File: 1766059809474.png (714 KB, 912x1136)

714 KB PNG

>>534941520
When was the last time an American needed a licence to fart?

It was fake and gay. Both sides were freemasons larping about warring against each other, while simultaneously visiting each other Masonic lodges and being friends. The war never happened. It was a myth in an attempt to explaining the origins of the United States.

File: IMG_1143.jpg (1.4 MB, 1960x3808)

1.4 MB JPG

it's complicated

>>534942171
It did happen and they sacrificed all of the uninitiated goycattle in the war while they all sucked each other off in their lodges. At the beginning of every new age the world needs to be drowned in blood, and it is always the blood of the clueless patriotic goyim who think they're doing the right thing. Like how the judeo-mason order brainwashed the third estate and weaponized it against the very people who were protecting them from the judeo-masons.

>>534942171
The Freemasons in America controlled the cotton industry and slavery while the Freemasons of Britain operated the East India Company, the opium industry and slavery (renamed indentured servitude) in India. Both benefitted from these criminal and crimes against humanity. A freemason's proof of being a lodge member basically acted as a passport. British freemasons would visit American lodges and American freemasons would visit British lodges (in Britain and India).

The American Revolutionary War of Independence was a farce and a hoax. It never happened.

File: Baphomet_by_Éliphas_Lévi.jpg (510 KB, 960x1424)

510 KB JPG

>>534941520
The tax rate that provoked the war was 3%. Immediately after the war the new American government imposed a 15-20% tax rate to pay for the war and it has never decreased.

The American Revolution was real in the sense that it was a massive power grab by the masonic power structure. It was fake in that it was never really an effort to give "power to the people".

Like all masonic plays there is an esoteric and an esoteric meaning to everything they do. They bring slavery while proclaiming freedom.

File: IMG_1685.jpg (103 KB, 1600x1600)

103 KB JPG

>>534942539
It’s no coincidence that the American flag is based on the East India Company’s flag.

>>534941520
lodges were instrumental for american independences, but not all of them were freemason. Here all freemasons were secretly working for the british or thought of the british as new masters on a new colonial order.

as Carlos Maria de Alvear a known freemason snake of the Argentine revolution put it:
>These provinces wish to belong to Britain, receive its laws, obey its government and live under its powerful influence. They abandon themselves without any conditions to the generosity and good faith of the English people...

>The country is not of age or state to govern itself and needs an outside hand to direct it... Only the generous British Nation can provide an effective remedy for so many evils, welcoming into its arms these Provinces that will obey its Government, and receive its laws with the greatest pleasure...

all freemasons deserve to be beheaded

Andrew Jackson made America free but only between 1835 and 1913.

>>534941520
Back in 1700s freemasons were interesting, now its just a networking club for old money sex pests and foreign spies, USA and West in general would lose nothing from proscribing freemasonry.

>>534941520
OF COURSE IT WAS REAL
WHY DO YOU THINK THEYRE STILL SO BUTTHURT
THE SECOND 1 WILL BE REAL TOO LOL

File: quote-they-have-the-guns-(...).jpg (68 KB, 850x400)

68 KB JPG

>>534942110
>When was the last time an American needed a licence to fart?
The rights and freedoms that liberal societies promote are an illusion.

For 200 years while the masonic order assaulted Christendom we were told about freedom of speech and freedom of religion. We were supposed to tolerate any vile blasphemy they could think of.

Now that gay communists control all the centers of power, Christians are saying, "hey, can I have some of that freedom you talked about?" and being told, "No, that would be hate speech. You have to do as you are told".

The diversity crowd was all about "equality" until they gained power, now they're all about anti white racism.

File: george washington.jpg (119 KB, 706x706)

119 KB JPG

>>534941520
christopher columbus was a freemason
the "spaniards" sailed to america to discover the "fountain of life" in 1492
but in reality 1492 is when spain entered its golden age because it kicked out the jews (search "when did spain enter the golden age", "when did spain kick out the jews"

so these "spaniards" that "sailed west to discover" were jews pretending to be spaniards (cryptojew freemasons) who were kicked out of spain for eating people and raping and making kids disappear and doing blood cult rituals to their fallen god satan

christopher columbus was a freemason
george washington was a freemason
benjamin franklin was a freemason

it was one big club and it still is, there are tons of active freemasons in politics and in media, the "men on the moon" (hoax) were freemasons etc

>>534943269
do they still take boywives for themselves? they were especially interested back in the day in taking away the Jesuits' monopoly on education, to the point of burning churches and schools

>>534941520
England has been a US colony since WWII

>>534941520
Every Major Revolutionary figure in the Americas was a Freemason, From Washington to San Martin.

Really makes you wonder why there wasn't an active ban on Freemasons in Britain and Spain.

>>534944353
San Martín wasnt, he was initiated when he was a prisoner of war but he never formarly joined, his political rivals, Alvear and Rivadavia were freemason

>>534941520
it was real
and they were ok with it so long as the city of london could have the first bank of the united states...the second bank of the united states
but once Jackson killed them, then they began planning and fomenting the civil war, in which the city of london was victorious and their prize was to corporatize the US government and have these corporate entities masquerade as legitimate government
this then set the stage for the third bank of the united states, I mean, the federal reserve

File: 1492.png (92 KB, 2034x445)

92 KB PNG

>>534944353
spain kicked out the jews in 1492 (same thing as kicking out freemasons) and then also entered their golden age in the same year lol

>>534944648
then the war of spanish sucession happened and the accursed absolutists Bourbons occupied the spanish throne, then slowly the freemasons started infiltrating the spanish court

>>534944648
Based Spaniards

>>534944496
Wasn't Lautaros' lodge pretty much Freemanson sponsored?

>>534944772
in a way, but not all of their members were freemasons, all the confusion comes from Mitre, when he wrote a history of San Martín, he pretty much warped the image of the general to suit his political needs, depicting San Martín as a apolitical figure and the lodge as freemason, but there's no evidence aside from a few contacts with the scottish lodge

>>534944770
unsurprising turn of events, that's what they do when they get kicked out, they just re-infiltrate and take over from within, it's what they did with rome after carthage too, the jews hijacked the "holy roman" vatican church

>>534941520
you're brown btw and your spam threads are fucking awful
australians used to be funny but now it's just browns and chinks spamming

>>534945050
>the jews hijacked the "holy roman" vatican church
And proceeded to slander and disenfranchise and genocide jews for the next 1500+ years? Luther was a raging philosemite his entire life and one of his greatest issues with Catholicism was literally its hatred of jews. Only on the final years of his life did he finally wake up to what the Catholic Church had been saying about them for the last millennium and a half.

>>534945050
>the jews hijacked the "holy roman" vatican church
yeah I heard that rethoric once before, about freemasons in the catholic church, usually blaming jesuits. But I made some diggins on the history of the first Jesuits and couldn't find evidence of it, they counter reform which in my opinion was a reform on its own often opposed to the freemasons objectives on Europe and the Americas, they controlled the universities and education, which had a pretty good scholarly program back in the day and rejected the divine authority of the absolute monarchs. Freemasons in Spain and France often shielded themselves on the absolutist monarchies to reduce the power of the Church

>>534942539
First free masonic lodge in India was made in 1720. It's crazy

>>534942539
Conincidentally the east india company flag has americas stars and stripes.

>>534942539
>The American Revolutionary War of Independence was a farce and a hoax.
I often hesitate to call it a revolution, a revolution destroys the status quo in favor of a new one, often resulting in a new dominant class. The American case was more of a emancipation rather than a revolution

File: gamaliel.jpg (116 KB, 594x420)

116 KB JPG

>>534945367
that one was pozzed from the getgo
muh church
jesus taught you didnt need a church, and 70 years later, the most important thing was a church

File: zionist_master_plan.png (741 KB, 1150x826)

741 KB PNG

>>534945323
>proceeded to slander and disenfranchise and genocide jews for the next 1500+ years

yup, jews do not care about their own. the ones at the top do not care about the ones that are not "enlightened", same way now that the jewish influence that runs the world does not really care about anyone in israel living or dying. they are demons who hate humanity

the false flag is the only trick they have. they attack themselves to get sympathy from white people so they can infiltrate their countries. rabbis spraypaint swastikas on their synagogues etc

babylon wages war on babylon
babylon vanquishes the evils of babylon
babylon falls and babylon rises
the wars aren't real but the genocides of humanity are

>>534945367
Jesuits are conversos.
Jews who converted to catholicism in order to try and subvert it.

>>534942110
Is she sniffing the fart residue?

>>534945607
you're right, but christianity was an entire different thing, the moment it became the official roman religion they needed a Church to accompany the state. The Church (the latin one) became a state when the roman state dissappeared, now if you destroyed the catholic Church (the authority of the Pope, the Vatican, the college of Cardinals, etc) it would cease to exist

>>534945607
>jesus taught you didnt need a church
nope. In fact, he was the one who brought up Churches.

>>534941520
It was a proxy war and the pro French liberal faction was eventually killed off through decades of tariffs and then a civil war. Then 100 years later that same faction moved into the south and dismantled their representation, again, and opened US borders.

The glowniggers need a psyop to sell to people for their conquests. Who's to say the pro industrial faction that killed the pro liberal faction in the US weren't explicitly paid by foreign governments. We had a president elected on English money manipulation and he ends up assassinated and his assassin said euros put him up to it

>>534945756
there's no evidence of it, most of its funding members were spanish priests, and the Spanish Inquisition kept a close eye on all conversos in Spanish territories, it was literally one of their main jobs

File: FATHER.png (1.49 MB, 1729x917)

1.49 MB PNG

>>534945918
no hes right, jesus specifically teaches over and over that you dont need rituals, prayers, churches, or anything special to have a connection with God at all

He DOES establish the church but it is something that has been co-opted and tranished. the ultimate message is that if your life has been transformed by the teachings of Christ then YOU are the church. there is no building you can go to to meet god, or meet someone closer to god than you. in fact, the bible specifically tells us to NOT call another man "father" or feel like we need to confess our sins to another "man", and asks us to distance from dogmatic rituals. while the catholic church encourages you to go to your local pastor "father" and do communion (consuming the flesh and blood of christ = satanic ritual), confessionals, etc

>>534945918
When Jesus handed the keys to St. Peter and spoke of binding and loosing he was directly invoking the Al Habayit of Isaiah, which carries the direct context of authoritative rulership. Also,
Saint Ignatius of Antioch (disciple of the Apostle John)'s epistle to the Smyrnaeans ca. 107 AD:
>See that you all follow thebishop, even asJesus Christdoes theFather, and thepresbyteryas you would theapostles; and reverence thedeacons, as being the institution ofGod. Let no man do anything connected with theChurchwithout thebishop. Let that be deemed a properEucharist, which is [administered] either by thebishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever thebishopshall appear, there let the multitude [of the people] also be; even as, whereverJesus Christis, there is theCatholicChurch. It is not lawful without thebishopeither tobaptizeor to celebrate alove-feast; but whatsoever he shall approve of, that is also pleasing toGod, so that everything that is done may be secure and valid.
>Moreover, it is in accordance with reason that we should return to soberness [of conduct], and, while yet we have opportunity, exercise repentance towards God. It is well to reverence both God and thebishop. He who honours thebishophas been honoured byGod; he who does anything without theknowledgeof thebishop, does [in reality] serve thedevil.

