[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 6782345b-cea0-426f.jpg (1.69 MB, 3840x2160)
1.69 MB JPG
Some of us in Canada like having a big country with a lot of natural space. We're conservationists without being retarded about industry and borders. I've put together a draft platform for what a Canadian First Green Nationalism might look like.

1) Close borders to immigration
2) Energy independence (including using our oil and gas during phase down)
3) National industrial policy (developing and building new technologies, automation, batteries, modular reactors, green hydrogen etc)
4) Strategic Mineral Reserves: Establishing state-owned stockpiles of "transition minerals"
5) Mandatory Secondary Material Recovery: Implementing laws that require 100% of high-value waste (electronics, batteries, specialized alloys) to be recycled within national borders.
6) Right to Repair & Longevity Standards
7) Imposing high tariffs on imported food that doesn't meet strict domestic ecological standards
8) National Seed Bank & GMO Sovereignty
9) Sovereign Industrial and High-Speed Rail network
10) UBI
11) Hearth and Home pro-natalist policies (focused on affordability and framing having children as a national duty)
12) National service requirement: can be military or otherwise 1 year service in Canada after high school
13) ban on building urban sprawl on existing farm land

What do you think? Anything you'd add or take away?
>>
Probably something about no harvesting of old growth lumber/forests and something about protecting our sources of freshwater from pollution and oil pipeline runoff.

Honestly I'd prioritize transitioning away from fossil fuels in general and fasttrack pivoting hard to nuclear and eventually solar/hydro/wind, which will require deals with China in the short term, since battery manufacture is supposedly very polluting and toxic.
>>
>>534699552
So communism with a gay little name?
>>
>>534699552
Yikes this is incredibly reasonable... 12 and 13 would be immediate nogos for almost all of Canada though.
>>
>remigration
0 results
>>
>>534701163
Thanks I will rework with your suggestions.
>>534701305
Thanks for the feedback. You think even if there were an option to work on reforestation or habitat restoration instead of the military the national service wouldn't fly?
>>
>>534699552
I'll bite.
>1) Close borders to immigration
It needs to be remigration now.

>2) Energy independence (including using our oil and gas during phase down)
Good

>3) National industrial policy (developing and building new technologies, automation, batteries, modular reactors, green hydrogen etc)
Good. We used to be a world leader in developing Nuclear technology.

>4) Strategic Mineral Reserves: Establishing state-owned stockpiles of "transition minerals"
That would make a lot more sense. Currently Canada holds a "Basket of International currencies" after we sold all our Gold off like idiots.

