When will the harassment end? A woman can't even go out for a walk in public without men sexualizing them. https://futurism.com/future-society/man-smart-glasses-records-woman-demands-money
>>534852404This might be someone's problem, but it isn't mine.
>>534852404What was she wearing?
>>534852404yesterday morning i was walking my dog and the cute blonde zoomette was walking hers like 50 feet ahead at like 7am suddenly she lets out this massive brap and wedges her hand way up in her sweats for a good itch. she didnt know i was down the hill. anyway i wish i had a pair of those glasses then
>>534852404husband and i are basically roommates Chadboi, and he is fine with me picking up cute guys for some fun>i was sexually assaulted by glasses
>>534852404I don't understand. The guy was recording her while she was at the mall? I mean yeah that's kind of creepy on its own merits but I don't see what's exploitable about that. Was she wearing a fucking thong or something?
>>534852404Gogo clubs all have signs up here already, if you put one of these on after going in they'll drag your ass out in record time. So there goes your "it's new and nobody knows it's a camera" advantage already.These glasses are already associated with being a weird creep.
>>534852808wtf is a gogo club?
>>534852404You know what the next step for these glasses is? They're going to have augmented reality. This augmented reality overlay will also work like social media where you will be able to ignore people and block them. The glasses will erase them from your perception of reality. This will happen to a lot of people who will end up being excommunicated because they are generally pieces of shit. Just you wait. It'll be like if dating apps were like oxygen.
>>534853121>gogo clubSounds like some shitskin-related thing.
>>534853187good I don't need to see globalist fatsos crossing the street as I'm driving
Are there actually any laws that prevent you from recording people in public and sharing it online?
People have had cameras everywhere for years and years now. Should have updated laws about right to privacy and photos/recordings in public spaces back then. Was never going to happen because it's contrary to the surveillance state big brother wants.
>>534853222>some shitskin-related thingSounds like your country would know all about that also you Anglos are #1 clients in them
>>534853230The data sharing from the glasses will trip the AI in your mandatory EV and will lock the vehicle in place until you deactivate the filter (assuming saving these people becomes a concern) OR the vehicle will be fully self-driving anyway so meh. You don't really need to run anyone down. People will go mad from isolation and will chimp out eventually.
>>534853187More likely it will show your social status to others.
>>534853367I don't go to gookland.>>534853285Who cares at this point?>>534853343The thing is you can't really argue against being recorded in public when you're probably being recorded by ten different CCTV cameras already.
>>534853431/ignore
>>534853285Nope.
i support the women in thisbecause i dont want to live in a world where everyone has a camera on their face at all times, its bad enough the cameras are in their pockets. but the only way concern about this will get any traction is to say women are feeling oppressed by it.
>>534852404>can't go out in publicOh now she has a problem with lockdowns? Well now it's too late
>>534852502
They have 17 year olds writing stories about sexual exploitation over there call the cops
>>534852404I’m too lazy to do it but the next invention needs to be belt buckle bodycams. Pros: Nobody would suspect it.Cons: you have to tuck in your shirt like a faggot
>>534852404>A woman can't even go out for a walk in public without men sexualizing themAs if females have any other purpose to existing.
>>534853469That's kind of what I'm saying. I'm pointing out how retarded is is for people to be reeeing about this because muh feminism or whatever when theybwere warned about cameras everywhere decades ago and privacy advocates got shut down and ignored. If they wanted to stop this they would have had to draw the line a long time ago. Cameras are only going to get smaller and more ubiquitous. It's been enabled to the point it's to late to avert. You could improve things by changing laws more broadly and in doing so removing a lot of cameras from the environment but it's never going to happen because it's contrary to what the powers that be want and that is the surveillance state. Sad how angry people were about wiretapping just a little over 20 years ago and now most spend their own money to install surveillance devices all over. The acceptance as ubiquitous recording as a social necessity with smart phones was a trojan horse for an incredibly effective psyop. If right to privacy had won out things might be different.
One time a guy told me he records women with smart glasses and then lewds them in the video with AI. At the time I thought he was joking but after playing with AI I realized he was serious.
>>534853285>Are there actually any laws that prevent you from recording people in public and sharing it online?not a one. since its not illegal, they have to try to do it by SHAMING.
>>534852404public recording seems like a hack, it wasn't supposed to happen.when you are in public you normally accept being seen by everyone but everybody knows that shit goes away from anyone's mind, unless you specifically freaky in public.photos/videos in public are being pushed as being normal by your masters wanting you to obey the flock mass recording, less headaches with surveillance of cattle.but it's not natural, human behavior is not adapted to it, since it's something that started happening for less than 100 years in our history, and this is affecting our behavior and relationships in society.this should be debated for human rights purposes. fuck your surveillance bullshit, this is anti-freedom. I should have the freedom to go outside on this God given Earth without having to worry about shit humans never had to worry about until now, just because psychos are power hungry ghouls
I mean, just to adapt to current times we could update democracy with technology so we can make sure our politicians don't get corrupted and are working for the benefit of the people.mandatory surveillance, but I mean 24/7 big brother style surveillance. police style body cam but on all steroids, following them 24/7 of their whole lives as long as they are serving, live-streaming all video and audio to their constituents. you know, just to make sure nothing bad/rotten happens to our politicians. for the safety of everyone, we make sure they serve the people's best interests. no way of having secret discussions, everything in the open. why not? they have nothing to hide do they? they are not criminals or corrupt or traitors to the people, they should be fine with it, high stakes job after all, police are alread doing it to some extent so there's precedent right there.curious how people would vote on such referendum.
