uhhhhhh davebros......
>>19146780Is Dave the WOAT journalist of all time?
>>19146798You tell me.
>>19146780Dave and being a hypocritical little weasel about aew - name a more iconic duo
>>19146780We already have this exact thread.
>>19146906your point?
>>19146780based raj hitting the bottle again
>>19146798Glad you know journalism more than Frank Deford
>>19146798>Meltzer>journalist
>>19146906Aww, you gonna oink and start trying to slide/report it?
>>19146780>Network vs cable are inherently differenceGOOD MORNING SIR. CW has less viewers than TBS so technically Dynamite should be winning. Yet NXT rapes it every week even with this handicap. Dave babbles nonsense about "muh cable vs network differences" in order to obfuscate this fact.>AEW's ratings only comprise 63-64% of the homes the show is in while NXT's are 100%This sentence complete nonsense.
>>19146780Dave has been getting murdered lately
>>19146780I'm convinced it's only like 3 people max here that care about dave
>>19146990maybe if he stopped saying so many retarded things it would be better for him
>>19146798Legitimately yes he’s terribleHe’s only accepted by wrestling fans who are the lowest of the lowHe was laughed out of MMA journalismAnd he thinks in another life he’d be a top tier nfl journalistLmfao
>>19146985The CW is in 20 million more homes than cable. The "Less viewers" stat comes from the rest of its content outside of NXT being shit and not drawing a big number from those 20 million more homes. Both Dave and the person responding to him agree that CW has a "network advantage" over cable, which it does in terms of potential viewers. You don't accept that because you don't know what any of the words mean that you are using because you are dumb.>Dave babbles nonsense about "muh cable vs network differences"What is your understanding of how Smackdown did much better ratings on FOX than it did on USA? If you don't believe that network TV has an advantage, then do you actually believe that Smackdown suddenly got randomly popular when it went to FOX and then suddenly became much less popular when it went back to USA? Is that what you think?
The bottom line is Dave is a wrestling pundit only. He doesn't know shit about the TV business. Every time he opens his mouth about TV ratings he looks like a fool. He should stick to grifting his lackeys for $11 / mo for his subjective match ratings and regurgitating the misinformation he's fed to work the smarks. - signed, you know who
>>19147012The newest cope for Meltzer fans is that for all his fault as a gossip columnist he is a great wrestling historian.Im not familiar with his work like that but given his obvious biases, lack of research and gullibility I am skeptical of that claim.
>>19147134ratings trannies can't explain why NXT only started beating AEW the moment it moved to free TV lol. no sense in trying to reason with them, their brains have been thoroughly hollowed out by the console wars.
>>19147375It’s actually 14.99 a month now
>>19146780>>19146798>>19146990>>19147012>>19147375>>19147409He literally changed the entire business forever. Every promotion including WWE acknowledges him. Everyone cares about star ratings. Japan and the indies won. Fuck you faggot e-drones
>>19147441Meltzer and AEW fans spent a year saying that NXT ratings on CW would be terrible before their debut and now they’re beating AEW weeklyDon’t try and memory hole this shit
>>19147496> indies and Japan won Quite literally Japan is nearly dead with attendance in every promotion. They have no major Tv deals and pro wrestling has never been MORE dead in the country ever in the history of mankind. Indies have never been more irrelevant since anyone who is anyone has been signed by TKO/AEW. Even the commentaries suck because no one is good anymore . The state of pro wrestling is in worse shape since Dave and his smarks have influence on the business . Everything is going backwards when it’s comes to anything besides TKO. Win? You’re a fucking loser if you think you’ve won anything .
>>19147496kek I love this clip. Dave looks like an excited little autistic boy in it.
>>19147549He just wanted to be one of the boys
>>19146780BIG DAVE FROM THE TOP ROPE
>>19146780he ignored this, didn't he?
>>19147134don't tell me nigga tell Dave a year ago when he said the exact opposite of that
>>19147659He says the network advantage that NXT will receive will be positive but not "significant" whatever that means. It can be interpreted however. It's just weasel words.
>>19147564KEK at least he doesn’t deny it
Dave won jaxton lost.
