Modern democracy seems to be the illusion of choice. Our votes don't actually matter, elections are all rigged and corrupt beaurocrats take advantage of it. Meanwhile the kingdoms of Denmark and Saudi Arabia seem to be doing pretty good for themselves. What exactly is so bad about monarchy? Why can't we return to the system of kings and emperors? Sure, sometimes you get a shit king, but sometimes you get a good one. It's not like our lives would be much different either way.
>Our votes don't actually matter, elections are all rigged and corrupt beaurocrats take advantage of it.So then you're not actually complaining about democracy; you're insisting that democracy doesn't exist.
This is the downward spiral of governments:>Monarchy>Republic>Democracy>Socialism>Fascism>Communism>Theocracy>Anarchy
>>534670017Which one of those would let us hunt down the kikes with impunity but isn't a complete anarchy? I'm thinking fascism.
It's all fun and games until you get prima noctis'd by a nobleman I agree democracy is jewed but monarchy gives too much undue (and unearned) authority
>>534670001Even the founding fathers and OGs like Plato and Socrates knew democracy was tyranny by the mob. I guess Gaddafi's third way political ideology is the closest I've seen to direct democracy actually being effective.
>>534670073Historically, Monarchy. Kings are the ones who expelled all those jews from all those countries.
>>534670153I don't think prima nocta is real or has ever been historically documented. It's a myth created in the anti-monarchy Hollywood film Braveheart. Braveheart coincidentally depicted Robert the Bruce as a spineless wimp even though he was irl a chad king who won Scotland It's freedom.
>>534669878Democracy is only shit because there’s no accountability among local and national politicians. Corruption isn’t punished, and thus people can ignore their constituents with impunity. This is easily solved in 2 ways: the China method where you have political commissars who will kill you if you engage in corruption, and the old school American method where you could quite literally be thrown out of town by an angry mob if you’re caught embezzling shit.
>>534669878Most monarchies are in name only these days. They have to listen to the henchmen clans, and they can't stop them running rackets. Or behead traitors.
>>534670486So you're saying we need to create a strongman position who oversees the republic and has power to punish anyone they deem acting out of order, including the judiciary. What would one call this position? Would it be an elected position with term limits?
>>534670573KSA and the gulf state monarchies seem to be flourishing. Pretty sure they behead people in some of these countries too.
>>534669878The problem is that the royal families all suck. Japanese and Bhutanese families are good, the rest are garbage
>>534670209>Plato and Socrates knew democracy was tyranny by the mobilliterate detected.
>>534669878>What exactly is is so bad about monarchyThe Crown sold their breeding rights to the Jews. One kind of very bad.The heirs will fuck eachother into degeneration and utter retardeness. Another kind of very bad.They would also kill eachother, after expending their armies worth tens of thousands of plebs. A very big kind of very bad.
>>534670017Name one time a communist state has become a theocracy
>>534670758>Name one time a communist state has become a theocracyEU Caliphate live speed-run, no drops!
>>534670313While not quite the same thing as prima nocta, 'The Princess Bride' gave the prince the right to marry any woman in the realm he wanted. Of course, that's just a movie. In reality, most women from the peasant class would have gladly taken the golden ticket into the royal house.
>>534670678They advocated for philosopher king dictators. Socrates was killed by Athenian mob democracy. >>534670670KSA seem to be doing whatever the fuck they want. The king of Norway is sitting on the largest sovereign wealth fund in the world. The kingdom of Denmark has the highest standard of living and happiness rating in the world.
>>534670821>prima nocta only exists in fictional Hollywood movies
>>534670735>The Crown sold their breeding rights to the Jews.???>The heirs will fuck eachother into degeneration and utter retardeness.The Ptolemies were hyper-inbred and showed no negative side effects, with onlookers noting how attractive and intelligent they all were. There is a solid chance whatever the fuck was wrong with Charles II was unrelated to inbreeding, since none of his (also extremely inbred) ancestors showed similar retardation.>They would also kill eachother, after expending their armies worth tens of thousands of plebs. Monarchies didn't invent war, and the end of monarchies also didn't end wars.
