Don't question the authentcity of this
>>535396067why would anyone question it? I await your retarded, ignorant answer for making this idiotic stupid shit post.
>>535396067That physically impossible.
>>535396313>why would anyone question it?>I await your retarded, ignorant answer for making this idiotic stupid shit post.I forgot Americans are not obliged to study physics in high school.
>>535396623>of course they are,BTFO
>>535396509>es mucho possible senor, I did la maffz and shit senior>uno momento, isso... SOPA DE MACACO>UMA DELICIA!
>>535396844Delicious
>>535396067They went back to their planet
>>535396067Guess the camera guy was just left there.
>Guess the camera guy was just left thereThe lunar rover on Apollo 15, 16 and 17 all had a remotely-operable TV cameraThe astronauts were instructed to park the rover a certain distance away and the commands were relayed from Mission ControlBecause of time lag, the motion was preplanned ahead of time and issued 2 seconds ahead of the countdownOn Apollo 15 the tilt mechanism malfunctionedjOn Apollo 16 the rover was parked too close, so the planned controls did not keep the ascent stage centeredThey got it (mostly) right on Apollo 17All 3 videos are found herehttps://youtu.be/fLlt9ZdCAfU?t=64Further sourceshttps://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N38K1VM/https://www.redsharknews.com/technology-computing/item/2742-how-nasa-captured-lunar-lift-offhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMHLvoWZfqQ&t=280s
>>535396067>questioning it is like gassing 6 million jews
That may be a scale model in some set in LA but the american moon landings were just 100% confirmed by the latest round of UFO disclosure.They did happen, but what we saw was recreations in a studio, as skeptics kept saying for the past 70 years.
>>535396067I don't.
Question to moon landings deniers:you are aware that the appolo mission could have been observed from earth with telescopes, right?So you are saying that the rocket actually went to the moon but never landed?Or that all people who observed the mission, including millions of hobbists and american geoplitical rivals, were in on the conspiracy?
>>535397170you are gay
>>535397134Kys eglinoid
>>535397120>shitholeYou're a pajeet and I can tell it right away. You are from a shithole, and you should go back.>being forced to study something hasn't done better than it being by choiceI agree with it, I never stated the contrary, you just made a strawmen. You can't deny that the average American has no knowledge of physics, sure, there's always outliers that have a passion for something and excel at something, but that's not true for the majority of people. The majority of people just accepts what they're told, and that's what you're doing right now. You just accept what you're told and then you insult anyone that disagrees. Notice that you cannot explain what's going on in the footage.
>>535397419I won't answer your questions, jeet. I don't want to talk to your people. If you and your people are so enlightened, go back.
>>535397259idk what u even mean desu
>>535397343It's possible that somebody could have seen Apollo back in the day, though it would have been pretty difficult.Here is an amateur astronomer who captured Artemis II, even showing the apparent curvature due to parallax from the rotation of the EarthBut we have a lot more tools than they had 50+ years ago, especially when it comes to aiming a telescope at essentially blackness and finding the tiny amount of light bouncing off ithttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbV6hWAqDLw
>>535397343But at very least, the saturn rocket launch did happen, right?And also at some point, the craft landed back on earth.And in the mean time, people were able to hear radio signals from the spacecraft.
>>535398168i still don't know what u mean but if u mean people thinking the landings were faked are gullible ignorant retarts watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpuKu3F0BvY&t=7308s&pp=ygUNYW1lcmljYW4gbW9vbg%3D%3D As an appetiser, we can move on to more interesting servings later on. Moron.
>>535398448>watch thisHow about instead, you tell me the best piece of evidence from that video that it was a hoaxTell me the argument that most convinced you, and we can talk about it
>>535397079tyres that would not last during the temperature swings. wonder why have not adapted that technology now.
>>535396067The moon landing was real. There are satellite images of the NASA installation. Yes, the footage was mostly fake largely because it was damn near impossible to record in that atmosphere but also that they were being watched which they mentioned in the original transcript.
>here is a visual explanation on what happened>retard 100 years later:>UUUUUUUUUGH THIS IS THE ACTUAL FOOTOAGO???? DUUUUUUUR???????>BRUUUUUUU THEY THINK WE ARE IDIOETS?????? (actually are)
>>535398559alot of nasa pictures being outright physically impossible to be real>>535398689ok so you're conceding. thank for playing retart
>>535398725a simple elbowsup.ca search will show you>The temperature on the Moon can reach up to 250°F (121°C) during the day and drop to -410°F (-246°C) at night, with extreme variations due to the lack of a significant atmosphere. This results in drastic temperature swings between lunar day and night, which last about two weeks each.California Institute of Technology PBS Learning Media
>>535396067Show us your real flag shtiskin.
