[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


Tag a friend who might need this anti-drone technology
>>
>>539821356
been seeing this shape of drone a lot by speed record attempters, not surprising they are using it as an interceptor
>>
>>539821356
Lets see that versus an incoming fpv drone piloted by a veteran on the battlefield. I doubt itll do anything
>>
>the anti-thing costs more than the thing
>>
>>539821489
Or just against...2 drones.
>>
Pls send this to our boys in Russia!
>>
File: 3wmbcz (1).mp4 (141 KB, 360x270)
141 KB
141 KB MP4
>>539821356
same vibe
>>
File: 1782256948047626.jpg (94 KB, 976x850)
94 KB JPG
how that gonna help with a 1000 drone swarm though
>>
>>539821356
>chinks: we are so stronk we have technology
>nigga comes and hit the chink on the head with a bat
>chink dies
>>
>>539821356
Amazing , here the morons use 50k$ missile to try taking 100$ drone
>>
File: 1755267568096713.jpg (141 KB, 1080x1326)
141 KB JPG
Jews are desperately trying to erase this thread
>>
>>539821356
do shotguns not exist?
>>
>>539821679
They just need semi-automatic shotguns with barrel drums, yeah.
>>
>>539821356
Kek how long until inner city niggers get this tech and start blasting Walmart and Amazon delivery drones?
>>
File: AipacBiden.jpg (215 KB, 1066x2136)
215 KB JPG
>>539821665
>>
>>539821489
They definitely would never hit a drone racer with a moderately agile drone, but 99% of the combat drone pilots I've seen look like they're probably not skilled enough to fly in rate mode through a basic course.
>>
>>539821489
He won't see it coming.

>>539821532
Just use 2 intercepter drones then.
You need two pilots for two attacking drones.
But a single defender can shoot down one after the other.
>>
>>539821569
1000 of them?
>>
>>539821356
Shotguns make more sense.

Cheaper and you get more than one shot.
>>
>>539821489
>piloted by a veteran
Who's your favorite Ace pilot tranny droner nafo troon?
>>
>>539821679
guns are banned in China, anon. they have some of the strictest gun control regulations in the world.
>>
This is the future btw. People here are just too retarded to understand it.
>>
>>539821489
just drop a giving 3 ton munition on the drone operators family, easy peasy.
>>
>>539822170
>BUT MUH GUNS
>Take the TRUST test: You must pass the The Recreational UAS Safety Test (TRUST) and carry the certificate with you.Register your drone: If your drone weighs 0.55 pounds (250 grams) or more, you must register it via the FAA DroneZone.Label your drone: Mark the outside of your drone with your FAA registration number.

MUH GUUUNS
>>
>>539821356
>be Chinese woman
>be underrated smart as fuck
>invent something revolutionary
>be yt woman
>be overrated "smart as fuck"
>invent a half nigger half human hybrid from an experiment with 10 starving niggers
How the fuck can yt women even compete with Chinese women?
>>
>>539821489
>incoming fpv drone piloted by a veteran on the battlefield
all those drones are loaded to the gills with explosives, they have so much weight and momentum that they can't easily change direction like a kamikaze interceptor like this is able to. all this needs to do is damage one prop or some electronics once a target is in visual range, while the slav fpv drones need to carry a bomb and loiter/travel for minutes on end
>>
>>539821356
anti drone weapons are a meme unless we see battle cams showing them work.
>>
>>539821356
>requires a human to aim it generally and identify the drone for the guided projectile to lock on
>is essentially a drone itself, ie a small low-powered autonomous aircraft, rather than a guided missile
These are the glaring flaws, and I suspect their social media video is a last-ditch viral marketing attempt because they got laughed out of the room and/or ignored by serious defense tech companies.

Ukraine and Iran have demonstrated that drones are the new meta, allowing an industrially inferior power to retard traditional military aggression. Any new anti-drone tech that doesn't actually beat the drones on the battlefield and anticipate new advancements is dead on arrival, because by the time this is produced and goes to the field, the drones it is attempting to shoot down will be superior.

