Are rocks protected under the second amendment since humans have always traditionally used stones for warfare?
>>534582838Is someone trying to take your rocks?
>>534582896Yes, someone is after my rocks.
When you really think about it, bullets are just very fast rocks.
>>534582929I was actually going to pivot to silicon being a rock and metal being a mineral, but that actually is pretty true.
I remember reading about a weird case years ago:>Guy is in the wrong place and wrong time with his Leatherman multitool>Convicted of carrying a deadly weapon>On appeal he argues that this is a 2nd Amendment violation>Judge says that technically a multitool isn't really a weapon>Therefore conviction for carrying a deadly weapon is upheldPoint is if courts decide that something isn't a weapon then you have no presumed legal right to possess it, even if you make the case that it can be used as a weaponThis means that theoretically a state could ban computers, but not guns
>>534582929I like fast rocks
>>534582838To the best of my knowledge even Canadians are allowed to own rocks and we have no particular rights at all
>>534582838yes the rights to rocks is constitutionally guaranteed
>>534582929
We still are actually. America uses Claude to designate targets. Claude is a rock.
>>534582838Would be in my state since our right is to carry weapons, any kind you please fren.
>>534582838What kind of dumbass question is this
>>534583522Only with proper acknowledgement of the land said rock came from, and only with permission.
>>534582838Boulderdash
>>534583256Let me see if I can find that case, that sounds absolutely fucking retarded
>>534583256https://ransom-lawfirm.com/state-v-evans-a-knife-is-not-a-gun/So here it is, he told the cop he had a paring knife in his pocket, that's a concealed weapon while committing a crime.That is the most cancerous read I've read in awhile and I am not even surprised it was in Seattle.
>>534582838should be able to own jet fighters