>>535398655>tyres There was no air in the tires - they were just a wire mesh and had no air inside of themWhy would these have problems with temperature?>temperature swingsWhat temperature swings?Here are the Apollo 11 readings of the temperature over a month on the surface (they didn't have a rover, but it's good data anyways)When they were on the Moon the temperature only varied between about 250 and 280 Kelvin (-20 and 10 C)So could you explain in more detail what you mean by "tyres and temperature swings"?
>>535396067What's unrealistic about it?
>>535396623Low IQ Mutts think any technological human achievement is magic
>>535398759>alot of nasa pictures being outright physically impossible to be realOk, good startNow show me those pictures and what about them you think is "impossible".Here's a reference you can use to get the original NASA scans, to make sure you're not falling for hoaxed pictures created by grifters like Bart Sibrelhttps://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/albums/
>>535398781We're talking about the surface of the moon which does not have the same protective atmosphere Earth's surface has. You would be exposed to the harshness of space including the radiation. Why do you think they had to wear specially designed suits? I would say not even today's electronics would not survive if exposed to that environment.
>>535399106Did they put in in a garage overnight? Is there underground lunar parking? I'm not up to date on Lunar Theory. >>535399084all outside of the range of that operating temp of that compound
>>535398957>The temperature on the Moon can reach up to 250°F (121°C) during the day and drop to -410°F (-246°C) at nightHow long does a day and night last on the moon?28 days from sunrise to sunrise.How long were the Apollo astronauts on the Moon?3 days maximum, and for all of them they landed very close to the terminator line, so just after sunriseSo the basis of your argument is invalid - they were not on the surface long enough for that temperature to changeSee the temperature chart at >>535399084
>>535396067I hekin love science!
>>535399326>all outside of the range of that operating temp of that compoundWhat compound?Where is your source for the operating temperature of "that compound"?The lunar rover tires were a metal mesh
>>535396989No actually they used a remote control from Earth and followed the shotThat's their official explaination anyway
>>535399262Such a recording device would have to be designed to survive the harsh elements of space so yes.
No digital cameras back then - that was recorded to analog tapeNo motion tracking - camera attempts to keep lander in frame with non linear movementsImmediate zoom out at launch and pan upward - was this pre-set or triggeredHow was the footage relayed to earth - analog tape is somehow converted and sent 276,000 miles3500lbs of thrust should have kicked up a giant dust storm, not a spark show - reduced gravity should have sent everything airborne
>>535399630Like I said - the moon's atmosphere does not have the same protective properties that Earth has which is why the surface is not habitable so it is unlikely NASA would have been able to record the moon landing. That is just my opinion but at the same time that is pretty much a fact. We're talking 1960's technology. C'mon now, anon.>Surface temperatures on the Moon range from higher than 250°F to lower than -410°Fhttps://science.nasa.gov/moon/weather-on-the-moon/
>>535399789>No digital cameras back then - that was recorded to analog tape>How was the footage relayed to earth - analog tape is somehow converted and sent 276,000 milesYou do understand that television exited in the 70s, right?>camera attempts to keep lander in frame with non linear movementsYes, it was guided by a man in Mission Control and was operated remotelyAll of this is explained here >>535397079>3500lbs of thrust should have kicked up a giant dust stormAnd it didLook at the legs of the rover just a few frames after ignitionThere is clearly a large amount of regolith being kicked upIt doesn't plume outward like you think it should because each particle is following a parabolic trajectory outward, not upward, and there is no air to make it swirl or hang in the airAre these your best arguments?Have you not looked into it at all?Because you could have had these answers in about 10 minutes with a search engine
>>535399971>the moon's atmosphere does not have the same protective properties that EarthOk>the surface is not habitableOk>it is unlikely NASA would have been able to record the moon landingThat does not follow from the two premisesThe floor of the ocean is also not habitable, but we can still film there.>Surface temperatures on the MoonIt's been explained no fewer than 3 times in the thread - they were not on the Moon during a full lunar day for those temperature swings to have effectYou are just vagueposting and making shit up while giving the same tired refuted talking points that all hoaxers give
>>535396067i have dozens of pics and webms that are instablocked on here yet this spammer can post the same exact thread, with the same exact wording and gif for a very long time and jannies do nothingplease explain
>>535400204>please explainIt's the jannies who are posting these threads, or they are incentivized to leave them up to poison the well
>>535396067You can tell it's real because it looks so fake, honestly.
