*AND TEMPORARY VISA JEETS!
Thank you Trump.
>>536799260But is this actually happening though?*2 more weeks*Judges overturn everything he tries to accomplish
>>536799445>judge overturnsnot how SCOTUS works, hernandezlower courts can't overturn rulings from SCOTUS
>>536799512I guess we'll see, I've stopped holding out hope for anything that isn't for big tech or israel
>>536799665Either way, yes or no, it is the biggest happening in US history, possibly world history.This decision determines whether or not the United States exists 100 years from now and doesn't just devolve a resource zone similar to SyriaDemographics is destiny.
>>536799445There is a court case right now to determining whether or not there is such a thing as birthright citizenship. Specifically the meaning of the term>and subject to the jurisdiction thereofAnd honestly it's not looking too great. Kentaji made the unbelievable argument that if you steal someone's wallet in Japan, this makes you a Japanese person. Yes, you read that correctly. When trying to come up with an example of how jurisdiction might work, the first thing that came to the mind of the only black woman on the Supreme Court was stealing wallets, and she made the incredible logical leap that a tourist who robs people is just as Japanese as the Emperor Naruhito himself.
>RetroactiveLegally not possible due to ex post facto laws.
>>536799906>lawsSCOTUS does not "make law", retarduse your favorite AI slop generator or web search and search>Are SCOTUS rulings on Constitutional Questions retroactive?And tell me what it says
>>536799906Laws mean nothing without enforcement.
>>536799260Nothing will happen. Nothing will change. You will be a minority soon.
>>536799809>This decision determines whether or not the United States exists 100 years from now and doesn't just devolve a resource zone similar to SyriaAnon, that's happening now.This experiment lasted 250 years, which is about average.
>>536799445>Judges overturn everything he tries to accomplishJudges don't have the Military, the President does. It is my opinion, even if SCOTUS says a billion people can come here illegally, President Trump will declare martial law, arrest them all; send the illegals home by force, and reset the entire Government from scratch. It will be their end.
>>536800093>happening nowCorrect, the battle is being fought for the soul of the nation right now and SCOTUS will decide the winner on June 30thThey will either declare borders fake and gay and become the greatest traitors in world history since Caracalla declared the Constitutio AntoninianaOr they will defend their nation with honor and dignity
>>536799260>RETROACTIVELMAO
>this coping migger is back after being repeatedly humiliatedlol
>>536799260What's stopping the democrats reserving everything trump has done
>>536800302>They will either declare borders fake and gay and become the greatest traitors in world history since Caracalla declared the Constitutio AntoninianaCorrect. And President Trump will do what needs to be done. He will use force, as needed to send them all home and arrest all the Judges.
>>536800388>What's stopping the democrats reserving everything trump has doneBecause we are going back to a Monarchy and never again will Democrats be allowed to rule.
>>536800388To reverse this Demons only have a few options1: Pack the supreme court and issue a new opinion that superseded the old one.2: A constitutional amendment which would require at least 38 out of 50 states signing onto it.Both of these are extremely difficult to accomplish.
>>536799969No, they interpret them. And there's not much left to reinterpret on the laws saying that people cannot be punished for crimes commited before they were illegal.>>536799970True sadly
>>536800294What presidency have you been watching for the past year? Nothing ever happens. 2 protesters were killed and deportations basically stopped.My parents are Q boomers and they believe all of the military cope as well. I would love to see him do anything. Please Trump, do ANYTHING
>>536799969>COTUS does not "make law", retardRoe V Wade called. So did 40 acres and a mule.They try to make law all the time.
>>536800558Tell me what it says, hernandez. I know you checked, probably even used multiple AI slop generators and got the same result
>>536799969>SCOTUS does not "make law",No, Trump can't use that law for tariffs and must refund, everyone.
>>536799880There really is something critically wrong with the reasoning abilities of black women who have attained a mode of power in a modern American society change a mode of to a mode of MODICUMMODICU M you stupid piece of fucking shit
>>536799970What >>536799906 meant to say was "prohibition of ex post facto laws.">>536799969Ex post facto laws (laws punishing someone for acts committed before the passing of said law) are prohibited by Article 1 of the US Constitution.
>>536800564Deportations never stopped don't be silly. The entire system of government is being reset. That is the plan. The bad people are being shown to you - Congress and the Courts do not work. It's too broken to fix. It takes time to wake up 200 million Americans. It's still happening.
