Central planning of markets, infrastructure, and housing is a good thing and we should do more of it, instead of exposing people’s livelihoods to cycles of boom and bust and irrational unregulated markets.
Good luck with the 5 year plans, Karl
>>534826869play workers and resources and see how it plays out for you.
mixed markets are goodwe need competition only for areas that need advancement like in cars and computersfor something like printers, who cares? just nationalize the industry, the technology is already mature, just stop ripping people off
>>534826869rural markets, radical factory investments, and land appropriation for housing is more important, and just as out of reach as your theory
>>534826869If we were allowed to build on rural land, there wouldn't be a problem, but they require you to have everything officiated with plans and approval and such. Everything in this system is designed to increase the artificial value, to the point the citizens are disallowed from even attempting anything: it's all or nothing with the latest technology and subjugated by the latest fine print.I've seriously considered buying my first place rural on raw land to save money and it's impossible almost everywhere to actually do it, because they want you to put a $100,000 home on it and a septic.
you do realize you're already living in a mixed market...
>>534826869And who is going to create shareholder value out of that?
This really is just a lefty board.
>>534826869The vast majority of people who have opinions on economics in online spheres have never taken a college level econ course.
>>534827785The vast majority of free-market fundamentalists posting online only took Econ 101, and usually not even that. They just want to stop paying taxes
>>534826869The cycles, irrationality, and unregulatedness are centrally planned, you stupid fucking nigger.
>>534826869>boom and bust and irrational unregulated markets.We've surrendered control of all the necessities for the pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness to the whims of oligarchs who are completely decoupled from the social contract. It's not going to end well for them.
>>534826869Imagine being this ignorant of even recent history.
>Central planning>goodIf you feel the need to grossly inflate public sector and make up lots of make believe bureaucracy jobs, sure.
>>534827684That is who writes the botscripts that spam here, yes
>>534826869Cycles of boom and bust are primarily formed by government regulations and interventions in the market like the Fed setting interest rates too low in order to stimulate artificial growth so the government can keep overspending.
>>534826869We need unrational unregulated markets to hide our shadow budget to fight a drone war on mars against Japan
