[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: arches.jpg (2.8 MB, 1800x1350)
2.8 MB JPG
Can tourism be a net benefit to the surrounding population who does not work in tourism or the service industry themselves? Can it successfully replace more polluting industries as a stable source of income for struggling rural communities?
>>
>>534736783
God no

what solves polluting industries is stopping the fucking pollution, using no chemical shit, food will be more expensive, people will be incentivized to grow their own food, microfarming pops up everywhere
>>
the supermarkets etc the industry has been very "customer centric”, since fucking Karen wants a pineapple anytime anywhere, a bunch of harmful industries pop up to meet demand

the answer is not communism is not tourism, the answer is to say fuck the customer, you get what you can when its available, if you dont like it fuck you, and you pay what we charge, if you dont like that, grow the food yourself

that solves everything
>>
File: 1719019760276781.jpg (52 KB, 799x534)
52 KB JPG
Every anon should grow trees
It is awesome
>>
ok
>>
>>534736783
I like fucking tourist women. I dont work in a tourist industry. So yes it is beneficial. How else is one supposed to sow the proverbial wild oats?
>>
>>534738034
uh ok
>>
>>534736783
Somewhat, someone needs to make housing for tourists, someone needs to maintain said housing, tourists also need food, and possibly might buy something. On the other hand any place that has a lot of tourists tends to be expensive as balls, so it's a double edged sword.
>>
>>534738339
I mean the tourists can be a mix of day and overnight, and I think ideally you want to attract people from neighboring towns not just like buses of people from far away - if it becomes an enrichment thing for the local population, all the better.
>>
>>534739851
But people from far away are more likely to visit and spend money, at least that's what I saw when I was working in a tourists towns.
>>
>>534741609
Well, it can't be dependent just on high income visitors, or you will get the situation you described before of everything becoming expensive for locals. You have to have enough housing for locals and for tourists.
>>
>>534741810
I agree but most people will chase profits, why would someone rent a room for 50 euros for a guy from nearby, when he can make double that from a guy from far away. Maybe this can be somewhat avoided by visiting during off season, but then most shops don't work and there are next to nothing to do.
>>
>>534742215
well thats kinda the role of government to make sure it doesn't get out of hand
but I think theres an untapped market for budget tourism in the US in slightly lesser known places
>>
>>534742334
If the local government organized tours where people visit less known places it could work, even the local people could see some products to visitors. Hell they could change the tours every week so they don't really become too stale. But you need money for this and with the current state of the world I doubt that traveling is at the top of the priorities for people.
>>
>>534742496
It doesn't even need to be guided tours as much as more signage and awareness of what's around and clarity about when things are open.

Traveling and recreation are vital to mental health.
>>
>>534742637
That could work in more car centric county with more disposable income, paying for a bus ticket and visiting a couple towns is more affordable to more people, at least in my opinion. Also tourism has a cultural effect where people can learn more about their history and culture, but at least now I doubt that many people would see this as a good thing.
>>
>>534742945
Europe has more in the way of small towns with things to see. America is more spread out, and the part I am talking about the towns are not that interesting except if you need a place to buy supplies, get gas, food, etc.

It is car dependent because everything is so far apart. Interestingly much of it used to be connected by railroads, but that took a lot longer to get places.

I think a lot of things now are just sort of disorganized and casual and more effort could be put in as well as more creative uses of land and opportunities. America lacks imagination.
>>
I don't like tourism.
If you live somewhere worth traveling to don't advertise it because it will be ruined.
People who work in tourism are jewish snakes.

Any amount of advertisement raises property prices and changes the demographic.
Once that's changed you lose the local government and then zoning brings in hotels and infrastructure to bring in the most amount of faggots for the littlest amount of money.

You lose your fishing spots, your peace and quiet, crime goes up, you house gets smaller, your children move away, and eventually it's all gone.

Make your shekels on the internet if you need more shekels and bring it back to your tribe.
Treat any tourists with contempt start rumors of hills have eyes and appear completely ridiculous for your own good.
>>
>>534743305
Well, it would be nice to have places that could be enjoyed without being ruined with conscientious visitors, but also without needless rules and regulations to hamper the experience.

I dunno like America the property is all taken already, the real issue is just not building enough housing for everyone and the rich having huge estates while everyone else is jammed together.

>You lose your fishing spots, your peace and quiet, crime goes up, you house gets smaller, your children move away, and eventually it's all gone.

well, there needs to be redundancy - multiple places that are equally desirable that people can enjoy to prevent crowding
>>
>>534736783
no, it's cancer. every touristic nation
declines in inteligence and productivity. tourism
>>
>>534743400
If someone is bringing in tourists they're responsible for their guest's actions.
This is why we blame the jews for ruining the west
>>
>>534743552
I think the culture of blame is one of the worst parts of America. All events are communal and interactive in origin and outcome.
>>
>>534743235
Oh yeah USA has a ton of potential for local tourism, as how could you guys improve it, I can't really say for certain. I doubt that you could have tourism the same way Europe or Asia has, we do have a couple more centuries of history on you guys, maybe you could play more into recent events, like all the crazy UFO sightings and whatnot.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.