If it requires a human to fire it and identify the drone to be targeted, it can be beaten by a drone that the soldier cannot identify until it is too late to destroy the drone using this device, then it is a failure. Ukraine drone footage shows time after time, soldiers being suprised that a drone is about to kill them.

If it is not a missile and is a battery-powered propeller craft/device, it will be ineffective at drone interception. Drone warfare is not about winning dogfights and establishing persistent control of airspace so ground operations can be supported. Drone warfare is about 1) intelligence gathering and 2) delivering quick, cheap, destruction of military assets and personnel. The second is why it has become the meta. These things don't hold the skies. If it is not a missile then I cannot intercept faster drones, because it is not just the interception - it's detection, human use of the device, interception. It needs to be fast. Plus, battery powered propeller things cannot scale. If they make drones big enough to withstand this device, then this device is going to have to hold more munitions. That extra weight is going to require more batteries here.
>>
>>539822025
US pilot who crashed in Iran said he saw a cloud of drones moving like a giant jellyfish THOUGH
>>
>>539822187

>le future is..........re-invented missile launcher

uhhhhhhhhh anon
they had this tech 80 years ago
>>
>>539822724
Seems a little bulky, when even a slight hit from a much smaller interceptor would detonate any munitions it was carrying.
>>
Mfers got locked down for a mild cold virus and still think a REAL war would be fought with ballistic weapons.
>>
>>539821356
why not just have a gun attached to a turret and camera like a mini anti air battery driven by AI? Bullets are much cheaper than whatever this thing is.
for bonus points give it the capability to be directed by a human vaguely pointing at the threat and saying "hit that drone!"
>>
>>539822966
Like a mini pantzir, it'd be way to heavy to carry. It'd have to be substantial enough to have motorized actuators strong enough and powered well enough to aim a gun.
>>
>>539822484
>visual range
That's not all of it. It's visual range for the time required to deploy this device. If we say the attack takes 10 seconds from the time the drone becomes spotted (I've seen many videos and I think this is a liberal allotment of time). There are many variables here.
>-10 seconds to attack: Drone spotted
>-10 through -8 seconds to attack: threat is communicated to group and the guy who is holding the device
> -8 through -5 seconds to attack: device operator soldier scans the sky in the direction the noticer indicates
>-5 to -4 seconds to attack: noticer establishes lock and shoots the device (I'm giving them 1 second for this because I assume they're trained and the device can be used that quickly)
This gives about a three second window for the device to work. If the device is effective at operating in this window, the drone side changes the equation: they load the drone with a third of the explosives. Now the time from noticing the drone to the attack is ~5 seconds, completely rendering this weapon completely ineffective. While it may not have enough explosives to disable a car or evaporate a human for a video that the NATO fellas can fap to, it might have the potential to take the operator of this weapon out of the fight. Then, on the next attack, the person using this device has a third of the experience and takes twice as long to deploy it, making larger drones more viable.
>>
>>539822875
Like I said, all these anti drone weapons are a meme unless we see combat videos about it. People say that shotguns work but so far we don't see drone warfare stopping anywhere.
>>
>>539822803
>Doesnt understand the difference between missiles, rocket propelled grenades, and versatile launching platforms for drones that require less resources than the attack drones.
>feels qualified to uhhhhh anon post