>>19147375>- signed, you know whoWe don't sign our posts here
>>19147675he's coping about aew, a wrestling fed created almost exclusively for him and based on the way he thinks pro wrestling should be, failing miserably. to admit that aew is unpopular smark trash is to admit the same things about himself
>>19147769Is your measure for failing miserably that they're on cable and that NXT is on network tv and has more viewers? Because you're really just looking at the fact that network tv is in more homes than cable and then concluding AEW has something to do with that when they don't
>>19147748
>>19147821
>>19147795nigga is you retarded?
>>19146780pro wrestling journalism yes even jap isn't real
>>19147496that part
>>19146798Yes
>>19146798No
>>19147832No I'm not. Maybe that's my problem, maybe I need to be retarded to see your point of view
>>19147864you mean the point of view where Dave is a hypocrite? nigga just read the OP dumbass nigga
>>19147409Shitposting aside, Dave was the man and the giant weekly newsletter isn't what it once was, but there is still nothing like it. Apter mags had a team and sold a ton of magazines, but 1980s Dave by himself without internet blew them out of the water information wise. Frank Deford didn't call him "the most accomplished reporter in sports journalism" for no reason. Cranky 66 year old Twitter Dave is not his legacy.
>>19146780Dave trying to save Tony Khan from being KWABOTY again?
>>19147982PWI magazine's Bob Smith said Meltzer's newsletter would arrive at their office and people would drop what they're doing and read the whole thing.
>>19146780Raj wonDave lost
>>19147496>>19147549I love it because he looks like a chimp in it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cqz4fWt-UNo
>>19147991OMG rly? nigga who tf cares
>>19149063pretty much
>>19147134>Both Dave and the person responding to him agree that CW has a "network advantage" over cable, which it does in terms of potential viewers.CW has no advantage. TBS has far more viewers. Which means that NXT is handicapped yet it's still wiping the floor with AEW. You think you're smart but you're actually an idiot who doesn't understand the things that people are saying I'm afraid. >What is your understanding of how Smackdown did much better ratings on FOX than it did on USA? FOX has an advantage over USA. CW has no advantage over TBS. It's all very simple to understand. Unfortunately you're so retarded that even this extreme level of simplicity goes over your head.
>>19149962>being in 20 million more homes is not an advantageHow so?>TBS has far more viewersWhen you say this, you do not understand what it means. What you think it means is that TBS has a greater population of potential viewers, but that isn't the case. What is happening is that TBS shows draw better and more consistent viewers from a smaller potential population of people than CW has access to because their content is generally more engaging. The CW's shows for the most part draw poorly from a bigger potential population of viewers, the exception being NXT which draws about as well as it did on cable and in addition it gets a boost from the fact it is in more homes than it was on cable. It makes no sense to say that because CW shows perform poorly on average, that therefore NXT should also perform poorly.
>>19150101>TBS shows draw betterwell not all of them
>>19146798Maybe
>>19147982>Cranky 66 year old Twitter Dave is not his legacy.Lmao yes it is. No one cares what he did in the 80s when all modern fans only know him for his awful twitter takes and relentlessly shilling the young bucks or Omega. He tanked his own legacy.
>>19147982The problem is that, over time, it's become clear how often Dave was wrong back in the day.
>>19147496Many are saying this
>>19147496they even put Big Dave's 5 star rating in WWE 2k games
>>19150187No
anyone unironically supporting Dave at this point is only doing so because of their personal agenda. he's one of the worst, least credible "journalists" in history
>>19150101>How so?TBS has far more viewers than CW. So being in 20 million more homes obviously doesn't give CW any kind of advantage. Being available to tens of millions of households means absolutely fucking nothing when only a relatively tiny fraction of those households actually tune in. >What you think it means is that TBS has a greater population of potential viewersNo, TBS has a greater population of active viewers.>potentialI'm not talking about potential.>blah blah blahNXT over-delivers on CW. Dynamite under-delivers on TBS. Are you starting to understand?
>>19150892Being in 20 million more homes is an advantage in terms of ratings, all other things being equal. Even despite being in more homes CW content draws less viewers on average than TBS does, hence your talking point "TBS has more viewers than CW", and this is because CW content is mostly garbage. But NXT had an existing viewerbase and your "less viewers" talking point does not apply to it because it is an outlier on CW. You do not actually understand the point you are making.>means absolutely fucking nothing when only a relatively tiny fraction of those households actually tune in.But those extra households that CW has access to *do* tune in for NXT which is why their ratings on CW are slightly higher than they were on cable. Do you understand?
