[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: vcoy5rgdwx321.png (108 KB, 1237x1017)
108 KB PNG
seriously though why didn't East Asians create the modern world throughout history instead of whites, despite East Asians having a higher IQ than whites?
>>
>>534702103
Do you know that 115 IQ “study” kikes love to share? It was the mean IQ of fewer than 30’kids at a private NYC jewish school. I suspect Chink “higher IQ” studies are based on something similar. The white averages are actual fair averages given to mathematicians and Jim the plumber alike.
>>
>>534702212
Also Western IQ tests are designed so the average is always 100, and normally most governments are not going to divide scores based on race
>>
>>534702103
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6625506/

Brain structure differences between Chinese and Caucasian cohorts: A comprehensive morphometry study

read this
>>
>>534702212
You don't need tests to prove asians are smart, just look what they're doing in the world.
>>534702103
I don't know, but asians must feel weird knowing they could have done all those things, but they just didn't.
>>
Europe has a bunch of peninsulas. This prevented any sort of centralized empire. That caused constant warring. Being somewhere cold and dark made high technology necessary for survival. The constant warring and high technology created big tech industries that had high pressure to always be more advanced than eachother. Whatever society fell behind technologically got crushed by some other more advanced society.
>>
>>534702547
They’re smart, just not as smart as northern Europeans and non-Arab rapebaby Italians
>>
>>534702103
Maybe east asian iq is only inflated by studying extra several hours by tiger parenting demand which only bumps them 5 iq points for midwit average masses that dont result in surpassing ashkenazi or euro geniuses
>>
>>534702103
Westerners are materialist, wants to spend time taking stuff for vanity and shit. and spreading their best god to make everyone a goy slave
Asians mainly chinese are more inward, wants to spend time not giving a fuck. and self cultivate your inner godhood.
but are always annoyed when stupid barbarians come knocking at their door.
>>
>>534702547
i know, i just don't get why they didn't invent things like the telephone, car, airplane, jet plane, space travel etc. first
>>
>>534702356
>whites are the standard
I think this is an attemp to conceal that they're making white people dumber.
>>
>>534702103
The high IQ is for east asian children who are millionaires with tutors, give the same test to the 800 million chinese farmers that can't read and it will end up the the same as ethiopia. Below 60 iq
>>
>>534702103
The Industrial Revolution began in England due to the Newcastle coal mines being pumped out by a steam engine. Access to resources is why.
>>
>>534702687
Well many of those inventions are based on materials science which Europeans have excelled at pretty much from the beginning. Places in Western Africa had iron smelting before anyone else but they were so bad at it they never made anything but shitty pig iron that was less useful than bronze. Once whitey got their hands on iron working it revolutionized the world.
>>
>>534702103

totally the wrong culture.
>>
>>534702757
Ah yes China world famous for its lack of coal and coastlines (lol) (lmao even)
>>
>>534702377
(summary because none of you read: asians have a smaller fore-brain and pre-frontal cortex)
>>
>>534702582
If europe had been filled with blacks things would have played out exactly the same, then? It's all just geography?
>>
>>534702103
Because outside of the Jomon asians don't have creativity.
>>
>>534702212
The Chinese studies for sure are based off only testing kids who tryharded as hard as they could at elite cram schools in Shanghai all their lives. Like unironically that is their stat, it's gamed to hell and back.

It also could be that in a society where everyone is at least kind of smart that the geniuses try harder to control the population and hold them back, instead of get docile and complacent assuming the idiot peasants can be pretty easily controlled. Today the CCP government doesn't take their citizens for granted as docile and stupid and thus very carefully brainwashes them from infancy and mass surveils and tracks everything everyone does. because they do trust that that any rando can look at the facts of their situation and become a future dissident leader against the chicoms, anyone is capable of it.

Also in the US and EU our IQs are being diluted by other factors - the IQ of whites-only in the US is actually 102-104. You can guess what's pulling it down sub 100. Being a bit above 100 would pretty much dead-on match us with the smarter east Asians.
>>
>>534702103
European alphabets are much simpler than the complicated shit Asians use. Made it very easy to Gutenberg to print stuff. The result was a quick flow of information.
>>
>>534702212
All I hear is cope, Whiteoid. Remember niggers and browns were the first ones to deny IQ test.