I will gladly take your money.
>>
>>539821356
I want her to launch one at my crotch
>>
>>539821961
1 drone per pilot is so 2026.
>>
>not just shooting the drone down with your .45 ACP
Sure is queer in this thread
>>
>>539823433
Yes obviously he's wrong. This device shoots a propeller device rather than a missile, which is part of why it will never work.
>>
>>539822803
>bro i am telling you muh grandpa shot 2 king tigers with one 'zooka rocket, it's true!
>so you should also be able to shoot dem drones with one amrite?
>>
>>539821679
They’re actually pretty shit against drones. Anti drone 5.56 mags are preferred and those aren’t great either.
>>
>>539823433
Panzerfausts were actually recoilless launchers.
>>
>>539821504
your point?
>>
lol chinks think that the drone is 20 meters away from you.
>>
>>539821356
a guy on youtube, maybe a south african, built a drone which goes 300mph/500kph and can weigh a few kg. there is no way to shoot down a drone moving at 300mph which barely makes a noise and smashes into your truck with 2kg of explosives. it can cross a city in 3 minutes and no one would know where it came from.
>>
File: 1754778422034713.jpg (402 KB, 1360x768)
402 KB JPG
>>539821489
that type of interceptor is against geran type of drones.
not mosquito racing drones.
>>
>>539821356
I would be curious what a Ukrainian or Russian veteran would think of this and how it would actually work in combat.
>>
>>539824893
Of course you can shoot it down.
the problem is with the cost of the missile taking it down.
>>
>>539821489
It's not for that usecase
>>
File: 72432734.png (640 KB, 775x873)
640 KB PNG
woman moment
>>
>>539821356
chinks first create the problem then after > 6 gorrilion deaths the awkward solution, they're almost worst than kikes
>>
>>539825267
The screen is literally touching her face lmfao
>>
>>539825339
Equivilant anti-drone drones with a similar design have been in service in the Ukraine for well over a year now. Once again chinks never invented shit.
>>
>>539822170
Guns literally don't matter anymore.
>>
>>539825267
>counter this by smearing super mega glue on the underside of the projectile
>sends chinese woman into orbit
>probleM?
>>
>>539825521
>>Doesnt understand the difference between missiles, rocket propelled grenades, and versatile launching platforms for drones that require less resources than the attack drones.
>>feels qualified to uhhhhh anon post
What if you put a gun ON a drone?
>>
>>539821356
You think she can, you know, fit that thing inside?
>>
>>539821679
Shotguns have a short range because the mass of the round is spread out amongst smaller shot.
Go throw an apple seed as far as you can then throw a peach pit as far as you can.
Same amount of energy but less mass.
>>
>>539822366
You sound pathetic dude. Get over those women who rejected you. Sheesh!
>>
>>539825752
>What if you put a gun ON a drone?
Then you now have a much more expensive attack drone, as it needs to be able to compensate for recoil. It also needs to stablize before firing to ensure a hit, making it slower and easier to destroy with small arms fire. Why bother doing this when for half the price you could get 2 drones and strap a high explosive or penetrator to them and just fly them into the enemy at a high speed?
The only reason you would want a gun on a drone would be for policing your own people who cant fight back.
>>
>>539822366
Starving ten niggers sounds hilarious though.
>>
>>539825429
You underestimate how flat her face is.
>>
File: 1739102374819486.jpg (59 KB, 600x692)
59 KB JPG
>>539821504
This is the most retarded take about defensive weaponry of all time and you should feel bad about your lack of critical thinking skills
>>
>>539821679
Shotguns are effective against birds, no so much against drones
>>
File: 1778210523573400.jpg (6 KB, 224x224)
6 KB JPG
>>539821356
>she never actually uses it
>has a man do it instead
>>
>>539825521
Feel free to stop embarrassing yourself at any time
>>
>>539821532
Wow maybe ... MAYBE, just use 2 interceptors?