>>536800726SCOTUS does NOT "make law", retard
>>536800558You don't understand. When SCOTUS decides, it means it was illegal the whole time. They're time wizards. There's no "before" in there to protect violatirs from enfircement
>>536799969SCOTUS said minors, like Karmelo Anthony, cannot be executed. We used to do this. Now SCOTUS has made it a law.
>>536799809>100 years from nowLmao, wut? Do you live in an extremely rural all-White boomertown? The US is completely fucked already. The SCOTUS decision just determines whether the situation is fixable through legal means or not.
>>536800847>You don't understand. When SCOTUS decides, it means it was illegal the whole time.And yet, that "power" is not up to them. It's up to Congress and Congress said nothing. SCOTUS gave themselves this "power" and made it a law.
>>536800904>>536800972Why are SCOTUS rulings retroactive?: Because SCOTUS does not "make" new law the way legislatures; they declare or discover what the law (including the Constitution) has always meant. A Supreme Court decision interpreting the Constitution is therefore understood as clarifying or correcting the true meaning that existed all along.
>>536801052There is no such power given to SCOTUS in the US Constitution. SCOTUS created that power in 1804 when Jefferson was in office.
>>536801052Jefferson said the People are the final decider of the law. SCOTUS said, no we are.Read his letters on this.
>>536799260I thought it already happened in May. Now you moved it to June. And later on you'll move to July. And so on. Countdown to you never being a woman. 0 days 0 hours 0 minutes 0 seconds. Because you were born a man.
The idea that President Trump reports to Judges is anti-American and tyrannical. It is not based in any law.
>>536799260I would be shocked if this gets a 5-4 decision banning birthright citizenship. You know Roberts, Barrett, and or Kavanaugh / Gorsuch are going to vote against it. We already know the three lib women are voting not to ban and Alito / Thomas are voting to ban. Which three are most likely to make it a 5 - 4? Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett has to as well or its not going to happen. Barrett will probably bitch out. Sad.
>>536799906Yes this op shows up every now and again and makes the extremely fantastic claim. I don't really know why. Maybe it's wishful thinking. Maybe he's a leftist who is trying to build up some kind of case that /pol/ was banking on this insane dream as some kind of future propaganda material. Far more sensible outcome would be merely the ruling that the children of illegal aliens are not automatically citizens, which is perfectly reasonable, fair, and should happen. This of course is clown world. Left wing judges are not going to vote away the thing that gives them power. ACB is not going to vote away birthright citizenship for her own adopted children.
>>536799969>>Are SCOTUS rulings on Constitutional Questions retroactive?>And tell me what it saysYou've been using that as an argument for months. And when people tell you that the real answer is 'it depends', you screech about how the SC can't change the Constitution. You also never post the search results that you claim tell you ALL rulings are retroactive. Last time you promised to kill yourself, when the ruling is NOT retroactive. It's 19 days away. Do you have your suicide kit ready? And are you gonna stream it?
>>536801524It's one of the shills from (((ptg))), it's literally their job to come up with ways to get people excited for Trump and the GOP.
>>536800787Ex post facto interpretations of law, future suicide victim.
>>536800787I never said it did. It interprets law, and it cannot interpret laws in such a way as to make it an ex post facto law. Put another way, it cannot allow a law to stand if, by doing so, it will operate as an ex post facto law.
Should be illegal to apply for a green card while on an H1b. The H1b application asks you to declare that your stay is temporary. By applying for a green card you make that statement on a federal document a lie.
>>536801524It's a tranny trying to rile up Chuds into disappointment.
>>536801699I see you are back to using the Mexican flag after using that European flag for months
never trust a word that comes out of a miggers mouth.this order if by some hail mary did not get struck down would only affect children born after January 20, 2025 as it clearly states in the order itselfbecause it is a presidential order, even if it did go into effect the next president can just shut it down by presidential order(just like pretty much every single other thing trump has 'accomplished'.
>>536801721>operate as lawretard, SCOTUS does NOT make lawHow many times do I have to tell you this?
>>536801511Yeah there is no way the clowns that Trump made SC judges will go against globohomo. They will cave to the Geroge Bush neo-con wing of the party.
>>536801779 I've always been Mexican, and use my flag, future gunshot statistic.
>>536801511The only thing that gives me hope is that Jumanji Jackson made such an insane argument ripped from the very bowels of the Retard Dimension that the other judges might vote opposite her just to distance themselves from her Africanized reasoning.
>>536801827Interpreting a law does not "make" a law.