>>534946129
Importance of the Eucharist and avoiding those who sow division
>They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they confess not the Eucharist to be the flesh of our Saviour Jesus Christ, which suffered for our sins, and which the Father, of His goodness, raised up again. Those, therefore, who speak against this gift of God, incur death in the midst of their disputes. But it were better for them to treat it with respect, that they also might rise again. It is fitting, therefore, that you should keep aloof from such persons, and not to speak of them either in private or in public, but to give heed to the prophets, and above all, to the Gospel, in which the passion [of Christ] has been revealed to us, and the resurrection has been fully proved. But avoid all divisions, as the beginning of evils.
>>534946065
Jesus condemned hollow faith, the show faith of the pharisees that was spiritually dead. Your exegesis is horrible.

>>534946065
Nope, that would mean that the gates of hell prevailed against the church, and that Jesus wasn't correct, and therefore not the messiah, which means you're still wrong.
>>534946129
Yes. They keys of hell and death, of binding and loosing that which is in heaven, is the authority to remit sins, perform liturgical services, baptisms, and pass down the authority to others.

>>534946244
"gates of hell prevailed against the church" is clearly not some sort of literal thing, in fact its incredibly obvious that demons run the world, satan is literally referred to as prince of earth, satan is the one who offered christ anything on earth as though it was his to give away.. how could anyone look at the world run by demons and not think that the gates of hell have prevailed

>>534946327
>Demons from hell are literally real, so Jesus saying they won't prevail against the church isn't literal because I'm putting the cart before the horse, but somehow I'm right, and "call no man father" highlighting the importance of God the Father isn't hyperbole and that's why we say "dad," instead.
What drug is this?

>>534946460
its called evaluating reality?

when demons wont prevail against christ it means that literally at the end of it all, christ will reign over them. but it is very clear to anyone with a working mind to look around and see that there are satanic cults running the world raping and eating innocent humans

how do you explain genesis 6:4 talking about nephilim and also the bible saying there will be a genetic war between the seed of the serpent and seed of the woman for all generations?

do you think we live in a demon infested society or not?

>>534946603
Read about the desert fathers before talking to me about demons, prot.

>>534946706
>redirection from the question

>>534946603
How do you take captive your thoughts? What sins feed lust?
>>534946745
You don't know anything about demonology, but are questioning me as if demons existing means that Christ was wrong or lying in what he said. The desert fathers will answer all of your questions.

It was real but British intelligence and Anglophilia won via wealth and elite education. Once it became a de facto requirement for every American President to have gone to Harvard or Yale, the City of London Corporation had won their colony back. Some resisted. Roosevelt was notoriously furious once he learned MI6 and the bankers had lied to him and taken advantage of American sympathies to draw them into the war. Teddy was despised by the WASP-British-Jewish banking elite for his traditional American machismo and colonial ambitions but his warlike nature was useful for them and Kennedy wanted dismantle the money-intel network in the USA so they killed him for it. This country saw a gradual overtaking of patriotic aristocrats by a cabal of actual socialists, Anglo-American financial elites, Jews, intelligence agencies, and banks. All the great families in America save for the Roosevelts date back to the civil war and earned their wealth through financial speculation or creating tools to kill white men (Pierre DuPont). It’s always been a battle of the money interests and their spies from the American patriot everyman, self made industrialists, and the Germanic impulse for gentlemanly warfare rather than subversion. These are the two Americas. Sadly, the former won big time through the 20th century.

>>534946846
i just dont understand, whenever im in a position of knowing something better than someone, its easy for me to explain to them, i dont need to say "go to this other guy and he will give you the answers", you're pretending i dont know anything about demonology but i guarantee you that i've spent way more time researching it than you have ever even considered, especially considering the average christian and even the average pastor doesn't have any comment about genesis 6:4 or the seed war

>>534947077
That's because you're an arrogant moron who think's they're right about everything. Why would I tell you, when there are monks with documented lives and experience who's sole purpose was to go fight demons in the desert for Christ?

>>534947077
You're more concerned about trying to tell me something than you are to look up who the desert fathers even were to find out why I might find them relevant to the discussion when you have all the power of the internet and AI at your disposal, and you just proved this about yourself.

all this derrailing of the thread feels like a freemasons plot

>>534941520
The American Revolution can be more accurately read as the 2nd English Civil War or the 2nd Glorious Revolution. It was, from the very beginning, a fight between Whigs and Tories, both in Britain as well as in the Americas, with famous Whigs such as John Wilkes supporting the colonists for example. The Whigs won and created their Whig version of Britain in the west while the Tories kept their Tory state in the east.

We are the Western British Empire. For the first 100 years of our existence, we were totally dominated culturally by Britain, much like Britain is dominated culturally by us today. We call that period the “Victorian Era” despite not even having Victoria as our monarch. Affairs between Gladstone and Disraeli were common topics in US papers. Young American heiresses married into British families, the play that Lincoln was watching before he was killed, “Our American Cousin” was satirizing this. Winston Churchill was the result of one of these trans Atlantic relations. The US Civil War was like a 3rd English Civil War, and people in Britain observed it and their opinion was divided by it much along the same lines as the American Revolution.

>>534941520
>are they still controlled by England?
lmao

no our democracy is still in tact, thankfully.

>>534947476
lol you think america has ever had a democracy?
let me get this straight, you think.. your leaders are elected.. off of fairly counted votes?

and you think the leader of the most powerful country on earth changes every 4 years.... based on what the population wants?

>>534947662
i believe we have it better than a lot of other countries, yes. i've seen constitutional rights that were given to us at the inception of the US be defended by the supreme court, that's enough to tell me we have it pretty good compared to other countries.

i'm not even bothered by the political back and forth bickering when i realize this. so long as our constitutional rights are never eroded we will always be able to fight for what is right and limit authoritarian policy.

>>534948013
what rights do you have if they can be given and taken away from you based on who is in power? is it really the right to bear arms when in reality any time someone brandishes a gun they get murdered by cops who get away with it? cops just murder people openly in the streets, instead of everyone blasting them with their revolver and enacting justice, they let it happen

what "constitutional rights" are even actually upheld? free speech isnt one, you can't even talk about mask mandates or covid unless you're inside a "free speech zone" at national parks etc (which are tucked away from where anyone goes)

americans have the illusions of rights and the illusion of choice, left vs right are both puppets owned by israel, the entire country is owned by israel. they give you little distractions and illusions to make you feel empowered

>>534948013
democracy on the US has been steadily eroded by land speculators and lobbyism to the point it resembles more of a plutocracy or an oligarchic republic rather than a true democracy

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/princeton-experts-say-us-no-longer-democracy

>>534946044
>Ignatius of Loyola, the founder of the Jesuit Order (Society of Jesus), had complex and historically significant ties to Jews and Jews by descent, particularly Conversos (Jews who converted to Christianity). While popular conspiracy theories often claim Ignatius was a "crypto-Jew," historical scholarship confirms that he and several early Jesuit leaders were of Jewish ancestry, but they were practicing Catholics who actively shaped the order's early policies.

File: 1655830339566.jpg (106 KB, 500x220)

106 KB JPG

>>534941520
The American Revolution was real, but it was brought about by Freemasons for two reasons:

>to create a vehicle to bring about a New World Order
>to once and for all if the ordinary man has the capacity to self-govern as a sovereign individual

The first point has been a total success. The US revolution successfully destroyed the Divine Right of Kings (Monarchy) worldwide. The second point not so much. Since 1900 the American public has steadily given up pieces of their personal sovereignty in exchange for perceived security. The rise of the New Deal welfare state began a system of dependence & slavery to a socialist government that's grown in size to leviathan proportions. Any time you are dependent on any one or any government to survive (social security, pension etc) you are a slave. Western governments now openly consider citizens as children, needing care from councils of Wise Men.

>>534949223
That's as stupid as saying that you took someone's right to free speech by killing them, but I understand the point.

>>534949214
>historical scholarship confirms that he and several early Jesuit leaders were of Jewish ancestry
not really, there are no sources confirming that claim, from where did you take that quote?

>>534945918
the council of nicea
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1v0jB3OswM
reminder Saul's mission was 100% successful

File: this is a case of mental (...).jpg (55 KB, 871x653)

55 KB JPG

>>534947476
>our democracy

>>534949775
So, do you have a rational position or are you just trying to slander Paul?

>>534949689
I got it very quickly from an ai with the prompty "ignatio jesuits what connection with jews"
If you would like a better source you can check this out.

https://now.fordham.edu/living-the-mission/nostra-aetate-dialogue-explores-tangled-roots-of-jesuits-and-jews/

>>534950187
Saul, who was a student of one of the exalted rabbis of the talmud
yeah he totally just went and had an epiphany 70 years after jesus
totally not an infiltration mission
the rational position is to understand what the talmud is
the rational position is to understand that one cannot worship multiple masters
the rational position is that one needs to be pretty retarded to accept that god must fuck your mom in order for you to have spiritual powers
and if you try to cultivate them you're communing with le debil
remember little one, only jesus legitimately had spiritual powers totally not of the debil like all other displays of spiritual powers in history
so you'd best not ever think you can have one
whether they are your human birthright or not
sorry chump christians have no basis to speak of a rational position

>>534946244
>gates of hell prevailed against the church
gates are a defensive tool, it talks about a church attacking hell, not a church being battered in the corner.
human created churches have all been infiltrated by satan. but the unseen Church of Jesus Christ prevails over satan since they are the attacking force chosen by Jesus Christ.

>>534946706
>>534946846
>read the desert fathers
>read the desert fathers
you have no fucking clue yourself.
we have way more access to who and what demons are than them.

>>534950580
That's just one big retarded incredulity fallacy.
>>534950980
There's no unseen church. The apostles were visible people with documented lives.
>>534951116
No you don't. You're a retard screeching on the internet, not an ascetic practicing radical self-denial and rejection of sin.