>>534669878>return to the system of kingsit is a bit pussy to reinstall a king. having one for centuries is a bit different as you are just maintaining your traditional culture. but to choose someone as permanent head of state based on nothing is slave behaviour. idk how denmark king became king, but the uk king is a tenuous relative of a guy who won a battle so at least there is some logic.
>>534670616You don’t need a singular strongman, just an agency that ruthlessly punishes corruption and lying. Such a thing is actually very common historically.
>>534670735How is this different from USA democracy sending thousands of men to their deaths in pointless 20 year forever wars?
>>534670872>>The Crown sold their breeding rights to the Jews.>???He doesn't know...
>>534670883Like the CIA for example? What are some of these historical agencies?
>>534670909>How is this different from USA democracy sending thousands of men to their deaths in pointless 20 year forever wars?We are talking about monarchies, pause your ADHD and focus!
>>534670875What if a Cesar type rises up to claim the throne? Just make the Kennedys ir Trumps the royal line. I don't give a fuck it can't be any worse than the system we have now.
>>534670875>choose someone as permanent head of state based on nothing is slave behaviourIt's delegation of responsabilities to a specific organization (family) that trains it's offspring to excel at diplomacy and leadership, while the plebs can churn mud all day and not worry about it.Democracy is inferior in this regard, because we elect complete morons that do the bidding of hidden societies while we think we are smart and fight in public for them.
>>534670758The USA in the transition from the New Deal to the Civil Rights regime.
>>534670964USA isn't even a democracy. It's a constitutional republic that has been corrupted in to a beaurocratic oligarchy of corruption.
>>534670841Saudi Arabia is an American/Israeli puppet. Danish royal family had deep ties to Epstein. Norway royal family doesn't do anything, just a tax drain.
>>534670875How did the German house Windsor Saxe-Coeberg Gothawhatever become the kings of England anyways? Why doesn't England have a native English royal family? We're the Plantagenets the last actual native English monarchy?
>>534671168The last English King was Harold Godwinson in 1066. The Plantagenets were French. The Coburg-Gothas inherited from the House of Hanover when Victoria died.
>>534671274>1066.Goddamn, the UK has been cucked by foreigners for nearly 1,000 years now.
>>534670758In the strictly literal sense of implying "Theo-" means a god(s)-worshipping religion:The 1979 marxist takeover in iran degenerated fairly rapidly into an islamic state iirc.Best Korea.Gaza PLO > HAMAS in 2005 (and one could say it's bordering on anarchy atm).
>>534670017>>Theocracyyay i get to sucka da popa's dickah
Nobody gives a shit about your quality of life just because you exist. Nobody. Not a king or a pauper. Government is not mom.
>>534670860Yes, because in reality it wouldn't be necessary. Women do that type of thing willingly.
Democracy is just jewish oligarchy.Monarchy is the most natural form of law and nowhere near as bad as Hollywood wants you believe it was. Most people lived their lives never once bothered by a king ever and the king didn't just do whatever he wanted. There was an intricate court of checks and balances which restricted any bullshit a king might want to do, which they generally didn't. A kings number 1 duty was to the people, which is better than gay jewish oligarchy (democracy).We literally live in a 1984 society where the Ministry of Truth tells us how bad the Tophats were and how much better everything is now and everyone just believes it.
>>534670860Isn't it weird how this clause that you talk about has barely ever been documented yet is depicted all over the place, while actual noblemen conduct, like Nobles Oblige, is never talked about despite being very well documented? It's almost like you just believe jewish oligarch lies.
>>534671469Yeh so why don't we just switch back to monarchies? It's not like our lives will get any worse. We might even get a based king who hosts regular public executions and gladiator fights to stop us from getting uppity. Imagine for example if a king took over USA and forced every senator and congressman and living former president into a single elimination death fight tournament, then broadcast it on TV and YouTube for free. The whole country would be loyal to that king for life.
