10-20,000 year lifespan, prohibited expensive costs that can be reduced with mass production. Uses nuclear waste as power.Why aren’t we utilizing this tech during the energy crisis?
>>534819313
We can't have any nice things because of stupid people, wicked people and greedy people. They cover the entire spectrum of reasons things like this can never be done.
>>534819313https://thebatterytips.com/battery-specifications/how-much-does-a-nuclear-diamond-battery-cost/
>>53481933120$ per nanowatt is a lot bud
>>534819313>28,000 year lifespanhow did they test this?
>>534819479But long term over 10,000 years it’s actually saving money. Let alone a lifetime, You never have to charge and it’s constant output.
>>534819331if our cars were powered by nuclear batteries couldn't someone make a dirty bomb from all the radioactive material? what happens during a car accident do we evacuate several city blocks?
>>534819516The half-life of carbon 14, as long as the radiation degrades it makes power,.
>>534819331> LABEL SAYS: lifespan 28,000 years!> dies in 100 yearsSo like, do my kids get the refund with interest?
The artificial evolution of humanity was introduced through massive cataclysmic event(s) 12,000 to 16,000 years ago altering the course of humanities development. This altered course has led to the current status quo of planned obsolescence power control paradigms dominated by those who have the most impact on shaping our societal models.
>>534819589It’s inert, the way they are designed they cannot create an explosion or leak radiation.
>>534819611Yea well i was credibly told LED bulbs also never burn out, but just had to replace like 4 yesterday for ones I swear i bought just last year
>>534819578yea but what the fuck do you use that requires constant output
>>534819516>build a time machine powered by NDB's>bury a NDB>28000 years in future>battery is now deadCmon bro, this is basic
>>534819623If you live 100 years then you can take that up with management.
We cannot have nuclear powered cars because oil companies have to eat too
>>534819704I’m a sex machine that requires it.
>>534819589Maybe make a less car dependent society would be a great start.
>>534819704The average household has a constant kilowatt per hour usage in modern first world countries. Personally I use about 40KwH a month continually over the course of that time interval.
>>534819479If you were rich as fuck, wouldn't you throw a hundred million to have a phone with infinite battery power?
>>534819623>my thousand-year-old(s) battery had issues at the hundreds of years mark. Good problems to have.
>>534819742Keke, ill be lucky if i make it past 60 given homelessness, jobless and unhirable with no food stamps or health insurance. Atleast the browns here will be happy.
>>534819578you won't be here 10,000 years from now. a pretty bold claim by the company thoughbeit
>>534819672at the small scale they currently exist at sure, but scale it up to car size and its different.
>>534819754Could you imagine letting Tyrone and shaniqua drive around in nuclear bombs?
>>534819949That would be solved by mass production, reducing overall costs, the tech should improve and voltage would be increased as costs reduce, any output can be paralleled to increase voltage as well.
>>534819838Getting ripped off is good? Its a scam.
>>534819407OK yes but let's play along with OP and assume it could possibly work. Do the fast neutrons hit the carbon lattice and generate piezoelectricity? I remember my materials science professor at uni told me that a thin film of diamond coating was generated during experiments by vaporizing carbon to like million degrees in a vacuum then rapidly cooling the carbon plasma so it precipitated a thin layer of diamond coating on the inside of the container... but it might be more cost effective to build silica quartz crystals instead to accomplish the same thing idk
>>534819998I can’t, but for an explosion you need an immediate release of all the energy, the carbon nanotube eliminates this completely. It’s specifically designed for small release of energy over a long time.
>>534819331>AI slopIgnored
>>534819704nigger smoke alarms
>>534820136Yes that’s basically it, the carbon is your reaction reducer, slowing the cascade of radiation release, it uses this radiation to create energy. Much how the ancient alien guys say the pyramids and bull coffins worked but with radiation instead. I’m not sure silicon will slow the electron split though in this application.
>>534820241>beep>beep
>>534820236lol, good day of the rake for you.
>>534819838If you are fine with 100 year life, you can look into plutonium batteries.
imagine having an electric bicycle with infinite range wow. it would be cheaper to build bike trails than highways, we could have trails all across the country, with pod hotels at regular intervals for sleeping. a pleasant cross country bike trail cruise would be a normal part of life.
>>534819313>Why aren’t we utilizing this tech during the energy crisis?because the current it can output is minuscule.
>>534819313>>534819331Because jews (and chinks) can't make profit out of it. Do not be antisemen or rice hater, OP!
>>534820492It’s the constant output that’s appealing, constant A/C or heat location depending, with NO variable trailing power costs.Military, commercial applications would be invaluable.Army grunt with laptops and radios that last forever, constant laser outputs for war or telecommunications. Public could use in any home product, never plug in anything again, could all be self powered. Blenders, fridges ect.
>>534820099>batteries that last the rest of your lifeScam.
>>534819313>We Who is we ? You are free to finance it yourself .
>>534820749All output is minuscule. They parallel all these 1850 lithium ions into a 21v Dewalt battery, so why can’t this be the same?
>>534819578a 1 watt battery would cost $1 million dollars.
>>534819331>AI: "costed"?
>>534820854see>>534820871
>>534820818Whaaaaaaaaaa, OP spoke as if we lived in a society in this theoretical thread!! >triggered post slider.
>>5348208541000000000 nanowatts is 1 watt. a typical 21v battery can store 3 amp hours.that is 63 watt hours. so 63 million dollars for one tool battery. I have no idea how big that would be and how radioactive. this is not something that can be used in everyday life.
>>534819821Every other component would fail next to it.Also you would start growing another head out of your chest.
>>534821023sorry that would be 63 trillion dollars
Why are pajeets so ugly and stupid??
>>534820871Because it’s a new product with new and specialized production. It’s nano manufacturing, that cost will decrease substantially if mass production ever happens. Just like how your phone has more processing power than NASA did in 1990.
>>534821023You don't understand how any of this works. Your calculation is completely retarded. Start from looking up the difference between watts and watt/hours>>534821060>Every other component would fail next to it.Can be solved>Also you would start growing another head out of your chest.Fair enough
>>534821023Just fire up the printer, probably cheaper than AI, and more useful long term, uses less water.
The public is not allowed access to something if an inbred retarded nigger has the possibility of smashing it open with a hammer and eating it.
>>534819313>leaksSorry goy, it's your own fault for contaminating your whole city
>>534819313https://youtu.be/qg1ckCkm8YI
>>534819786Only if that is code for less brown people.
>>534819313Nuclear waste ?You know ... glow radiation poisoning and death in few hours!Maybe this may be a problem!Right?