>>534950580
So the kings prophets in the OT were chosen through the Devil's power? You're a retard.

>>534951464
kings and prophets*

>>534942657
Shut up Robbie

>>534951362
>y-you're just incredulous that I'm a talmud apologist
already pasted it here
>>534945607
>Gamaliel, a pharisee and celebrated doctor of mosaid law
>Paul says he was taught at the feet of rabbi Gamaliel
you're just being selective about what you would like to believe and reject anything that doesnt fit your malformed teachings
there's a reason why the council of nicea kicked a bunch of material out of the bible and introduced the concept of virgin birth as a prerequisite for having spiritual powers
now nevermind about Jesus' childhood
there's just simply "not much written about it"
because the pharisees did not want plebes with spiritual power
thus the suppression of the history of jesus learning egyptian spiritual practices at the perfect time to make the accomplishment, which is at the onset of puberty

File: 1762632390786.gif (517 KB, 400x165)

517 KB GIF

>>534941520
The Empire was always the Jewish banking empire.
It was much more reserved when it was British, we likely kept them in check a lot more than the Americans do. Now it's basically dying and they have nowhere left to go.
The United States is basically Moria.

>>534951362
the Church is an assembly of people under Jesus Christ, not a building or denomination.
Jesus is where two or three are gathered in his name.
once you have an institution it is easy for satan to infiltrate said institution by sending people who pretend to be christians, or actually people with the spirit of anti christ to take over that institution.

>>534951362
>No you don't. You're a retard screeching on the internet
according to who, You? youre a slanderer. I studied the subject of demonology extensively.
you know what funny to me? roman catholic top exorcists dont even know the difference between demons and fallen angels.
they think the world is run by demons under satan, no its much worse than that. there is an entire organized power structure of fallen angels which results on the very base principles of this earth to be upside down.
satan doesnt take over people, he is concerned with his kingdom over earth from a heavenly place.
demons are a joke in comparison, disembodied spirits of the nephilim who were half humans half angels.

>For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.
Paul is talking about fallen angels here, not demons.

>>534951671
No, you're a retard with a schizophrenic theory about Paul, the guy who was condemning circumcision and judeization, who you accuse of talmud apologism for having repented of being a pharisee.

>>534951755
The church is the assembly of people whom Christ ordained as such, not any other assembly claiming to be a church based on misinterpretations of scriptures that don't belong to them.

>>534951755
based neph researcher. anyone who refuses to acknowledge genesis 6:4 and how there will be war between the fallen angel/seed of serpent/neph descednants and mankind simply does not have the right context to continue reading the rest of scripture. ALL of scripture MUST be evaluated and read with the distinct understanding that the watchers exist, there have been non-human forces interacting on earth prior to, during, and after all events in the bible, etc

File: 1773717383369132.png (551 KB, 1748x1241)

551 KB PNG

>>534951894
>not any other assembly claiming to be a church based on misinterpretations of scriptures
glad we agree that the roman catholic church is not the true Church.

>>534941520
Freemasons are such giant faggots fuck them all

>>534951939
the neph seed was eliminated tho.
its their unclean disembodied spirits that are the problem since they were half divine half human. they still have their human desires, thats why demons are called unclean spirits. everything considered unclean is of a mixed nature.

>>534951962
You can disprove the Romans with 2 chapters from Matthew, but that would mean affirming the concept of apostolic succession, which would be difficult for you.
>>534951755
Completely irrelevant, not salvific, and has nothing to do with resisting sin or repentance, or successfully exorcising unclean spirits.

File: nephilim to federal reserve.jpg (120 KB, 782x1024)

120 KB JPG

>>534952097
>the neph seed was eliminated tho.
well, im curious for you to elaborate on this, from my understanding the descendants of nephilim (modern day jews) are basically all around us still and running the world, under the guidance of satan who they all worship. the rothschilds genuinely believe they are descendants from the watchers etc which is why they all inbreed and look all fucked up and corrupted

otherwise, my understanding of "unclean spirits" being disembodied nephilim is identical to yours, they are what many cultures refer to as djinni, ghosts, possessions, demons, etc. they thirst and hunger but have no body, which is why their only intent is to possess a human (because they crave physical experiences)

>>534941520
It was real but the Rothschilds recolonized us over time

File: george washington nationa(...).png (2.31 MB, 1280x1884)

2.31 MB PNG

>>534952491
the rothschilds are freemasons and america was founded by freemasons, it was always "colonized" by them

>>534951755
Funny you mention Paul, who gives the requirements for clergy in his Epistles, and makes numerous statements about the sacraments and the priesthood throughout the NT. I guess you can keep picking and choosing instead of repenting and talking to a Priest about your questions instead of making stuff up, though.

>>534951828
>no, Paul and his successors told us the truth about Saul
wave that rainbow flag

>>534952734
An Orthodox priest*

>>534952797
>t. A Jew

>>534952148
>You can disprove the Romans with 2 chapters from Matthew
lol no?
do you even know what Matthew depicts Jesus as and who Jesus is talking to most of the time?
>but that would mean affirming the concept of apostolic succession
apostolic succession is not scriptural. nowhere is it stated that any of the apostles hands down their apostleship.
apostles are not bishops, they are two completely different callings.

>>534952402
>well, im curious for you to elaborate on this
the last nephilim where among the tribes of Canaan.
Canaan was a son of Ham, why was Canaan cursed instead of Ham who actually raped the wife of Noah, and why even do such a thing.
because there was something wrong with Canaan.
>Gen 6
>12 And God saw the earth, and behold, it was corrupt, for all flesh had corrupted their way on the earth.
ALL flesh was corrupt, that includes the wife of Ham, and maybe even Japheth. thy had genetic code of nephilim in them that was later expressed in Canaan.
so now we know where the giants of the land of Canaan come from that God told the Israelites to destroy. the Amorites, the Emim, the Zuzim, the Rephaim, the Anakim and Goliath.
those tribes were all wiped out by the descendants of Esau and the Israelites during that time. these were the last people who expressed the genetic linage of the Nephilim.
and thats why God wanted them genocided, not because God was a genocidal maniac but to not let humanity again get infested and overrun by this demonic linage of half human half angel DNA.

>he rothschilds genuinely believe they are descendants from the watchers
thats just the demonic disembodied spirits who they contact tell them to. they fall for their lies, but subsequently are used by satan for his world system. they are not of the line of the watchers, they are just humans being lied to by spirits using their pride.
satan and demons always play into pride, easiest way to deceive someone.
>bro youre totally special yo
meanwhile they laugh about them.

>>534952848
>you jew!
>continues to support the jews and itsreal and all their fag endeavors while defending their augmentations of history
typical church going sheep
dont act like you didnt mask up every day and get your boosters because your preists wouldnt let you in the church otherwise

>>534953124
>>You can disprove the Romans with 2 chapters from Matthew
>lol no?
>do you even know what Matthew depicts Jesus as and who Jesus is talking to most of the time?
>>but that would mean affirming the concept of apostolic succession
>apostolic succession is not scriptural. nowhere is it stated that any of the apostles hands down their apostleship.
>apostles are not bishops, they are two completely different callings.
Pretends to have some arcane knowledge of matthew, and then contorts apostleship.

>>534953124
>>You can disprove the Romans with 2 chapters from Matthew
>lol no?
>do you even know what Matthew depicts Jesus as and who Jesus is talking to most of the time?
>>but that would mean affirming the concept of apostolic succession
>apostolic succession is not scriptural. nowhere is it stated that any of the apostles hands down their apostleship.
>apostles are not bishops, they are two completely different callings.
>>>534952402
>>well, im curious for you to elaborate on this
>the last nephilim where among the tribes of Canaan.
>Canaan was a son of Ham, why was Canaan cursed instead of Ham who actually raped the wife of Noah, and why even do such a thing.
>because there was something wrong with Canaan.
>>Gen 6
>>12 And God saw the earth, and behold, it was corrupt, for all flesh had corrupted their way on the earth.
>ALL flesh was corrupt, that includes the wife of Ham, and maybe even Japheth. thy had genetic code of nephilim in them that was later expressed in Canaan.
>so now we know where the giants of the land of Canaan come from that God told the Israelites to destroy. the Amorites, the Emim, the Zuzim, the Rephaim, the Anakim and Goliath.
...
Pretends to have scientific knowledge of race that no longer exists to contradict Ephesians 6:12
This is willful heresy.

>>534952734
everyone in Christ is a priest, its not a special clergy class. every priest needs to know the Word, that why studying the bible on your own under the guide of Christ and the Holy Spirit is so important.
>who gives the requirements for clergy in his Epistles
exactly, and the roman church doesnt hold up to it, thus invalidating it.

Qualifications for Overseers
3 The saying is trustworthy: If anyone aspires to the office of overseer, he desires a noble task. 2 Therefore an overseer[a] must be above reproach, the husband of one wife,[b] sober-minded, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, 3 not a drunkard, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money. 4 He must manage his own household well, with all dignity keeping his children submissive, 5 for if someone does not know how to manage his own household, how will he care for God's church? 6 He must not be a recent convert, or he may become puffed up with conceit and fall into the condemnation of the devil. 7 Moreover, he must be well thought of by outsiders, so that he may not fall into disgrace, into a snare of the devil.

Qualifications for Deacons
8 Deacons likewise must be dignified, not double-tongued,[c] not addicted to much wine, not greedy for dishonest gain. 9 They must hold the mystery of the faith with a clear conscience. 10 And let them also be tested first; then let them serve as deacons if they prove themselves blameless. 11 Their wives likewise[d] must be dignified, not slanderers, but sober-minded, faithful in all things. 12 Let deacons each be the husband of one wife, managing their children and their own households well. 13 For those who serve well as deacons gain a good standing for themselves and also great confidence in the faith that is in Christ Jesus.

>>534953400
What about the 7 churches? What about the drunk priests who were killed by the eucharist?
You should know these stories, since you think you're an expert.

>>534953400
You can't pull from these scriptures and deny the ecumenical councils at the same time, btw.

>>534953388
Lexical Summary
apostolos: Apostle
Original Word: ἀπόστολος
Part of Speech: Noun, Masculine
Transliteration: apostolos

1. a delegate
2. (specially) an ambassador of the Gospel
3. (officially) a commissioner of Christ, "apostle" (with miraculous powers)
apostle, messenger, he that is sent.

episkopos: Overseer, Bishop
Original Word: ἐπίσκοπος
Part of Speech: Noun, Masculine
Transliteration: episkopos
1. an overseer
2. (in genitive case) one of the co-superintendents entrusted with the well-being of a local assembly or of assemblies within a city or location
{literally or figuratively}


apostle and bishop are two different jobs in the Faith.

