I am an oldfag and remember the times when we had long ass threads about this. I've logged in after many years and all I see is crap and discussions that ignore the elephant in the room.Most people are unfit for ruling themselves or others yet they create systems where they are being used and abused. Monarchy at least had skin in the game. The peasant chose a passive life, the knight enjoyed riches yet died in the frontlines, the advisor was comfy yet lost his head if a wrong decision was made and the king, well the king could be simply poisoned if the people did not like him.
This, the French Revolution was the worst thing that happened to humanity.Bring back feudalism, in the form of techno-feudalism!
>>535136115French realizing they weren't greek heroes was needed
>my little boy from royal familiesdid his father care while he killed thousands of poor children?don't care about your faggy lil boyoff with his head too
>my family is 10 generations inbred and I wear a funny metal hat, everybody do what I say!Royalty isn't real and you're a retard for thinking it ever was. Death to all "kings", pretentious fake faggots.
>>535136115Death to chudism, death to authoritarianism and oligarchs.
The idea that everyone is equal has had terrible consequences
>>535136237There is nothing wrong with techno-feudalism as long as it is local. The entire point of monarchy was the small communities with self governance. So you can have walled cities with a firewall that enables you to speak only with your commune and will all be good.
>>535136457>I'm going to say niggers are equal to whites men to hurt slave empires
>>535136386I will be happy even if a cat was placed on the throne. The point of monarchy is that commoners don't get to decide for the rest since they are vastly incompetent in numbers. This is why duels worked so well. Pussies today hide behind parties and democracy whereas this would never get so out of hand if everything was settled man to man. Pussyfication wouldn't grow to such monumental extremes that today you get "cancelled" by someone who needs a bottle opener to twist his soya drink. Thats the guy whop decides your future.
>>535136468>techno>>535136468>localtechnology and the internet are not local by their very nature.
>>535136709True. Politicians should duel to the deal
>>535136757Death*
>>535136721Anything can be local idiot. You set up a local network. Every sensible business that rules over your ass today does this. This place has gone completely to shit. All morons
>>535137071>insultsin a debate if you use insults you automatically lose, you should study parliamentary procedure and also take a chill pill. you live on an island paradise, chill out sheesh. that or build your local internet, lol, lmao imagine being this MAD on a basket weaving anime forum. bro like, what is going on in your life this is what upsets you?
>>535136709>I will be happy even if a cat was placed on the throneI hate monarchs but I would certainly not behead this a cat.
>>535137197If you use just insults you lose. if you lose insults and make point that the other party cannot refute then you will while you are humiliating.you are burger. you have an IQ of a potato peel. Its people like you that just poison threads and revert them into complete shit. You punny brains have been fried from goyslop and whatnot
>>535136115There’s a fundamental misunderstanding about monarchy and aristocracy. Monarchy and aristocracy are competing systems that arise from different sources. Aristocracy arises from private property. Is core is ownership. Monarchy arises both from tribal hierarchy and religious/mystic traditions. I’ll try to clarify the distinction. The aristocrat is a landlord. He owns the property and in some system owns the peasants that work the land. His obligation to the people he rules over is like a ceo or business owner. Aristocracy is not much different than modern web oligarchy in this sense. The king is totally different. The king may rule a specific land but that is not the source or meaning of his position. The king of France was not the king of the land of France, but the king of the French people. A Frenchman could travel to foreign lands and still his allegiance would be to the king of France and not the lord of the land he resided in. The obligations of the king are therefore to the people. He is obliged to ensure their safety and prosperity and mete out justice for them. Therefore monarchy and aristocracy are seperate systens and inevitably opposed. This is why Louis the 14 the sun king is considered the greatest French monarch. He subdued the aristocracy by bringing them to Versailles and giving them little jobs to keep them busy. He took control of the aristocrats and put them to work in service to the people of France. In this way he is a figure similar to hitler or Putin (who is noted for his tight control of Russian oligarchs). Also this is what the French Revolution was really about: destroying the king. This grand conspiracy continues to the modern day. It is a plot to kill all kings or “strong men” as they are now called. The king is the only predator of aristocrats and oligarchs and without him there is no one to protect the people from them. The king is the organizing principle through which a people derive justice.
>>535137313nice, so whats it like being the smartest person on earth and still posting on a weekday on a hentai forum? lmao
>>535136115SOUNDS LIKE SOME FAGGOT SHIT
>>535137338Thank you for this anon. Well put. We live in an age where the plebeian has been convinced by the oligarch that one figure is the source of evil whereas is just an totem. Most people never got to see the king and the king left most people live their lives with self governance.
>>535137579>Thank you for this anonbut he's an america?>>535137313>you are burger. you have an IQ of a potato peellmao
Communism and the French Revolutionhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IG6WM3NExP4
>>535136115>Most people are unfit for ruling themselvesno one rules themself in the modern day you fucking dumb nigger
>>535136115based, elites deserve worse considering what they do today *cough Epstein*
>>535136115>muh cannon fodderno one signed up to die on the front lines like a dog until napoleon died throughout history except easterners, what youre alluding to is the lack of access education which has been supplanted by a monopoly on time through servile occupational worknonetheless, i dont agree with the execution of louis the 16th, he was good for the people... but revolution is right by natureas to those systems of use and abuse, they do freely operate today under the guise of justice and very much deserve revolution all the same as those previously alluded to servile circumstances; that being said, there is only so much to learn from the revolution, and so little to be gained from the servile wars of rome as gladitorial phsichality and skillbut more than anything, yes, 4channers are fucking imbeciles... all the more reason to show out in text for lurkers sake
>>535137935>innocent child deserves imprisonment and torture because he was born in the wrong housereal tolerant of you comrade
>>535136115This is the main event, this was a free mason coup d'état.This board is full of free masons pedo kikes so ofc they avoid to talk about it. You still see them posting pro republican pics here and there tho.
>>535136386Kings descended from men who killed their opposition and presumably would do so again. I can’t think of a current European monarch that would do that but it just means that they should be replaced.
>>535136115Monarchy is for IQ 90 plebs, real 120 IQ Chads long for anarcho-capitalism
>>535136709Isn’t your flag kind of rare? I don’t know if I see it often.
>>535138247uh, diane?
>>535138341No sorry. Close though. I am a woman, I’m aware no one will believe me.
>>535138341Oh wait sorry. Are you talking about princess diana? She wasn’t a serious threat. Anyways the British monarchy isn’t protecting its own people and for that it deserves to die.
>>535137338I do see the conflict therein, and yet it may be desirable. "Traditionalism" describes a system that is explicitly opposed to absolutism and divine right monarchy, which only arose in the 17th century.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traditionalism_(Spain)
>>535136386>"my ancestors had an inferior mating strategy and now I want to kill"
>>535136721intranetsthere was never any good reason to share the internet with the 3rd worldevery liberal envisioned they would be grateful, they would have access to opportunity and education, and this would make the world a better place.The reality is they just opened up a vector for them to scam grandma for her passwords and identity information.There's no reason to be optimistic about the internet.
>>535136115Because monarchists are stupid, basically the blackest gorilla niggersAnd nobody wants to hear some larp about how it would be better if everyone just obeyed one mentally ill person all the time
>>535141366They told us it would end tyranny. Literally.
>>535136115Did they remove this part? Couldn't find it.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Revolution
>>535142355it did in a way, but also tyrants used it to regime change other tyrants and counter opposition consolidating a bigger tyranny. their reach exceeds their grasp, and it let them reach farther than any tyrant before them.you can't end tyranny, there's too much human nature driving it. you can only resolve to be vigilant and to prepare for it in your own time.
