I hate this disgusting inbred freak so much its unreal
>>535157605He has no idea what he is talking about. What a fucking retard
>>535157605Public Services Loicence
>>535157605Oh wow government issue work passes? On a system for illegal immigration? That's what the US does giving illegals IDs
>>535157605I remember when people were going on about how he's a "based" Traditionalist who loves Sufism. Yeah he's a "Traditionalist Sufi" alright he's ushering in a Techno-Feudalist state where his subjects are kept in line by Paki mercenaries kek
we've decided to debank you for not allowing suckdeep and rapejeet into your home. you've been a naughty boy online! cant have you criticizing your replacement no more gibs for you wake the fuck up the state is an active enemy against its own people. these rich cunts do this for no purpose other than to enrich themselves. they are no different to the welfare nigger, siphoning tax from all classes below them.
>>535157871The speech is written by the government i.e. Keir Starmer and the Labour Party, the King only gets to read it. His position is purely ceremonial.
>>535157605So do we. He is an adulter claiming to be the legitimate head of the church of england. His homewrecking whore wife is claiming to be a legitimate queen. It's a bad joke. Hopefully the House of Windsor will be pushed out and a new popular king who isn't such garbage may be proclaimed.
>>535158402>His position is purely ceremonial.Yeah and remember his coronation ceremony? Did that represent us at all? At least he will be dead soon.
The US is going to end up as the only place in the modern world where there is some sort of freedom of speech and freedom in general. Gov and institutions like EU is just pushing stuff just for the fuck of it. There was not a long time ago that some gov official, politician, suggested that people should pay some tax or what it was for breathing. That is how fucked up people over here are.
>>535158402Imagine being the world's gaudiest dress up doll/puppet. Who is this even for?
>>535157605After mummy died they attempted to make him the face of the monarchy, but the spoiled brat kept throwing tantrums like the man child it is so they bailed on that bright idea.
I now consider him Tresonous.Too late for him too, UK... everyone really.Great shame and treason.
>>535157605Digital ID is fine, we've used it for ages at this pointIt all depends on what you need it for
>>535157605>Waaah I don't want to use an ID!How do you expect them to control migration then?
>>535157605Why is he even being asked anymore? I thought he had handed all the business over to his son.
>666 card
>>535158633Logging online obviously, tracking every word you type, every link you click on, all of your shopping habits.....checking to see the very moment you go off the greedy boomer slave reservation and challenge the rich elite ruling golem vampire masonic class caste masters.
>>535157605This man fucked kids with Epstein
>>535158804sounds roughand physical IDs don't do any of that?
>>535158675>How do you expect them to control migrationthis may shock you but multiple physically presented ID check for that already exists
>>535158894how would a physical ID card track your online activity? are you retarded?
>>535158804This isn't about that kind of digital ID. It's about being able to identify yourself when you want to use government services online. There's no connection between your internet connection and the ID. The only controversial thing is that they want to link it to an age verification system, which could then be used to track your online activity.
>>535157605He's only getting started with the iron hand.
>>535159010How would logging into your bank track your online activity aside from the fact that you checked your balance online? Are YOU retarded?
>>535159167The fear is that they will hide the entire internet behind age verification procedures, and you will have to prove your age for every activity you do online. Which then allows tracking.
>>535159283But that's exactly what I said thoughThere's nothing wrong with digital IDThe issue is what they're gonna use it forIt's like saying you don't like cars because people die in drunk driving accidents. The car is innocent
>>535158633Yours actually leaked a few months back.The entire source code. Which allowed them to get all your transaction history, locations, digital signatures and more. Lol
>>535159167youre the only one talking about using it for that. in the op image the so-called monarch is clearly talking about using it for public services, allowing you to be tracked in things like accessing records. you should kys tonight
>>535158538We've done this ceremony for centuries and it doesn't hurt anyone so there hasn't been any political will to stop doing it.
>>535157605He’s a Muslim and a Globalist larping as a British monarch.