>>534953388
>This is willful heresy.
you have zero knowledge on the subject and then accuse others? lmao

>>534953933
Defining words isn't what ecclesiology is.

File: Gospel 2.png (252 KB, 1738x1232)

252 KB PNG

>>534941520

>>534953933
The eucharist and baptism are both miraculous powers? Who reads the gospel during the liturgy, and who prepares the eucharist? Simple questions that you should be able to answer.

>>534942171

Interesting theory ty

File: 1775269826497857.jpg (85 KB, 680x680)

85 KB JPG

>>534941520
were the european powers real? is the vatican or christianity even real?

>>534941520
After all the expense england wasted trying to get the colonies on line, engkand suddenly just gave up.
Seems likely there were backroom negotiations and an agreement was made to compensate England and pay them off to leave us alone

>>534941520
Fake, look at a map of DC. They made a government over a bunch of retards who never asked for it, and made them think that it was a good system. Meanwhile, the system is a politician making up the whatever lies are most appealing to the largest number of stupid people. It's totally demonic, now, and always has been.

>>534947476
>democracy
Kek

>>534950520
i got this from AI too:

>The historical evidence regarding whether St. Ignatius of Loyola was of Jewish descent is inconclusive and unproven, though the possibility remains a subject of scholarly debate.

>Lack of Definitive Proof: No definitive genealogical records or primary sources conclusively prove that Ignatius had Jewish ancestry (was a converso). Historians note his Basque noble lineage and service in Castilian courts, where limpieza de sangre (purity of blood) laws were strictly enforced, as arguments against this claim.

AI just tells you what you want to read, but I'll give you this: Ignatius of Loyola has a quote where he said he wishes to have been born a jew to be in that way more closer to Jesus, also the Jesuits accepted conversos as members, but they had to be convinced conversos, and the Inquisition made sure the conversos were legitimate and constant

>>534953742
>What about the 7 churches?
its about the 7 Church ages. each Church gets their lampstand removed and the next Church age takes over.
the last Church age is Laodicea, the lukewarm Church. guess what Church age you are under.
after Laodicea comes judgement since she has the last lampstand.

>What about the drunk priests who were killed by the eucharist?
what about all the churches that were eradicated because of their blasphemies and doctrines of demons? a priest dying is nothing special.
Babylon the harlot Church awaits the worst judgement of them all.

>>534953801
scriptures stand above councils as authority.

>>534954023
>Defining words isn't what ecclesiology is.
Words have clear definitions, its not up to people or churches to define what the Word says.
just become a talmudic pharisee if you think otherwise. God does not bow to the Will of man.

>>534954152
>The eucharist and baptism are both miraculous powers?
baptism in the Holy Spirit is biblical, water baptism is a symbol of being born again afterward. water wont save you.
the eucharist doesnt turn magically into the blood and flesh of Jesus Christ.
if you dont taste literal blood and flesh the eucharist is nothing but a ritual.
we break Bread, not a wafer, and pass the Cup, not a sip, in remembrance of Jesus Christ and not to do cannibal blood rituals.
>Who reads the gospel during the liturgy
very person in Christ should feast on the Word since Jesus Christ is the Word become flesh to give Life.
not some special priest that is above the laity and withholds the scriptures from them by speaking in Latin.

>>534954152
There is literally no point in trying to reason with this kraut, he's on here shitting up threads with his neurotic heretical garbage practically 24/7/365. You learn to identify him really fast, just ignore and pray for him.

>>534956640
>attacking the person instead of the content
your entire scriptural knowledge stands on roman catholic traditions, not on the scripture itself. otherwise you could prove me wrong with the scripture.

Rockefellers and other industrial families, in their haste to enslave their fellow man and social climb to “godhood”, sold the USA back out to British interests. A lot happened since then, and now in 2026 everything appears to be financially run through trusts formerly operated by John Dick/Helliwell on the Isle of Jersey (British Crown’s “peculiar possession”), and the empire’s assets managed by sadistic pedophelic snuff blackmail under guise of shock rituals. Military comped too. Glhf
https://youtube.com/watch?v=8mH3JNJj_e4

>>534941520
definitely real. Things would be very different if we still answered to the crown. Imagine Rome just shutting the fuck up and listening to whatever the Greeks told them without complaining.

>>534956079
>its about the 7 Church ages
No, those were 7 churches which existed at that time and were being written to. It's has nothing to do with some dispensational nonsense where you ignore the one true Orthodox Faith and it's history to prop up some kind of cultural syncretism nonsense.
>Babylon the harlot Church awaits the worst judgement of them all.
Babylon isn't a church. The whore of Babylon and babylon are two different things, retard, and the Whore of Babylon is a city, Jerusalem, a fact that is clear to anyone who reads the words of the prophet Jeremiah, since that's where that comes from.
>Words have clear definitions, its not up to people or churches to define what the Word says.
just become a talmudic pharisee if you think otherwise. God does not bow to the Will of man.
You're using words to make a word/concept fallacy that Bishops aren't apostles when they are, even by your own definitions.
>>534956079
Only the Romans refuse to translate the liturgy into the language of their jurisdictions, to my knowledge. I'm western rite Orthodox, so portions of the liturgy are in latin, but the english translation is in the booklet. It's not a big deal.

>>534956640
He needs to read why he's wrong so that he can acknowledge it and be convicted. I will pray for him though.

>>534957629
>Babylon isn't a church
then why does the Pope have the Babylonian title of Pontifex Maximus? its his twitter handle.
>Pontifex Maximus is a Latin title meaning "Greatest Bridge Builder" or "Supreme Pontiff," identifying the head of the College of Pontiffs in ancient Rome. It originated as the most important religious office in Roman paganism, bridging the gap between men and gods, and was later adopted by Catholic Popes.
and the Roman in turn adopted it from the fleeing Babylonian king priest class.
>retard, and the Whore of Babylon is a city, Jerusalem
so the same belief as zionism? lmao
>the words of the prophet Jeremiah
Jeremiah? who prophecies about Jerusalem going to exile into the literal city of Babylon as judgement in his days?
Babylon in Revelation is a picture of the pagan Babylon capturing the people of God.
who in history persecuted and killed the ones that didnt bow to the pope and the roman church?
rome declared any believer in scripture over tradition a heretic that needs to be killed.
papal rome is Babylon.
>Bishops aren't apostles when they are, even by your own definitions
bishop and apostles have two different translations, the former is a local overseer, the latter is someone sent out by God.
you have no apostolic succession, there is only the succession of bishops.
Peter was sent out to open the gospel to jews, samaritans and gentiles by using the keys given to him by Jesus Christ. he opened the door of the gospel to these people in Acts.
his special role was already fulfilled.

>>534957629
>I'm western rite Orthodox
then why even apologize for the roman church or the pope? you dont even recognize his authority.

>>534941520
The american revolution was the civil war.

>>534958315
I have not done this a single time.
>>534958235
>then why does the Pope have the Babylonian title of Pontifex Maximus? its his twitter handle.
Begin the question fallacy. "The whore of Babylon is Vatican City because the Pope..." Has nothing to do with anything. The Antichrist rules from the 3rd Temple in Jerusalem, and the "Whore of Babylon" is a reference to Jeremiah's characterizations of Jerusalem in the Old Testament, for paying tributes to Babylon and worshiping their gods. He calls Jersualem a whore in like 100 different ways, other than being persecuted by the Hebrews, it comprises, I think, the bulk of his work in the OT.
>bishop and apostles have two different translations
Peter was a bishop, so that invalidates your argument, entirely. Your definition of apostle includes what bishops are and do. Nothing about being an "overseer" precludes one from being sent, as bishops are often sent.

>>534958694
begging the question*

>>534958694
>The Antichrist rules from the 3rd Temple in Jerusalem
no, this is wrong. the jews were judged by God for rejecting their Messiah in 70 AD. there will never be a temple build again in Jerusalem.
the temple the anti christ inhabits is a human temple, not a physical building. anti christ is also a spirit, a spirit that inhabits a person, not a building.
>He calls Jersualem a whore in like 100 different ways
Ezekiel too.
>Peter was a bishop, so that invalidates your argument, entirely.
the bible documents Peter in Jeruslam where the head was the James, the brother of Jesus and not Peter.
we know Peter was in Antioch according to Paul meeting him there.
and we have Peter writing from "Babylon" in 1 Peter 5:13.
maybe Peter was an overseer (bishop) of a local Church like Antioch or Rome, but we dont have much information about that in the scripture.
Peters main role was to open the gospel with the keys he was given by Jesus to the jews, samaritans and gentiles. not be head bishop or head apostle over all others. he was one among brethren according to his own words.
the main point is, that there is no apostolic succession that papal rome can justify their roman emperor role on and call it divinely sanctioned.

File: 4cc0e5c0f64604c12c398145a(...).jpg (37 KB, 900x499)

37 KB JPG

>>534941520
>or are they still controlled by England?
Royals were taken down. Trump is King now. He even rode in the royal carriage (first non royal to).

>>534959452
Antichrists, and the spirit of antichrist are distinct. They are two different things. The attribution of the title "The Antichrist" to the beast of the earth at the end of time, is colloquy for the beast of the earth. The great commission was not completed, so the end of the world has not come. There is typography to this.
>there will never be a temple build again in Jerusalem.
You can't know this.

Scripture's not a history book. It's a liturgical book. The apostles wrote things that aren't in the bible. It's not the sole authority for the history of the church.
Peter was Bishop wherever he went and founded a Church, instituting Bishops in those jurisdictions. Being an apostle of Christ, ordained before the Church was established, he had a different responsibility.
>the main point is, that there is no apostolic succession that papal rome can justify their roman emperor role on and call it divinely sanctioned.
Duh, but why were the other apostles given the same keys?

>>534959452
Even today, bishops establish new churches in places. Big deal in ukraine actually, between Constantinople's OCU and Moscow's UOC. You can read about it on https://spzh.life/en/ to get a better idea of what bishops actually do.

>>534961977
>to the beast of the earth at the end of time, is colloquy for the beast of the earth
according to Daniel beasts in the bible are empires.
we also know from Daniel that the last beast or empire is the continuation of the Roman Empire mixed with the secular world, ie papal Rome.
>You can't know this.
yes you can. the temple of the Holy Spirit is the born again believer in Jesus Christ atoning work on the cross.
>Scripture's not a history book.
yes it is, from Genesis to Revelation it records history.
>It's not the sole authority for the history of the church.
but its the sole authority over the Church since John defines Jesus Christ as the Word.
>Duh, but why were the other apostles given the same keys?
Peter was first in the context of opening the gospel to the gentiles. ofc you also have Paul, the apostle to the gentiles.