>>534671685Prima nocta was only "documented" in anti-feudalist satirical writings written hundreds of years after the fact, and Hollywood movies like Braveheart.
>>534671705No, the country would be loyal to TV and YouTube, just like they are today.
>>534671567Medieval peasants worked less days and hours than we do, and had their own plots of land to farmstead on. Their lives sound awesome compared to the modern western serf peasant living in freedom and democracy.
>>534670984that man has been born yet, clearly.
>>534671749I know. It all lies and projection by jews now that they're the Ministry of Truth in our gay monarchyless society. Noblesse Oblige kept noblemen in check in an honor code, a concept which jews also completely destroyed.
>>534671796If the king hosted the show and ran commentary of the fights, every one would love him.
>>534669878nothing, jews & masons hate monarchies since it creates a protective layer between the populace and the jews.
>>534671168i think one of their kings fell in love with commoner pussy and resigned. not 100%, though.
>>534671816I look around at modern western democracies today and they are corrupted and shit. I look around at nations still ruled by kings and emperors today and they are based and awesome.
>>534671274>>534671323From whom was the deposed Scottish line(s) descended, Mary Q of Scots, James, etc. Were they truly Celtic Scots or just married-in descendants of the French Normans?
>>534671807until the local land baron rides up and tells you to "grab your pike and your eldest son. the king wants to kill our neighbors again".
>>534671842Perhaps they'd love King Prez, but they'd still be loyal only to /TV/ .
Outright dictatorship would be better than democracy and "freedom". The normie cattle doesn't deserve any sort of freedom.
>>534671906>The House of Stuart, originally spelt Stewart, also known as the Stuart dynasty, was a royal house of Scotland, England, Ireland and later Great Britain. The family name comes from the office of High Steward of Scotland, first held by the family progenitor Walter fitz Alan (c.1150). The name Stewart and variations had become established as a family name by the time of his grandson Walter Stewart. The first monarch of the Stewart line was Robert II; he and his descendants were monarchs of Scotland from 1371 and of England, Ireland and Great Britain from 1603, until 1714. Mary, Queen of Scots (r. 1542–1567), was brought up in France where she adopted the French spelling of the name Stuart.Wiki suggests originally they were Breton immigrants
>>534671937You mean like what already happens in drafts like the Vietnam draft, or middle eastern forever wars designed to get the corrupt democracy freedom beaurocrats more oil and poppy fields to turn in to opiod epidemics?
>>534670017If you read the Books of Samuel, you would realise that Theocracy descends into Monarchy. Theocracy was as if an idyllic Arcadia where God Himself governed. God deigned to permit Monarchy because the people wanted it, and with their cooperation, it can work.
>>534670313prima noche is referenced ib the Epic of Gilgamesh, which was allegedly written about 2000BC.
>>534671939That means the King can easily distract his people with TV while taking care of foreign and domestic affairs unhindered by beaurocratic middlemen.
>>534672083How can a medieval Latin phrase be referenced in an ancient Sumerian text, anon?
>>534672051>t. repatriated middle-east refugee
>>534669878Christianity ruined the monarchy and jews creating endless wars.
>>534669878The concept of democracy is woman-coded. Everyone gets a say etc etc. Monarchies are male-coded and are very strong and effective. But their major downside is that if a malevolent or illegitimate dictator seizes power, the only way to fix things is through civil rebellion. In the past, this problem was cross-checked by having the Pope and the church oversee the political realm, but by doing this you are effectively just merging the church with the state and the pope is basically the de facto emperor; so kikes simply just started infiltrating the church instead, and they just control everyone and everything second-hand from there. It’s hard to believe, but the best system against Jews is Anarchy; no system at all. Whatever governing system is present, like the kleptocratic “democracy” we have now, or monarchy, kikes will infiltrate it and take it over. You cannot stop it. Even nazi germany was the creation of British intelligence funded by kikes. The only way they can wield power through deception is by controlling systems. If there in no system in place, chaos ensues and they cannot control the chaos. Their numbers drop and they slowly erase themselves from the gene pool, just as parasites die without their host.
