Pedos are rampant on X nowadays. It started with generating nudes of kids with Grok but now they’re straight up spamming CSAM. My video feed will get a CSAM video after just several swipes and they seem to be using code words. Right now it’s #nolimit and it’s just thousands of bots posting and resharing. What the fuck.
>>534737192Doesn't it show you things based of off your view history?
>>534737283It degenerates. I used to just get games and anime in my feed then it turned to gore and now it’s CP. Part of me thinks it’s some type of psy war going on on our minds.
>>534737192 Am here you, too
>>534737283if you view something once it will start spamming you with it.
>>534737192What in the blue hell is CSAM, pal
>>534737523nu-slang for CP
>>534737192>yeah bro it's totally x the biggest platform there's no other site that comes close into delivering cheesy pizzaretard
>>534737192Bluesky.There isn't a single user on there who doesn't consume "egg cracking" CSAM.
>>534737192Tag Elon on any of those posts. They will be taken down at the source.
It is because it is allowed. The owner of the website approves of pedophilia AS LONG AS ITS PICTURES, ITS JUST PICTURES ITS NOT WEIRD YOU FUCKING BIGOT THEY ARENT HURTING ANYBODY ITA JUST A PICTURE BRO WHY ARE YOU EVEN JUDGING THEM!!!!????? WOW MAD AND JUDGING THEM OVER A PICTURE???the vast majority of internet communities, like even here, have deemed it too fucking weird but the current owner of X says "hmm yes I like that"
>>534737629It’s the code words. I’m telling you they are making hundreds of posts every minute if you check latest tab.
>>534737192>>534737283>>534737334why is op looking up child porn
>>534737283Yeah, it's a distilled-down transformer model based on Grok.So it feeds into itself your comments, your potential liking posts, and then gives each a score/flag that should be reflected even in the order you see things.If you linger on pedo shit, comment it, like it, that'll be a pattern it'll stick to for a long time.
>>534737192>>534737334The apple doesn't fall far from the tree https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1805805057843380528
>>534737677The heart of man, his consciousness is damaged by those images and ideas.
>>534737523Child Sexual Abuse Material.Didn't you read the Epstein files?
>>534737192>Right now it’s #nolimitBro they are advertising full on csam websites over there, what the fuck?
>>534737283yes but also noone time it just started showing me naked black chicks porni only ever liked video game stuff on that account
>>534738197It’s not just advertising. They’re posting VIDEOS of it. Even early 4chan didn’t have that.
>>534737192Are we talking real or>OMG she's 17.9 years old in shorts, she's a naked Child!> you're a pedophile because you have a sexy drawing of Madoka!
>>534737192I checked it and all the girls look way too old.Nothingburger.
>>534738332Bro there’s toddlers being fucked. It’s bad bad. I thought all that shit was supposed to be hash banned.
>>534738371No you didn’t. Check latest tab and just scroll. There’s literal toddlers.
>>534737192Op is a ChinkThose little white girls are so cute, exotic, and submissive
i just have anime on my feed.
>>534738248>yes but only sometimes
>>534738383Wait, what? On X??? Well shit, they must REALLY want Elon's new toy taken down if they're spamming that shit on it. Not even this containment site gets that treatment.
>>534737822Find comfort in knowing the vast majority of human beings find it repulsive as well.
>>534738765That’s what I’m saying. Even the old spam here was just lewd photos. But there are videos being posted every minute on X rn
>>534738282I'll take your word for it but I'm not looking any further. I have a good algo full of wholesome videos, I don't want to ruin it.
>>534738871Fair. I just wanted to draw attention to it. It’s crazy.
>>534737192>My video feed will get a CSAM video after just several swipes and they seem to be using code wordsLiterally never happened to me, and I've been using x/twitter for years now. It shows topics that you showed interest in by clicking on it, playing the video, reading comment or liking. So it is a YOU problem dude
>>534741151>hundreds of CP videos being posted every minute is a YOU problem my guy Fuck off you dumb faggot. This isn’t a problem on any other social I’m on.
>>534737192It seems like a botnet advertising a scam network.This happens on many websites.Basically any old forum that has lax moderation is 99% these kinds of spam posts before they get taken down.IIRC a guy who tried running an image sharing site a few years ago said the weirdest part to him was that his site was fine until out of nowhere he started getting spammed with CP, where literally within seconds, sometimes a fraction of a second, he'd receive a report from a watchdog group about the uploaded CP.A few other image host providers confirmed this is a thing, suggesting whatever botnet is behind this is trying to get websites either shut down or more restricted.
