This soviet submarine feels illegal international law speakingly
Cool shit is never illegal that's the law
>>543670025the new ones are even worse for NATO since they are extremely hard to detect.seems like russians perfected the submarine recently.
>>543670025submarines are that big? I thought they are like 20 feet max
>>543670025International laws don't exist
>>543670025nothing is illegal if you follow procedure
>>543670138They carry like a dozen moby huge nuclear dong missiles bro of course they have to be big
if you can't detect that chunky boy you deserve to get nuked
>>543670234how big are his boobs though
>>543670138No it’s a special case. This piggy is as big as an old aircraft carrier probably
>>543670025man that's a thiccccccc boitoo many tendies
I love submarine movies
>>543670388checked. must be pain in ass to park it
>>543670025Would be epic if it popped up in Copenhagen harbor one random morning.
>>543670025This is simply the PL Chonkarev
>>543670138That's a ballistic missile submarine. It's gigantic because it carries a bunch of intercontinental nuclear missiles. Attack submarines are way smaller.
>>543670025THICC
Typhoon class submarine built with a double hull to withstand a direct hit from a torpedo. I think they were just too loud and bulky to maneuver well. Also most Russian submarines never venture outside the artic circle since the ice keeps them hidden from hunter killer submarines and obscures their acoustic signatures. Also makes launches nukes at america way easier since going over the arctic is the fastest way possible.
>>543670025I think they finally gave up on these big Bois a few years ago, too expensive to refit so they sit rotting away in the north somewhere, biggest Bois ever made apparently
>>543670580bruh what happens if it crashes or sinks with all these nuclear weps on board
>>543670025there is no international law anymore, it's all dog eat dog/kill or be killed/blow up people in their beds now (the jews decided that was the way as soon as they had the power to start murdering their enemies)
>>543670936They just sit on the bottom of the ocean until the end of time. Nuclear weapons don't just go off. Nor are they particularly radioactive. The biggest issue would be the hundreds of pounds of high explosives in each warhead. And don't forget the nuclear reactor that powers the submarine. It'll just sit enclosed in its shielding forever.
>>543671021interesting. i thought the nuclear shit would leak out somehow
>>543671102The reactors on subs are designed to be sealed off in the event of a casualty. And they're different than nuclear power plants on land in that they don't operate at high pressures and temperatures. So they don't meltdown and explode. Nuclear weapons have big spheres of plutonium in them that will stick around for 25,000 years or so. And, while I wouldn't want to hold one in my bare hands, you could and not get a particularly big dose of radiation. It wouldn't be great for them to be in the ocean, but it wouldn't be some sort of massive ecological disaster or anything.
>>543670098Then why do they always break down when going through our waters?
>>543673345Does Denmark even have a Navy? I've always wondered about this because there are more White people in my state in the US Midwest than there are Danes in the entire world. And my state doesn't have a navy. Primarily because we're landlocked. But still.
>>543670025They're just going to sell it to Pepsi the next time they collapse
>>543673619>Primarily because we're landlockedThat's no excuse!But yeah, we do have a navy, the military one is very small though.Our merchant navy is gigantic though.
>>543670138pretty sure it was the largest submarine ever built. soviets were nuts. i think russia still has one giant submarine that they use for those nuclear powered nuclear tipped autonomous torpedos (which themselves are like 10x the size of a human).
>>543670025it's wide https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEvopkbc4FE