Seriously, since when does the US gov give out contracts for construction projects without accepting bids for from multiple contractors and choosing the best one based on some (albeit probably flawed and exploitable) objective criteria?Has anyone looked into these companies doing the work, checked their estimates, and figured out what connections they have to the people in the administration approving the contracts? Anyone find any campaign contribution or other business connections?The fuck is this shit?The fuck is going on?
>>534711400Since 1913
>>534711400Shut the fuck up incel
>>534711400The national park service has issued a handful of these 'no bid' contracts for work. Seems like a lot of it is happening around the 'monument update' initiative in DC.This is CLASSIC mob shit. Construction projects have "thousands" (not an exaggeration) of ways to move dirty money in and out of them. This is so clearly corruption.I've seen this shit in Chicago and Bay Area construction projects of all sizes for 25 years. (Here's my tucker carlson impression) "Why aren't the contracts for the national monument update projects going through the standard bidding process? I mean WHY?"Miriam Adelson is allegedly funding "The Arch" (while the national debt is exceeding the GDP, and the service payments on the interest for our national debt is exceeding our military and healthcare spending.) supposedly private donors were doing the ballroom, but now Ladybugs is demanding $1B in tax monies, which is why I got suspicious in the first place.Who is getting the contracts?How do I even find out?
>>534711400It depends on the work, but it was usually either a company that had unique expertise or capacity (like if you needed microchips, you buy from TMSC exclusively) or else some emergency situation.Trump's DC cleanup contract was pure kickback grift thoughbeit.
>>534711400you lost tranny
Libtards pretending to care about corruption and fiscal responsibility is really funny to me.
>>534712311The much bigger joke is conservatives pretending to care about it.
>>534711615I'm what you would call a 'volcel'.I'm chad and can tap your favorite girl with a wink and motion of my index finger beckoning her to come nearer.But I would touch her ranch-dressing drizzling 3-day old pastrami umbrella with your dangerously close to raping anything, looks like a stroller got run over by a peterbilt, jewcut, got-aids-from-your-crackhead-mom-at-birth dick.
>>534711615Sorry, I meant: "*wouldn't touch"freudian slip.
>>534711400>Has anyone looked into these companies doing the work, checked their estimates, and figured out what connections they have to the people in the administration approving the contracts? good question, maybe they should look into it
>>534712311>>534712373Can we put down the "sides"ism and just deal with facts.I didn't even vote in 2024 because I refused to believe that those were legitimate choices.They're obviously running a crazy game, funneling hundreds of millions possibly (probably) billions, from our tax-base to (((somewhere))).We know there's some Israel Lobby, we know there's some oil companies, we know there's some arab royalty, and we know there are some white American finance guys.Which ones?I'm American so I'm retarded. If I want to start digging, what is the name of the gov org that deals with stuff? I could have sworn all projects and spending had to go through some legislative branch procedure, but I can't find anything in recent bills.t. not libtard pretending not to understand, actual retard, trying to figure it out, asking for where to even start.
>>534711400they do it for shit like engineersdesu i would be willing to bet most of the government fraud is organized.as in likethe regular employees are useful idiotsand its 1 big grift lol
>>534713537>the regular employees are useful idiotsThey weren't, but Trump did replace them with that, yes.