Asians and Europeans are smartest IQ, China was the most civilizations for most of this time. Europe surpasseed Asia for a few centuries and now is behind again. It’s not a big deal really.

The general consensus is that China fell behind because there was no will to modernize any further because everything worked the way it was supposed to anyway. Don’t fix what isn’t broken philosophy.
>>
>>534702823
>the Chinese population showed larger cortical structures in the temporal and cingulate regions, and smaller structural measures in the frontal and parietal cortice
Post all the result, nigger.
>>
IQ is not a perfect measure. Asians are not smart, just highly, highly obedient. They read the books they're told. Sign the forms they're told. Go to bed when they're told. Study when they're told.
This high level of obedience does well in the school system and for job placement. But they are often dumb as a bag of rocks. You ask them to explain something, they repeat the wikipedia entry, but ask them to really explain it and they'll be at a loss. Ultimately they are "faking it until they make it" all of them, taking cues from the white people around them and following their lead on any endeavor while memorizing, copying, repeating, and never understanding.
>>
>>534702687
I think they're simply not very adventurous people, all east asians are kind of isolationist who prefer stability above all. China invented their own compass, yet didn't use it to explore the ocean somehow. They discovered gunpowder yet didn't try to build guns like westerners did when they got it
>>
They knew the modern world sucks because of their high IQ so they didn't invent it
>>
>>534703657
>China was the most civilizations for most of this time
China is a giant bullshit factory, I've stopped believing anything they say about their own history.
>>
>>534702103
If by “East Asia”, we mean China, it’s because the Qing Dynasty was run entirely by Jurchens (Turks) who conquered the previous collapsing Ming Dynasty, and after this they blundered relations with Western European colonial powers who then proceeded to carve up China after realizing how weak the Empire was. After this, a foreign imposed “Republic” was installed to replace the Jurchen Emperor, and then the first President immediately declared himself Emperor.. and then the entire region immediately fractured into warring providences run by local warlords as no one recognized the new “Emperor”’s legitimacy. Quickly after the Nationalists reunified China, the Japanese invaded and Communists started a revolution. So, from the early 1600’s to the 1930’s, China hasn’t been run by Han Chinese.
>>
>>534702103
they have high IQ(self reported) but they lack soul. the spark of creativity is not something God blessed the gooks with
>>
>>534703812
> But they are often dumb as a bag of rocks. You ask them to explain something, they repeat the wikipedia entry, but ask them to really explain it and they'll be at a loss.
Who comes up with this shit? I haven’t had enough conversations with Asians on these kind of subject matters to confirm or deny them, but the majority of conversations I’ve had of this nature with White people have gone exactly how you described. The majority of humanity only understand things at the surface level regardless of race.

I can at least say with confidence when it comes to social skills, Asians are at a deeper level than White Westerners. Who tend to be far more crass and obvious.

As for technical matters like “how does an engine work vs how does it REALLY work” again every race would give you the Wikipedia version unless they specialize in it.
>>
>>534703940
You believe textbooks made by Ghisline Maxwell’s family instead?
>>
>>534703891
>chinese big 4 inventions
I don't think china did any of them, they were orphan inventions and china just claimed them. Encyclopedias from the 1800s don't mention china as a possible source for gunpowder at all.
>>
>>534703657
I didn’t “deny IQ test,” illiterate.
>>
>>534704050
Do they say china is a shameless lying self promoter? Then yes.
>>
>>534704350
Implying the source is only 30 kids at a private school and not a true mean aggregate of the ethnicities is in in-fact denying the IQ test de facto.
>>
>>534704461
No, it’s not, you weird fucking retard.
>>
>>534704603
So you think the Chinese and Jewish IQ test are accurate to their ethnicities?
>>
>>534704745
>Chinese and Jewish IQ tests
I think you’re an actual retarded subhuman who can’t even form a coherent sentence to communicate what you think you’re saying. One classroom of kids at a private school isn’t representative of any populations, period. It isn’t a rejection of the test itself.

You are incredibly stupid AND annoying.
>>
>>534702103
Because creativity is a trait carried almost only by whites.
The asian high IQ is purely mathematical/logical, but when it comes to art and philosophy, they're midgets.
Almost like being white made you more human...