>>535157605didn't these bong faggots got hacked and all of their digital id data was stolen?
>>535157605Coming from that fucking useless idle layabout ski-ing parasite and thieving tax-evading arse bandit and charity case Charles Windsor, the cunt who would be king, of all people.Wonder what kind of conversations went on between Chuck and Major Parker-Bowles ? "Come to roger your old woman, don't mind do you. Not at all, Sir, not at all. Not on the rags is she, wouldn't want to be slipping her one in the servants entrance, eh, although come to think about, might make a change. Slip off now Parker-Wotsit and amuse yourself while I dip the royal wick in your wife, the mother of your children. Diana ? No idea, probably chomping on some wog doctor's cock, there must be a few she hasn't blown. Mad cunt. Threw herself down the stairs the other night, just like that. Anyway, all officers and gentlemen here, Mum's the word and there's a colonelcy in it for you. A brigade, maybe. Him ? One of those Dimbleby oiks. Dunno, old bean, just hangs around, grovelling; he can come and help me on and off with the old rubber johnny, eh, make himself useful. Won't be long old chap. Come and give her one yourself when I'm done, if you like. She's your Mrs.. Tally Ho! Dieu et mon droit, what?!"
>>535159369I didn't intend to attack you. We also have an electronic ID here, which makes government services available online and saves you the trip to the authorities. I just wanted to explain people's fears, which are also why the UK is now issuing it on a voluntary basis rather than making it mandatory.
>>535157605Modernity stopped being a good thing when this fossil was an adult.
>>535159645kek
>>535159632Yes, and they still want to go ahead with their plans anyways because they want to ensure Jewish domination over the west is permanent. They want to use "digital ID" (papers please) as a Chinese social credit system. They are jealous of the Chinese and want to force us into slavery here, but without any of the nationalism so it's just slavery/poverty that they want for us.
>>535157605It makes sense, just have a digital fingerprint to an approved browser where you log in with a cloud account. You would already have fingerprint, face ID or whatever biometric feature that comes out and it would look at a govt ID that's on file to make sure you're the user. Not really intrusive most of us don't even have local hard drives, we keep everything in the cloud because it's instant sync and hard drive crashes are brutal. Idk it sounds scary but if you have a token kind of like an advertisement ID on your browser or network it would make sure you are old enough to watch porn, gamble, buy nicotine in the mail etc.I was exposed to porn in 2009 when I was 10...there was no safe search or AI filters to help my innocence. If someone is using an account that's linked to them IRL they won't or be less likely to groom kids in games, online, in messages, and kids will get their own sanitized internet. It was always coming to this, the digital wild west was a failed experiment. Too much abuse, look at the dark web and the 764 types extorting, sextorting. Everyone is sick of it and the few holding out will eventually just be out of date and exposed to exploits if they don't update onto a secure operating system. Saying to parent your kids is bullshit, kids will find a way to get a phone secondhand even buy their friends old one and hide it from parents. 80% of traffic is already the popular "monopolies" so we are already pretty much centralized, only difference is accountability for the predators because anything cloud related scans real time for C-S-A-M in real time on screen or in the cache, files, photos.
>>535159413That's cool, never heard about it so it was probably not a big deal>>535159437I don't know what his definition of public service is but the ones I'm thinking of never required a physical ID so they won't require a digital one either. Using it for logging into banking services or buying things online is very quick and easy though. Feel free to MAID yourself if you can't handle the fact that living in the 21st century means you can use your phone for things instead of needing a piece of plastic>>535159679I never took it as an attack, I'm just confused why you explained my point back to me.
>>535157605Well he's not your problem now is he OP?
>>535157605I don't even have regular I.D so that's me fucked then
>modernize how i wait on hold for the doctor surgery>modernize how tens of millions of niggers have broke the NHS>modernize how i say no to experimental gene therapy vaccines>modernize how i type all the same numbers on government documents
>>535159772>never heard about it so it was probably not a big dealI'm guessing there's a lot of important things you know nothing about, anon>I don't know what his definition of public service islet me help you, since youre retarded. banks are businesses operating for profit, and therefore not a public service. see? simple. good luck out there!