>>534672238How did it work in Japan? Their imperial family is the longest unbroken royal line in history and they're still around today, owning all the best real estate in the center of Tokyo. Theirs seems to be the model to follow for long term success.
>>534672238>The only way they can wield power through deception is by controlling systems. If there in no system in place, chaos ensues and they cannot control the chaos. Their numbers drop and they slowly erase themselves from the gene pool, just as parasites die without their host.That doesn't work. Masons/Jews love chaos and deliberately create chaos then fill the power vacuum and install whatever system they want.
>>534670017>Anarchynothing bad about anarchy, if its in submission to God.the only problem with anarchy is when the people leave God, and effectively become Jews/satanists.if you look at the history of israel, since the exodus of egypt, what you described is basically what happened, but in reverse.it started as an anarchist society, and moved up, to a monarchy, then they killed their king (Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews), and then reverted to their initial state of anarchist, but now with the curse of murder, regicide (which is high treason), where as before, they were freed free of bloodshed.>>534670153>>534670313>>534670860>>534671491prima nocta only applied to slaves, according to the law (of moses, which the european royalty would've been using), a master of a slave could take a slave girl, if she was a virgin.then he would've had to set her free, seeing how he has defiled her, regardless of how far along into her of slavery she was along (normally 6 years, then they were set free on the 7th)yes, the law of moses states that, not only that, but even if she was betrothed, he could take her, if she was a virgin.yes, the law of moses, i.e. the law of Israel, inherited by both the kingdom of Judah and Israel after its fracture, and on until the birth, murder and resurrection of Jesus.yes, the law of moses, which the Jews are still currently under, even after the temple was destroyed, without being able to atone for their sins.yes, the law of moses, which is the OLD covenant made with the people of israel, not to be confused with the covenant of Abraham, and his seed (singular, i.e. Jesus), the one which Christians are under.yes, the law of moses, which compels sacrifices for atonement, and ascribes death for breach of that same law in lieu of atonementyes, that law of moses
>>534669878only jews hated the Monarchy. why they lampoon it constantly
>>534669878Why do I need a wealthy person to tell me what to do.Can do that myself.
>>534670234Yeah you ain't wrong on this one. The problem with expulsion is the always come back like the locusts they are. I was thinking about more permanent solution. No arm bands, ghettos or concentration camps. Mass extermination is what I had in mind but still, Monarchy might still be the best choice if the King is right...
>>534672498This exactly, I've come to the same conclusion.
>>534672364They like controlled chaos, that’s different. Chaos between factions that can be manipulated with money. If they can’t control the outcome, the chaos is detrimental to them. They are arrogant pussies irl face to face, they aren’t as proficient at survival or real world skills.
>>534669878Imagine any politician you dont like. Give them absolute power and lifelong rule over you. Enjoy.
>>534672317The same country that got nuked into submission 80 years ago? They’ve been under the veil of control ever since buddy
>>534672542It's already happening to you and me right now, m8
>>534672694The Imperial family is still there and ticking, despite Tokyo getting firebombed and 2 of his cities nuked.
>>534672668Imagine a based king publicly executing every politician you don't like.Enjoy.
>>534672770Japan bent the kneeThey work for the kikes nowThat’s all you need to know
>>534672997that sucks
>>534669878The problem with monarchy in 2026 is that we are going to get a kike king, and he is only going to kill innocent goyim. It is time for bottom-up solutions. The top-down ones are illusory you lazy piece of shit retard.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMHCw3RqulY
>>534672997The Imperial family still exists. Occupation doesn't last forever.
>>534673145Wasn't Jesus a kike king, anon?