>>534962244
I never challenged the position of the bishops, just that the office is distinct from that of an apostle.
there are only few apostles but many bishops who are there to oversee established churches according to Paul.
Paul established churches as his role of apostles but those churches then had bishops since Paul went on in his ministry.

>>534942110
You don’t understand the awesome Monty Python nature of this.

>>534962468
"..that beast is a man"

>I never challenged the position of the bishops, just that the office is distinct from that of an apostle.
Only in chronology. They still do the same thing.
>yes it is, from Genesis to Revelation it records history.
Just because there's history in it doesn't make it a history book. You have to analyze it to get the historical data from it.
>but its the sole authority over the Church since John defines Jesus Christ as the Word.
Jesus Christ is the Word that God spoke in order that all things were created. That's not what the bible is.

File: 132-16-43-47-2026.png (157 KB, 653x126)

157 KB PNG

>>534962468

>>534962900
It is not through a want of names containing the number of that name that I say this, but on account of the fear of God, and zeal for the truth: for the name Evanthas (ΕΥΑΝΘΑΣ) contains the required number, but I make no allegation regarding it. Then also Lateinos (ΛΑΤΕΙΝΟΣ) has the number six hundred and sixty-six; and it is a very probable [solution], this being the name of the last kingdom [of the four seen by Daniel]. For the Latins are they who at present bear rule: I will not, however, make any boast over this [coincidence].
Against Heresies (St. Irenaeus) Book V, Chapter 30

the beast is the Latin man reigning his Latin empire on the world, and that would be papal rome. an empire is ruled by a ruler, always.
Vicarious Filii Dei in roman numerals adds up to 666.
now we come to the question, what special Mark does the Latin kingdom and the Latin man have?
what makes him distinct in the role of office of anti christ, claiming to be the man in place of Christ?
did papal Rome change Gods law that would make it another law that would set people apart by having the Mark of Papal authority by keeping said law instead of Gods law?

>That's not what the bible is.
2 Timothy 3:16-17
16 All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 17 that the man of God[a] may be complete, equipped for every good work.

>>534963523
666 was talking about Nero in the time of John. I said erliar that there was typography to this. I meant typology, of course.
>2 Timothy 3:16-17
The Bible is not Jesus. The Bible isn't part of the trinity.

>>534963523
Your still working on the assumption that there is some relationship between Jerusalem and Rome, like there was in the time of Nero. You have no idea whether Roman Catholicism will even survive until the end of time.

>>534963776
>666 was talking about Nero in the time of John.
yes true, and papal Rome claims its authority as the Roman Pontiff back to Constantine who was the Roman Emperor with the "Donation of Constantine".
the only question regarding the 666 is, who is in charge of the continued Roman Empire.

>The Bible is not Jesus.
thats not what I am saying, the Word, divinely inspired by the Holy Spirit is Jesus, since it was the Holy Spirit that overshadowed Mary and later descended onto Jesus as it was prophecied by the divinely inspired scriptures.
Jesus is the Word manifest in the flesh, and the apostles were chosen by him who in turn were divinely inspired and gave us the gospel.

>>534963901
>Roman Catholicism will even survive until the end of time
if we theorize that the harlot Babylon is the Roman Catholic Church then according to Revelation it will be destroyed by the kings of the world, the secular part of the last empire on the earth.

>>534963901
>>534964325
>if we theorize that the harlot Babylon is the Roman Catholic Church then according to Revelation it will be destroyed by the kings of the world

Revelation 17 and 18

>>534964325
How do you know the pope isn't simply "an antichrist," since 666 was already fulfilled w/ nero?

>>534964325
There were many antichrists in Roman and Byzantize history. 666 was code referring specifically to nero, so that his identity could be communicated in secret. It's an anachronism.

>>534964764
the papal office is the office of anti christ, in that sense that each successive pope is "an antichrist" which in turn will result in the final antichrist.
its just this office of authority that satan uses to subjugate the world into worship to him through these/this men/man.

>since 666 was already fulfilled w/ nero?
if Nero was the antichrist then the Word and world would have been already judged and the new heaven and earth would already be here. but this is not so. thus it wasnt Nero.

>>534964983
yes ofc, just as there is the Holy Spirit and the spirit of antichrist. this just means satan has already used many men to deceive the flock and lead it astray.
its just how he has to operate to wage war against the people and blind them of his defeat by the finished work of Jesus Christ on the cross taking all sin on himself in place of us.

>>534965152
>the papal office is the office of anti christ, in that sense that each successive pope is "an antichrist" which in turn will result in the final antichrist.
You don't know this.

>>534947016
And here we are, true aristocrats, our land stolen from under our feet

>>534965152
The popes are antichrists, sure, but the claim that it will be the office of the final Antichrist is just something that you made up.

File: 1772174707491666.jpg (44 KB, 1169x495)

44 KB JPG

>>534941520
Washington was never a mason. Don't @ me.

>>534965281
it becomes painfully clear if you combine Daniels revelations with the book of Revelation.
they are complementary.

>>534965357
>but the claim that it will be the office of the final Antichrist
idk what the final deception will be, it could very well be that the pope declares some figure as the 2nd coming of Christ thus making him THE Antichrist. I cant see into the future, but its 100% connected with papal rome.

>>534945607
Eastern Orthodox holds this guy converted. He quite famously told the kikes to not bother Jesus since if He wasn't the Son of God He would fail anyway, and if He was they were foolish to fight him.

File: 5547.png (11 KB, 785x321)

11 KB PNG

>>534946065
>blocks ur path
I'd like to thank the anon shilling this Geneva Bible. It's actually quite nifty.

>>534965546
The Roman Empire was already destroyed. There's no need for a Roman Empire to exist vestigially for the typology of 666, Babylon, and Jerusalem to exist in future events.

>>534965810
>The Roman Empire was already destroyed.
the Pagan roman empire is the legs of iron.
the last Empire is the feet of Iron mixed with clay.

36 “This was the dream. Now we will tell the king its interpretation. 37 You, O king, the king of kings, to whom the God of heaven has given the kingdom, the power, and the might, and the glory, 38 and into whose hand he has given, wherever they dwell, the children of man, the beasts of the field, and the birds of the heavens, making you rule over them all—you are the head of gold. 39 Another kingdom inferior to you shall arise after you, and yet a third kingdom of bronze, which shall rule over all the earth. 40 And there shall be a fourth kingdom, strong as iron, because iron breaks to pieces and shatters all things. And like iron that crushes, it shall break and crush all these. 41 And as you saw the feet and toes, partly of potter's clay and partly of iron, it shall be a divided kingdom, but some of the firmness of iron shall be in it, just as you saw iron mixed with the soft clay. 42 And as the toes of the feet were partly iron and partly clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong and partly brittle. 43 As you saw the iron mixed with soft clay, so they will mix with one another in marriage,[c] but they will not hold together, just as iron does not mix with clay. 44 And in the days of those kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that shall never be destroyed, nor shall the kingdom be left to another people. It shall break in pieces all these kingdoms and bring them to an end, and it shall stand forever, 45 just as you saw that a stone was cut from a mountain by no human hand, and that it broke in pieces the iron, the bronze, the clay, the silver, and the gold. A great God has made known to the king what shall be after this. The dream is certain, and its interpretation sure.”

Iron, the continued roman empire after the fall of pagan rome combined with clay of the secular world. papal rome ruling over kings.

>>534941520
Well considering is how America is completely fake and gay, I'd yes it is controlled, and yes Britain; the head state of freemasonry, is in control. In fact, the infowars network is a British-masonic web. The British used Washington & Franklin as major PR recruitement into their spiders trap called freemasonry and it worked like a charm. All you know about Franklin & Washington is what you were shown in gradeschool picture books. They were both either loyalists or just dumbasses somehow unknowingly in a cult patently run by the British government.

>>534965810
>>534966127
Head of Gold = Babylonian Empire
Chest and Arms of Silver = Assyrian Empire that conquered Babylon
Middle and Thighs of Bronze = Greek Empire that conquered Assyria
Legs of Iron = Pagan Roman Empire that conquered the entire known world by then
Feet of Iron mixed with Clay = Papal Roman Empire mixed with the secular world. Papal because the Pope claims he is the ruler of the Earth in place of Jesus Christ.

>>534966127
No. What we have of the Roman empire is their bureaucracy, military innovations, etc, even secularism is just disguised paganism. You merely insinuate that the Roman Catholics are "Iron," even though Empires like the Byzantines and the Russians were direct continuations.

>>534966489
only the pope carries the pagan emperor title of Pontifex Maximus tho.
thus he is the Roman Emperor, the direct continuation of pagan rome.

>>534941520
Somewhat during the early stage of revolution and then it become full revolution after the battle of bunker hill

>>534966603
What empire? What paganism?

File: 1758563911067158.jpg (112 KB, 1786x1230)

112 KB JPG

>>534966687
>What empire?
the Empire where all world leaders are under authority under the pope, people like Bush Jr, Bill Clinton, Macron even Trump and his roman catholic cabinet are under Rome since papal Rome controls the world finances with the Rothschilds running the vatican bank. the FED is completely under roman control.
the entirety of Germany is in the pocket of Rome. papal Rome owns like a third of all property in europe. even China is under the pope, the UN is under the pope, Israel is through the Rothschilds etc etc.
look into it more.
>What paganism?
roman catholicism has completely decended into paganism, sun worship, mithraism, queen of heaven worship, mother earth environmental worship etc etc.

why would a man of God mingle with the politics of the world so much and why would he care about worldly stuff and riches so much always playing into his authority as "God" of this world.
we are called to be separate from the world, the love of God is not in him that loves the world, the world is supposed to hate you as it hated Jesus etc.
the pope is not a man of God, thus he is a man of the opposite, the man of satan, the man of sin.

>>534942936
De habernos quedado con la corona española ahora seríamos fuertes, tendríamos presencia militar en Europa, América, África y hasta en Asia. El imperio español sería una potencia similar a la URSS que no tendría que mostrarse sumisa ante los mandatos de los gringos o de China.

La "independencia" fue un suicidio colectivo del mundo hispano que nos condenó a la pobreza, la debilidad y la irrelevancia por 200 años.

