Why are leftists constantly asking for sources?
>>535139929Why is OP always a faggot?
>>535139929But never>Per capita?
>>535139929We do actual research and
>>535139929Curious how you research if something is legit. You just go by your feelings?
>>535139929Idk anon, why do groupthink people seek out what's current consensus
>>535139929Because leftists constantly want to be told by others what they should think. That's why they invented a library of fallacies to protect their retarded opinions.
>>535139929Research is fucking bullshit
>>535139929Why do they only ask white people for sources?
>>535140150Correct. Friendly reminder, the right-wing believes a book written 2,000 years ago by sand niggers about a Jewish carpenter with magic powers is true. Feelings don't care about your facts when it comes to religion for them.
>>535139929So they can disregard the source for not being from an (((approved))) website
>>535140427Leftists believe women have dicksThat'll never be better than a magic jew
>>535140594this anon wants to be a big breasted bimbo slut too
>>535139929
>>535139929Why do chuds believe whatever the GOP tells them to think?
>>535140594Not according to basically every poll since 2020.The number of people legitimately on the troid train is vanishingly small, but it's a great foil for rightoids to use to dismiss left wing economic policy that would actually help them. Gee, wonder who could be behind THAT?
>>535139929>Why are leftists constantly asking for sources?- i deliberately edit html on websites before taking screenshots.- then I crop out logos and addresses so they can't trace it back"disinformation" is /pol/s inbred-cousin we keep chained in the basement
>>535139929>I get all my information from pol and YouTube schizosthe post
>>535139929If you have a source you can decide if you consider the source credible or notAlso you can hold people responsible for spreading misinformation
>>535141062pol and YouTube schizos are legitimately more reliable sources than some gay paid government agency paying a statistician to say the result he was paid to find out.
>>535139929good question considering providing it never changes anything in their arguments
>>535139929because you keep making shit up.
>>535139929Brain drain, and it’s kind of complicated. It’s why there are any white leftists.In the 1960’s, there were basically no niggers on the West Coast. Oregon had a “no niggers” exclusion clause in its constitution when it became a state, and sundown laws well into the 1950’s. During the Civil Rights Era, there was massive economic opportunity on the West Coast an PNW alongside civil unrest and collapsing cities in the rest of the country. This is when white flight went into high gear and the nearby suburbs all exploded in popularity.But the most talented, smartest, and far-planning people didn’t move just 10 minutes from the niggers. They moved to California: no niggers, excellent weather, and massive growth. It was a no-brainer.So we had generations of very smart people producing very smart children in a safe, high-trust society that saw massive wealth and opportunity while being completley insulated from the reality of the nigger problem. That environment produces liberals with an anti-racist sentiment. They’re not liberals because they’re smart. They’re liberals because they live in an insulated community (or were raised in one). Ironically, that insulated community exists because of anti-nigger sentiment. Their grandparents and great grandparents being absolute nigger haters and being able to travel across the country to get away from those apes is why liberals are smarter than you. Smart people ask for sources because retards beleive literally anything.
>>535139929Because they know most of people dont autistically collect source and any attempt to google something quickly will only lead to shit confirming whatever bullshit they spew atm because google and search engines are comped.So its an easy "win" for them
>>535141305
>>535139929Generally speaking, leftists are always telling one of their lies, which involves inventing imaginary sources—such as friends, family, life experiences, TV shows, soap operas, or movies—to hide their message.Instead of saying “A” directly, they say things like, “Bad things happened to A in a soap opera I read or a friend told me about.”You may recall messages like, “My 5-year-old son/nephew explained this to me, and he came to the conclusion (the leftist’s idea).” This is clearly a lie. But leftists call this type of lie “rhetoric.”Because leftists lie or cite a quote from a leftist thinker as a source for their arguments. They assume that in a debate, their opponents will do the same. So asking for sources is a way of denying that you’re using the same tactics as them.That’s the first reason to avoid using rhetoric to put your ideas or observations into the mouth of an imaginary source, just like they do.The second reason is that when you cite a source, they can dismiss it if they think the source is right-wing or represents an ideology they don’t like.The third tactic is to seek out any criticisms of the source or opinions that contradict studies or news reports in order to avoid the debate.The fourth is to waste your time by demanding a large number of peer-reviewed studies in reputable scientific journals to make a point. Meanwhile, they will claim that logic, emotions, or their own experience is on the same level as—or even superior to—your source.In general, these are just rhetorical tactics used by leftists to appear to win debates or shift the social context.By asking for sources, they can stall those they disagree with by imposing a massive burden of proof, ultimately allowing them to walk away from the debate if they come across as ignorant and uninformed on the subject.
>>535143508The leftist idea is to generate a debate where they present their points and try to change others. Meanwhile, they avoid changing anything themselves and keep their true intentions secret to avoid being attacked in a discourse that goes round and round just so they can speak.You can read *The 48 Laws of Power* or *Rules for Radicals* to see the kind of leftist rhetoric they use.When leftists read Marx, they believe they are already in the right, and that any means are justified to impose communism.So leftists don’t waste time wondering if they’re wrong; instead, they focus on how to turn others into leftists using rhetoric or any psychological tricks from recent decades.Any weapon is worth using, and the enemy must be denied their weapons.
