[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 2131312244234565u6.jpg (48 KB, 980x980)
48 KB JPG
When people ("experts" lol) say "Omg, AI will replace all our jobs soon. It can run entire companies", have the same people ever used an "AI" before? Because it cant do SHIT!

Its output quality, ACTUAL quality is worse than that of your average jeet. Worse, infact. So what are people afraid of? lol

t. sysadm
>>
You are wrong

t. Jew
>>
>AI is close to being able to replace VFX artists
>already replaced tumblr-tier 'artists'

I used ChatGPT to set up a FOG server for imaging mini computers at work. It's useful but still requires intelligent input. It also makes me sound like a genius in email when dealing with unhappy customers.
>>
>>535127892
Define "AI". Because if you are talking about those silly consumer robots that look like a human, then you are absolutely right. But if you are talking about serious industrial robots, then you have been wrong for decades Hans.
Your country is known for building the best car building robots in the world. Robots that have been taking human jobs are only getting better. But for some reason people are dazzling investors with these garbage AI robots that "can do any job a human can do". These robots are not designed for longevity, and are only there to inflate shareholder profits even more.
>>
>>535127892
>it cant do SHIT!
80% of office workers also can't do shit either.
>>
Even if it sucks it still works 24/7.
While humans work 8/5 and effectively only work like 4 of those 8 hours.

Quantity outperforms quality in this instance.
Fire 80% of your staff doing mental work while keeping the last 20% to correct the fuckups the machines make. It's the capitalist way.
>>
>>535127892
Output quality for non enterprise customers is going down by design
>>
>>535127892
Wrong, Claude can code better than the average programmer. Now I can work alone and do the real work of 5 peoples who were doing nothing usefull. Also I make all the decision myself and work alone from anywhere in the world. AI is amazing.
>>
>>535128295
Programmers are the gayest and most useless people on the planet, second only to english teachers
>>
>>535128295
fake news
>>
>>535127892
>Because it cant do SHIT!
true, they only thing it's decent at is regurgtating informations and summing it up AND as goon bots, but even the bots have to be written by some dude
>>
>>535128524
Summarizing and regurgitating information can be very useful in this era when everything is data and reported.

Some certification documents I work with are 2,000 pages long, and there are several dozen of them. It's nice to have basically Google at work if I need to reference something.
>>
>>535128615
complete nonsense
if something that is 2000 pages long can be fit on 2 pages, why is it not ?
that AI is for processing cameras and microphones, that you already have deployed everywhere
>>
>>535127892
It’s useful but it’s for sure a bubble.
Very over invested.
>>
>>535128800
fake news
it is not useful
NOT
>>
>>535128734
Buddy has never heard of the concept of summarizing
>>
File: 1633261278987.png (209 KB, 372x474)
209 KB PNG
>>535128828
you are retarded dumb ass zoomer pajeet
>compression exists

if something is done right, there is no way to compress the info
>>
>>535127892
LLMs are excellent at bullshitting because that is most of their training data. If your job is replaced by it, either your job was bullshit or your boss got scammed by bullshit and his company will fail.
>>
>>535128918
Government agencies care very much about information that I don't.

That's why they necessitate 2000 page documents, and I only need a paragraph or two.

I'm a different customer than the reports were originally made for.

Really isn't that hard of a thing to grasp.
>>
>>535129075
use control-f to find things
you can do that on a potato PC
>>
>>535127892
It already replaced graphic designer over here, so people has already lost their jobs to the machine. Lots of ads also use AI
>>
>>535129174
So you're cool using a computer to do Ctrl F, but not cool using a computer to go Ctrl F for you.

Very odd and autistic. Are you by chance an amateur artist?
>>
File: 1762831193453789.png (733 KB, 943x1024)
733 KB PNG
>>535129260
you are so fucking retarded
Why do you need a summary for? You need the computer to press find to find what you you need, but how will the computer know what you need to be found if you did not input it.

you have no idea how computer work, you are a shill zoomer and brown pajeet
>>
>>535128295
Get out of japan you fuck ass ugly Jeet. What have you built? All you ai goyim talk about being a billion times more productive, AT WHAT? What ai vibe coded products have been released of any value? Oh 1 million more calorie tracker apps?
>>
>>535127892
>When people ("experts" lol) say "Omg, AI will replace all our jobs soon. It can run entire companies",
It's PR/Marketing from those financially-invested in AI, or NPCs just repeating same. It isn't even remotely close to being trustworthy or capable enough to replace anyone's job.