>>534741908I’ve seen the botnet scams before but have they ever spam uploaded CP videos before? That’s the crazy part about this.
>>534741266Instagram got exposed for a similar scandal like a year ago where big networks were involved. Seen spam bots trying to advertise clearly illegal sites and i barely used instagram. Also seen some of these unhinged spammers in youtube comments. Maybe they were trolling. It's probably an issue on most social media sites. Been using twitter a ton but never heard of any of this egregious stuff.
>>534741982Often times there's a handful of actual CP uploads mixed in with the spam.I don't know if it's to give the spam "legitimacy", or if it's others thinking they can get away with posting it during the spam/chaos.I suspect in this case it's a bit of both, because a quick skim through what's being uploaded you see the college age girls who look young, which is a classic staple of this kind of spam, and then you see shit like previously mentioned in the thread of actual CP.
>>534737192Oh look another reason I don't use or subscribe to Elon's bullshit. I don't think I'll ever leave here, everywhere else sucks.
>>534742189The Instagram scandal was about the fact that Meta's algorithm pushed pedos to the same watching kids do gymnastics or look at this little girl who does live chats, etc.Then when other accounts started posting CP, because all of the pedos were already in the same "bucket" it pushed them all to the CP uploaders.When those CP uploaders got banned, it didn't remove the pedos from the "likes CP" bucket, so when the next one appeared they all got pushed to it by the algorithm. Meta was basically creating a larger and larger network of pedos and keeping them engaged by pushing them to CP.So odds are if you didn't see stuff like that, you just saw spam bots.
>>534737772Because it's addicting.
>>534741908The. If problem is the government defined possession to include image caches. It popping up on your twitter feed can get you arrested if the government wants to. Clear your cookies, op, and consider deleting twitter. The only defense is making an effort to report/delete what you see, and even then, thats a court defense. Possession is a strict liability crime, meaning that they are legally obligated to investigate and bring up charges. They were using tags five years ago. >>534742020I don’t think he’s talking about loli, anon.
>>534737192The first time I noticed was when I suddenly had one of these japanese junior idols in my feed and it was just blatantly sexualized softcore porn photography of teenagers. It's not even getting deleted these accounts have thousands of followers. Rather concerning but also really weird - are these bots? Is this the angle of attack to get X banned in the EU? Why does the algorithm randomly bring it up?It's very hard to believe real people would spam this shit in the clearweb. There must be more to it.
>>534741908This is exactly what they did to motherless. All of the sudden bots started posting cheese pizza emojis and spamming their telegram all over the comments of every video. If the kikes can’t monetize the site they’ll spam it with cp garbage until it’s taken down or able to be monetized.
>>534742633I have pictures of real kids one is a first communion picture of 50-something girls on the front steps of a schools. I also have a Eucharistic procession with altar boys. I plan to use them as a reference for paintings. Why do you have kid models?
>>534742760I said teen but what I meant is like 10 year olds in pretty much underwear and swimsuits and clearly sexualized poses. It might be legal in china or whatever but that doesn't make it any less weird and it certainly isn't legal in Europe. Twitter would be wise to at least restrict access if it wants to exist in the EU in the next 10 years to come.This is precisely the stuff that will be used to take it down or censor it.
>>534743000It should've never been banned. It's not porn yet it made my dick rock hard.
>>534742715>>534743000Thats the kind of stuff that used to get posted on 4chan. The current X wave is way worse.
>>534737334X is owned by Chabadnik Musk. Of course it is a war on our minds.
>>534742948
>>534743024Are you sure it’s not because you’re a pedophile?
>>534742948At least all of my photos are antiques and fully clothed.
>>534742633>>534742760>>534742020you are the freak. pls kys.
>>534743174So then why do you have these pictures saved on your computer?
>>534743055Well aren't you lucky? It doesn't seem to be banned at all.>>534743058The public is a lot more sensitive to it nowadays. There's a reason it's not posted on 4chan anymore and it's not because the userbase grew up. There's harsher legal consequences and detection is easier.
Fuck this. This threads radioactive
>>534743024oh yeah and you never touch ur dick while looking at these pics yeah? who are you trying to kid, you are a pedophile and should be give ndeath sentence
>>534743174This is the shit I mean. Maybe it's not by definition illegal or abuse in america but it's still weird and unsettling and illegal in the EU for sure. Unlike 4chan, twitter operates infrastructure in the EU so they better tread lightly.
