you lose your right to self defense
>>535043270What's the N word?
> "Fighting words" are personally abusive epithets which, when addressed to an individual in a face-to-face encounter, are likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction
>>535043270Should be easy to cite to Tennessee state precedent demonstrating that then. Especially where a defendant turned their back and walked away from the confrontation.
>>535043443oh so you are trying to get me in trouble?not today!
>>535043443Netanjahoo
>>535043270Are there any other words?You would like us to not use so that we can be 100% good slaves?
>>535043270Provoking someone you intend to kill isn't self defense.
>>535043270Das ryte yt
>>535043443Nevada
>>535043643>Are there any other words?Yes, there will be more later. Stay tuned!>>535043688Words alone, no matter how offensive or hateful, do not justify physical violence.
>>535043270There’s a nigger in the moon.
>>535043270What if you say nigger, then shoot him, and then defend yourself in court by saying you were afraid for your life after saying nigger, and then cite several cases where niggers killed people for saying nigger? Saying the word nigger demonstrably created a life-threatening situation for you. I call this the nigger defense.
>>535043810"fighting words" have legal precedent
I actually had to look up how many americans are lawyers when I saw the answers here. One in every 200 americans is a lawyer. Fucking crazy.
>>535043999Checked. Alas, 'fighting words' might only mitigate the punishment for the attacker, in that the attacker only did so because he was provoked. But it does not mean that now the person being attacked physically no longer has the right of self defense.
>>535043537
>>535043999>>535044629btw I'm making all this stuff as I goI honestly have zero idea how it'll play out
>>535044777
>>535043443N
>>535043270Never thought I'd see the day /pol/ defending niggers niggering