>>534967174
I generally agree with you, but that doesn't substantiate your position that he's the final antichrist. Nor does "iron" come to mind when thinking of them. They seem to be a mixture themselves. I hypothesize that the final form will be as described in Fr. Seraphim Rose's "Orthodoxy and the Religion of the Future," catholicism's errors that have allowed their heresies will have to run their course, and they would have to fake-merge with the ecumenists in Orthodoxy in order to get the Great Apostasy to happen. All the idolatry you point out in the Romans means it lacks the deceptive potential to make the Orthodox faithful fall into Apostasy.

>>534967705
>All the idolatry you point out in the Romans means it lacks the deceptive potential to make the Orthodox faithful fall into Apostasy.
in the final ecumenical system Jesus Christ will vanish as the only way to God where every religion "leads to God", it will include all kinds of faiths. the muslims will join through their Mary veneration, Protestantism is already ecumenical including NAR movements, the eastern faith will be in there too since Jesus is "just another good teacher" to them and even the jews will be somehow grafted in, either by conversion or something else, everyone will be under the pope.
and I can promise you, even the orthodox patriarchs will enter into ecumenism with papal rome, its inevitable.
so yes, I hope to bring awareness to the faithful orthodox then what that time comes they come out of that ecumenical system and dont go into union with Babylon.
I simply hope I made you think about it a little. the writing is already on the wall.

>>534968084
*when that time comes

>>534968084
It's too contradictory to be a good counterfeit.

>>534968084
You aren't telling Orthodox anything about ecumenism that they don't already know.

>>534968157
most likely there will be a big crisis and war that will lead into this where you dont really have a choice. the roman mark will be enforced with the secular law, and not following that law will get you persecuted.
covid was a small prelude, just a test so to say. there will come something way bigger.

>Solve et Coagula is a Latin alchemical maxim meaning "dissolve and coagulate" (or "separate and join together")
from darkness to light, thats will be how it works and people will fall for it for the sake of peace and safety.

1 Thessalonians 5:3
3 While people are saying, “There is peace and security,” then sudden destruction will come upon them as labor pains come upon a pregnant woman, and they will not escape.

>>534968261
yes, so better to be an observer of the current times and look out how the snake moves.
ofc satan cant deceive the elect, but most people wont see what is coming towards them.

>>534968084
There is a merge attempting to happen, there are several jurisdictions that vest catholic clerical converts without re-baptism. There's the ecumenical Patriarch in constantinople. To actually succeed, Catholicism will have to pretend to be Orthodox, say all of the right things, but not require any self-sacrifice or repentance on the part of believers.
>>534968429
The mark on the hand and forehead is symbolic of thoughts and deeds which have their allegiance to the world.

File: 1753799024655201.gif (1.61 MB, 420x420)

1.61 MB GIF

>>534968507
>The mark on the hand and forehead is symbolic of thoughts and deeds which have their allegiance to the world.
very nice, you know your stuff.

>>534968429
>>534968507
>The mark on the hand and forehead is symbolic of thoughts and deeds which have their allegiance to the world.
This is in contrast to the seal of God, received in baptism.

File: 1764302042373.png (1.35 MB, 2564x1332)

1.35 MB PNG

>>534941520
(((England))), yes.

>>534942408
>your countries are fake goy
>you have no history
>there is nothing to fight for
>all great men were actually total phony pieces of shit, all of them (and gay tehe)
>shitskin culture is actually real. let them replace you
This board is more shitskinned and niggered out than reddi* at this point.

>>534945323
>blendingjewgetsangryatovertjew.jpg
Nothing of value was lost.

Yes and no. Democrats and Rinos are globalists controlled by city of London, wef davos etc. Trump is not their puppet which is why there is so much hate directed at him.
Iran is being freed from the globalists and Venezuela is mostly free.

>>534942171
The American founding fathers used masonry for intelligence operations. Franklin and Washington were spymasters. A little knowledge is dangerous because you got the entire narrative wrong.

>>534941520
There are networks that control America that run through England, but they aren't exactly "English" as a state enterprise. It's more like the residuals of the British East India Company and the wealth generated particularly during the Opium Wars. That flowed into the US in the 1800s, formed the Boston Brahmins and many endowments for Ivy League schools (including the Russell Trust from the family of Bertrand Russell, which is what founded the Skull and Bones Society at Yale). These are actually the SAME people (as a class) that became the investment bankers on Wall Street who eventually led a coup in the early 20th century when the Federal Reserve was founded.

People get it wrong when they think "bankers" just means retail banking like Wells Fargo, Chase, etc. Of the Big Four in the US, only Chase does much internationally. They control something like 4T in assets, but Black Rock alone controls something like 20T in assets. It's not even close. Black Rock is really just an evolution of the investment banker that was big in the early 20th century prior to the pump and dump known as the Great Depression (which they engineered). George Bush's family earned their place among the elite by joining the Skull and Bones at Yale, then working for Brown Brothers Harriman on Wall Street, which was an investment bank ran with wealth from the House of Marlborough from England, which was among the nobles who profited from the opium trade. These are merchants but thoroughly English merchants.

You'll find that "Jewish bankers" tend to be lower banks relative to the investment banks which actually cause the wars and actually create insane profits out of nothing by manipulating the market and society.

>>534941520
well, America did adopt the east india trading co flag instead of any of the other flags colonists came up with
and today there's an entire subset of americans who are pretty much government families/dynasties who work to suppress humanity very actively

take that as you will

>>534973656
>It's more like the residuals of the British East India Company and the wealth generated particularly during the Opium Wars.
here's an educated American

Washington played Freemasonry. He wasn't a Mason but pretended to be one. Due to this, they, as well as the crown, thought it wasn't a real rebellion. They were wrong, we got a real, free Union absent Monarchy. It didn't last long though. Both Franklin and Jefferson were traitors.

>>534974283
Franklin too?

I know the British tried to balkanize the US during the US Civil War, but I'm not too familiar with other things the British did to the US in the 1800s.

File: LincolnOnJesuits.jpg (148 KB, 512x640)

148 KB JPG

>>534942171
>>534942408
>>534942539
>the war never happened
The war happened. According to Lincoln, the whole thing was instigated by the Pope and Jesuits (who infiltrated Freemasonry after invading the British Isles).
Freemasonry used to be a noble organization for white men who weren't satisfied with the obvious failings of basic Christianity. To the initiated, what Kierkegaard purported was extremely apt - no one today does actual Christianity or even knows what it was talking about, what the bible really says or what the story of Jesus was actually about. Instead, they have a whole new cult that they've built and it has nothing to do with the actual Mystery Rites that made Christianity so special in continuation of the Mysteries.
Freemasonry has no monopoly on references to the Mysteries. Jesus, Plato and many more like them were initiates who were killed for sharing too much. Many men throughout history have performed feats like they did and were killed in kind. Washington was one such man. Washington was the world's most famous spy that none of you have ever heard about. He's virtually unrivaled in history. We truly stand on the shoulders of giants.
>Freemasons controlled all the slaves
You evidently know literally nothing at all about muh cRaFt. Apronniggers are the pinnacle of white man liberalism. Dangerous Freedom is their whole agenda. Crowley went way overboard and blew up the whole lodge world's spot not that long ago and pushed the envelope even further with muh "Do what thou wilt" - leaning heavily into the True Will, which you'll find equates to muh Great Work or Magnum Opus for le cRaFt or the East's Dharma/Tao or Astrology's North Node.
Anyway, to actually speak to Freemasons owning slaves, you mean jews. It was the jews.
Don't get me wrong, the jews are just another tool of muh "royal" Roman "Nobility", who also make use of infiltrated lodges, the Jesuits and their vassal state, Israel.

k8NkLxXB is a shill.

>>534974522
After some research, you'll find Ben was found to have a lot of skeletons in his basement.
I'm not using a metaphor.

File: GerpwcTbsAEP0Kp.jpg (69 KB, 680x671)

69 KB JPG

>>534974872
>Anyway, to actually speak to Freemasons owning slaves, you mean jews. It was the jews.

Cope harder Masonic nigger lover.

>>534943269
Normalfags aren't allowed to know this and explaining this will just make people call you schizophrenics because of all the propaganda at play here, but Freemasonry has a lot of different offshoots or lodge flavors. One of the most prominent movements within Freemasonry, eventually becoming its own independent offshoot, came because of Louis Claude de Saint-Martin. He was a huge philosophical backbone for Freemasonry back during the late 1700s and early 1800s. Because of him, the emergent lodge system, called Martinism, became a centerpiece of Freemasonry. One of its big talking points was against Catholicism and what was wrong with it. To really understand the nuance of what's unfolded the past few hundred years, this is pertinent groundwork. Essentially, this means Freemasonry and Catholicism were at odds prior and have been at odds ever since. This should explain >>534974872
In essence, what I'm explaining is that Freemasonry essentially oversaw Protestantism and has ever since (frankly prior depending on who you listen to) been what normalfags, if they understood spiritual system metas, would call Esoteric Christianity. Freemasonry really, desperately, wants to have contained muh mYsTeRiEs from Egypt, through Christianity and all the way to modern times. They may have some residual link to the Proto-Christians through their Pythagorean base (see Essenes and Asclepians), but at that point we're just over-indulging with le everything is connected, though admittedly it does take a lot less leaps than the usual players, particularly since Jesus kept talking about "speaking in parables" and referencing the "Musterion". The trouble is, normalfags don't know about the Orphic Code or what the Musterion (also see Teleai) was really about, so they wouldn't know these are gigantic signifiers that muh cRaFt has a perennial theologia link if nothing else (an inspired predecessor, basically).

>>534975141
That's the shackles' manufacturer tag thobeit

>>534975141
I like Freemasonry more than I like jews, niggers, feds or faggots like you, yes.
To be clear, I do not wear and apron and I never will. I just know more about these subjects than you do and it's very clear.
>freemasonry is connected to stuff
Right. They're a le secret society. They hide from retards like you because you pretend to understand them only to never take anything you do seriously, so you'd never know that you're a retard only LARPing spirituality while a small (very small these days) segment of the people you lament actually attempt it.
Don't get me wrong, the Mystery Schools are dead and so is Freemasonry. Today, it's just boomers escaping their fat wives at a book club. You will not find the real Mystery wearing some apron like a faggot. But you can le talk to God if you ignore everyone and actually figure out what the ancients and even some more recent characters were talking about. Shit it's way easier than you'd think, really.

File: 1774506228288397.jpg (35 KB, 330x504)

35 KB JPG

>>534972103
I normally don't believe idiocy should be punishable by death but I make an exemption for knuckledraggers like you. Even glowniggers are more self aware than this.

