A simple thought:You should only vote for the person that can physically incapacitate the other person, regardless of how intellectual the debate is. That means, that in a philosophical debate on energy sourcing, the first thing I look at is the size of the person's biceps and whether he could physically choke out the other person for the validity of his argument. what does this make me?
>>535415050Makes you a hyper masculinist inverted realist operating on a flawed might makes right heuristic.You believe physical strength is proof of character - and for many things that it is. But your heuristic of strong = correct fails in regards to energy sourcing and fails miserably - muscle must be maintained and is cost inefficient relative to more sustainable sources
>>535415050It's based. I would add a "lookism" layer to that and It'd be perfect.>ugly and weakfuck off>handsome and strongGot my vote
>>535415582you lost tranny