>>19150854It's also because they had paid him for his opinion for years so now they feel the need to justify their payments by defending him all the time.
>>19150941>TBS has more viewers than CW", and this is because CW content is mostly garbageyeah nigga aew is garbage that's what we're trying to tell you ffs
>>19151013TBS has more viewers than CW because of shows like AEW pushing TBS's viewership average higher.
>>19151043then how come aew always has lower viewership than Sheldon reruns
>>19151043is that why rampage got cancelled?
>>19147564Kek the last son of planet retard
>>19151169TBBT also contributes to TBS viewership average being higher than CW.>>19151114I don't know why you would think TBS average viewership being higher than CW would have any bearing on that.
>>19151203>I don't know why you would think TBS average viewership being higher than CW would have any bearing on that.so rampage got cancelled because it was too good for the average viewership of the network it was on?
>>19151212You really struggle to understand anything that's being said. I think you are capable of holding maybe one idea in your head at any one time ("AEW bad") anything else is too taxing for you.
>>19151221so rampage didn't get cancelled for that reason? I'm not sure why you're avoiding the question tho anon
>>19151286Can you explain to me why you or anyone would think Rampage was cancelled for having above average viewership?
>>19151302nobody would ever think that anon, which is why you saying that aew contributes to a high average viewership is confusing
>>19151321maybe he means that cancelling rampage increased the average viewership?
>>19151321AEW's ratings are included in the average TBS viewership which you referred to many times when you said TBS gets more viewers than CW. Unless the figure you are referring to is "TBS viewers excluding AEW shows" which would be a weird stat for people to collect.
>>19151361right but aew is contributing to average viewership in a negative way considering that TBS beats the CW in literally every other timeslot
>>19151373NXT being an outlier on CW doesn't relate to AEW being a negative. AEW would be an outlier on CW too.
>>19146780lol i really enjoyed the way ICP and Russo WORKED that faggot meltz and showed him to be a lying piece of trash. Meltzer is a cancer, he has done nothing but encourage the worst and suppress the best.
>>19151382aew is an outlier on TBS insofar as it has lower viewership than sitcom reruns from 20 years ago
>>19151408aew has the lowest rated weekly wrestling TV shows actually
>>19151408An outlier means that something does not follow an established trend or pattern. One show having lower viewership than another does not make something an outlier.
>>19146798He has a degree in journalism, but he had to cover wrestling instead of a real sport. That tells you everything you need to know. No editor in their right mind would have hired him because of his awful writing skills and style. Hence why he had to make his own newsletter
>>19151552of course it does you fuckin idiot. If aew's ratings are significantly lower than other shows on TBS (they are) then aew is an outlier.
Why is AEW's flagship show on TBS (#14) losing to the wrestling school on CW (#24)?
>>19151636Dude, the network jews have known how to manipulate ratings since well before either of us were born. I don't believe WWE or AEW's numbers.
>>19151607Not just other shows, it has to be every other show. >>19151636As has been explained many times, anon. CW is in 20 million more homes than TBS so NXT's cable audience + new CW viewers gave them a slight edge over Dynamite. if AEW were on network TV, then they would have the edge, but it isn't.
>>19151656>CW is in 20 million more homes>TBS (#14)>CW (#24)
>>19151664Are you having trouble understanding that potential viewing audience "more homes" and actual viewers "more regular viewers, despite less homes" again? Do you need me to explain it again?
>>19151675You have no argument
>>19151675Are you having trouble understanding that TBS is a bigger channel than CW? There's no reason why Dynamite should be losing to NXT. Go ahead, post more cope.
>>19147544Indies are also terrified to make fun of WWE (all their indy/NIL programs) and AEW (letting their wrestlers work indies), so it's not the edgy shit we used to be able to see.Nobody's going to cut a promo telling Tony Khan or Triple H to suck his dick, because it's no longer just a death sentence for that wrestler, but for the entire company.
>>19151698The reason is because CW is in 20 million more homes and NXT gets a viewership boost from being on network tv that it did not get when it was on cable.I don't know how many times I need to explain this. Do you understand it yet? Do you understand that TBS content being on average "more watched" than CW does not have any bearing on NXT's ratings?