>>534743233I knew posting about this was trouble but I needed to draw attention to it. It’s too much. Literal hundreds of videos every couple minutes. Whatever the anons are posting here pales in comparison to what’s on X right now.
>>534743342Do you think that pic is appropriate? How many proxies are you hiding behind?
>>534743277what does this have to do with pedo don? i hate trump. i hate epstein. i hate the podestas. i hate hillary. i hate obama. i was here for pizzagate. i was here for epsteins island. but how are you better than them? children need to be protected from people like you
>>534743293>who are you trying to kidHaha
>>534737192when did we start calling it CSAM?
Jannies had better not fuck over the whole thread bc of some retads derailing..
>>534743366Yes, it's appropriate. Does she look uncomfortable? Does she look sad like she is being forced into that outfit? What is so wrong with it?
>>534743458>implying you don’t have worse on your hard drive
>>534743465literally beyond hope. you should be killed too imo.
>>534741908I wonder if anyone has sued watchdog people doing that, because they'd have to use US based accounts/addresses to make legit claims, otherwise if it was foreign countries it would be ignored against US servers. Probably behind VPNs and shit, but if I had a log that showed CP showing up and a claim to take it down a second after, I'd be reporting the watchdog as the criminal posting it to the police and FBI, and initiating a civil suit immediately to back it all up if the feds were little shits about it - which they probably would be if it's a government black ops activity. No way does a real person know about CP the SECOND it posts. It takes hours or days for that shit to flow. It's basically tacit admission you knew the CP was going to be there.
>>534743465She looks sad, misguided and too young to give her consent to a photo in lingerie that will be uploaded to the Internet. Her parents should never let her do that, what if she regrets showing this much of her body to strangers as her brain matures and she deals with an increased sense of shame and dignity? The japs are fucked for allowing that. Idol culture or not.
>>534743536alright ure a fed. go away with ur pilpul. just because these inhumane psychopaths at the top are raping and killing children you now say its okay to do it too? wtf never heard such a retarded pilpul you guys seem to be really freaking out atp
>>534743536You really have the whole archives don’t you?
>>534743298>weird and unsettlingwhy does it unsettle you?>and illegal in the EU for surelolno
>>534743683kill yourself too. imagine lusting after kids because you realize no women over 18 could ever fall for you. must be a sad existence.
>>534743683It’s unsettling because it presents a child in a sexual situation. A cute and innocent child is being used to evoke lust. Ofc this is unsettling.
Thank you janny for preserving the thread
>>534737192i dont use Xits dog shit
>>534743683Because they're children, anon. In compositions placing far too much focus on eroticism. These aren't happy family pictures of them at the pool but closeups showing off their swimwear and body in model like fashion. Just strikesbme as weird and unsettling - you gotta notice that yourself, no?
>>534743744brother do u go on a beach, see naked child and lose your mind? lmfao you are mentally ill
>>534743733seethe, cope & dil8>>534743744is going to the pool a sexual situation for you? I can see your point with pics like >>534743536 but most of them are not sexual at all>>534743854>uuoooh, the female child is too erotic, I can't take it!!fair enough
>>534743872There is a difference between naked children playing at a beach (normal, common sight) and saving pictures of closeups of children in swimwear on your PC (not normal).
>>534743854
>>534743872no thats something completely different. its insane how you pedos cant make a difference between saving clearly erotic pics of children on your pc and seeing children in swimwear on the beach. and it really leads me to believe that YOU actually get turned on by children on the beach, just like by looking at these pics.if i would be president you would all get public death sentence.
>>534743929it is not normal exactly why? because donald trump says so ?
>>534743930I'm not blaming you nor lolicon anime. In fact I'm arguing with you respectfully just pointing out that this isn't a happy family photo a normal person would keep. This comparison feels rather unfair.
>>534737884sounds like some focus tested by pedophiles bullshitits cp. its always been cp. csam sounds like some military industrial complex bullshit
>>534737523read it backwards
>>534737192I still think this is all just libshits being butthurt they don't control the public zeitgeist anymore since Elon bought their public forum that let them ban anyone right of Trotsky.Spamming CP in an attempt to get something you don't like taken down is literally the most pathetic shit.
