downloaded, will read
>>537599187Great book. India needs to implement policies like these.
qrd?
>>537600057>>537602489Retards that don't get itThe book is part of the problem
>>537602782No, the book is filled with solutions. You're just a de-growth faggot who wants billions of people to die so people can die of preventable diseases and famines again
>>537603086>de-growth badso if you're growing a tumor, the solution is growmaxxing?
>>537603504My country was considered very nice when the population was 1/5th of what it is today, everyone says the problem is the politicians, corruption. Five times more people? Never mentioned.
>>537603934De-growth isn't about population. The most developed economies are below replacement level. Industrialization brings an initial population boom then a steep decline
>>537599187>((Klein))Should tell you all you need to know
>>537603086>India flag brainlet 2 pbtidfuckin kek this has nothing whatsoever to do with 'growth'It's all DebtIndustrial society (particularly post-1970s with global Financialization, all wealth = *speculative debt instruments*) is a total hoaxhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt-to-GDP_ratio
>>537604640>India flag brainlet 3 pbtid DERP
>>537604886>Debt bad not always. Stop watching the Dave Ramsey show, boomer
>>537599187too many peoplebillions must die
>just...have more stuff o algo
>lol
>>537605086>4 pbtid India derpNot that kind of debt, MoronMoney = Debt, is created as debt thanks to central banks >>537602938>>537602938all wealth in the 21st century is sourced from *speculative debt instruments*entire global economy post-1970s is Financialized, all post-1990s "growth" is *DEBT* based, half the U.S. annual $2T federal budget is instantly spent on Interest PaymentsSTUPID FUCK TARDhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt-to-GDP_ratio
The Modern period (I'm saying 18th century until now) is a Ponzi scheme. There is no such thing as sustainable exponential growth. You simply take the misery and the poverty elsewhere. And what did anyone gain? You have 10x as many people in South Asia who live in garbage and work like slaves, and they are STILL on the edge of famine and pestilence. It's like saying chickens have benefited from factory farming because otherwise their population levels wouldn't be so high - even though that excess population of chickens live in misery and get cut to pieces in a factory. If you could ask a chicken, I think they would rather have 0.0001% of the population and live in a field with sunshine and the occasional wolf attack.Is it better to have 1,000 people living in nature or 1,000,000 Bangladeshis in sweatshops with lung cancer?The simple fact is that the 8 billion plus people on this planet CANNOT achieve whatever standard of quality of life is supposed to be the target. There are not enough resources on the planet for every Chinese, Indian, and African to have a suburban home, two new cars, clean drinking water, 24/7 electricity access, healthcare access, education, and so on. It is simply a matter of logistics. We can barely sustain the West via the abject poverty of the Third World.And even if you support this idea from the perspective of Western dominance, the fact is that the sewage is overflowing back into the wealthy countries. There is no more space to hide it in South Asian and Central Africa.
>>537606604See graphs ^^^^^above. It's all Debt. (There is no ""growth"" except the growth in Debt and Interest Payments to central banks, on the backs of every free citizen of every nation all 160 countries globally, you are slaves to central banks: having bought their scam of 'muh GDP', muh 'growth' = Debt and Interest Payments YOU ARE SLAVES.)