>>19151698>There's no reason why Dynamite should be losing to NXTit's a poorly run and presented niche vanity fed that translates to a scatter shot amateur looking tv production all of which alienates a casual audience
>>19150941Tens of millions of those "more homes" are via antennas that aren't tracked by Nielsen. NXT is still winning based on what's actually being tracked. If we counted antennas and MAX, NXT would still win.
>>19150381>Memeltzer invented the 5 star scaling
>>19151719>muh 20 gorillion more homes#14 TBS vs. #24 CW. I accept your concession.
>>19151664it's very simple:more viewers watch tbsexcept aew
>>19146780>are inherenly difference Is Dave a jeet?
>>19151763You don't understand the difference between a large sample from a small population and a small sample from a large population. Until you summon the brainpower necessary to understand this distinction, you will continue to be confused and frustrated.>#14 TBS vs. #24 CW. This figure means that most TBS shows are more engaging than most CW shows. What argument do you believe yourself to be making here? NXT is still in more homes than it was when it was on cable, it still gets a boost despite the rest of CW content not being a draw relative to TBS.
>>19151733>NXT is still winning based onBased on the fact that it's in more homes than it was when it was on cable.
>>19151793The conclusion I'm reaching is that AEW fucking sucks lmao
>no you see other shows may be more engaging and get more viewers and have more of an audience and get better ratings...yes yes no one watches we get it
>>19151837That's a whole lot of cope to avoid the fact that AEW on a bigger channel is losing to NXT on a smaller channel.
guys nxt has no choice but to get better ratings than aew, it just has to get better ratings than the average cw show, while aew just has to get lower ratings than nxt despite more people watching tbs than cw on averagewhy is that so hard to understand
>>19151935I am not avoiding it, I am explaining to you repeatedly why that is the case, and the reason is that the "small" channel is in 20 million more homes than the "big" channel, despite TBS content being watched more on average than CW content with the exception of NXT which brought its existing cable audience to CW and received a boost from the extant CW viewers.
>>19147496And its the main reason the buisness is in such a shitter as it is.Its boring, its lame, its toothless, its uncreative, and its obnoxious.Wrestling buisness literally became Persona.
Why is Raj working himself into a shoot? I mean, damn, calm down, mark.
>>19151984AEW on a channel that averages 738k is losing to NXT on a channel that averages 445k. 20 million more homes cope doesn't work.
>>19152064>The actual reason for the viewership differential doesn't work because of this unrelated statistic that I continually misunderstand.
>>19152070Nobody cares about your headcanon mental gymnastics, lil bro
>>19152070>The actual reason for the viewership differentialis that if people wanted to watch aew they would, but they don't
>>19151842No, learn to read. The number for CW being counted includes antenna homes, which are not tracked by Nielsen.
>>19151719nigga did you even read the OP tho? you davetrannies were saying the exact opposite shit before NXT went to the CW, and we know because Raj kept the receipts. we know you change the narrative to suit whatever makes aew look better at any given time, so all of your arguments are fake and gay
>>19152391wait did you just destroy this tranny faggot's argument that he's been making for 8 hours?
>>19152871fraid fuckin so
>>19152785>>19147675
>>19152871You'll never know if he did or not because you can't read.
>>19153163nah kinda feels like he did brah
>>19146994I cared back in 92 when I was reading the observer. Yes that year is correct. No you cannot make the joke. That would be mean.
>>19153141nigga linking your own stupid post don't mean shit
>>19153733Are you that black guy with the anti-AEW themed twitter account?
>>19152024>>19147544When the Young Bucks said they were going to kill the business, this is what they meant. They turned it on its head and redefined what wrestling is and what it's supposed to be about. You're only option is no longer having to do rolls and humiliate yourself in some faggot Performance Center. you can go to AEW and be a star right away instead of having to play by outdated rules. In the end they won and got their revenge on WWE and faggot e-drones.
>>19146780Based Raj from the top of the titantron with a barbed wire bat
>>19153768>go to AEW>be a star
>>19153768Many are saying this
>>19153871many retards
>>19153865Ospreay is more known, over and respected by any wrestling fan than bron breakker
>>19153888nobody in aew is more famous than anyone on WWE unless they've appeared on WWE TV themselves.