Im in favor of digital ids and against anonymity. It's a recent epiphany I had. I dont think you guys can give a proper argument as to why you're against them.
>>535159822>I don't even have regular I.DDo they even exist in the UK? I thought you were planning to introduce them at some point, but it failed? Mine expired 10 years ago. But since there's no ID requirement here, it's not a big deal.
>>535159852Since when did you need an ID card to call the cops? Or an ambulance?Like I said, I don't know what his idea of a public service is but I don't see it requiring any ID and therefore won't track you.Is logging into a hospital's web page with your digital ID to book a time slot to see a doctor bad? It's not like your visit there was off the record anyway
>>535159961>Im in favor of digital ids and against anonymity. It's a recent epiphany I had. I dont think you guys can give a proper argument as to why you're against them.Go on then, sell it to me.
>>535160023>implying the only public services are emergency servicesI already told you. Scroll up and read it again, or don't bother actually, you are too retarded for this subject matter. Try talking sports or something that seems more your speed.
>>535159728sorry, but I can't afford a smart phone or pay for phone/internet plan.
>>535159961You've already been doxed at least 15 times for your faggotery, and your house has been burned down 7 times. Are you sure that's what you want?
>>535160177So you don't have any examples of public services that requires physical IDs now that would track you in a very intrusive way if you had to use digital IDs?If you can't think of one that's fine, but it kinda fucks with your argument a bit you know?
>>535160054With digital id you can get good goy social credit points which will give you a 10% Discount at greggs.
>>535160189alri Charlieboy? Got them turkeyie teeth sorted then is it?
>>535157605>the King Charles III ensures his official announcement of "sausage ID´s".
>>535159772It'll be a big deal when your signature is used for a loan or a lease that is never paid back. Lol
>>535160556Banks can fix that for you real quick as long as you tell them your ID was hijacked, not huge problem
we don't want to "modernize" how we "interact with public services"who even voted for this guy?
By the way, the pajeets, with aadhaar, have the most comprehensive digital ID system in the world. It connects numerous systems to your ID and creates the transparent citizen. All data is accessible to authorities, including law enforcement agencies. It probably provides the best argument against any step towards digital ID.
>>535160892Parliament sadly
reminder: the alarmism about online pornography is part of the problem/reaction/solution chain of social manipulation that results in internet id, censorship and a chilling effect on free speech and dissent against unpopular agendas.
>>535161096Why would (((they))) want to kill off porn when it's one of (((their))) biggest income sources?
There's one way around thisBefriend someone in local government who makes ids and has access to the systemThey can input whatever photo and data for you they want, even fake, so you yourself aren't tied to that id. They can put any documents into the system, birth certificates, anything. Whoever you want to be.Of course you can be off the system entirely but you should commit to staying wherever you are off grid. Fake IDs aren't enough now because they can scan your card and see if it's attached to a database.
>>535161235i explained whyand it won't kill off porn, if anything it will be easier to sell it because you'll already be logged in with your credit card. but even if it did kill off porn, they would sacrifice that pawn to enact total informational control.
>>535158675It's simple, look at their fucking face and speak to them in local language, if they look foreign and can't reply they can't get in. Close tourism.
>>535161409Normal people don't pay for porn, if they forced you to log into a porn site with your face then people would just start using VPNs which wouldn't be very helpful for their end goal. People are aware payments carry their identity which is why they don't pay for porn because they're ashamed of watching it. Letting the government track your porn browsing is equally bad.
>>535160054I dont care about persuading you but I'll share. Anonymity is unhealthy to us. It disconnects us from the real world and real connections. It's a toxic surrogate activity that's harmful to (you).With digital ids you can stop scammers and other bullshit. You can build trust online and it can lead to real life benefits.
>>535159772Sven you're a fucking retard that can't see the bigger picture.
>>535162566
