I think the physically superior should protect each other in a sort of covenant not minding any intellectual differences. It just makes so much sense. Physical battles are different from intellectual ones. It's the most rational strategy. Now, in-group, they could still have intellectual battles, but the consequences of intellectual battles are fundamentally DIFFERENT and basically like it just, the leaking of it into the physical realm, it makes no sense. If the physically superior (and keep in mind this extends to all realms of physical defense, like weapons, etc. so "physically superior" is a label you can correctly apply to anybody regardless of their bodily measurements that can physically defend themselves better than the average person) band together they are multiplying their "force" in a maximal sort of way which like a physically inferior person could not aide to that much. It's perfect dude.If any of you faggot retards reply about some retarded shit like memeflags, you must McNutt yourself
>>534940190oh like a 'thinking done by cowards and fighting done by fools' sort of thing?I vaguely remember Thucydides positing that as his "#1 Sure-Fire Business Strategy" or something to that effect, on a Youtube short I watched once on the toiletpeople who CAN defend themselves totally SHOULD nebulously band together in some capacity, putting aside all other differences, in support of the exact goal which you stated or meant to stateseems like a winner to me
>>534940711Yeah pretty much, yeah.This is a rational conclusion I'm drawing from a person standard. But it's not perfect as it is. A more perfect way to put it would be that the allies that you have in the covenant are at the bare minimum agreeing with each other on what qualifies as defense of themselves. If they don't, then cooperation gets much harder or at least complex due to defection or treason, but there is a balance where the systems to control for these things are worth it, to put in place, in exchange for better defense that numbers provide.Basically, if they do have that same baseline of "In this particular scenario and in every scenario of a higher impact, I am either defending myself or dying trying" then that's the "perfect" covenant.
>>534940711This is not something to be taken over and applied to endevors like entrepreneurship. It's purely about physical defense.
>>534940190>Anon invents the Mafia but is to dumb to realize it's already been done
>>534940190Dude, a cardboard drone will create another asshole to your genetically superior men.Shut up, retard.
>>534940190>me lift big rock>me no read maps>2 kliks?>shoots teammate twice