>>19150941>Being in 20 million more homes is an advantage in terms of ratingsNo it isn't, because those 20 million more homes that CW is available in aren't watching CW. Availability is a meaningless metric. The only thing that matters is how many people are actually watching. Not how many people could theoretically watch if they wanted to but don't. >You do not actually understand the point you are making.Nah that's you. My whole point is that NXT is more popular than Dynamite. Shills like Dave try to use an excuse that NXT only does higher ratings because "muh network vs cable" but that doesn't apply in this case, because in this case the cable channel(TBS) is a lot more popular than the broadcast channel(CW). Network vs cable isn't a factor here. The sole reason why NXT beats Dynamite in the ratings is that people like NXT more.
>>19153888Ospreay is only known to a small handful of wrestling fans in the west and he's only liked by an even smaller handful of them. His fans are fat, retarded neckbeards who only pretend he's good because Dave Meltzer told them to. Even a lot of AEWtists don't like him which is why his segments always bomb in the ratings. Bron Breakker is infinitely more known, over, and respected than Ospreay ever will be.
>>19154027>My whole point is that NXT is more popular than DynamiteAnd you fail to understand that it's because of>those 20 million more homesI don't know quite why you fail to understand that. Maybe you're lying to yourself? Maybe you're dumb? I don't know exactly what it is.>Dave try to use an excuse that NXT only does higher ratings because "muh network vs cable" but that doesn't apply in this case, because in this case the cable channel(TBS) is a lot more popular than the broadcast channel(CW)I feel like I've probably explained this about 20 times previously in this thread. The fact that ON AVERAGE shows on TBS do better than CW shows is completely and utterly irrelevant to the fact that NXT gets a small boost from being on network tv. Why don't you understand this?>The sole reason why NXT beats Dynamite in the ratings is that people like NXT moreAnon, if this was true NXT would have beaten Dynamite when it was on cable, but it didn't! It lost! When they were evenly matched and were both on the same day and the same night, one show beat the other. Now one of the shows is on a different channel that has access to more homes than it did previously. So when you combine the audience who watched NXT on cable and followed it to CW *with* the new CW audience who now watch NXT, it results in a higher number!
>>19154175>Anon, if this was true NXT would have beaten Dynamite when it was on cable, but it didn't! It lost!tf are you talking about you fuckin dumbfuck aew used to get a milly too but now it can't even get 500k and it's on the same fuckin network. shit doesn't stay the same forever
>>19154190Thanks Jamal
>>19154204your concession is accepted dumbass nigga
>>19154175>those 20 million more homesThose "20 million more homes" may as well not exist because they aren't watching CW. The vast majority of homes that CW is available in aren't watching CW. Availability does not equal actual viewership. I can't tell if you're acting stupid just to troll or if you actually are this stupid. >the fact that NXT gets a small boost from being on network tvNXT gets no boost from being on network TV. TBS is the bigger channel.
I genuinely feel like this issue is an actual IQ filter moment for the anti-AEW posters. Their brains cannot tease apart the two concepts of viewers vs homes. There is no way for them to break down components of the numbers they quote. To them, TBS shows getting higher week-to-week viewers than CW means that TBS is "bigger" despite CW's potential viewer ceiling being many times greater.
>more corposlaves arguing about ratingsthe only thing I'm convinced of is that we shouldn't believe any of these numbers.
>>19154236>Those "20 million more homes" may as well not existThey do exist, anon! A small proportion of them are watching NXT now! That's why NXT's network tv number is higher than it was on cable!>NXT gets no boost from being on network TV. So in your view, NXT moving to a channel and getting a small boost in viewership, and that channel being accessible by 20 million more homes have absolutely NO relation whatsoever? Where did the new viewers come from? NXT's numbers went up on CW. Where did those new people suddenly come from if they aren't just regular CW watchers tuning into NXT? What's your explanation for the increase? My explanation makes perfect sense. Your explanation (I would love to hear it) I am assuming is something like NXT suddenly and very specifically getting an organic viewership boost that purely coincidentally absolutely perfectly coincides with its move to a network accessible by more homes. That's pretty curious!
>>19154276>A small proportion of them are watching NXT now! That's why NXT's network tv number is higher than it was on cable!source?
>>19154286It's not about the source, anon. It's about whether you have a brain or not. (You don't)
>>19154297ok so there's no source and it's just your headcanon cope? got it thx
>>19154305Jamal you need to stop replying to me. AEW isn't for your types. Don't worry about it.