>>536801805This isn't about Executive order 14160 retardYour talking points are nearly two years out of date nowSCOTUS is ruling on the MERITS of the case which means they are ruling the Constitutionality of itThat is entirely separate from an Executive Order which is now irrelevantThe EO was merely the vehicle to get the Constitutional Argument in front of SCOTUS
>>536801834Trump's lawyers have specifically said that they're not asking for it to be retroactive. OP is mentally ill.
>>536799906Birthright citizenship is a civil matter. Expos facto applies to criminal matters only.
>>536802027Finally an anon who begins to grasp what SCOTUS is and is not capable of
>>536799992Post hand and timestamp.
>>536801524There is a statute that gives adopted children citizenship already. Her children won't lose citizenship.
>>536801979doesn't really matter, a woman who adopted niggers will not vote against poor brown people
>>536801979Trump's EO could not be prospective. The executive branch doesn't have the power to retroactively reinterpret the law. Only scotus has that power. scotus can weigh reliance interests against the sovereignty of our country and decide that our sovereignty is more important.
>>536801052>A Supreme Court decision interpreting the Constitution is therefore understood as clarifying or correcting the true meaning that existed all along.Pharisees?
>>536802264>>536802301Barrett, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh are going to have to vote to ban it. Everyone knows Roberts is compromised and won't vote to ban it. I think its like a 1% chance that all three of Trump's picks vote to ban. Fucking thing sucks!
>>536801524Nothing ever happens
>>536799260there is no solution inside the current system. If they do this, and it's a big if, I guarantee it won't be retroactive, it will only be going forward, and there's so much rot baked in the cake already that that doesn't matter.
>>536802469I'm hearing it could be ended for non-immigrants since there is so much historical evidence that it wasn't intended for temporary sojourners, but there isn't as much evidence against illegals.
>>536799260what? how have i missed this where can i get more info?retroactive how far?extreme doubt
>>536801968it is not entirely separate or separate in any way shape or form.the court is deciding if it is legal for trump to enact the presidential order.nowhere does anything say that if SCOTUS rules it isn't illegal for trump to do it that it would automatically mean anything is or will be retroactive or anything of the sort.feel free to show me i'm wrong. everything i see says that even if it is found to be constitutional to remove birthright citizenship then the entire case reverts back to executive order 14160 which specifically states trump isn't looking for retroactive law.
>>536799260More room to import millions of jeets legally.
>>536802454>scotus can weigh reliance interests against the sovereignty of our country and decide that our sovereignty is more important.yeah and I could get a BJ from Sydney Sweeney
>>536802469Gorsuch already said he was voting in the Trump Administrations favor when he specifically quotes Elk v. Wilkins and says "that sounds exactly like the Trump Administrations argument" which means its standing precedent. ACBs house was raided by SWAT last week which means she is going to vote in favor as well
>>536799512>lower courts can't overturn rulings from SCOTUSactually they kinda can and do all the time.1)big secret: any SCOTUS "ruling" only really affects that one case, and isn't "case law" (another hoax)."case law" is a 'concept', and nothing legal. Its "guidelines for what might happen IRL if this is appealed"."conservatives" act like Communist "case law" is gospel. Jews and Leftists ignore it or more correctly and effectively see it only as Overton Windows that need moving.
>>536799260not happening.you should not get your hopes up.GOP loves birthright citizenship now. theyre running a literal anchor baby shitjeet for governor of Ohio. theyd lose their nominee lmao
>>536802680It could be retroactive, but most likely this initial ruling will be prospective and a new case will need to work it's way up in 10 or so years for retroactive. When the Dominican Republic retroactively ended birthright citizenship and deported all the Haitians they went back to 1929. BRC was created by SCOTUS in 1898 so technically it could go back until then.
>>536802700>>536802737Wait can anyone confirm if this SCOTUS decision would actually end birthright citizenship or if it would just allow Trump's executive order to be legal? Because if its just for the legality of the EO it doesn't mean much because the next Democrat or NeoCon president will throw it in the trash.
>>536799992wtf why is time dilating?
So what happens on the 30th exactly? I'm kind of struggling to find anything on google
>>536802979Doesn't SCOTUS release all their decisions before they go on a long recess?
>>536802734The only way I see it happening is if court packing becomes a thing. Democrats will use their turn to give trans special rights and make abortion legal for the whole country. Republicans will use their turn to retroactively end birthright citizenship.
>>536802979June 30th is the final day of Spring Session, its the deadline when SCOTUS has to release their opinions on the cases they agreed to hear and rule on during Spring Session.