>>535400160I will ask you a simple question. Do you genuinely believe humans had the technology to record in that atmosphere? In the fucking 1960's? Not just the temperature but also the radiation of space. This is common sense. I'm not even denying the moon landing happened.
>>535400537Ah, deflection, I was waiting for thatWould you like to address any of the vagueposting you've already done, or are you going to revert to factory default settings here and just start "asking questions"?
>>535396433It's like playing with Russians on Xbox live. Bad ping but it kinda works
>>535396067Bro we really did land on the moon we just faked the newscast.
>>535400839I'm old enough to remember when anything below 100ms would get you called a "low ping bastard"Now if I get anything above 25 I'm changing serversBut I'm also quite close to data centers, so that might affect my tolerance
>>535400284it really seems that way at this point.
>>535397343>the stack was simply too small to be resolved using a telescope.Sure, but the radio communication was received by amateurs and they measured the carrier frequency phase shift moon orbitin included. Me have known them personal and yes, they were German like all of the things that made the landings possible and are unthinkable for UShitholers noweadays.
>>535400195>iThat does not follow from the two premisesThe floor of the ocean is also not habitable, but we can still film there.You're talking about a different atmosphere with its own conditions. To record in the deepest depths of the oceans you would need a device specially made to be impenetrable to the sea level pressure. That's it. To do the same thing with the moon's surface you would have to make such a device to be impenetrable not only to the catastrophically different temperature but also to the radiation. Yes, I'm sure we have such technology now but surely not back then.>It's been explained no fewer than 3 times in the thread - they were not on the Moon during a full lunar day for those temperature swings to have effectThe temperature difference would still be catastrophic enough for a recording device to survive regardless when they landed. It's not exactly the Earth.
The truth that some disregard is the fact that the austronaut left behind to film this was george floyd’s father. His last words was ”i can’t breathe”. This is whyBLM exist and this is why we need to flood europe and usa with shitskins and niggers.
>>535400811Like I said I can not possibly see NASA to have created such an impenetrable recording device back in the 1960's. The film is just one component. Not even that as it's an accessory.
>>535399971>the moon's atmosphere does not have the same protective properties that Earth has which is why the surface is not habitable so it is unlikely NASA would have been able to record the moon landing.They made special film and containers to protect the negatives from Sun's radiation.>We're talking 1960's technology.1960's *military technology
>>535396067>whitey, namely nazi engineers, couldn't possibly have put man on the moonidk, mohammed, i think it's 50/50
THE ALIEN ARRIVAL IS CONFIRM FOR TUESDAY MORNING 9:30 AM EST TIME.QANON INSIDER HERE WITH DEEPSTATE ILLUMINATI SEE YOU ALL IN THE MOTHERSHIPS GOODLUCK SAFE.PS. Disappearance of UFO expert Gen. Neil McCasland 'confirmed gameover'
>>535396067How did they live stream it using 60s tech? Wouldn't this be on film? Also what explanation did they have with the cameras already being on the moon as they were stepping out and leaving? Plus the fucking phone call to the moon? Absolutely batshit. The only real conclusion I can see is that we did go to the moon, but we couldn't broadcast it so we did it in secret and filmed a fake one months later to own the soviets. And that's the best case scenario.
>>535396067I do question the authentcity of this
>>535400074You can't actually believe this is real. Of course Google has to have answers to all of this. It also can explain 269 different genders, but it doesn't make it real.Yes there was broadcast TV back in 1969 ... I must have missed the 90' tall dishes they assembled to send the RF signal - rabbit ears? Cameras only had mechanical zoom back then. We are to believe the camera was mounted on servos and controlled from earth with a 2s lag? Is that really your story? Are you aware the RCA TK43 broadcast cameras were over 250lbs and required 2kw of power to run. Then the broadcast signal ON EARTH was 30-300kW, I can't imagine the power to broadcast 276,000 miles. The input power because of tube inefficiency was 2-3x the signal power. You of course are going to explain how this was all run from batteries now? Can you comprehend the size of a lead acid battery to accomplish this? Good thing weight wasn't an issue and they could bring a 10,000 lb battery with them. What do they pay you to say about why we haven't gone back in 60 years? Do you have a snappy answer for that one? It would be too easy so we are going to Mars?
don't question the authenticity of this 200 year old automaton
I trust Werner Von Braun more than I trust some nigger brained idiot pretending the earth is flat
>>535405344Werner would gas every subhuman in this thread.
