Why did they stopped?
>>535061989Muhammad failed to conquer Europe. So no.
why is every thread an irrelevant time-wasting question?
>>535061989Christianity managed to spread and dominate Rome without bringing the sword. Islam could never
>>535062091How would Europe be today if conquered by Islam?
>needing to justify conquest in anything else but loot and glorycucked>>535062071it was good for a while but then it was islover
>>535062170Islam conquered MENA and ruined it forever. Rome failed to protect us.
>>535061989>justifiedno
>>535061989Byzantines and Sassanids wasted their wealth and power fighting each other all the while the plague was ravaging their population. They got what they deserved
>>535062180The Umad empire basically suck3d greco-roman dick as hard as possible, so latins would replace arabs as the dominant race in the islamic hierarchy and Rome would be declared the city where Muhammad was spiritually connected to, with an empty tomb to him being built there. Islam would be christianized even more and all islamic art would feature Jesus showing Muhammad all the cool stuff they have in heaven. Islamic cities would have stained glass windows of muslim saints with blonde hair lording over the short brown creaturas of places like pakistan. The Emperor and Caliph of Rome would PBUH all the non-believers. Vikinigs would muh dick the fuck out of the middle east.
>>535062196Amusing because anatoles are a mutt race descended from hattians conquered by hitties conquered by greeks and then turkified. You are like the opposite of a conqueror race, similar to russians.
