>>4
libertarianiggers always use the same example of america and the soviet union. as if those are the only two economic systems possible. capitalist vs communist boomer slop. pure distraction theatre. they forget that every country that follows imf and world bank recommendations goes broke. go libertarian go broke. deregulation = broke. privatisation = bankrupt. look at all the south american shitholes. its almost like the economy is complex or something.

>>534697494
>>5
>the Japan redpill
the only countries in recent history to develop are Japan, south Korea etc. they used extreme state intervention in industrial planning and heavy banking reform. no free market bullshit. these east Asian countries also only vote a single party. democracy in name only. high trust society with strict rule of law. this is how a country actually becomes wealthy. libertarians say that free market is what caused the industrial revolution and made Europe/america rich. its bullshit. they only say that because it happened hundred of years ago and nobody personally lived through the history. they cant hide the same thing in Asia because its too recent. the flaws are too obvious

>>6
>the money trail
global libertarianism is funded by a small number of glownigger ngos and thinktanks like Cato institute and mises institute. they control the discourse and spread controlled opposition ideology like Austrian economics. Austrian economics and neoliberal economics are retarded and have no empirical evidence. they are supposedly enemies but say the same crap. they also smugly tell people they dont understand basic high school economics. as if high school economics education isnt complete glow in the dark propaganda slop. anything below graduate research in economics is totally useless. most postgraduate work is still slop. economics is overwhelmingly pseudoscience with unfalsifiable and unverifiable models. astrology for men

>>534697007
>private property requires state intervention.
I mean it doesn't, historically speaking this is incorrect. won't read the read the rest because it's incorrect from the outset

>>7
>the libertarian pipeline
as a former recovering libertarian, this one is devious. many highly intelligent people from scientific and technical fields promote libertarianism as an intelligent political ideology that understands economics unlike other parties. these academics are completely retarded. being an expert in astrophysics has fuck all to do with the economy, but ordinary people that look up to these idiots eat it up. being an expert does not make someone an expert in everything. libertarianism mainly survives on experts who are out of their depth in actually understanding the source material but want to sound smart and contrarian. my advice to libertarians is to actually critically engage in the theory without "expert interpretation" by some NGO smartass. you will quickly see that it is slop full of loopholes and contradictions. be free my friend

>>534698682
yes it does. anarcholibertarianism always leads to the formation of a pseudo-state. most of the history about "free market" city states in Europe is highly misleading or falsified. the true financial backers and money sources are lost to history and the historical record has become obviously biased and contaminated with conflicts of interest. theres no such thing as a truly free state.

>>534697007
Agreed

>>8
>The myth of natural rights
libertarianiggers believe that humans are naturally entitled to certain rights and freedoms. has anybody told them that freedom isnt free. giving a nigger more freedom means less freedom for everyone else. freedom is zero sum. to give some people freedoms, you have to take away freedoms from others. limitations on freedoms are not only reasonable, but necessary for a functioning high trust society. human rights are not real. constitutions are not real. the only thing that is real is what you actually *do* and what is enforced. everything else is larp

>>9
>the politics of envy
the classic cope is that anyone who questions the libertarian orthodoxy is a low productivity nigger that wants to steal from all the successful libertarians that are so full of merit and hard work. this is pure cope and projection. it flies in the face of their own economic theory. the value of a product/service and how wealthy someone is has jack shit to do with how hard working or meritorious they are. the most hard working people are manual laborers. where are all the billionaire manual laborers. the market will always reward the bottlenecks of production, the areas where supply and demand are most imbalanced. it has nothing to do with hard work. oil companies, drug dealers, medical providers, and dram manufactures are making massive profits purely because they are cartels that control an artificially limited supply and can squeeze the market. this is how the libertarianigger gets rich. but when you try to squeeze the market by calling a strike, he calls you a lazy nigger. I would rather a worthless lazy fatass drain on society than a libertarianigger who actively enshittifies products and betrays their nation, culture, and people to make a quick dime.

>>10
>the rich are oppressed
it is always the wealthiest libertarians that cry loudest about being oppressed. they are already rich enough to break any law and face zero consequences. what else could they even want. they want the freedom to take away freedom from others. freedom for the heron means death for the fishes. more freedom for the rich means less freedom for the middle class who are exploited mercilessly and cannot fight back. the stock market grows at 10% a year but GDP only grows 3%. where is the other 7% coming from? it's coming from the pockets of the middle class and the government. this is the dirty truth of passive income. passive income is theft from society. it requires stealing from people that do the actual work. there is no shame in taxing a libertarianigger's passive income. there is no honor among thieves.

>>11
>how to win against the libertarian dystopia
you cannot win playing by their rules. you must use their own tricks against them. there is a reason that jews are highly successful people. it is not because they are smarter or have higher merit or work harder than others. it is because they cooperate by any means necessary to come out on top. they have a strong in group bias. they dont listen to the bullshit about how great competition is.
>how to copy
start your own community of like minded thinkers. you should all have a strong in group bias for each other. like a pack of wolves or a cult or a mafia. whatever analogy works. its your group versus the world. the group should have an ideology of almost unconditionally trusting and defending other group members even under the face of attack. regardless of false rape allegations or legal attacks or economic attacks the brotherhood defends its members as long as they contribute back. this creates a shared sense of identity and courage. use each others networks and abuse group member positions of power to score job referrals and business opportunities for other group members. pool resources together and coordinate to exploit opportunities for group power and money. trade as much as possible within the group and prevent money flowing to outsiders. basically, from that point you have created the early seed of a nation or at least a revolutionary group. you will have the minimum power to change society according to your groups will. competition and individualism will only make you lonely and dependent on the exploiters.

didn't read lol