seeing the data it very much looks like Massie is out. as for the data they have a good track record for this sort of stuff. are 9/10 correct.
And before people mention polymarket, polymarket has been wrong, allot recently, polymarket is not a poll.
>>535041866Elections are rigged
>>535041866Anyone voting gallrein needs to die very slowly and painfully.
>>535041866>>535042026Imagine believing that the guy who got the Epstein files released is going to loose his seat because the guy in them tells people to vote that way
>>535041866God, please give us massie. Massie for fucking president let's go
>>535042059It’s boomers, and trump is removing their medical coverage so they actually will unironically
>>535042059sir you live in canada, don't get me wrong i comment on this stuff too, but i don't get invested it's not my country. absolutely oneshot by american propaganda. should i just email you the clown make-up.
>>535041866imagine believing this when internal polling contradicts it, baris' polling contradicts it, and quantus' own previous polling contradicts it.
>>535042174it's what they are saying currently and quantus has been pretty accurate in general for awhile now. there could be a one point swing as is usually the case with quantus but that is how it's been for awhile now.
>>535042026No goy keep vooting you've got to legitimize the system
>>535041866>Massie remains stronger with younger and male voters (47.8%), while Gallrein leads among women (52.3%) and older Republicans | source Spectrum 1 Louisville news: https://spectrumnews1.com/ky/louisville/news/2026/05/13/massie-gallrein-pollwomen
>>535042026pretty much, maybe if kentucky rwds came out in force, but that would be night of the long knives level work short of pitching tents and sieging
>>535042087for your statement to be true, elections would have to be fairthe reason why the SAVE act won't pass is because both parties rig primary elections for establishment politiciansthe reason why the betting odds are the way they are is because the smart money is rolling in
>>535042419oof massiecels, how do we square this. are maga cocks superior to our tiny massie clitties? our leaking clitties are toast!
