Colonizer upon arriving in India was amazed at how clean India was compared to his shithole LondonHindus were clean freaks, colonizers are the reason why India is so dirty today.Take responsibility.
>>534769573The solution is to depopulate india in 48 hours.
oh look bros, another pajeet thread!
>>534769726Mad that I’m exposing colonizers and their lies?
>>534769573Indians really just don't want to do the same thing they claim they used to do, huh
>>534770102because of bong genes, they're subhuman like southern nigger lovers that also throw trash everywhere
>>534769573Absolute rubbish. Be gone with you, Jamboy.
>>534769573that had to be top shelf pajeeta pussy
>>534769573in what part of india did he reside in? the one with mudslime majority or the one with pooloo majority?
>>534769573So why isn't it clean now?The colonisers left decades ago.
Before britishers looted India for 65$ trillion we were one of the richest places on earth. Wignats cannot cope with this fact.
>>534770499Some Raj villa along with all the other upper class British twits during the colonial era. The idea that these people spent any length of time among hindu peasantry is utterly delusional.
>>534769573British high society were romantic faggots. Do you have another source?
>>534771092You had good farmland and plenty of craftsmen. But no kind of progress. And above all, you were never clever enough to implement any kind of population control.
>Saars Fecalia was very cleaning before Britishers coming and making fecal consumption mandatory. Also forcing polluting of rivers the bloodyFuck you Sanjay, you fecaloid rape rats gypsies are scum.
>>534769573Plastic and litter hadn't been invented then
>>534771092>65$ trillionyeh, these niggers are definitely poop colored jews.
>>534771092Fuck off with your fantasies. Even today with all the newly mined gold and modernisation we aren't close to 65 trillion you insufferable rat. You were abbots when the muslimes found you and you were walking with a loincloth when the Brits found you. You're just abbos.
>>534769573The caste system ensured everything was cleaned. The untouchables were forced to clean under threats of violence or imprisonment. After the caste system was abolished, no one could force them to do it and the other indians weren't gonna lower themselves to picking up trash.But you need to remember. The high caste indians were still shitting in the street and littering back in those days. It just wasnt an issue because they had a slave class to clean up after them.
>>534770698Gypsies live the same way. It's genetic. The indian gene is inherently dirty and tainted
WE WUZ CLEAN
>>534769573>take responsibilityWhat, by going to India and cleaning it up and removing anyone who fights against the goal of cleanliness?
>>534771092>I don't not
>>534772338This. India is a lot like the rest of the brownoid world: it doesn't quite know how to function without slavery. Indian society quite literally built on shit rolling downhill.
>>534769573>Surpise pajeets are cleanSo in general they are not
>>534769573All of the problems in third world countries is due to white people. And white people should have to donate everything they own to people living in third world countries to make things right.
>>534772311If you're wondering where they get that figure from. Take a look into Utsa Patnaik. She was the one to divine it. Take a look at her beliefs and ideals. Take a look at how she actually came up with the number.... it'll all start to make sense (hint there are a lot of Indians, means there are a lot of communists)
>>534769573>memeflagIt's crazy that pajeets acknowledge all memeflags are jeets
>>534769573It's trueEven US founding fathers called brits a bunch of nigger for ruining india and gave that as part of the reason they couldn't let them keep controlling americalook it up
>>534769573Why is India so dirty to this very day when the English left many decades ago now? Your best source material for the "cleanliness" of Indians is from William Hodges a British aristocrat that I'm sure did not associate with the average Indian even back then. I'm sure he was mainly hanging around the top people who would be considered aristocrats of India at that time. Your source material is gay and you can just use commone sense plus your eyes to see how filthy Indians are today instead of going off of the word of someone who was in India 250 years ago.
