>an NGO clothes, feeds and transports hundreds of these men across the English Channel to English shores every day>UK Border Force takes them in and processes them>They are then given food and shelter and other amenities at the expense of British taxpayers>Many of them go on to commit crimes against Britons including rape and murderThis is the most fucked up thing I've ever seen in my life, this is like the plot of a Bond film that James Bond would be sent to try and stop, what the fuck is the deal?
>>534765161>what the fuck is the deal?Briton and Europe lost ww2 when they got tricked into fighting the Nazis instead of the commies and the jews. This is their prize.
>>534765161What is the UK supposed to do?You can't shoot them or capsize the boats, that would be a war crime.Once they're in the UK they are very difficult to deport. Often their countries won't take them back. And even if you had the legal go ahead, you have to physically force a handcuffed screaming refugee onto a plane. Nobody wants to do that.The basic problem is geography. The English Channel is short and you can even swim it. Essentially the UK is part of the European land mass and there's no humane way to prevent someone landing in England if they really want to. Would have been more sensible to stay in Europe and work to stop wars in the middle east and africa which cause the refugees.
>>534765517>What is the UK supposed to doDeclare war on France.
>>534766169You've summed it up. Nobody in the UK who is obsessing over refugees has any sensible answer what to do instead.
>>534765161easy peesy Step 1: Any nation that refuses deportation or even has anyone committing crimes in UK automatically loses all legal VISAs.When some African warlord finds out his kids wont be allowed to go on shopping trips to London, much less attend any UK prep school or college because of what some of his dirt bags are up to, there will be action taken against dirt bag's family.If Trump can kill people in boats by claiming "drugs!!!" 1000 miles from USA's shores, then UK can kill these invaders.You COULD call the Russian troops entering Ukraine "migrants" and pass the Giggle Test, since many have connections and could reasonable be assumed to soon live on the land more or less like Ukrainians doing the same things, raising same crops, etc.....but not these Niggers coming to a White nation.
>>534765517>The basic problem is geography. The English Channel is short and you can even swim it.You do realise all asylum seekers are picked up at sea and could instead be dropped back in Normandy with zero legal fuss, right? What would France do, shoot our volunteer coastguard?Even a land border could be policed.They're here because the powers that be want them here and don't give a shit about democracy.
>>53476516120 million EU refugees actually came by plane
Fingerpointing at the migrants and the politicians gets you nowhere. You have to start targeting the NGO investors directly. On discord.
>>534767003>all we have to do is invade Francelol>What would France do, shoot our volunteer coastguard?Yes. They literally have coastguards who would stop refoulement.
>>534767003>>534767257Plus, how is this even going to work practically? If you pick up war refugees who are determined to get to England, they are not going to get off peacefully. They are more likely to try to hijack the boat and force it to England. The coastguards are not armed.
>>534765161said years ago this is all fighting stock for ww3 when is started happening, they laughednow we are rapidly approachingeurope has no standing armymassive amount of unemployed immigrant males aged 18-40all stamped and tracked locked in on a islandround them up and off they go
>>534765517Wars aren't causing the migrations. They're economic migrants looking for a handout.
>>534765517>that would be a war crime.against who? thats not a french ship.
>>534765517>You can't shoot them or capsize the boats, that would be a war crime.Just do what America does, realize that war crimes don't exist and are purely penalties leveled on the losers of wars. If you don't lose a war, or at least don't lose it in such a way that the opposition forces capture your leader and drag him to trial, there are no war crimes.
>>534765161It's about removing whites>WhyBecause jews feel ugly and inferior next to whites.
>>534767448These aren't exclusive things. They're mostly from war torn countries and they want to go somewhere with favourable economics to help their families back home.If they were just looking for a hand out they wouldn't be keen to get jobs, but they are. The UK bans refugees from working.>>534767537Treatment of refugees falls under Geneva conventions.
>>534767572I don't see America shooting illegal immigrants and refugees either.
>>534765161NGO is an anti-semitic term. Reported to the AIPAC.
>>534767602>Treatment of refugees falls under Geneva conventions....and I am reminded of the movie Lepa Sela Lepo Gore as to how to respond to that bullshit.>Jebiga, ne razumem engleski.
>>534765161What are you bitching about? Were't you the ones who went to their country and bought their people as slaves, claimed ownership over their valuable resources and forced them at gunpoint to do "business" with you. Imperialism means you embrace it all matey,
>>534767684It should.Other countries are doing it.
>>534768141Many of those migrants are Arabs, who did the exact same thing, except on a much larger scale.Anyway, that's not the point. The point is, if something is a negative to your country, you should stop it, not try to justify it morally by finding contrived historical justifications.
>>534768141>Were't you the ones who went to their country and bought their people as slaves, claimed ownership over their valuable resources and forced them at gunpoint to do "business" with you.1. Where is Memeflag OP from, and how do YOU know where he's from??2. Post documentation for Memeflag OP went to the 57 Islamic countries and bought the Muslims as slaves, claimed ownership over their 'valuable resources' and forced them at gunpoint to do business with him.
>>534765317More like Hitler was an imbecile who decided to attack western nations rather than create an alliance to destroy the commie niggers at Moscow>butthey would have to go through PolandSigning a defense treaty with Poland rather than start selling raw materials to commiejews didn't require more than yor average IQ, Spengler was right, the average national SOCIALIST was a fucking brainlet who collectivelt ruined everything and served the planet to leftoids in a silver plate fuck yo all hitlerian apologists.
>>534767257>>all we have to do is invade France>lolThere's no invasion. It's perfectly legal to bring those stranded at sea to a safe port.France has lots of them.>>534767384>If you pick up war refugeesThere's no war in France and these are economic migrants.>they are not going to get off peacefully.The criminal courts in France will have to handle them as it will have happened on French soil.If this consistently happens then it would be reasonable for the coastguard to not rescue these hostile foreign actors, for their own safety. At worst we'll have to disband the coastguard if all of their workers are injured or killed in the line of duty, which would be no great loss and would end boat immigration.
I don't understand why we can't just shoot at the fuckers
>>534765517>You can't shoot them or capsize the boats, that would be a war crime.So what? Mass migration as a weapon is already a war crime.
>>534765517>that would be a war crime.what war? It might be a moral crime, but at a certain point you have a duty to protect your people.