>>534974928
Yes, in his basement. I've read about that.

>>534974872
"The Jews" are pretty minor if you exclude the Rothschilds. That's just ONE family, not a race. As a race/religion, Jews are about as relevant as Mormons, except the Jews live in a more geopolitically relevant place, and Mormons are used as cannon fodder for intelligence services but they live in the middle of nowhere.

How the Rothschilds emerge though is interesting. There are clearly a lot of missing details, and I think the only way they could have done what they did is if the Vatican/Jesuits supported them as a project to infiltrate Europe under a different mask.

Also, if we're being strict and technical, old European nobility is Jewish, since supposedly the bloodline of Jesus (via Mary) went west and settled in France. Also supposedly Jesus himself may have went to Britain. I'm currently trying to connect Aristobulus of Britannia to Aristobulus of Chalcis, and then from Aristobulus of Chalcis to something more, like Izates of Adiabene.

>>534975659
>"The Jews" are pretty minor if you exclude the Rothschilds.
I like you.
You can ask me a question and I'll answer it.
>Jews are about as relevant as Mormons, except the Jews live in a more geopolitically relevant place, and Mormons are used as cannon fodder for intelligence services but they live in the middle of nowhere.
Shit. I didn't realize one of you was lucid. No way.
>How the Rothschilds emerge though is interesting. There are clearly a lot of missing details, and I think the only way they could have done what they did is if the Vatican/Jesuits supported them as a project to infiltrate Europe under a different mask.
The Rothschilds belong to the Orsini family. The literally are the Vatican, anon. Same things. They the same guys.
>old European nobility is Jewish
This, you'll find is long-term inter-familial warfare. Jews realized some of the European "nobility" (they killed all the real Nobles... well, most of them) were best absorbed.
Are you familiar with droit du seigneur or jus primae noctis, anon?
>since... Jesus and Mary
My man, come on. They went to their relatives - back home. You're looking for the Bell Beaker Expanse and the Pontic Caspian Steppe Nomads moving back and forth. They share the MC1R allele.
"Jesus" started getting assassination attempts so he went West to seek political refuge. "Mary", his wife, belonged to a powerful Phoenician bloodline. She was a Priestess of Astarte and worked with Seven Daemons. Her disciples referred to her as a "Queen Bee".
The assassination attempts didn't disperse until they fled the area. "Jesus" didn't die. He went East, travelled to Persia, died of old age and fulfilled the Bhagavad Gita. Mary and her Children (see Goidel Glas) traveled West. She was buried in Glastonbury Tor - didn't last long.
>I'm currently trying to connect Aristobulus of Britannia to Aristobulus of Chalcis, and then from Aristobulus of Chalcis to something more, like Izates of Adiabene.
I can't help with this (yet).

>>534976145
>went West to seek political refuge
Should be East

>>534975654
Go back to red**dit and watching TV. This place probably isn't for you.

File: 2cb0ad2c.gif (176 KB, 220x124)

176 KB GIF

>>534944617
Follow the money long enough and you'll end up looking at jews in the City of London.

>>534976145
>You can ask me a question and I'll answer it.
Going to take you up on this. I have a couple comments incoming.

Maybe you can explain a few gaps in time and provide a more cohesive narrative as you understand it.

I think the last major revolution was the Enlightenment, which should be correctly understood as a revolution between native Europeans and Rome. Of course, mostly what we hear about this period is the philosophy that made it possible to form legal arguments to distance themselves from the Vatican (and their lackeys who were given titles of nobility... thanks Investiture Controversy). This culminates in the American Revolution.

Prior to that, it starts to get murkier. Venice and the Vatican were both serious players. Venice controlled all trade to the East, and the Vatican controlled all banking in Europe. I believe Venetians were influencing the papacy by 1000 AD, around when Gregory VII came into office. Do you see Venice and the Vatican as separate? Do you see Rome and the Vatican as separate at any point in time? I realize the Vatican was definitely Roman or reconquered by a certain point, and any general prohibition of the mysteries would be a pro-Roman act, but I also can't ignore some of the theoretical benefit of the Vatican at one point in time.

Also, once you get to before Rome, the center of power was clearly not in the west. Well, aside from the Macedonian Empire. Before that, it's Persia, Media, Scythia, Assyria, Babylon, Akkad, Sumer, etc.

they teach us in britain about how we are still in charge, but we aren't supposed to tell anyone or speak about it outside of conversation with each other. i'm finally blowing the whistle. it's true. the king still rules over the united states and uses america to fight britain's wars. i'm going to tell everyone ab

>>534976145

Some retards think this means "all semites are evil" (based on region of world), but they weren't really that. There's Indo-European skeletons once you go far enough back. My theory is that power and wealth accumulate in areas that are easily navigable. That's why Phoenicians were so powerful — they could travel by boat to exert authority over a huge range. Similarly, Mesopotamians and Egyptians could exert authority across their entire river systems. It's true that these rivers were also useful for agriculture and population = larger armies, but it doesn't explain centralization of power or empire.

On the subject of Indo-Europeans (and "Semites", I guess), I don't think these races are correctly understood. Native Europeans and Indo-Europeans are separate people. They are related, but it's totally wrong to see IEs as the root of all white people, not to mention the fact that "white" is not really meaningfully a race (the charts that show you the gradient of isolated gene pools is more accurate, and there are several isolated pools that have "white" attributes).

I think what we call Semite now is something like Arabs/Dravidians mixed with IEs from a race perspective, and linguistically, it might even be a holdover from a pre-IE but also not Arab/Semitic civilization. Phoenician, here, would be native European but not IE.

I think that some states originated early on as slave societies, and some originated more like free states. The first empires could have been slave empires (majority of population is a slave) because that's a huge boost for recruitment numbers. And frankly, there's no reason not to think that the Indo-Europeans who invaded Europe weren't also running slave empires.

This is where ownership really comes from, the concept of owning a person. That seems even more fundamental to owning land, although I don't mean to be pedantic. Credit and money seem to evolve out of this ownership system. This is a key point for the "origin of evil".

>>534976145
>>534977059
>>534977227
I think that the entire Silk Road was a Narco Empire. We say they traded in goods like "spice", but real spices to ancients weren't just for taste. They had effects, from being aphrodisiacs (which could honestly include a ton of categories, because anything psychedelic also improves sensory experience) to full on mind-altering drugs.

I'm not saying they made their wealth solely by trading drugs, but I think it kept them relevant and powerful, and it also once again meant that they had a strong recruiting base for soldiers (if the drugs were provided and restricted in the correct manner).

This led to a particular pattern in religion coming from this region of the world. Abrahamism borrows myth elements from other parts of the world, but the core principles that we know it by today are more aptly Persian in my opinion. This is because it is now a mind control religion by altering your concept of metaphysics. This is done by altering things like the definition of self. I have to throw a disclaimer in here because I used to think Buddhism was wrong on the self, but I learned it was only western perception of it that had gone too far to the extreme.

I don't have specific questions here but would love to know if you have any thoughts.

I have to start cooking for the senpai, but I'll be monitoring this thread.

>I like you.
Thanks fren. I wish I could talk to more people like you.

>>534941520
It was the Anglo-Saxon Renaissance. Removal of the Norman Yoke. That was why most British slave soldiers during the Revolution were some form of pygmy british, and not actual English, if they weren't German bootlickers.

>>534977059
I'm frankly not convinced this period of history is told in earnest. Instead, I think Venice and the Vatican are two heads of the same beast. The real Nobility, as we've outlined, wasn't apart of these groups but targeted by them. Think of the Vatican as Rome itself - a literal continuation of Rome. Rome didn't die. Instead, it transitioned into a pseudo-spiritual empire, Mithraism masquerading as Catholicism. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against Mithras. This isn't about Mithras at all, but the people who replaced a functioning spiritual system which precipitated a cohesive society with piracy and commerce. Our whole world was turned upside down because these retards thought they could become Noble if they just raped the nobles and took their shit.
>Semites
It appears "semites" aren't an earnest ethnic designation. We have Eastern Europeans and we have Persians. "Semite" seems retarded and made up based on what I can tell. You know those people are just LARPing, right? They're from Europe. Look up the Haavara Agreement.
>em dash
Are chat bots allowed to notice the pragmatic utility of ethnic groups as they relate to covert federal activities? How odd.
Did you just em dash and expect no one to say something?

>>534977791
>>It appears "semites" aren't an earnest ethnic designation
This is the conclusion I've come to as well.

>Did you just em dash and expect no one to say something?
I was using emdashes before it was uncool.

>Think of the Vatican as Rome itself - a literal continuation of Rome. Rome didn't die. Instead, it transitioned into a pseudo-spiritual empire, Mithraism masquerading as Catholicism.
"Rome" as what though? The aristocratic families? You mentioned Orsini. They flow through caesars and the papacy. Or is it more like the institution of Rome, as in the rule of law, which essentially changed hands as it became an empire. I know of the latifunda in Rome who were largely foreign born. Probably Phoenician merchants. "Jews" didn't exist at the time, so probably best to call them Phoenicians.

Have you ever heard of the idea that the Macedonian Empire was a Persian project? Or more specifically, a Babylonian one. The Babylonians had the science and medicine that were force multipliers. They supplied drugs that enabled Alexander's troops to march for days without rest. Why do this? Idk, but I guess they didn't like their Persian overlords as much.

Was Jesus theoretically the priest-king for pretty much all of Europe and west Asia? He was Phoenician on his mother's side but whatever equates to Judah on the father's side, and I gather that Scythian nobility was the real nobility of the world for hundreds of years. If his dad was Scythian nobility (in some form... whichever branch it was), and the Germans and Gauls remember their connection to Scythians, then Jesus wasn't just an idea of a hero from a distant land. He was literally their guy, in a sense. I know that even before the Vatican and Islam, people went on pilgrimmages to visit sacred sites and sacred priesthoods. I'd imagine that Germany to Syria is a bit far but theoretically coherent.

>>534977227
>>534977227
Best take i have read so far. But there does seem to be some additional weirdness. And that is the cone-heads all over the place, the natural type i mean not the head binding cargo cults. With them being al over the world often as a basket carrier motif bringing agriculture everywhere and seemingly some 'pre flood' geopolymer builds . The ''funny hat'' people seem to be a cargo cult left over of them, or watered out, or real deal blood lines.

You heard the story of malta underground that used to filled with them? Also the reptile theme, fallen angels theme etc seem to have some weird connection.

Been wondering for a while how this fits within the same basic framework you mentioned. How does it fit in?