>Oh no sir the iron dome should be shut down, it >only intercepted 1000 missiles and they send >1001?!
>>
File: Shotty.webm (3.81 MB, 1280x720)
3.81 MB
3.81 MB WEBM
>>539821679
They do
>>539821356
>>539826090
>>539826844
>Shotguns are effective against birds, no so much against dron-ACKKKK
>>
>>539821489
>heheh I could just dodge that
holy shut up faggot
>>
>>539821356
That's really cool.
China numba wan!
>>
>>539821569
Kill one and it becomes a 50 drone swarm
>>
>>539826090
>I played video games the rocket launcher is best guis
good grief infinityfaggot
>>
>>539821504
>He thinks 1 shotgun shell costs more than a FPV drone and all the munitions it's carrying
>>
>>539821569
defeat them with a different drones that flies up in the sky and establishes its own EW umbrella nigger.
Who the fuck is doing fixed EW shit in the year of our lord current year
>>
>>539827349
It's an irrelevant point either way. The interceptor just needs to cost less than the thing it's saving from being blown up.
>>
>>539825267
Finally lol
>>
what is the point of the gay launcher when you could just slap ~50 in a couple of fields and set up a basic ultra high res electro-optical gimmick and passively hit anything. why the fuck do you need someone to pull a trigger?
>>
>>539826771
Found the guy in charge of the treasury kek
Lề mề guess a $2 trillion bolt on an aircraft is worth it because it's extra defensive
>>
>>539826771
You're the most retarded faggot to have a retarded take about a perfectly reasonable take. When it comes to war if you're spending 20k to take out something that costs 10k, that's called attrition.
>>
>>539827484
>the more worthless thing in globohomo jew clownworld is the goyim

What kind of a price tag you think they’re gonna put on the enlisted mystery meat goyim? There’s no way it’ll be very high at all, considering getting rid of a bunch of us is the entire point.
>>
The "bazooka" thing is retarded. Any dron that size goes zoom in 1 second from floor.
>>
File: USA_USA_USA.webm (1.99 MB, 782x440)
1.99 MB
1.99 MB WEBM
>>539821356
>behind every ricepaddy blade of grass, will be an anti-air autonomous drone interception manpad launcher
I KNEEL.
>>
>>539827055
YES FINALLY THANK YOU
>>
>>539821447
Nigga, you didn't see shit. Shut yo bum ass up.
>>
>>539827604
>why is portability and adaptability in the field valued by soldiers

It’s a very good thing they don’t let people like you become officers. Or in a good world people like you aren’t allowed to become officers.
>>
>>539827759
>nooo goyim you can’t talk autistically about design specs

That’s what we do here nigger. It’s publicly available knowledge
>>
>>539827429
>establishes its own EW umbrella nigger
This. The future of warfare on the battlefield is going to go back to before the WW2 era. Any technology that uses electronics will just be jammed and disabled on the battlefield. Communication will be done with signal flags. Cellphones won't work, radios won't work, any technology that relies on the flow of electricity through a copper wire will be disrupted and jammed and rendered non-functional by EMP weaponry. Think of a solar flare hitting the battlefield. All electronics=fried.
>>
>>539827759
This is a White website, please refrain from talking like a nigger.
>>
>>539825492
Correct
Chinks just invented an inferior product to sell for high margin to idiots
>>
>>539827256
>50 drone swarm
No
>>
Drone counter-measures followed by counter-counter-measures... etc... etc...
>>
>Hitler ≥ Benjamin Moore
>>
>>539821356
Just need them to be automatically scanning the air and launching plus have 10-20 of them in a launcher or something.
>>
File: 6owiwresyunc1.png (676 KB, 1898x1069)
676 KB PNG
>>539827654
>getting rid of a bunch of us is the entire point.
bingo
>>
>>539821356
Awesome
>>
>>539827850
>Publicly available
That doesn't mean the information given is the most accurate or up to date you retarded tranny

>>539827918
>White website
Did you not just see the video clip of chinks showing you weaponry that they're planning on using on honkies? Get replaced quietly.
>>
File: 1785337562876132.jpg (150 KB, 576x1024)
150 KB JPG
>>539825267
>>539825429
>>539825687
>>539827550

superior, because its womensafe
>>
>>539821356
>Tag a friend who might need this anti-drone technology
YOLKA 3.0
seemes that (eyeball mk1) were lacking in target aquisition especially at night
>basic bitch thermal will make it all around day/night antidrone drone
>>
>>539822366
Is that the latest Fields Prize winner?
>>
File: 1728740751479953.png (2.27 MB, 2510x4057)
2.27 MB PNG
>>539821356
>>
>>539821356
China pays pointdexters with problem glasses to convince the world they are awesome by being as annoying and unlikeable as possible.
>>
>>539828308
>Did you not just see the video clip of chinks showing you weaponry that they're planning on using on honkies? Get replaced quietly.