>>534852404at least he didn't touch her
>>534852521if she goes to supermarket wearing nothing but a bikini, its her choice!you are not allowed to watch her
>>534852521also was the man Indian
>>534856337Dude sounds like a total retard and an asshole. She comes off as bitchy but come on, she's in the right on this one
>>534856337>I don't have childrenSad for you.
>>534852404>SmartglassesIs this story from 2014? I haven't heard SmartGlasses in years since Google Lens went down.
>>534854142I get it. They can't shut it down without also having to say all of those flock cameras and CCTVs are also invasive. Is it only intolerable when an individual does it?
>>534853469>The thing is you can't really argue against being recorded in public when you're probably being recorded by ten different CCTV cameras already.Fucking this. It’s time to go innawoods or some remote shithole with zero recording devices set up on every goddamn fucking block. The current surveillance/police state in this country should be fucking illegal out invasive it is.
>>534854142That's what I figured, they don't want to make it illegal because then that puts big brother back into question, if I'm not allowed to record you then surely businesses shouldn't be allowed to record you either.And yeah even if the law was suddenly changed, literally everyone has a pocket-sized device that can take videos, it would be practically unenforcable.
>>534856753the point is that surveillance data about you would ever be useful in case you fuck up and they need to review/use it. so for most people all surveillance data would be irrelevant. at least in theory/expectationwhere some retard stalking you until they get some "non-flattering angles" and using it to attack your image online is outside the scope
>>534856753>It’s time to go innawoods or some remote shitholeand you get a flock camera installed pointed at you and it's illegal to do anything to it. what do? they can keep installing or moving that camera wherever you move/go, resources are not an issue apparently. they can easily say it's for everyone's safety.
>>534852404I'm convinced all the stories of people freaking out about smart glasses are just marketing plants. No one cares about the ten gorillion security cameras recording them 24/7 and if they jeet was actually hosting the videos in social media they could report it and request they be taken down through the platform
>>534852404Why did the video get so many views? What did she do or say in it that she is so worried about?
>>534852404if he died his hair he wouldn't look a day over 17
>>534853121>>534853222Gogo dancers were big in '68, are you not 71 years old? ARE YOU NOT?
>>534852404Total government surveillance THROUGH ANY available technological medium is fine, though, because it doesn't have social validation implications.
>>534852404deport jeets now
>>534857285>Total government surveillance THROUGH ANY available technological medium is finethat should go both ways. ze peoples should also have full and total monitor of most of government employees, just to make sure they're on their best behavior. detect corruption and traitorous acts. for everyone's safety
>>534853285There may be something related to stalking, but if it's just a once-off incident, there's nothing illegal about it.You're in public. Act like it.
>>534852404That's nothing. I have a condom cam and run a website committed to Pussy Galore. You're not really seeing women unless you're seeing cervix.
>>534856682This was the whole point of "CCTV MAN" videos 20 years ago. It's only gotten worse since.
>>534853187It would be interesting if you could add an AI nudifier in the glasses
>>534857452>You're in public. Act like it.this is something new in human history, it's not natural behavior, it's unprecedented, we don't have the biological and social tools to deal with it. stop acting like it's normal, it isn't, by any definition. it's something imposed in the last what...15 years? that's nothing for human history, absolutely nothing is normal about it.if I started acting crazy 50 years ago, a few people would think I'm nuts and they all would forget about it in 1 hour. now the moment can stay accessible to everyone on the planet, forever, online. we did not evolve to deal with this, it is not natural. it is a perversion of the natural human state and interactions. having to control your behavior to such degree because you risk some nonsense haunting you for all of your life is not natural
>>534852404>Scary title, secret glassesIts legal to film in public. This is a tactic to get it banned. Subvert women on your side and they do your dirty work. It works every time.
>>534856351Public place Ill watch all i want Cope faggot
>>534856337Marriage is pointless and stupid. It doesn't make a bitch put out, it doesn't protect him if he takes what he's due, it should not exist. Simple as.
fuck it, let's fast forward to this:https://youtu.be/_dXqugxU1skidiots think that's a punishment lmao. I'd pay money for it
>>534852808They had bangkok112 photo up all around Nana plaza they were gonna kill him. That's why he disappeared
back in my day we had fake x-ray glasses, and we liked it
>>534858052>Marriage is pointless and stupid... unless you have kids
>>534852404So will it be legal now only for women to record men in public, but now you cant record women? Gotta make sure you cant have proof of them committing crimes then, right jews?