>>535396313Jews steal money. Buzz aldrin wearing a freemason ring and "taking a freemason flag to the moon" were the pedophile Jews "admitting it's fake."Jewish freemasons rape kids and steal tax dollars.
>>535405419
>>535397079Wow that's so cool. Why did they take a fucking golf cart to the moon? On the world's most dangerous mission? Why waste the space? Why did they delete the high quality full color tapes?Because it was a psyop to make boomers cream their pants and thank Jewish pedophiles for stealing tax money.
>>535404778Nobody can debate on facts. All they do is use the emotional arguments fed to them in school.Another Jewish myth - nuclear weapons. Never witnessed or recorded by a civilian. Above ground testing banned right when home film cameras were invented. The military puts peope in jail for decades over classified aircraft paint, but they teach every child exactly how to make a nuke? Bullshit.Japan had 0 radiation contamination. Look it up. Moon landing, nuclear weapons, and the Holocaust are the largest Jewish myths in modern times.
>>535396989the power of one slightly autistic junior engineer spending a day to figure out where to position the camera and how to tilt it so it follows the return module
>>535396433How so?
>>535405419So the jannies are awake enough to delete the spamming flat earth retard, but they leave this thread by the repeated spammer up?The worst part is that it's working - they are making /pol/ frustrating to use and thus destroying it from within
>>535396509They don't even teach them derivatives nor integrals. They stop at y=mx+b and i'm not even sharting
>>535406054Very cool. I like how defenders of bullshit always make shit up with no facts. 100% circular reasoning 100% of the time.
>>535406319I had AP physics in high school and have a BS in physicsHigh school was purely algebraic as you said, y=mx+b or x(t) = x0 + v0t + 1/2 at^2Only when I got into college did we start integratingHell, only about half of those who graduated my high school knew what an integral was, because that was considered "advanced math" and was optional
>>535406566>I like how defenders of bullshit always make shit up with no factsThe links have already been posted in the thread describing exactly what he said>>535397079https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N38K1VM/https://www.redsharknews.com/technology-computing/item/2742-how-nasa-captured-lunar-lift-offMeanwhile the hoaxtards have nothing beyond vagueposting, shifting the burden of proof, or just plain incredulity
>>535396067ITT: untermenschen seething at what peak White capability produced 60 years ago.
>>535406730>>535406738Wow liars lying for money. I'm proven wrong!>>535406749It was operated by Jewish freemason pedophiles, and they faked it for money.
>>535396313Fpbp.
>>535396067Moon landing deniers want to take away from the white man's achievements.
>>535396433>I dont understand it, therefore it's impossible.
>>535407071Ok moische. Seethe more that I'm calling out your money laundering psyop.>>535407115For anyone interested here is the Jewish child molester saying how your tax money was needed for SCIENCE.
>>535400074People who think it's fake are neither intelligent or honest.
>>535397324seething about muh average american is super cringe grow up
>>535396067the video of the cardboard house models getting blown over by a "nuke" (but not the camera being knocked over or destroyed) is my favorite one personally.boomers really did and still do fall for whatever jewish schemes are put in front of them, huh?
>>535396067>9 gorrilionSay "I wanna see Russians blown up" and then we walk. Pass the vibe checks.
>>535407244>If you don't agree with me you're stupidWow great argument, kike. there's no room for social shame in science unless you're a Jew trying to hide crime.
>>535407550To be fair pedophile Jews infiltrate schools and brainwash kids. See >>535405677Also the Rosa parks myth. She was a Jewish freemason who hated white people.KKK? Didn't exist. It was a bunch of Jews scaring blacks into thinking whites are secret racists. The KKK did Jewish freemason pedophilia rituals, protected Jews, and did charity work for niggers.
>>535407550I like how conspiratards are experts on everything.