>>534744019They had to change it because cp conveys a very specific narrow concept. CSAM was invented to include a much much wider range of content because what a normalfag would consider CP, 99.9% of it doesn't actually qualify.
>>534743562There's nothing illegal about reporting a crime.So without hard evidence they're the ones who did it, you're expected the feds to investigate themselves.
>>534744019P stands for porn, which implies consent and also "legitimizes" it. CSAM is a more correct term.
>>534744255porn implies consent?if i record raping your entire family it implies conesent?LOL
>>534743910>>534743872see how they bring up the SAME ARGUMENT in the SAME TIME???LITERALLY GLOWING FEDS
>>534743617She doesn't look sad to me. Misguided? That is just your opinion. Too young to give her consent? According to who? You? >what if she regrets showing this much of her body to strangersThat is just life. We all do things that we wish we didn't do. Why should she feel ashamed for showing her body like that anyways? The world is different now. Many women feel that it is not shameful to show off their body. Why would it be any different for a child?
>>534744019the main justification is that porn is good and hecking wholesome and sex work is real work chud. they have yet to explain why "revenge porn" is still a thing for them, but leftists are usually well trained in doublethink and mental gymnastics.>>534744073you have it exactly the wrong way around and it's the reason I refuse to use the new term: "sexual abuse material" is the much narrower term and only appropriate when the material depicts sexual abuse taking place. "porn" is the broader category and can contain anything from everyday scenes to the most brutal rape imaginable. I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out that pedo activists are behind the push for this lingo to legalize porn that does not have sexual abuse in the long term
>>534744359Children have developing brains and are unable to make sound decisions themselves. This is why we, as a society, don't let them sign contracts for example. They're easily influenced and manipulated and the risk of her regretting this kind of attention and photoshoot later in her life is a significant concern.Considering janny-man deleted the picture it was legally questionable or pornographic too. Even for US law.
>>534744537how come 80 year olds are allowed than?
>>534744591Dement 80yo aren't allowed to sign contracts either. Sometimes they can't even decide for their own medical treatment and bodily wellbeing anymore.
>>534744633what are you talking about fucking nigger lol they are allowed to be your fucking president you nigger anus tonguing fucking faggot
>>534737283>>534737192I created a an account in 2025 to follow the iran - israel happening (12 days war)The biggest error of my life, the first 3 days were ok (osint shit and videos of tel aviv burning) and suddenly an account of a chink troon showed up, a blonde girl (no more than 5) doing nasty things to a fat piece of trash, i wanted to fucking kill myself. I don't use any social media anymore, my only goal in life is to make kikes life as miserable as possible since then.
>>534737587Both are owned by pedophile kikes. russniggers, kikes, saudis, mutts, shitskins and even niggers are implicated and the only way to save the world is a massive purge of kikes and their most loyal slaves
>>534744537>Children have developing brains and are unable to make sound decisions themselves.First, children already are allowed to make some decisions for themselves. Second, they can make sound decisions. They are not dumb little creatures that can never make a decision that makes sense. So what if they are easily influenced? How is that relevant here? Someone is not automatically a bad person just because they convinced a child to engage in sexual activities.I am against children being manipulated, or coerced in any form, into performing sexual activities. But, that doesn't mean they always will be. How is it a significant concern of her regretting that kind of attention and photo shoot? So what if she did lewd photo shoots or pornos as a kid? In a world where it is becoming increasingly accepted for adult women to be whores, why would it be different for a kid?
When did CP change to CSAM?
>>534745007About 3-4 years ago
>>53473719267
>>53474499570IQ post
>>534744995I really tried to be respectful here anon, you brought up the "bad person" strawman. I didn't call you one. I understand that you have the opinion a child could consent to a sexual encounter and I'm just clearly opposed to that idea.A child, in my opinion, can never consent because a child isn't capable to grasp the implications, consequences and the circumstances of their own decisions like an adult could. There's fundamentally no common ground to argue on between us. I simply think you are wrong in every conceivable way.
>>534742715gaylord
>>534744995>>534744359glowniggers or kikes, >>534745140 look at the id change
>>534745235You are not going to change the mind of somebody who only sees consent as willingness alone.
>>534744995>In a world where it is becoming increasingly accepted for adult women to be whores, why would it be different for a kid?glowniggers are not even trying lmao, you can't compare a 16-18y with a 5y kid fucking retard
>>534745286yeah im also 100% sure they are glowniggers.