>>534673147Of course it doesn’t.But right now they are infiltrated.That’s all I’m saying
>>534671168jews. literally. bongs expelled them. the rats fled to amsterdam. financed the english civil war from there. with the kike money machine behind him, how could cromwell lose? after the victory, cromwell lets the kikes back in. kraut "nobility" -- being the absolute worst garbage -- were the ideal candidate. they were used to grinding their peasants up for the jews, thus the "glorious revolution." "glorious" because jews write our history books.
>>534673188I wrote 'kike' you nigger -- not Messiah.Behold, your new king!
>>534673188>>534673420> Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.
>>534671937The kings job is to maintain a military, he'd be doing a pretty piss poor job if he was begging the peasantry to help, which would cause a mutiny. This is more jewish lies. Even if it was a common occurrence, military service was the only way to move up socially and anyone would gladly join just for the chance to make a name for themselves.
>>534669878Monarchy is great if you have a benevolent monarch that loves his people and country who does everything in his power to make his country better. Monarchy falls apart when you get a queen, the benevolent king's spoiled rotten heir, or a new/foreign king takes the crown.
>>534673147And the heir (only heir) to the throne is a simpleton.
>>534673755That's why the good Lord gave us uprisings.
>>534672051>if you read the schizophrenic ramblings of a bronze age jew
>>534669878You see if we had a king or some dictator or even some politburo political body you'd know who to point at if things go wrong. In inverted totalitarianism aka modern corporate democracy there's only a vague, nameless, faceless deep state apparatus so you can never identify the problem people. That's how you construct the final tyranny.
>>534672435>Leviticus 19:20–22 discusses intercourse with a female slave who is pledged to another man. The act is treated as wrongdoing requiring punishment and sacrifice, though not punished exactly the same way as adultery between free persons.The Bible universally condemns adultery, appropriately enough jus primae noctis comes from Latin not Hebrew as the Romans are into all sorts of sexual stuff that the ancient Hebrews (not modern satanic Jews) were against. Funny how they were both Mediterranean cultures that went in opposite directions.
>>534673688>he doesn't know what peasant levies are.The kings forces were made up of his personal guard, and sometimes a few other soldiers.The military proper was made up of peasant levies(off season), professional lifetime soldiers, and mercenaries. There's a reason many wars and sieges ground to a halt when planting/harvesting seasons came up, all the levies and land owning soldiers had to return home to work the fields or both the army, and the populace that supports it would starve. Especially when you're several years into a war and the locals you're trying to conquer arwnen't able to work their fields because they're all locked up in the city.Also, there's even cases of sieges where the sieging army would have it's levies and land owning soldiers work the enemies fields to keep themselves supplied with food while the besieged starved behind their walls.
>>534669878Succession crisis is pretty much the only thing
>>534671469Actually kingdoms did many quality of life "hacks" to stave off peasant revolts. If human societies don't exist to benefit and uplift living breathing human beings what does it exist for? To accumulate capital? Yeah no thanks libertarianism is fake and gay and ultimately meaningless.
>>534674264I just remembered an old website against genocide in Africa mentioning that stable monarchy is where genocide is least likely to happen, that was before the Internet became a Jewish propaganda outlet around 2018 when there was a lot more accidental truth out there.
>>534673828Having a revolution every 100 years isn’t a viable solution
>>534672238In the times of squishy naturalism, I'd agree. But we techno-interfacio-abstraction now. The spotfires of revolt are easily extinguished as they're deterritorialised and dispersed into the collective schizo-pool of ideologies and well-wishes. Everything is absolutely exchangeable, digitalised and liquefied. A very different kind of anarchy as opposed to the classical kind. The chaos is baked-in but controlled/neutered simultaneously.
>>534670017I would put a theocracy above monarchy not insofar as it is preferable but that it is more centralised power. Since many kings essentially claim to be appointed by God the distinction between monarchy and theocracy is almost semantic. Monarchies are dynamic. Theyre better and worse than democracies. Like rolling a dice with only 1s and 6s on it Democracies tend towards middle like a dice with only 2 and 3. Its like choosing between an experimental surgery that coild completely heal you or kill you, and a medicine that will buy you a few years and nothing more.