Why do you think Japan is so creative, it's basically a western country, culturally speaking? It's because they were infused with the white genetics from the Jomons, who brought those genes into the Japanese genepool.
>>
>>534704871
So you are denying the results that say Jews and Chinese have X IQ. So you are denying the test results.
>>
>>534704951
One classroom of children is not “jews.” No, I’m not denying “one classroom of children’s” results.

Which part of this are you struggling with? From my angle it looks like you’re too stupid to understand the concept of sample sizes and outliers.
>>
>>534704926
Niggers are dumb but they’re plenty creative
>>
File: 1656930256822s.jpg (3 KB, 125x112)
3 KB JPG
>>534702103
East Asians had one rather important disadvantage compared to whites that nobody talks about: their language is really hard to read and write. Not only does it take way more effort to teach these things to someone in China than in Europe, but it also affected things like printing presses. Building and operating a printing press in China was way harder than in Europe simply because of the language.
>>
>>534705087
Aren’t you speculating? Why is it White mathematician and White plumbers are equally represented in the White IQ results but Chinese is only private school in Shanghai? Where’s the proof? Where are you getting your info that Lynn and everyone else who did IQ studies only used a single private Jewish school with 30 children for them as well?

You are a dumb nigger brain with skin the color of poop and a low iq.
>>
>>534705175
Already been mentioned >>534703579

Interesting that a Finn and Hungarian, weirdo language speakers, were the ones to bring this up
>>
>>534705139
Niggers are not creative except slightly altering White things and being astroturfed by Jews afterwards.
>>
>>534705230
Holy shit dude. For the jewish number, I’m getting that from THE STUDY I REFERENCED itself. It gets shared here a lot. If you ever see “115” as the jewish number, that’s the study it comes from, ONE CLASSROOM. I speculated that Chinese numbers may come from a similar strategy and never claimed to have proof.

I never claimed it applies to all jews. You are seriously really really really fucking stupid. Like, probably the single stupidest poster I have ever seen.
>>
File: IMG_7070.jpg (27 KB, 582x343)
27 KB JPG
>>534705457
What IQ test that Jews love to cite? What are you referring to? We’ve all seen IQ test on this website, you’re the one claiming they are misleading or inaccurate. Where’s the proof of your claim?
>>
>>534705457
Why do you speculate? Who the fuck do you think you are? Every study says they are smarter than 100 on average not just one. Idiot. Let me guess, you got 95 and are desperately coping why they might be wrong?
>>
File: IMG_6137.gif (3.71 MB, 1010x1200)
3.71 MB GIF
>>534705457
Also what do Chinese have to gain by “faking IQ test” anyway? The Jews actually gain something because they can try to mislead people they their ill-gotten ethnic-nepotistic success is actually earned by merit.

Chinese, by contrast, don’t gain anything. “National prestige?” But then why wouldn’t every country do it? Plus it’s not even Chinese who did these surveys and studies but westerners. And they all come back that the East Asia racial group is all high-iq- japs Koreans and Chinese - not just Chinese. If it was so fake, do the South Koreans and Japanese also fake their IQ test?

I thought you were a coping retard, but the more you typed the more I realized your argument was extremely nonsensical.
>>
>>534702103
they spent their IQ where it was most profitable, exploiting rules to get a lifetime sinecure in the bureaucracy.
>>
>>534706257
>Also what do Chinese have to gain by “faking IQ test” anyway?
Chinese are obsessed with face. They do a lot of shit simply to look good to other people
>>
>>534706304
I should add that Euros did the same thing, which is why there is so much scholarship and writing done by the Catholic church, and it's not until that hold is broken that IQ starts to be spent on more materialistic concerns.
I should also add that the church was a net positive, it was the framework that western intelligence developed in.
>>
Because white people have the highest percent of ultra high 130+ IQ individuals who carried our civilizations on their backs. Having a larger amount of slightly higher average IQ individuals means jack shit. It's like the difference in 20mpg and 25mpg vs a car that gets 50mpg
>>
>>534706454
Bragging isn’t safe face. Again, do Koreans and Japanese also fake the test? The real takeaway is that the East Asian race has a higher average IQ than Europeans. Not the Chinese nationality specifically.

Also again, these test that pop up all over the internet were complied and published by Westerners. Not Chinese themselves. Not Japanese or Koreans.
>>
>>534706454
If it’s about bragging and self-published, jeets would say they have an IQ of 200 on average because they are the biggest Izzat farmers. Instead all the test say they are pretty dumb.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.