>>535396067considering all the paper in NASA's records about Apollo (specifications, diagrams, meeting transcripts, approvals, budgets, operation and service manuals) weighs more that a full Saturn V stack, you'd better not>vidrelated: nerds track down original 1960's NASA ground testing hardware and following the original documentation, recreate two-way communications between the Command Module and Mission Controlask yourself: why would NASA work ten thousand times harder when they could just make it up?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdJBgpocB7I
>>535407733>it's not real because it's not okay?!you're not a proponent of science, you're just a fucking retard
reminder moon landing deniers are 3rd worlders jealous at the success of what white people can do
>>535408069I never knew that the displays in Mission Control were not actually the data terminalsThey were TV signals broadcast from cameras pointed at the actual terminals, which were on an entirely different floor of the buildingThat's pretty fucking great
>>535408459Hahaha holy fucking shit what a joke. This shit falls apart the second you start asking for evidence and facts instead of Jewish sophistry.>if you don't let me scam you... You're a dumb science denier!What did occultists mean by worshipping science as a form of satanism, then they have to fake their achievements? Similar to their Satan worship trannies all being abominations.
>>535408069>why would NASA work ten thousand times harder when they could just make it up?Because they didn't work 10,000 harder and are lying? Because they had to fake the signals so their SCIENCE :O faggots would think it's real?
>>535408038I like how you didn't address his post and shamed him like a Jew or woman.
>>535409904Cameras were hidden inside steel, concrete, or lead-lined enclosures with small optical windows. Some were buried underground with mirrors or periscopes aimed at the blast.
>>535400811>films designed for use in vacuumBut nasa themselves say a hasselblad camera was used with its usual regular film
>>535396313Because it's fake. Nothing brings out the shills like these threads. They must have a whole team of glow nigger shills at NASA to try and keep the narrative intact.
>>535410365Were they? Do you have proof? Or more circular reasoning to explain why it doesn't make sense? Why was above ground testing banned the vert decade home film cameras came out? Why has a civilian never witnessed or recorded one? Why was a dedicated film studio required? Why didn't the trinity test have glass at ground 0? Why didn't the military guy standing there die of radiation poisoning?>>535410509Aww Jewish shill wants to run away when facts conflict with his feelings. Call me stupid again I'm sure I'll be shamed into compliance.
>>535397079>jews said they did it, so that means they did itInteresting argument. Could you provide the telemetry data? Or better yet let’s just see the original camera recording footage. Not the screen that was recorded at nasa and broadcasted to America, the actual footage. If you could produce that surely it would put all of these gullible skeptics to bed. I’ll await your reply that contains said evidence
>>535411367>how did i do that when this is your first post on this ID?I think the VPN faggot just outed himself as a paid shill who can't remember what IP he's posting fromI mean, it's pretty obvious that it's just one or two paid actors in here trying to keep the thread aliveBut for them to so blatantly admit to it is pretty rareThey're not sending their best
>>535410550Several moon documentaries ive seenFor a guy who continues to spout off technical proofs and extensive knowledge of the moon missions why dont you know that?
>>535411567>Several moon documentaries ive seenIf there were "several" of them, then it should be easy for you to find itGo ahead - show a NASA source saying they used "regular film"I look forward to your reply of "Not doing your research for you" and/or moving the goalposts
>>535411634Was it obvious though? Not sure if (you) mentioned it was obvious
>>535411704Nah im not going to go looking for it to please you faggot. I dont really care whether you think there are anomalies in the moon missions. You seem really over uptight and anxious though maybe you forgot to take your meds? The hasselblad camera issue is one of the talking points always brought up concerning moon missions. If youre as anally retentive and the meticulous nigger that you come off as here, Then youd be interested in finding out more about nasas use of a regular old hasselblad camera on the moon.
>Nah im not going to go looking for it to please you faggotAh, the "Do your own research" cope as predicted
>>535412124
>>535411367He’s probably at least kx5n4pEg, 5KJgx1HG, and qxMYsGwi since they all have weird angry low iq writing styles, constant superfluous jew references thrown in, and don’t overlap as far as I can tell.For being so obsessed with conspiracies that would require so many people to keep quiet despite endless scrutiny, he can’t even maintain one effort to consensus-spoof on a single thread in a laotian spear fishing forum.