>5) Mandatory Secondary Material Recovery: Implementing laws that require 100% of high-value waste (electronics, batteries, specialized alloys) to be recycled within national borders.
Good
>6) Right to Repair & Longevity Standards
I really like this one. Will be tough to sell to Canadians because our culture has become very consumerits. Lots of normies switch their cars out every 5 yrs for example.
>7) Imposing high tariffs on imported food that doesn't meet strict domestic ecological standards
Good
>8) National Seed Bank & GMO Sovereignty
Yes
>9) Sovereign Industrial and High-Speed Rail network
Yes
>10) UBI
I'm lukewarm on this
>11) Hearth and Home pro-natalist policies (focused on affordability and framing having children as a national duty)
Good. Its going to be hard to counter 40 years of antinatilist brainwashing. It's going to be a hard sell to foids who think its their right to murder their babies and party until they are 35.
>12) National service requirement: can be military or otherwise 1 year service in Canada after high school
I disagree. I have worked with Euro conscripts before and they are unmotivated shit. The Military needs to be all volunteer.
>13) ban on building urban sprawl on existing farm land
That's a good one. Its insane that our major cities are expanding and swallowing up arable land when we have so much area in the North to develop.
>>
>>534701644
Thanks Juhani. I think it's still a hard sell in Canada at the moment. Even stopping immigration would be very controversial... that's why I didn't include it
>>
>>534699552
Izzat banff?
>>
>>534701783
And thats why this country will continue to become a 3rd world country. If you havent noticed lately most of our major cities are already beyond the point of no return.
>>
>>534701749
Thanks for the feedback anon. You think even if the one year mandatory service had other options than military it wouldn't work? Only those who are attracted to military service would have to take that option.
>>534701880
Point taken and understood
>>
>>534701648
Yes it would immediately be labeled fascist. You would need to set up a massive volunteer network first and the infrastructure to make it possible and then try and transition to a necessary 1 year commitment... And I still don't think it would work. Canadians love to press the blue button in public and talk about how much they care but the only time I've seen it come to fruition was when they were all scared and could get a shot that made them better than people with zero understanding of the consequences. Our society is entirely performative. I don't think it's a bad idea I just see no real avenue to viability. Most of these points would actually need to be reframed to allow for agreeance to represent virtue signaling. Close borders to immigration is an immediate nonstarter but restructuring our immigration system to benefit environment justice is something fags would vote for all day. Same policy just make it cuck positive
>>
>>534702087
I'm afraid your analysis of the country is correct. I'll make it volunteer, and see what I can do to reframe the rest to allow for virtue signalling.
>>
>>534702028
I'm against forcing people into work against their will. Its kind of like those lame volunteering hours they already force high school students to do already to graduate (I dont know how it is in your prov but its in Ontario). I had already had job in highschool so having to do that got in my way. I have a teen son who wants to start a small business so why should he be wasting his earning potential for a year planting trees or fighting for people who hate him? We have a ton of east coasters riding on yearly seasonal welfare that could be doing that kind of work.
>>
>>534702515
Leftists win through language. Their ideas are dogshit and often even they know they are impractical but voting for it makes the citizen feel like a better person than their rivals. Pragmatism will always lose to flowery language in the court of public opinion. Nobody understands the topics anyway
>>
>>534702531
I'm not. It creates philia and you should have to do something you don't like that's hard to learn what real work is... Plus a year off schooling would give kids a chance to evaluate themselves before signing up for a 4 year 100 thousand dollar commitment because hey everybody's doing it and mom would be sad
>>
>ubi
hell no. no one should be able to live without contributing to society.
>>
>>534699552
I would add that the natives be given a choice of becoming Canadian citizens with all the freedoms and restrictions that entails, or being exiled to their reserves and going back to the Stone Age. No more treaties, no more hunting/fishing privileges. They’re either leafs or natives, but not both.
>>
>>534703499
That's actually really important and somehting that I should have included. Good way to start a national uprising too though. I think the natives would take up arms in some communities. We'd have to blockade them and basically starve them out
>>
>>534703769
I believe they would yes. Particularly in the northern parts of the western provinces. It would be a bumpy road but that road would still lead somewhere, especially after a winter.
>>
>>534699552
I'm in favour of a stateless, classless, moneyless society free of the hordes of Gog and Magog (regardless of colour or origin - the world is overpopulated with people who may as well be thought of as zombies, and it has been since the loosing of Satan), with full automation, and an end to the gender system (roles, divisions, patriarchy, whoredom, people screwing eachother into oblivion, etc, basically, female and male should be purely aesthetic choices). None of this need be in Canada (in particular), but if it were to be, I also want plains Indians, the kind that live in teepees and hunt buffalo, having their land back - because they are far more aesthetic to look at than the godless European colonizers that built the suburbs of Winnipeg and defend the money system like lost dogs. Most of all, I see no reason why anyone should work if they don't want to. People (all who remain, those who "get it" only, or get the hell out of the way and do not try to bring back Babylon) should just be free to play, have fun, and make art. The entire bourgeois, capitalist system of "civilization" (in reality, "the man", who is an incomplete, godforsaken fool - from the Zionist Entity to the Vatican and the City of London), and all of its supporters and idols, needs to be totally eliminated. None of this is possible without supernatural intervention. Make Canada (and the world) *great for once*. Actually, why even have Canada as a concept in a world without states or borders? Why not Quebec, Cascadia, and so on? To your point about "green", yes, the environment should be pristine, and would be, without insane overpopulation, but we don't need solar panels and stuff. Free energy is real.
>>
Honestly Canada would be better off without the whiny crackers
>>
File: Yakub.png (134 KB, 340x447)
134 KB PNG
>>534705276
Agreed. Yakub needs to tell his children to shut up their chatter a bit.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.