File: file.png (55 KB, 299x168)

55 KB PNG

>>534978315
>the cone-heads
I think this is a neanderthal trait. Or maybe a result of mixing neanderthals with homo sapiens. See pic rel. Try tipping the skull a little sideways in your mind.

>malta underground
Oh ya, underground cities is a big theme. I didn't get around to mentioning that, but it seems to be central to certain periods of human movement. We could use the Mt Toba eruption as one example. The CW show The 100 seems to be about this. Also a VERY good lesson in the depravity that all humans can fall to during crisis. In order to defeat evil, we need to see it in ourselves / our history.

Also, the Knights of Malta and the Club of Rome are basically one circle. Club of Rome is a secret society for the Black Nobility, who are the nobles promoted by the Vatican.

File: IMG_7161.jpg (58 KB, 665x1000)

58 KB JPG

Around that time the masons were being taken over by rosicrucians. I don’t know if it was super talmudic before but Washington commented on it as well as this book
>Proofs of a Conspiracy by John Robison opens with a scholar’s unease. A professor of natural philosophy — once welcomed in elegant lodges from Liège to St. Petersburg — finds that what began as fraternal diversion has become a conduit for new doctrines. Reading the German Religions Begebenheiten and revisiting his own experiences, he notes the spread of speculative rites and the ambition of men who sought influence behind closed doors.

>Robison recounts how, over years, continental lodges absorbed projects far removed from the craft: mystical systems, magnetizers, Rosicrucian schemes, and political adventurers who used secrecy to test ideas that would have drawn censure in public. He describes obtaining ritual papers for the Parfait Maçon Écossais (Perfect Scottish Mason) and several Parisian degrees, then sifting them with care. The pageantry dazzled; the substance, he argues, often served agendas that had little to do with fellowship.

>From this survey he advances his central claim. The Illuminati, founded in 1775 at Ingolstadt by Adam Weishaupt and suppressed in 1786 by the Elector of Bavaria, did not vanish. Rather, the network adapted, adopted masonic cover, and pursued the abolition of religious establishments and civil governments. Robison contends that leading actors in the early French Revolution drew on its methods and aid, and he cites correspondence pointing to British links as early as 1784. He presents extracts and names meetings, then traces channels of influence so the reader can examine the case step by step.

>>534978667
Right. Might get some weird hybrid effects leading to the tipping. Neatherthals werent a homogenous group anyway functioning as moziak ethnic-inbred tribes with very little inflow from other groups from europe to siberia. So who knows what weird genetic isolates were among them. The funny hats seem to have selected for neantherthal traits.

So how is the reptile theme connected here? And who would the tue nobles be in this view, the neatherthals, the hybrids (or a specific hybrid line) or the cro magnon?

Bump

>>534979259
According to The 100, if I'm understanding it correctly, Neanderthals ARE us, but a twisted demented variant, perhaps as a result of living underground (and that as a result of physical cataclysm). I haven't been able to get any further on this hypothesis though.

>The funny hats seem to have selected for neantherthal traits.
For some weird reason, pan-Mediterranean traits have been labeled "Jewish". Lots of Jewish conspiracy theories are not true, anon.

>reptiles
People using motifs of serpent to describe everything from the body to sexuality to cognitive effects to an abstract sense of change. I don't know where the idea of repitiles ruling the world come from, but maybe that retard Erich von Daniken.

>true nobles
Supposedly people who lived underground and had schizo powers. If they were like the Christians, they talked to the dead. If it's something even simpler, maybe they were just dead, so they were literally "ruled" by the dead and people thought they were still alive or something. I'm talking about the mounds and megaliths in Britain that were built thousands of years ago.

A little more soberly (but still imaginatively), I think we're talking about Atlanteans. According to the Solutrean hypothesis, they went west from France and Spain around 30k or 20k BC.

File: 8d08766f-b612-427a-8031-b(...).jpg (103 KB, 1024x800)

103 KB JPG

we were founded as a free state. but then that christcuck woodrow wilson came along and jewed everyone, and now we are effectively under control of the same jews who conquered england, yes.

1776 - 1913 = United States
1913 - present = jewNited States

>>534975334
I don't know half the words you're using but it's extremely obvious that freemasonry and kabalism are both stolen Egyptian magic, which itself is inherited/decoded line of Cain creation magic-- derived from encrypted obelisks that survived the flood

Line of Cain worked with Nephilim to corrupt, subjugate, and torment humanity, before the flood

Everything goes back to the watchers, the flood, and Cain and the knowledge revealed to him tbqh

File: PZ5r36P.png (230 KB, 384x480)

230 KB PNG

>>534941520
In southern Ontario we have communities called "United Empire Loyalists" who were allegedly Loyalists Americans who moved north into Canada, which at the time was a French speaking territory. Eventually they became the majority and they had to split Canada into Quebec (french) and Ontario (English). Ontario is evidence that the war occured, otherwise we would be a French speaking territory.

>>534941520
so how it went was, jews got kicked out of spain, moved to amsterdam, successfuly rebelled against spain, supported cromwell and got him to murder Charles I, jews move into London, Create Bank of England and then bring in William of Orange, ruled the world from London until appx 1917 when they moved their base of operations to the U.S. and rule the world from here. American Revolution was basically free masonic puppetry Eventually they will have to move on somewhere else

There was no revolution.

US is Old Civilization, it was one with old Europe and part of Asia and Africa even.

The revolution was a cover up for murdering those who still knew of it. And introducing clone children to repopulate after mass, mass death and destruction.

Especially to cover up the part about US and Russia literally being the last part of one to split.
Now that shit runs deep...

UK still controls US, well, those who control UK that is. UK is occupied too.

File: 1778014146665372m.jpg (146 KB, 878x1024)

146 KB JPG

OHHH NYOOOOOO!!!!!

File: 1.png (603 KB, 1164x1737)

603 KB PNG

reminder:
>the catholic church does NOT allow it's members to be masons
- https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19831126_declaration-masonic_en.html
>an orthodox synod has condemned masonry as incompatible with a christian's faith and practice
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_attitudes_towards_Freemasonry#Eastern_Orthodoxy
>the kkk does NOT accept freemasons as members, and many other protestant denominations have also condemned masonry
>hitler and mussolini threw the masons in the same concentration camps as the kikes, fags and jeets
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_concentration_camp_badges
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Freemasons#Nazi_Germany_and_occupied_Europe
>the communists persecuted masonry
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Masonry#Soviet_Union
>masonry is ILLEGAL in most muslim nations today
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Freemasons#Muslim_anti-Masonry

File: 2.jpg (233 KB, 1080x1043)

233 KB JPG

1st degree
>Binding myself under no less a penalty than that of having my throat cut across, my tongue torn out by its roots, and buried in the rough sands of the sea at low-water mark, where the tide ebbs and flows twice in twenty four hours, should I ever knowingly or willingly violate this my solemn oath and obligation as an Entered Apprentice Mason. So help me God, and keep me steadfast in the due performance of the same.
2nd degree
>Binding myself under no less a penalty than that of having my left breast torn open, my heart plucked out, and given as a prey to the wild beasts of the field and the fowls of the air as a prey.
3rd degree
>Binding myself under no less a penalty than that of having my body severed in two, my bowels taken from thence and burned to ashes, the ashes scattered to the four winds of heaven, so that no more trace or remembrance may be had of so vile and perjured a wretch as I, should I ever knowingly or willingly violate this my solemn obligation as a Master Mason. So help me God, and keep me steadfast in the due performance of the same.
also 3rd degree:
>I, __, of my own free will and accord, in the presence of Almighty God, and this Worshipful Lodge, erected to Him and dedicated to the holy St. John, do hereby and hereon most solemnly and sincerely promise and swear, that I will hail, ever conceal, and never reveal any of the secrets, arts, parts, point or points, of the Master Mason's Degree, to any person or persons whomsoever, except that it be a true and lawful brother of this Degree, or in a regularly constituted Lodge of Master Masons, nor unto him, or them, until by strict trial, due examination, or lawful information, I shall have found him, or them, as lawfully entitled to the same as I am myself.

here's what jesus says on the subject:
>But I tell you, do not swear an oath at all
- Matthew 5:34

File: 3.jpg (3.15 MB, 3528x2873)

3.15 MB JPG

here's what the famous 33rd degree albert pike, who's book moral's & dogma was at one point given away for free to members said on the subject (in his own book):
>"masonry, like all the religions, conceals it's secrets from all except the elect, misleading those who deserve only to be misled. the blue degrees are but the outer court of the temple. part of the symbols are displayed there, but the initiate is intentionally misled by false interpretation."

File: 4.jpg (1.05 MB, 2840x1006)

1.05 MB JPG

pike, in his book, says that 'there are piece of divine truth in all religions. jesus is a way, but he is just one teacher among many.'. he compares jesus to osiris, mithras, krishna, etc (much like that movie Zeitgeist). he says that "jahova represents divine law", but also compares him to brahman (of hindusim), and others.

File: 5 swedish politicians.jpg (2.29 MB, 1122x3898)

2.29 MB JPG

here's some historic facts:
- the "Bavarian Illuminati" was founded by Adam Weishaupt (in 1776). it's goal was to be anti-religious/anti-christian. it's members are known to have "infiltrated" some masonic lodges
- while some of the founder of america were masons (washington, franklin, hancock, hamilton, monroe), john adams denounced freemasonry, calling it "an engine of cunning, ambition, and fanaticism"
- the FIRST 3rd party in USA history were the "anti-mason party". it was created when a former mason (william morgan) was abducted and disappeared/killed after threatening to publish masonic secrets. the party accused the masons of favoring their organization above the law/republic and corrupting courts/juries/elections/etc (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Masonic_Party)
- the P2 lodge of italy (Propaganda Due), despite being regular, was found out to have among it's members: the prime minister, top generals and judges, journalists, top vatican bankers, among others. it was declared "irregular" by the UGLE when their crimes came to light (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_Due)

just recently in france, 22 masons were arrested for assassinations btw
- https://www.france24.com/en/france/20260330-french-masonic-lodge-at-heart-of-murky-murder-trial

File: 6.jpg (1.8 MB, 1128x5648)

1.8 MB JPG

and have you stopped to think how it is that the masons ("who are so patriotic and moral!") were fighting on both sides of the american war of independence? overthrowing the government sounds a little bit illegal to me, no? so how come they weren't declared irregular? on the other hand, if you want to argue that they "lived under a tyranny!!", who, pray tell, was in change of this tyranny? was it not exactly the masons in britain, those "rubbing elbows with the rich and famous", those who "have the royalty in their ranks"?