Is CHATGPT correct?
>>19434675B&G NXT and AEW prove that.
>>19434675AI is getting smarter. It knows aew is dimeless
>>19434675Quite true, but I would define it more as character work including promos that makes you really popGet a unique character going in the ring that can make the crowd react to all your signature spots and taunts and you're in baby
AI is the future
>>19434675Unironically have never used chat GPT even once I feel like if you use it multiple times, that's basically an admission that you are an absolute moron incapable of even the simplest of thoughts and are just lazy to do any amount of actual research
>>19434675AI just scrapes reddit so no they're always wrong
>>19434878huh? reddit love this dimeless fag
>>19434675It’s on the right track, but there is a position past top guy: mainstream star. Every wrestler that had real, tangible transitions to media outside of wrestling with success had the intelligence to incorporate their characters loved in promos into their wrestling. If you steal Hulk Hogan’s, The Rock’s, Stone Cold’s, Batista’s, or John Cena’s moves and gestures it is immediately noticeable. Not just to us, but to casual watchers. That’s why celebrities love doing the People’s Elbow.So yes, everything it said is correct, nothing is inaccurate. It’s just that there’s more to it if you want to round out the reasoning.Uploaded my captcha because holy kek
>>19434802Everyone with an IQ under 70 is saying this
Everyone may call Bret Hart ranking of look, charisma, in ring work where if you get more than 20 you're a star is the most real ranking I have ever heard. Because how you can say you're a ring general but you have a beer belly, or you can cut great promos but then you hit the ring or you have okay promos and ok wrestling but you just look like a CAW.Wrestlers need a good combination of mic skills, wrestling abilities and presence to make it big. And presence is more about mic skill if you're over 6'3 feet tall.