>>19154325>concedes againnigga I already accepted it my nigga you can just STFU now fr
>>19154276Are you an actual retarded person? The existing viewers followed NXT to the new channel, and because it was new programming on an existing channel, existing viewers of CW also tuned into the new show
>>19154346Holy shit, you get it! Finally! That's what I've been saying this entire thread.>existing viewers of CW also tuned into the new showYes, and these viewers are a small part of the 20 million new potential people that NXT has access to on CW that they didn't on cable. Which is why them going to network tv is giving them a small ratings boost! You've cracked the code!
>>19154376why don't all the other shows on the CW get that ratings boost and beat TBS? also why is dynamite like 300k fewer viewers than the TBS average?
>>19154386Because those shows are all shit and don't have the pre-existing cable audience of NXT. Remember NXT is the Hulk Hogan of The CW. Nobody cares about the jobber shows. >also why is dynamite like 300k fewer viewers than the TBS average?I have no idea, depends what average you're looking at, ratings get enormous swings depending on day and timeslot and what's being shown. I can find TBS averages for you right now that are lower than what Dynamite does, but I won't abuse that and try and hoodwink you over it because I'm an honest person and only care about what's true, anon.
>>19153768>>19147496R Fraid so
>>19154405>I can find TBS averages for you right nowI know what it averages.
>>19154416I'll be really honest, I don't think you know shit, anon. I think your brain is made of dog shit and you've never done PCA on any data set in your life.
>>19154430oh you're doing PCA and datasets and not just headcanoning reasons why aew gets bent over by NXT every week? damn anon share that shit with the group in that case
>>19154443I've explained why NXT does better on CW than it did on cable about fifty times already, anon. Every time I type it to you, you respond with "concession accepted, nigga!" I don't know what else you want. Maybe to go smoke some more crack?
>>19154376NXT getting a boost of 50K or so viewers cannot be explained by point to 20,000,000+ more households which - once again, because you are retarded and still don't understand - the vast majority of those households are on OTA/antenna and not counted or reported by Nielsen. CW costs a fraction of that TNT/TBS costs, just like QVC, Hallmark and other SHIT channels, and it has limited hours of programming (only 8-10pm on weeknights). NBC has the Today Show, Late Night, etc, CW has none of that.The story of how you would tell things makes no sense, and makes you sound fucking retarded for believing it. We're supposed to believe that there's 100,000+ households (comprising around 20% of the total NXT audience) who, until late 2024, followed exactly 0 wrestling promotions and either only had broadcast channels on a cable/satellite/MVPD plan, or had a plan that specifically excluded TNT/TBS. Then once NXT magically landed on CW, those 100,000+ households started watching NXT religiously, week in and week out, as if their lives depended on it. Such that NXT dropped in viewership, every single one of these 100k stuck around, because if they didn't, then the numbers don't work out.Do you seriously not realize how fucking retarded it makes you sound to believe this? It's an Occam's Razor situation, AEW is blowing dick right now because the show fucking sucks. It's doing dogshit numbers everywhere including YouTube for a reason. It's not because a mythical X million households have CW but not TNT/TBS and are pushing them over the top, AEW is just that fucking bad and keeps cratering.
>>19154527do you seriously not understand how much of a pathetic fanboy nerd it takes to make a post like this?
>>19154527>NXT getting a boost of 50K or so viewers cannot be explained by point to 20,000,000+ more householdsLol. Why the fuck not? Yes, it can. >We're supposed to believe that there's 100,000+ households (comprising around 20% of the total NXT audience) who, until late 2024, followed exactly 0 wrestling promotions and either only had broadcast channels on a cable/satellite/MVPD plan, or had a plan that specifically excluded TNT/TBS. Then once NXT magically landed on CW, those 100,000+ households started watching NXT religiously, week in and week out, as if their lives depended on it.It's completely plausible and factual, yes. Please explain where the new NXT viewers came from if not from CW.
>>19146798Its a tie between him and every other wrestling "journalist."
>NXT magically landed on CWI like how, in trying to paint the scenario as implausible, you decided to frame the move of NXT onto CW as being somehow a magical and preposterous event.
>>19154542>Please explain where the new NXT viewers came from if not from CW.NXT used to simulcast on Peacock.