>>534674377I dont know if its anything special when it comes to that but yeah a king has a vested interest to not kill his subjects or allow others to kill them obviously, kings power comes from the plebs which he then uses to keep the other oligarchs/nobles and rich merchants in line, the power of the king doesn't come from institutions its directly from the populace, kings can become tyrants aswel tho but in an ideal situation its as I described, the jew fears the righteous monarch
>>534674575It’s not possible in its truest form that’s for sure. Fortunately, their tech can’t survive without us here to build and maintain it for them. Hopefully we get a digital blackout or carrington event or something in the future that forces everyone on the planet back 100 years so we could eradicate this filth
>>534670001>>534670209There is no democracy. It was subverted long ago by the Jews using propaganda (all Jewish propaganda is gaslighting by the way). Read Propaganda by Bernays and see how he acknowledged that the world is ruled by a hidden hand; the propagandists. The idea of the will of the people is just gaslighting to convince you that what they decide was actually what the "mob" decided. This is why they push for "democracy" it's literally coded language that means rule by Jewish Propaganda, i.e. " a threat to our democracy" means a threat to the power of Jew propagandists.
>>534669878>What exactly is is so bad about monarchy?Leftists hate it.That's it.
>>534674826Pull the plug! Pull the plug! (posted on 4chan)
>>534670073>Which one of those would let us hunt down the kikes with impunity but isn't a complete anarchy?In practise: Any except communism.
>>534670758>Name one time a communist state has become a theocracyIran.
>>534671434You kinda have a theocracy though, it's just a Freemason-Jewish one, not a Christian one.
>>534670209Plato in Republic was arguing for a philosopher king which just so happened to look like Plato and his crowd, it's the biggest 'and this is why i should be in charge' text of all time.the founding fathers were a different because the constitution was drafted specifically to protect land owners from getting robbed by kings or taken over by dictator even if their document didn't actually cover most of the people in the US alive today. The separation of powers specifically meant you eliminate the winner takes all logic.>>534669878You neglected to mention the shithole that is the hereditary monarchy of North Korea and the circus of Xi Jinping's monthly political purges. Monarchies CAN be good or even preferable to Democracies in some ways, but when a dictator gets ahold and does dictator things there isn't an off switch to it.
>>534671937>until the local land baron rides up and tells you to "grab your pike and your eldest son. the king wants to kill our neighbors again".1. Doesn't happen. Serfs couldn't be used in armies.2. War was social mobility and not very deadly back then, you'd have to be a complete retard not to take that chance
>>534671434jesus would never had said it this way and just goes to show the amount of deliberate gaslighting christians put themselves throughsimply to make their pacifist jewish religion sound the way they want it to sound inside their heads.jesus didnt fight, he didnt resist, he simply gave up his life without resistance.so what youre promoting with this retarded me is quite frankly no other than collective mass suicide at large.
>>534672833baldwin was a deformed weakling and never wore a mask in his entire life, covering up your face is abrahamic though.
>>534674209I didn't say there weren't peasants in the ranks and if there were they were most certainly willingly there on their own will. The old world wasn't just peasants/noblemen either, but I'm sure you already knew that.
>>534669878You're in a republic not a democracy. Go back to mexico.
>>534669878I will teach you what is missing.The population is divided into 2 imaginary arbitrary groups left and right.When group left is in power we focus on the things we like in the left.When group right is in power we focus on the things we like in the right.It doesn't matter what the groups like, what matters is who pretends to lead them.We can always pretend to lead any group at any time.
>>534676050Jesus was jewish, he never actually died on the cross. The Sanhedrin send his bodydouble to die in his stead. Then they created the cult of personality around him while the real rabbi Jesus laughed and lived in peace.