>>535396067
>>535411255
>>535409849>enough paper to bury your city>all internally consistent>everything described works>using it as guidelines, it's possible to recreate todayno LLMs back then, it took a million man-hours to write all of thator, they could have faked it and not gone to any trouble>and yet, the paper exists
https://youtu.be/0514L2QwOBEhttps://youtu.be/GwkqLv-fOjg?t=2209https://youtu.be/m7ZpvLu_tFEhttps://youtu.be/lKg-yn86zp4https://youtu.be/p-BFmn2S_jUhttps://youtu.be/BVJgObFHLY4https://youtu.be/ru5fdfovkGIhttps://youtu.be/74KRZt5oJMEhttps://youtu.be/tdwy-hxS-tshttps://youtu.be/UAx5cl9VpTEhttps://youtu.be/JlFnJPFjcc0https://youtu.be/XetG30_YOeohttps://youtu.be/ziVLbEoQ4Schttps://youtu.be/7H_1ZbuA9HIhttps://youtu.be/UbYtkrTquXEhttps://youtu.be/1WHIr-IFqAohttps://youtu.be/WcqKUhU0WDchttps://youtu.be/wPrDg0CtWnkhttps://youtu.be/hoGTBdu7dMchttps://youtu.be/mcLwr86emdshttps://youtu.be/U_bJYXS9p4Ahttps://youtu.be/JOqc63Pp9OAhttps://youtu.be/X-w8acuxF6whttps://youtu.be/nGLJ5XJP3uEhttps://youtu.be/olbyJDou4qQhttps://youtu.be/0Q18iSz6mushttps://youtu.be/aFFM3YJAs4Qhttps://youtu.be/Stft_t48Hxchttps://youtu.be/QWa7lTxhrKIhttps://youtu.be/Zc_J2k4Cdp8https://youtu.be/DdLLamniSyghttps://youtu.be/udjk_FB80kMhttps://youtu.be/4nKIN_eHYxwhttps://youtu.be/fDBRhxryfZMhttps://youtu.be/-rmDj1MJyaYhttps://youtu.be/Kv9-JuLRpg0https://youtu.be/7Eeo-82Eac8https://youtu.be/0Vv62PFFsNUhttps://youtu.be/CDG4oiCx_ishttps://youtu.be/wz68Q2Nz05Ahttps://youtu.be/WffliCP2dU0https://youtu.be/uUuTAflN1rUhttps://youtu.be/lkmY_4PKMlYhttps://youtu.be/McdMMmclGVchttps://youtu.be/Cm7fBZq-8T4https://youtu.be/4SlRsbQ3nfMhttps://youtu.be/Z36Ns7KUYHwhttps://youtu.be/XhIwZuPGfsshttps://youtu.be/CATklVkPEMwhttps://youtu.be/eJK1gLHbOxAhttps://youtu.be/WXaXnAvEpB8https://youtu.be/gWnFMWqDRQEhttps://youtu.be/EvnrD49RmAYhttps://youtu.be/3wU8_jT61eEhttps://youtu.be/lMhheDWThxEhttps://youtu.be/hG_sv5SWi3Y?t=507https://youtu.be/UOLLMkAHHQI?t=2477https://youtu.be/d_h5tupEdn8https://youtu.be/jDKfJROVHJEhttps://youtu.be/maBf0H3UNJIhttps://youtu.be/Jm7nBn7RxhUhttps://youtu.be/BEV2SAL8z5ghttps://youtu.be/Qse5Jc8jgSkhttps://youtu.be/zMAa5Ir7IHU
>>535396067I know it's hard to fathom, but before DEI, NASA hired only the best of the best.
>>535396067Was the word authenticity too hard for you ?
Mutts went to the moonThe world didn't see the actual missions on the moon
>>535413119Always 1pbtid?
>>535396067>trust them.
Why did the leaf get deleted?
Hey I don't browse pol as much as I used to. Can someone breakdown why the Canadian and his 40 posts got deleted and what his story with the (presumed) flat earther is?
>>535396067>(((memeflag)))yawn>americans can build a rocket that lands on the moon and then safely return the astronauts sent there>multiple times>NO WAY they could have set up a camera to tip upward in one movement upward as the lunar module blasts off from the moonCONSPIRACY!
>>535412443>possible to recreate todayWatch out, you'll trigger one of the flerfer's favorite pre-programmed arguments
>>535396067>authentcityAnd ESL retard doesn't understand how LMAE works in low gravity, imagine my shock >The lunar module ascent engine (LMAE) is a fixed-thrust hypergolic rocket engine developed by Bell Aerosystems for the Apollo Lunar Module, designed to lift the module off the Moon's surface. It used Aerozine 50 fuel and nitrogen tetroxide as an oxidizer, providing about 1,600 pounds-force of thrust.
>we have to retcon the White man's greatest achievement to epicly frickin pwn the libs on xitter, goy- I mean my fellow MAGApedes!!!!Fuck off
