[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: x5k6lwz33leg1.jpg (130 KB, 1290x1588)
130 KB JPG
Is collectivism the future of global politics, and if so will ethnic lines be blurred into these obvious racial groups?


%35 Brown
>chinese, japanese, korean (%25) vietnamese, Thai, Indonesia (%9) central/ turkic (%2)

%14 African
>sub-saharan NWES African (%14)

%10 White
>NWES European (%10)

%38 Blended between the three
>aboriginal (%2) arab, persian, berber (%6) latin american (%8) indian, pakistani, bangladeshi (%23)
>>
You ever seen the movie Elysium?
>>
rob boomer women blind and rape their white daughters
>>
>>535470618

Nah, but I think it was more about money wasn't it?
>>
>>535470563
I love how they can't figure out what to call Feather Injuns and Abos.
>Indiginous Peoples
As if they're a race, despite being more genetically distant from one another than they are from the other races.
Imagine being an Abo and getting lumped in with Native Americans just because you're the inconvenient leftovers on a continent that has been civilized.
>>
>>535470563
Politics is collectivism by definition, liberalism is just collectivism of the upper class against everyone else smokescreened as individualism
>>
>>535470563
East Asians aren't brown...
We all know what "brown" is.

Brown is basically the entire world with the exception of Whites, East Asians, and Persians. You can also further make a clear distinction between browns and blacks (sub-saharan) if you choose, I think that makes sense.
But Whites, East Asians, and Persians. They are the only people capable of making high trust societies on their own.
>>
File: BIOREACTOR.jpg (73 KB, 686x386)
73 KB JPG
>>535470951
Numbnuts we are headed for global economic fuckfuck with billions of for all intents and purposes zombies trying to eat what is left.
>>535471190
Injuns are asiatic from the Alaskan land bridge. Abbos are closer to pajeets. They're both pieces of shit contributing to the zombie horde.
>>
File: IMG_4436.jpg (234 KB, 1024x1024)
234 KB JPG
>>535470563
>”god is real and just”
>he made pajeets a quarter of the population
>>
>>535471467
iroquois are brotier
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPqFcLTR2w8
>>
>>535471467

Well ok. Like I said, I never saw it. But wasn't Elysium this giant ring city where all the rich people lived?
>>
>>535470563
The true white population is closer to 4% globally and dwindling. Whites will never collectivise if they haven't already in the face of government coordinated attempts at replacing them with other races.
>>
>>535471424

East Asians would include chinese & north korea which definetly don't have high trust societies while Japan AND south korean do... but were hand held by USA occupation. It's fair to say they can maintain high trust society, but only if its handed to them.

Not sure about persians desu
>>
>>535473105
North Koreans ARE Koreans and are perfectly capable of creating a high trust society. The Chinese can too, but they're all fucked up from being conquered too many times. Racially speaking the Chinese are capable people. We're watching them transform right now.

White societies have had their fair share of cyclic dystopian/authoritarian shitholes and eras. Doesn't mean the actual race wasn't capable of high trust society. It means for a time evil prevailed and had to run it's course.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.