Except for maybe HR departments or Jeet-coders, which are both as useless as the AI that's "replacing" them. So just think about the most worthless employees in existence and maybe those jobs are at risk?
>>
>>535129375
The other day I had it recommend a type of sealant to use between two sheets of aluminum skin for an airplane's weatherproofing, referencing the document it pulled the info from because sealant types are spread out between like 6 different reports at this company.

I also used it once to scan the X00,000 certification documents we have released in our system to determine what specific regulation I needed to show compliance against, and also draft a substantiation statement against that regulation.

It's very good at subsiding things spread across many sources.
>>
File: 1684413992845343.jpg (68 KB, 892x892)
68 KB JPG
>>535129621
you are a chat bot
>>
>>535129661
I'm an engineer at an airplane manufacturer and you play video games and shit post on Chinese little girl cartoon forums.

Of course others have more use for AI than you.
>>
File: 1737819249235292.jpg (163 KB, 1080x960)
163 KB JPG
>>535129756
you are here on /pol/ shilling your chat bot
that's your job
>>
File: 1694035701584176.gif (1.52 MB, 204x200)
1.52 MB GIF
>>535127892
it dosnt matter if the results are worse, its still better then paying a bunch of people vs just install one robot or trained model then put all the work and stress on 1 dude to run it and fix and make it work, easy, its greed
>>
>>535129818
It's simply not possible that others have different lived experiences and backgrounds than you do
>>
>>535129853
AI is a black box, there is no fixing the result, you need to re-make the result
>>535130061
you are clueless
>>
>>535127892
The current AI is unreliable, but in time it's performance will improve, the same as the steam engine. Now AI still has it's uses, and mist governments will most likely use it to spy and censor their own citizens, every authoritarian county spend tons of money on secret service/police, they usually spent around 30 percent of their GDP, at least that's what I heard, now they can just have AI look for a person through surveillance cameras, which are on pretty much in every city, and let's not forget about using smart devices for spying. The government will use AI to comb over your entire online history just to find one thing you said so they can punish you, and will all the social media and rampant use of internet they will find something, hell they might even search this board. So get ready boys the shit is going to get worse much, much worse.
>>
>>535130342
>currently miracles don't work, but if you believe hard enough and give me all your money they will work !
>>
>>535130420
You do understand that we constantly improve technology we have, give it a couple of decades and AI will make our current AI look like even bigger piece of crap.
>>
>>535129034
>LLMs are excellent at bullshitting because that is most of their training data

Ad thats exactly the problem here. Thats why eevry piece of software in recent years is absolute garbage, code-wise.

Its like youre talkign to indians 24/7 when using AI. Its bad. Its worse than their usual customer service.
>>
>>535130342
AI companies are still not profitable and their models keep getting more expensive. At some point they'll have start making money.
>>
>>535127892
>quality is worse than that of your average jeet
and your average jeet is worse than local tech support, but he's cheaper
and local tech support is worse than in-house professionals but they're cheaper
that's all that matters. it's worse but cheaper so it wins.
Same with food quality. Pink Sludge made of tur world scraps is disgusting, but it's cheaper than beef, so by any means, legal or not, that's what you'll eat
>>
>>535130846
eat sludge - get cancer
use AI - kill your product
>>
>>535130777
Unless they just offer their models to the government in order to gather data on people that the government wants to silence. AI is very good at finding some obscure information, that is unless it's already used for this.
>>
>>535127892
>So what are people afraid of?
PALANTIR
>>
>>535127892
Can confirm. I try to use it to help with coding but 90% of what it gives me is just wrong and doesn't work at all or is inefficient slop spaghetti code. I spend most of the time calling it a fucking retard.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.