Which designs do you like?
>>19408117instead of introducing a women's IC title they should've retired the men's one. simply put there's too many belts
>>19408117Smack overall has better belt designs
>>19408117They all kind of blow. I was confused looking at the top two belts and figured the ones below them are the women's and not just some alternate design used in designing the original; in which case that's a fucking shit design. I'm not saying it has to be like the Diva days and be all obnoxiously girly, but at least make it OBVIOUS it's the female title. One thing to note though is the obvious descriptor: "Women's WWE Champion". That makes it feel lesser than "WWE Champion" because it feels like having "Women's" in the title specifies it exactly and a place below the actual title. Because you're not "WWE Champion". You're the WOMEN'S Champion. The original titles are just called "Intercontinental", "United States", "WWE Champion" and so on. This kind of more default sentiment makes it easier to take seriously because there isn't any preconceived notions attached to it. This is all to say that either the women's titles should get entirely different designs at the minimum, and title names if possible. They should absolutely drop the "women's" part if they want to be taken seriously, or start adding the "men's" part to all original belts so they're playing in the same field.
>>19410057With that said, only the midcard belts look good, and since the women's are based off the men's title, they get worse scores for complete fucking laziness. The original IC title looks good, and so does the US belt. But they still feel pretty close to looking more like props than belts. The main belts look like those tacky fake gold toys you see at bargain bin shops for cheap, the designs have no semblance of coherency. Especially the WWE title which looks like a shitty bumper plate made into a belt. The tag titles have good iconography but they fall close to the mistakes of the main belts and are just too scrunched up together. Women's taf team... what the fuck is this shit. Looks like an AI generate prompt for a generic wrestling company. All in all, ass on a general level.
>>19408117there's a few of them that would be alright without the fugly W plastered all over them. the fake big gold sickens me though.
>>19408117We need to go back.
>>19408117These all suck
The women's title just copying the men's was the dumbest shit. Completely soulless.
>>19410543>They should put heckin butterflies on them instead
I think the white strap is better on almost all of them, the universal championship is where I could lean either way I guess. on the midcard belts I definitely feel like the white strip is better
>>19410166Yes. The winged eagle and the domed globe will always be my favorites
>>19410549If you didn't have breakfast this morning, how would that make you feel?
>>19410549The Diva's Championship looks better than every women's Championship that came after it lol, and that's saying A LOT because it looked like a fucking earring you'd get a mall kiosk.Not the flex you think it is, retard.
>>19410057>They should absolutely drop the "women's" part if they want to be taken seriously, or start adding the "men's" part to all original belts so they're playing in the same fieldSup hangmaam? Didnt know you posted here
>>19408117I honestly don't like any of them
they're all awful. the only one that looks decent is the tag title
>>19410549They're fucking women, not men. What else kinda design are you meant to put on a women's title that doesn't look tacky and forced as hell like what we currently have?
>>19410057>One thing to note though is the obvious descriptor: "Women's WWE Champion". That makes it feel lesser than "WWE Champion"Because it is? Every women's title in the world combined has less prestige than the WWE Speed and WWE 24/7 title.
