Had an epiphany the other day.... The notorious medieval law of ius primae noctis made a lot of sense if you assume inbreeding was a mass phenomenon in small dwellings back then. The right to the first night by the non-dysgenic and capable knight or other kind of ruler made sure that at least one child of the family wasn't a moron. It's also the first child of the family, which in most cases inherited the farm. Ius primae noctis therefore was responsible that Europe's cultures didn't end up in a dysfunctional bottleneck, but that slowly but gradually capital was build up for decisive escape velocity.Maybe Pakistan and other shitholes need a few generations of ius primae noctis?
It's just a kike myth, retard.
>>535474060This literally never happened. It's propaganda from the judeo-masonic French Revolution intended to paint our Christian ancestors as retarded and barbaric, just like every single other piece of slander against our medieval ancestors.
>>535476090And what's funny is that these judeo-masons railed against Christian Europe for all this completely fabricated barbarity, and then went on to rape and decapitate little girls across all of France with total impunity, and prop "literature" like 120 Days in Sodom as some sort of amazing and groubdbreaking literary achievement. They also accused Marie Antoinette of having incestuous sex with Louis XVII and then literally went on to rape then-10 year old Louis XVII to death in prison. They accuse you of what they themselves have always been guilty of.
>>535476038>>535476090nigga what
>>535476240>royal families keeping it in the family specifically in order to maintain their extremely delicate and turbulent alliances and power = the entire general population of all of Europe
