Why does /pol/ condemn Jewish Usury but not White Usury? >is usury based if the aryan race does it or…
>>534596148White usury is cool
>>534596148It’s Judeo Christian usury
>>534596199
>>534596148I pawned my truck to buy a guitar, only had to pay $70 extra and I still have both so worth it.
>>534596148Most people don’t really understand what it means or why it’s wrong. They’d rather argue over the culture war because that seems more real and tangible to them. If most people understand how the finance world actually works then they’d declare it satanic light wallstreet on fire, but that probably won’t ever happen because barely anyone has the time, energy, attention span, or intellectual drive to really devote to learning about a subject that was intentionally designed to be misunderstood by most people.They essentially developed their own culture and cryptic language just so that they could openly discuss their plans and coordinate with each other over how they intend to slice and dice all of us up for supper.
>>534596148usury literally did not occur in white nations until at most 300 years ago and on average 150 years ago.that's why white nations gave jews control of the banking system, because jews were religiously allowed to do usury but christians were not.so for most of white history usury was illegal.
>>534596413The Vatican bank engaged in usury since at least the early 1500s.
>>534596413Oh, those glorious times with mud huts and stone axes - but without usury! - that Himmler was gloating about.
>>534597170what you see in movies about a violent grimdark medieval history is pure hollywood kike propaganda
>>534596148White usury is for a good cause. There would be now jewish question if there was only white usury.
