political implication of fpvs fpving fpvcels?
So being a grunt is instagib these days huh
I thought this had a video of two flying drones colliding. That would have been epic.
>>534676681>throws away the only object that could've been used as a shieldNot the brighest..
>>534676681Thats awesome. Normally I dont click on these, glad I did this time. Got what he deserved. Live by the sword, die by the sword.
>>534676852only cause youre cute
>>534676681Based. Drone ops deserve every bit of hate that comes their way
>>534677087It's like niggers killing niggers, huh
>>534676681Nothing better than seeing a former Russian kill another Russian. Kek. They're in a war against themselves and they haven't realized it yet.
>>534677341But soon they will. And then they'll realize who did all of that. And then you are going to wish they only funky-towned you.
>>534677025Thank you fren:3
>>534676681Other clips showed drone operators safe in bunkers with monitors. Has this changed?
>>534677915thats not good for ratings
>>534677915They don't have infinite range. You won't always have a bunker available where you need to operate.I personally think we'll be seeing a lot of easily deployed, ultralight net structures in the future though, since nets counter drones quite effectively.It is hilarious that evolution is playing out right Infront of our eyes. Fpv are flies or mosquitoes, nets are spider webs and the cope cages are slowly morphing into fur.
>>534676681that's a tactical recon drone, zigga
>>534678456Watching the monouverability of Drones through bushes or forests, seems nets would be easily countered no? Hell, seeing drones patrol through wrecked urban buildings seems to indicate nets are a very mild solution. Or just blast the area around the nets to down them, then send in more drones to kill the targets