>t. evil White man hating globohomo jew

A tranny too, it gets worse
>>
>>539821356
Whats the temu link?
>>
>>539821489
>How to take down an FPV drone
>Drop a missile on drone faggot
Whew
>>
>>539828442
Based thanks for stopping in to add some knowledge pierogi bro
>>
>>539827759
damn why so mean :3
>>
File: 2.png (27 KB, 748x204)
27 KB PNG
>>
>>539821356
What if the enemy has 2 drones?
>>
>>539828720
Andruill is unable to "invent" that for price of less than one milion of goybucks
>when you think you cannot be more antisemitic...
>>
>>539821356
old news.
>>
>>539825077
>I would be curious what a Ukrainian
it is a Ukrainian drone stolen by chinks
Ukrainian one is called "P1-sun"
>>
>>539828971
It’s all about signals warfare bro. Even individual solutions like this are meant for a one-off event in the field for soldiers who find themselves in a situation they shouldn’t be in. If you’re taking a fucking stroll into no-man’s land without defeating the enemies signals first (and thus greatly reducing drone swarm abilities, or outright eliminating them), you’re already gone. Something like this is probably nice to have on hand to defeat those fiber optic guided drones which are impervious to the signals blocking.
>>
File: LeninRussland.jpg (82 KB, 790x575)
82 KB JPG
>>539821356
why is war so gay now? no sovl
>>
>>539829250
Fully autonomous drones driven by embedded computer vision AI have to either be already a thing, or almost a thing. In the slavshit war should be simple enough to have them look for a cross or Z on a military vehicle, or the proper color arm and helmet bands. If they misfire and teamkill or blow some civvies up no big whoop nobody at all seems concerned about more slav deaths, least of all slavs
>>
>>539821356
it's a normal drone on a 3d printed "RPG" tube, the launcher does absolutely nothing
>>
>>539825267
THE BARRELS GONNA BURN HER HAND
>>
File: 1507483926815.png (30 KB, 406x452)
30 KB PNG
>>539821504
it costs less than the thing it is protecting, dumbass
>>
>>539821356
>AI TIKTOK slop on /pol/
>>
>>539821489
where do you think China gets to develop this tech for free? it will 100% be challenging the goodest goys on the Hohol drone leaderboard.
>>
>>539827654
If that was true, they wouldn't bother with body armor, helmets, medics, armored vehicles, EW defense, etc. There's a documented dollar amount cost to soldier casualties and equipment loss, which is why a $2500 defensive drone or a $1M interceptor missile are still cheaper than replacing what can be destroyed with a cheap offensive weapon.
>>
>>539829554
>BARRELS
????
i just think that it is cute that height of this cutiepie is 4 and half feet

>>539821489
>Lets see that versus an incoming fpv drone piloted by a veteran on the battlefield.
You think that it is imposible to machine learning some "rasbery pi" to attack any dronealike target and disregard humanalike nearby. That is is imposible to combine it with thermal cam and some AGS alike grenade launcher encased in some tumoralike turret on top of tank that full set will not weight more than 250kg?
>norgefren increase your imagination then
>>
File: 1784472342927696.png (326 KB, 864x891)
326 KB PNG
>>539827615
>you're spending 20k to take out something that costs 10k
jfc you're painfully retarded. You're spending $20k to protect something that costs more than $20k to replace. The cost of the offensive weapon is irrelevant.
>>
File: 1718640233421888.jpg (186 KB, 996x1600)
186 KB JPG
>>539830010
SHES HOLDING IT WRONG THAT PART OF THE GUN GETS HOT SHE PROBABLY DOESNT EVEN KNOW WHERE TO PUT THE CLIP
>>
>>539821356
...Cmon love
>>
>>539830166
>SHES HOLDING IT WRONG THAT PART OF THE GUN GETS HOT
trust me holds it very very well
>>
>>539829817
> If that was true, they wouldn't bother with body armor, helmets, medics, armored vehicles, EW defense, etc. There's a documented dollar amount cost to soldier casualties and equipment loss

