What's worse, incest or "race-mixing" ?
It depends on what type of incest vs what type of race mixing.
>>534590223Yes.
>>534590223>What's worse, incest or "race-mixing" ?Incest is not bad if the genetics of the family members are fine. Incest is only a problem when there are tons of bad recessive or dominant genes that are undesirable. TLDR - Good genes are good, Bad genes cause bad things.
mixing is an aspect of assimilating in outsiders. and proximity will incur some mixing regardless. the mixing you see in most media is just straight manipulation, though.
>>534591230In addition, race mixing improves the weaker lesser race (such as blacks or Indians) but hurts the superior races, such as NE Asians or Western Whites. It's not proportional either as good genetics are severely hurt by bad genetic mixing, while bad genetics are only slightly improved leading to more recessive bad genes that are still present in DNA.
>>534590223Both are miscegenation both are terrible
>>534590223that's horrible
>>534590223>What's worse, not wearing a radiation suit or "wearing a radiation suit"?
>>534590223Race mixing
>>534590223both are pretty bad desu
