569649
they have jerrymandered every district to the hilt already. they have no room to jerrymander. but i encourage them to. it will dilute their districts.
I'm no fan of republicans -- i'm sick of queer geezers. but the dems function as a mafia. and i"m sick of it.
I mainly want free and fair elections to bust up this ridiculous uniparty system.
the people can win -- and will win -- if elections are fair and auditable.
>>
>>534571520
yeah, these people are too stupid to understand the implications of this ruling. it's devastating for the dem mafia.
>>
>>534569649
You already gerrymander the hell out of your stronghold states, especially New England where Republicans have no congressional representation. It's just that now you can't force your nigger loving ways on the south anymore.
>>
>>534569649
>TL;DR Now, Dems are free to gerrymander too.
No they aren't. Look at California. It's max gerrymandered already. They will need to ungerrymander in order to gerrymander any more.
>>
>>534569649
>draw a line around a bunch fo brown people and call it a district
>Republicans sue saying its racial gerrymandering
>democrats have to argue that they didnt draw a line around a bunch of brown people because of their race
>>
>>534571196
keep telling yourself that
>>
File: IMG_4354.jpg (1.02 MB, 1804x2059)
1.02 MB JPG
>>534571196
>democrats will ensure that Whites gets the lowest representation possible
You can never hate the left enough.
>>
>>534569649
how can it possibly backfire?
What other tricks can the Democrats pull?

Only other desperate move would be California splitting into 3 or 6 states.
>>
>>534569649
The Dems already gerrymandered the fuck out of their states decades ago. They might be able to swap a few seats around, but they won't gain much. The Republicans can probably gain up to 40 seats.
>>
File: Birth Pains.png (3.46 MB, 2000x1537)
3.46 MB PNG
>>534571520
>black swan event
That's coming, BTW.
>>
>>534573060
Middle americans are not white. BMI over 30 cannot be considered white.
>>
It's obvious that a large part of what we're seeing today is the revenge of the confederacy on the north. Surprised it rarely gets brought up.
>>
>>534571520
>black swan event

Obama 2.0 redux with a blue trifecta coming right up
>>
>>534569649
a race to the bottom then. not my problem.
>>
>>534569649
>Now
You stupid fucking cuck, dems have been gerrymandering like crazy for decades.
>>
>>534573339
You retarded young person, Obama was heavily favored to win.
>>
File: you sure about that.gif (2.14 MB, 498x373)
2.14 MB GIF
>>534569649
>TL;DR Now, Dems are free to gerrymander too.

They have been doing that since after the Civil War in the 1880s until now.

That and voter fraud have kept the Democrat Party limping along.
>>
>>534573169
Huh, good idea. I'm gonna pass that one along. Thanks!



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.