>>19146798Yes.
>>19146780
>>19154530nigga you got btfo
>>19154527>>19154530You ethered him cuh
>>19146780Has Dave responded?
>>19156456even if he did it would just be the usual Dave bullshit that he says when he gets pwned
>>19153768this one got them squealin
>>19153865most of the current WWE champions are AEW rejects
Tony wanted to keep all of them. They just didn't want to be part of his toybox anymore
>>19156972you mean Tony fumbles
>>19156972They factually are not. Maybe Dragon Lee.
>>19146780Check from tony didn't clear this week, dave defending triple h on twitter
>>19153768That Part
damn Dave's paypig simps got btfo itt
>>19154527>the vast majority of those households are on OTA/antenna and not counted or reported by NielsenA.C. Nielsen has been doing antenna ratings since the 1950s. When they say half the nation watches the Super Bowl, much of that is over the air.
>>19160923Nielsen for the last ten years even has people wearing devices out in public to track viewing at bars and airports. Cornette recently got offered to do this.
>>19161083Really? That's now they track it?
>>19151636Wow AEW is doing a lot worse than the rest of the programming on tbs
>>19147496>JapanThe funniest thing about that statement is that despite him mythologizing the Four Pillars or him shilling Nu Jamal stuff back when they were relevant, Not a single Japanese fans or wrestlers even noticed him. They probably don't even know who he is or even cared for his star ratings
>>19151831No
>>19153768how come when the young bucks attacked their boss and did this huge angle where they took over the show for months, no one cared. They lost viewers, the story went absolutely no where, no one came out better for it, no new stars were created from it. My point is, if they are such huge stars in the business, shouldn't it have mattered more?
>inherenly differenceAnd Dave isn't the jeet in the conversation. Grim.
he will cry after this
KWAB HE WILL BE MAD
>>19146798Yeah
>>19147982>Apter mags had a team and sold a ton of magazines, but 1980s Dave by himself without internet blew them out of the water information wise.the Apter mags were never an attempt to cover 'facts' they were kayfabe publications. They weren't competing against each other and basically every magazine would have paid ads from Dave if you wanted to subscribe to the Observer as well.
>Tony wins KWABOTY>Collision ratings GIGAPLUMMET>Dave gets buried by pajeetnot a good October for him
I want to beat the fucking shit out of Dave Meltzer with my own bare hands until I am hosing blood off concrete and picking skull from my knuckles.
>>19165825for who?
>>19146798He'd have to be a journalist not a blogger for that to be the case.
>>19167189Based as fuck
>>19167189gigabased
>>19167152Always pops me
SAARS I HATE THE MELTZER MUCH LIKE I LOVE EATING THE COW DUNG
>>19167152>>19168426Trannies actually look up to this guy and defend him lmfao
This one will get him bubblin'
He hates when people make fun of dave
>>19146780Dave isn't a journalist
>>19146780Reminder that he wrote that because he expected NXT to giga plummet and so he was trying to set them up for embarrassment
>>19146798Dave is not a Journo tho, he's already compromised.
>>19153768And I mean folks....
>>19146821Lol
>>19171563did he really
>>19151793Which means, whenever AEW goes live, TBS’ viewers change the channel. Nothing that we didn’t know already, doe.
>>19171563Sounds about right
>>19172914Most of them do. Some boomers pass out.
>>19146798R-fraid so
Grim.
>200 posts about a street shitter's tweetthis board is the WOAT of 4chan.KWABOTY stuff
>>19175558>LEAVE DAVE ALONE HE SAYS HOOD THINGS ABOUT AEW
>>19175565SAARS PLEASE BE DOING THE NEEDFUL AND DO THE POSTINGS ON 4CHAN BLOODY BASTERD RAPE YOU LATER
>>19175627>DAVE TELLS ME HOW TO THINK
Dave Meltzer is the Serebii of wrestling. Incredibly annoying, incredibly autistic, and any semblance of criticism sends them into a tailspin.
>>19176029Huh?
>>19146780Dave always gets raped like the singular AEW fan
he bubblin in dublin
>>19146780Anyone have the screenshot from the f4w board with Dave saying that someone told him not to interact with lil nicky?
>>19146780Raj? Well if you ask me that’s one jeet that simply don’t miss
