This motherfucker spends so much of his time conspicuously producing "entrances" and raving about the importance of an "entrance" only because he does not have the faintest clue of what to do when a thing has to end.
>>19479209But enough about your bedroom performance
>>19479209No, he's right about that. Someone like the Undertaker who was never actually good at anything, not good in the ring and not good on the mic, was able to be a hugely over guy for decades purely because of a hype entrance. It makes a big difference.
>>19479209I really don't think he's actually booking the show in the traditional sense of the term anymore. It's likely that he's just executing the guidelines presented to him by tko much like a hired gun director would just do what pleases a major studio like paramount or some shit.
>>19479272He definitely was sub par on the mic but saying he wasn't good in ring is silly
>>19479363He wasn't good in the ring, his character protected him because he wasn't allowed to sell and mostly had squash matches, the only good matches he had were with guys who could wrestle a broom. He got a little better as he got older but he was never great, certainly not what you'd expect from a guy who was main event adjacent for decades. He's great at being present when Foley throws himself off a cage or HBK wrestles around him, but who isn't?