Soldiers serve as the meat bag irl test subjects for all of that shit bro. You can’t possibly be serious. Thats why the data is so valuable. Everything learned in warfare is paid for in human blood.
>>
>>539821356
Looks absurdly impractical. How many of those huge goofy things are you supposed to lug around with you?
This has "Chinesium" written all over it. That's the Chinese way. Flashy demos and prototypes, nothing after.
>>
>>539830637
>Looks absurdly impractical.
it's used against larger drones, like shaheed type drones
it is practical, since those fold entire buildings
>How many of those huge goofy things are you supposed to lug around with you?
as much as necessary if you don't want to die
war is quite retarded if you didn't know it already
>>
File: 1406153360033.jpg (25 KB, 399x501)
25 KB JPG
>>539830781
ARE YOU GONNA FILE LAWSUIT ON THE THIEVING CHICOMS THAT IS UKRANNY TECHNOLOGY
>>
>>539827036
Okay now imagine the logistics of a squad having to carry enough launchers and ammunition on top of everything else
>>
>>539830637
>rpg’s are absurdly impractical
>someone would lug one of those things around on the battlefield?

Jesus, listen to yourself.
>>
>>539821356
>So mannnyy black deeldo in my fagottree!
>>
>>539821356
Better to have proximity drones that take down anything that comes near it
>>
>>539829486
so far only rumours
>>
>>539830865
Imagine having some commander like you who doesn’t give a shit if his units can defend against what is most likely to attack them on a mission, and instead they need to lug some of your dragon dildos to the front
>>
>>539830856
>ARE YOU GONNA FILE LAWSUIT
me? I didn't design it lmao
I don't think anybody is going to do it really, but good to know some people know it's UA design made out of necessity really, not just for the lulz
>>539830865
>Okay now imagin
this type of drones are used in Ukraine (to intercept BIGGER drones, shaheed-type, not small ones)
one doesn't need to imagine something that is factually happening
>>
>>539831122
>>
>>539831122
AUTONOMOUS AI DRONES
NO HUMANS IN THE KILLCHAIN JUST THE TARGETS
ONE DAY CLOSER TO TOTAL MACHINE DOMINATION
>>
>>539831122
Because it doesn’t exist yet. If it did, we would know about it.
>t. Autist
>>
>>539821844
Now do Trump
>>
>>539821356
Only a matter of time until terrorists start using those against civilian airliners.
>>
>>539831551
>Because it doesn’t exist yet.
it exist already only problem is containing it.
>ohh you will mark killzone with GPS?
>too bad we spoffed it straight on your HQ area
you get it now?
>>
File: 1763080184515887.png (442 KB, 736x491)
442 KB PNG
Why not load the drone with a small single-shot shotgun instead of having it fly straight into the target? It's already capable of aiming itself in the air, so why make it expendable against small targets like FPV's?

It could fly up, shoot the target once it's within range, then return to the launcher to have its cartridge and battery swapped out.
>>
>>539821356
Never trust a chink wearing a mask
>>
>>539829226
I wonder if there are any restrictions on building and selling drones without explosives that can only be used for defense.
What law would it violate even if you sell it to your enemy?
>>
>>539831740
I'm surprised it hasn't happened yet with fpv racing drones. A piece of rebar taped to it and fly it towards the jet intake on landing approach 500ft up. Or through the rotars of a helicopter. It's incredible that no one has done this yet. Thank God I don't fly often because for sure it's going to happen soon
>>
File: alCIAda terrorists.png (1.01 MB, 896x864)
1.01 MB PNG
>>539831740
>until terrorists
what changed that airliner kills are again needed against general population?
>>539831820
>semiautonomus Geran cost more than 50k goybucks to make one
how much will cost autonomus armed geran?
>it can fuck up its only job



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.