There is the imprisoned, the penalized, those bound to work by debt, those by greed, and those whose only loyalty is to the constitution and their family. Those in government at times may be in any one of these stations, and those outside of these stations must certainly be dispatched with extreme prejudice for any offense against our citizenry and their operation in governance.By the accounting of and knowing of thus doing, can it be presumed that our people may be certain of proclaimed truths.The greedy are indebted to the imprisoned, the indebted are accountable to the penalized, the penalized are reliant on the loyal, the imprisoned are judged by the indebted, and the loyal are more virtuous than the greedy.We nonetheless masquerade as a capitalist democracy, within the structure of a constitutional representative republic. However none of these things are true. Oligarchic interests define the lines by which political actors vie for office, the police state aggresses a legislative prerogative to proffer as a penal colony under the firm hand of judicial insolence sworn to no common sensibility, and the states hold no power relative to what proscribed republic once existed.The patient sufferance of these political bands does impel us to hold repeated injuries as absolute tyranny. May God save our souls.
>>535473526This isn’t the first time you’ve posted this text alongside this image. The text is semantically and categorically flawed. Just one example: prisoners are, after all, people who have been punished. So what’s the point? At the very least, have an AI check it before you get torn to pieces here.
>>535473952He posts this several times a day, just report and move on
>>535473952he is a dumb niggercattle whose thread is eternally stuck on page 10.
>>535473952youd have to be coherent, rational, and reasonable to offer a critquewhich you arent and havent done
>>535474183peter csere is that you? are you and eric talking philosophy again?
>>535474183Your categories overlap and differ in terms of their levels. For example, imprisonment is a social/spatial status, whereas greed is a character trait. You can’t simply put them on the same level. There are also greedy prisoners who feel they’ve been wronged. Idiot.
>>535474723maybe dont deal in semantics like a jew
>>535474723What a surprise, a German who doesn't understand speech figures lol and can only defend an argument through the structured rationale of language. No doubt all are dead inside.
>>535474773Could it be that this is simply your best piece of writing, and that’s why you have to parade it around like a monstrance? You arsehole.
>>535474986youd do well to collect writings on todays revolution if you are white
>>535474941 Aren’t you ashamed to defend this rubbish with that flag? The text lacks any analytical depth. The list of groups it attributes to is arbitrary and follows no necessary distinction. Arbitrariness is also unforgivable from an aesthetic point of view. So please shove your figures of speech up your arse.
>>535475371its arbitrary to provide no substance in the space of diminishing what all people are accounted for as integral to the citizenryworse, its insulting, there is no excuse for nationalism in the course of correcting western democracy wherein all are pretenders to a republic in and of themselves
>>535475043Anon, where exactly is the technocracy mentioned in the text? Capitalism as a cover for oligarchy is only vaguely touched upon. The ‘police state’ could be a procedural offshoot of both oligarchy and technocracy (which, by the way, is better suited to addressing the digital age).There are also hybrid forms, such as between communism and capitalism (China), but these must be substantiated and not simply plucked out of thin air.
>>535475847subliminal actors are active in the climate of social stagnation and organized unrestactual operators are more or less the same prescription in action as they were when radio was invented, let alone before
>>535475987
