[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images (2).png (2 KB, 310x163)
2 KB PNG
>Invented by the Nords
>Works for the Nords
>Lead the Nords into greatness
Yet white people feel the need to revive a dead failed ideology that is Nazism or other flavors of fascism whose entire achievement was grinding down the white population even more and destroying Europe? They have their own Magnum Opus already, why isn't every single white majority country a social democracy?
>>
>>535137633
Define social democracy, the majority of developed countries already follow a model of "let private enterprise generate wealth then tax some of it and use it to fund welfare programs"
>>
>>535137634
The Nordic type
>>
>>535137635
Great definition
>>
>>535137636
Thanks
>>
Works ok for high trust, high cohesion societies like parts of europe used to be. Doesn't work well if you have bunches of blacks, muslims and the likes. Which social democrats are historically very much in favour though, because they don't understand why their system works. They're bleeding heart do-gooders who think if you just treat everyone nice they will do the same in return and the world will become paradise.
On the whole, many right wingers are actually ok with social democracy as an economic system and some right wing parties (like in poland) did do something of the sort. But the average right winger is really worried about demographic replacement first, cultural degeneracy second and economic policies a distant third at best.
>>
Israel has social democracy therefore it's bad.
>>
>>535137633
Because social democracy includes open borders and therefore 20% of a population doesn't like it and somehow they must be appeased.

>>535137638
20% of the population of the nordic countries has always been against social democracy and its 20% today.
>No it's higher because they hate muslims
Wrong, they hate muslims because muslims hate israel.
>>
>>535137634
I am not an expert on British economics for instance but besides NHS I think it’s called pretty much every other sector is privatized because of Gordon Brown’s austerity programs under the Blairite regime in the 2000s. Britain isn’t a “socialist commie hole” like neocons say. It’s the opposite actually besides having healthcare.
>>
>>535137641
You still have a welfare state that pays for school, healthcare, unemployment benefits and whatnot. It doesn't really matter if it's privatized or not, it's not like the Nordic countries aren't.
>>
>>535137642
I mean, even USA pays for elementary school and has unemployment benefits if that is all it takes to be a social democracy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme
>>
>>535137643
I asked OP to define what he meant by social democracy but he gave the most non-answer he could think of.
>>
>>535137638
>>535137634
"Social democracy" is not an economic system, retards.

Social democracy is a liberal democratic system, liberal economy, with a high amount of WELFARISM. Welfarism is the best word to describe the Nordic countries. Use that instead, faggots.
>>
>>535137644
If >>535137642 this is OP then his definition is literally “when the government does anything.”
>>
>>535137645
>anon says it's not an economic system but 2 out of the 3 ways he described it references how it works economically
>>
>>535137647
That 1/3 reason is what makes it not a pure economic system you dumb nigger. Democracy is literally in the name, it's not compatible with le fascism. That's why I provided an alternative word, welfarism, which strips away the political aspect as well as the liberal economy aspect. You're welcome faggot.
>>
>>535137633
>Nazism or other flavors of fascism whose entire achievement was grinding down the white population even more and destroying Europe?
By killing those who declared war on them. KYS.
>>
>>535137640
Muslims are hated because they commit a lot of crime, you dumb brownoid
>>
>>535137649
>Invade Poland
>Declare war on Poland, Denmark, Norway, Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Yugoslavia, Greece, the Soviet Union, America, and I guess Abyssinia if you include Italy and China if you include Japan
Wow so defensive
>>
The nordic countries operate on a tripartite corporatism system where the goverment acts as the mediator between labor and capital
>>
>>535137641
Most stuff in Nordic countries is private too. The Wallenberg family in Sweden didn't make money working 9-5 jobs lmao, they controlled up to 10% of the entire national GDP at their peak.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.