>>536803102you know I actually had a thought about this that I forgot. Now that AI and robotics are advancing so fast our overlords may have decided we don't need so many useless eaters coming in so they may make this decision clamp it off going forward. They're a bit stuck though, if they clamp population growth at all the debt ponzi will start collapsing on itself. Threading the needle would be clamping future population growth and increasing the debt load on the existing population, maybe they will go that route.
>>536803439It's their target day, but they can do extensions.
>>536803526Correct, I am secretly hoping they do an extension into the first week of July and SCOTUS ends Birthright Citizenship on the 4th of July.
>>536802979OP kills himself, hopefully also streams it, after it ends up not being retroactive.
you really think your going to depopulate 95% of Texas?
>>536803102Yeah any day now the GOP will become opposed to cheap labor for some magical reason.
>>536803612exactly. and the jewish gdp line would go down, and republicans will do anything, even murder their own children, to keep getting those line-go-up dopamine hits.
>>536803592Retroactively ending birthright citizenship is on the table until Congress passes a law giving them citizenship. I don't think congress will ever pass a law giving children of illegals and non-immigrants citizenship.
>>536803564That would be worth buy fireworks for
>>536799260You wont do shit nigger
>>536803639Like AI and automation.
>>536803639>>536803509Webm related is Larry Fink from a few months ago
>>536803102>muh abortion>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO DONT YOU DARE KILL THE PRECIOUS NIGLETS!!! MORE NIGGERS MUST BE BORN IMMEDIATELY!!!I hate retardlicucks.
>>536803883I'm pro abortion for eugenics reasons.
>>536799260>a little more than tWo MoRe WeEkS and there'll be a habbenin'
>>536802922the scotus can wave their magic wand and declare whatever. as narrowly or as broadly as they want. they could invoke penumbras upon penumbras if they so choosepro tip: if they do declare birthright citizenship for illegals, which is extremely doubtful because it requires a jew worshiping foid with adopted nigger children to vote for it, it will never be retroactive - and not just because they couldn't theoretically wave their magic wand to make it so, but rather because enforcing such a remedy would be impossible. oh, you say your family has been in the country since the mayflower, please provide documentation your great grand parents were born here. oh, you can't? then get out! it's not happening.
>>536803509One way to deal with debt is to print so much money that the debt is basically nothing. We could 1000x every Americans bank account and then we pay off all our debt with a dollar that is worth 1000x less. Ezpz.
>>536799260Lmao your still holding out hope for this? Even Trump had a melty on day one of hearing the case when he realized not enough of the judges will be corrupt enough to hand him a win.
>>536799260And hopefully by then Iran will be taken care of? No? Ok then.
>>536803835I'm not quite sure what exactly he is arguing for here. But I know that our monetary system can not handle any deflation without imploding, the entire paradigm would need to change. >>536804376Elon has already said that we can print shitloads of money without it causing inflation because the robots/AI will increase output so much. Is he correct or just a shill talking up his trillion dollar IPO? Maybe the truth is somewhere in the middle.
>>536804253>but rather because enforcing such a remedy would be impossible. This facet seems to be completely lost on people. Just the insane logistics of how we would even begin to process proofs of citizenship, how they would be enforced, where wed get the money to pay for all this, as well as the millions of people who have paid taxes and own guns that likely would be upset at having their citizenship revoked. But hey, miggers don't have to actually think about how it'd actually works, or if it would even work at all, when it makes for such a good headline. Just like with building the wall, just like putting Hillary in jail, just like winning the Iran War...
>>536804855there is a lot possible here but there are two things that are not possible:>birth-right citizenship will be retroactive(trump isn't even asking for it)>birth-right citizenship will become ratified law(trump isn't even asking for it)this cope is just more migger garbage like the ballroom, arches, renaming buildings, iran etc..etc..trump is an ineffective lame-duck president that will go down in history as the biggest clown to ever sit in the oval office(that's saying something after the likes of biden)this drives him absolutely crazy as his entire life has revolved around people praising and giving him attention.
>>536804731Who cares about money when all your needs are automatically produced by ai automation?
>>536799445Birthright Citizenship case begins the end of 13th, 14th 15th Amendments Our guy Clarence Thomas sweetest revenge before he retires. >>536804758
>>536803612That guy is Italian, not Latino.
>>536806019Any and all US Supreme Court arguments FOR Birthright Citizenship tug on threads of unconstitutionality of 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments Illegal ratification.Justice Clarence Thomas has just cause and ability with just a couple sentences in Birthright Citizenship case to start the forced integration unwinding.
